>muh 3 year head start

[Anonymous No.18561813]

this is the most retarded argument for chainlink ive ever heard.
3 years.... is 3 years long at all?
Atari had a 10 year head start on Nintendo
Nintendo had a 10 year head start on Sony
How fucking deluded are stinkers?
>muh 3 yearz

is 3 years really that long a time? if someone came up with a better more cost effective oracle solution tomorrow, would people go
>oh but chainlink tried really hard for 3 years to build a network :((((( i dont want to wait 3 years again

[Anonymous No.18561829]

>>18561813
How many years have you had to learn how to use the potty?

[Anonymous No.18561883]

>>18561829
>altavista already has a 5 year head start on google, how could anything possibly replace it!?!

[Anonymous No.18561932]

>>18561883
I loved hotbot. They were the first with EXACT PHRASE search option

[Anonymous No.18561939]

>>18561813
Except first mover advantage is paramount for inherent security guarantees via the network effect. You are correct anon, first mover advantage isn’t really critical with traditional businesses, however, we are not investing in a business, rather a network or protocol. Said network will have underlying security guarantees based on its previously established network effect. Devs understood this, you saw it first hand with ETH and BTC. LINK appears to be next.

[Anonymous No.18562003]

>>18561939
>TECH IS DIFFERENT FROM BUSINESSES REEEEEEEEE
https://petapixel.com/2012/02/09/kodak-to-kill-off-its-camera-business/

[Anonymous No.18562008]

>>18561813
3 years is a long time for development of a complex software solution and building of a network, yes.

[Anonymous No.18562021]

>>18562008
>complex software solution
you have no idea how basic chainlink's tech is, do you

[Anonymous No.18562033]

>>18562003
This is something that could be evaluated with a 10-K...you’re missing my point entirely or just shitposting at this point. All you have is the network and it’s underlying security. Said security is influenced by # of participants and quality of said participants. This is called a network effect anon

[Anonymous No.18562038]

>>18562021
I can tell you've never worked in software. Even "basic" things have a lot of kinks to work out.

[Anonymous No.18562047]

Link buyers immediately become the equivalent of commission based wageslaves, posting about link, thinking about link, agonizing about link 24/7. And you do it below the owners of the project. You are the cattle of the entire link workforce. You are laughed at as the link devs make 6 fig salaries while throwing their “investor” cattle pennies.

But let’s talk numbers. Since let’s say Oct 2017 there have been 928 days since then. The total value of a 10k stack is ~$30k (generous after deducing tax). Assuming only 12 hours a day of link shilling, agonizing, research etc (again, being generous) that is:
$30000/(928*12) = $2.70/hr

Yes, you read that right. You have been working for 3 years straight, no vacation no break, for $2.70 an hour. Now seethe.

[Anonymous No.18562061]

> be chainlink team
> Hype up a pivotal epic
> Be steve ellis
> Delet pivotal epic
> Tiresome or profit?
People are still making money from vaporware made by fat russian scammers.

[Anonymous No.18562060]

>>18562047
Let’s think about this logically. Link enthusiasts bought 10k link in 2017. That investment is now worth ~30k. That is 30k over 3 years... less than the salary of a fast food worker.

[Anonymous No.18562067]

>>18562047
you didn't factor in all the perks, like the funny memes and all the frens we made along the way

[Anonymous No.18562068]

>>18561813
3 years?

And what's been accomplished?

There are customers right?

Wait. They dumped on their holders.

[Anonymous No.18562077]

>>18562033
>oh no, Chainlink spent 3 years paying people to use their tech. THIS IS COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE TO REPLICATE. Microsoft could never in a million years pay a bunch of people to participate in their network in the 3 year span chainlink did! :O
>>18562038
*has computer science paradox in your path*
>>/biz/thread/S18145402#p18150522
"heh, nothing personnel kid*

[Anonymous No.18562090]

>look at the millions of movies on vhs, nothing will replace it!

[Anonymous No.18562099]

>>18562060
I bought 75k for $14,000 in 2018. That’s $262,000 profit in two years, or a salary for many doctors and lawyers.

[Anonymous No.18562100]

>>18562077
I dont know what to tell you anon. Scam or not, I turned $9k into $170k in 13 months. Money is money, sorry you missed out

[Anonymous No.18562102]

>>18561813
>the solution has to be the literal end-all-be-all in its class for all of eternity and forever for it to be a profitable investment

[Anonymous No.18562105]

80 (EIGHTY) % (PERCENT)

FIVE DOLLAR FOOT LONG!!!

WOW!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.18562117]

>>18562100
i sold link at $3 and have 300 k right now. LOOOOL

[Anonymous No.18562127]

>>18562099
>>18562100
I’ll check our dubs of wealth fren

[Anonymous No.18562135]

>>18562077
If Microsoft or other bigger players could have replicated and surpassed Chainlink, they already would have. Clearly time and money aren't the only variables at play here.

[Anonymous No.18562149]

>>18562117
you don't need to larp bro. you can just admit you missed out. it's ok.

[Anonymous No.18562155]

>>18562117
Congrats on your gains, good luck trying to fud link back below $3 so you don’t kys if it moons.

[Anonymous No.18562157]

>>18562117
So how sad is your life then? Make $300k and have to come back to an anonymous forum to talk shit about the investment that just made you that $300k. Fuck I’m glad my life isn’t that depressing, I’ll pray for you anon

[Anonymous No.18562160]

>>18562149
>Im not larping YOURE larping
okay

[Anonymous No.18562178]

>>18562077
>Microsoft could never in a million years pay a bunch of people to participate in their network in the 3 year span chainlink did! :O
They literally can't you retard. This is actually impossible

[Anonymous No.18562179]

>>18561932
>>18561883
Fuck I miss it so much.

[Anonymous No.18562195]

>>18562117
>bragging that boomerstack
'1k eoy' is the phrase, fren

[Anonymous No.18562200]

>>18561883
Your fudding is so gay

[Anonymous No.18562227]

>>18562102
>be chainlink
>add enormous costs for businesses in promise of delivering decentralized data
>>/biz/thread/S16686932#p16688762
>dont be decentralized
how could it go wrong???

[Anonymous No.18562252]

>>18561883
>Implying this is replicable

[Anonymous No.18562258]

>>18562178
>microsoft: i built webscraper. please submit price feeds here and ill pay you $10,000
>HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? :OOOOO
replace microsoft with chainlink

[Anonymous No.18562274]

>>18562252
oh boy, here comes the bullshit partnerships. Fernado, get your link bag ready, its time to make another powerpoint in your company's name!!!

[Anonymous No.18562311]

>>18562274
I’ll ask again, how sad and depressing is your life? Do something with that $300k anon, I can feel your depression through the screen

[Anonymous No.18562362]

>>18562274
>bullshit partnerships
https://www.docdroid.net/pIudrF8/mediledger-dscsa-pilot-project-final-report-pdf#page=32

[Anonymous No.18562426]

>>18562311
The $300k isn’t real. He’s a fudding poorfag that swinglinked his ticket to freedom. They are here every time link pumps.

[Anonymous No.18562474]

>>18562047
LOL

Harsh shit. Don't post. You'll break their hearts. Meanwhile in the last four days, my imperial stack staked from 1 to 15, x15 the return and I'm about to make 60.

[Anonymous No.18562493]

>>18561813
test

[Anonymous No.18562531]

>>18561939
/thread

>>18562003
Aren't they paying more for China flu prop

[Anonymous No.18562661]

>>18562474
Based

[Anonymous No.18562841]

>>18562426
>whenever someone who sold chainlink has money, its fake, but whenever someone holds link and has koney, its real
>NO U

[Anonymous No.18562869]

>>18562362
every partnership you have is either:
1. the chainlink team themselves confirming it with no feed back from the other side (SWIFT)
2. its made by a bagholder of said corporation who got fired for pumping his bags (Fernado at Oracle)
3. ChainLink payed a small pop up company to give price feeds

[Anonymous No.18562930]

>>18562841
it's not just "someone". it's you. you, specifically, are larping.

[Anonymous No.18562940]

>>18561939
Thieves u turdeds check the 44

[Anonymous No.18563041]

>>18562930
>everyone who isnt pro-chainlink is a larp
gotcha

[Anonymous No.18563790]

>>18561883
Fucking memory lane bruh.. searching for porn on altavista..good times