Can Tezos ever hit double digits

[Anonymous No.18331856]

Or should I sell at 3 bucks

[Anonymous No.18331936]

>>18331856
Could easily see double digits by Q4 imo.

[Anonymous No.18332003]

yes

[Anonymous No.18332959]

will reach double digit before LINK

[Anonymous No.18332965]

>>18331856
It was 14 at ath. XTZ isn't enterprise tech though, Link is

[Anonymous No.18333079]

>solves no problem within crypto
>oRo lies about no token needed for its decentralized oracle
>imagine holding this shitcoin

[Anonymous No.18333178]

>>18331856
It’s glorified vaporware anon, literally no different than EOS or ADA or any of the “ETH killers” for that matter. Look at the names linking up behind the EEA and actually throwing devs, money, and resources at the EEA. Now look at Tezos...there is no comparison anon. Big enterprise chose ETH and Hyperledger as their respective chains. We all know every smart contract protocol suffers from the data connectivity issue. Chainlink already works with the EEE (EMINENT) as well as Hyperledger. When you buy individual smart contract protocols, you’re betting on specific car manufactuerers. When you buy LINK you’re investing in the fuel they all need. Ultimately it doesn’t matter what car (SC) succeeds, it will still be reliant on fuel (LINK).

[Anonymous No.18333203]

>>18333178
>It’s glorified vaporware anon, literally no different than EOS or ADA or any of the “ETH killers” for that matter. Look at the names linking up behind the EEA and actually throwing devs, money, and resources at the EEA. Now look at Tezos...there is no comparison anon. Big enterprise chose ETH and Hyperledger as their respective chains. We all know every smart contract protocol suffers from the data connectivity issue. Chainlink already works with the EEE (EMINENT) as well as Hyperledger. When you buy individual smart contract protocols, you’re betting on specific car manufactuerers. When you buy LINK you’re investing in the fuel they all need. Ultimately it doesn’t matter what car (SC) succeeds, it will still be reliant on fuel (LINK).

[Anonymous No.18333318]

>>18333203
Typical response from a Tezos bag holder in denial. No rebuttal of substance whatsoever. Are you mad anon that your lone “enterprise” user is a no name non profit automotive research company? Talk shit when you have names like Microsoft and ErnstYoung forming teams and dedicated resources towards your chain, until then, you’re vaporware who gained traction because you held one of the largest ICOs (instantly capturing thousands of bagholders) and was the first to release the staking (baking lol) meme. Offer a rebuttal with facts and maybe I’ll engage in debate

[Anonymous No.18333322]

>>18332965
>>18333178
linkies love using this "enterprise" buzzword, their token has been around for over 4 years and accomplished virtually nothing

Dont worry guys, in another 4 years you might get staking

[Anonymous No.18333420]

>>18333203
>i did it boss, i refuted his post by posting the soijak next to it like you said

[Anonymous No.18333441]

>>18333322
Why aren’t any of the names linking up behind LINK and ETH mentioning Tezos? Really makes you wonder why Microsoft, IBM, Intel, Google, Oracle, TaoBao, SFExpress, and many others put their name behind the ETH chain and not Tezos. Cope more

[Anonymous No.18333455]

>>18331856
Yes

[Anonymous No.18333476]

>>18333318
>>18333420
I don't give a shit, i'm in gain right now, when it will stop i will sell.
I'm not marrying shitcoins like you retarded do.
That's it

[Anonymous No.18333487]

>>18333420
They can’t refute it, that’s the issue and even they recognize it. This will be another coin that comes and goes from the top 10, nothing revolutionary about it whatsoever and definitely not an “ETH killer” as evidenced by all the enterprises lining up to build on ETH.

[Anonymous No.18333515]

>>18333476
Yellow or red curry tonight anon? I’m shocked that this is the Tezos community, congrats on this guys seriously

[Anonymous No.18333524]

>>18333487
I'm not even trying to refute your narrow minded bullshit, keep believing in link $100000 eoy and hold forever your json parser.

[Anonymous No.18333536]

>"enterprise"
>accomplished virtually nothing
>tezzies steaming because the ecosystem is growing, growing, growing and staking isn't even available yet for link
>the stench of tezzies and their overbaked vaporware
>tezzies aren't going to make it

[Anonymous No.18333557]

>>18333515
What didn't you understand of "i'm not marrying shitcoins"? I'm not marrying tezos, when it will be ready i will just drop, and maybe buy again, and maybe drop again.

[Anonymous No.18333561]

>>18333441
seething linkie just name dropping companies that literally have zero skin in the game, link is all "promises" but when it comes to getting the work done nothing happens

when your shitcoin finally drops out of the top 20 it will skydive

[Anonymous No.18333585]

I personally like both Tezos and Link. Having both in your portfolio is a solid investment.

[Anonymous No.18333637]

>>18333585
this is a good statement.
Link tezos and eth are the strongest holds in 2020

[Anonymous No.18333663]

yes

[Anonymous No.18333673]

>>18333585
Seems some linkies here don't like market competition. I can't understand the tribalism ITT

[Anonymous No.18333690]

>>18333561
Look at the EEA EMINENT? All the info is right there for you to see. Ernst Young is literally holding a 3 day webinar in April centered on the Baseline Protocol, which uses ETH. Just because some of us are educated and up to speed on the market doesn’t mean you get a free pass to be a dumbass. “Zero skin in the game” literally read the articles published on EY, you’re either trolling ore exemplifying just how retarded the Tezos community it. Likely number 2 imo. You’re in denial, I get it. The truth hurts but the sooner you can accept it the better

[Anonymous No.18333716]

>>18333673
There is no competition that’s the issue. I’m not even an ETH maxi but it’s evident who enterprises chose. It be different if there was even a slight bit of interest in Tezos by big corporations but there really isn’t. Anyone saying differently is out of touch or in denial

[Anonymous No.18333770]

>>18333178
god damn. are you the same moron who I owned in the other thread last night? Ethereum is stuck in 2017 tech. it can't even upgrade to proof of stake without spinning its wheels for 4 years. the difference with Tezos is that it is self-governing and all changes are proposed and voted on on-chain, so the latest tech is always voted and implemented on with Tezos. even when Ethereum does finish their 2.0 upgrade by 2025, new tech will be out by then and they'll be behind the ball again. tezos will be already upgraded

[Anonymous No.18333780]

>>18333690
Yeah more webinars full of "promises" and more bullshit "articles"... wow amazing

projects that dont put up, get put down.

[Anonymous No.18333842]

>>18333716
There are entire markets to carve up and transform. If you believe everything will land on one single blockchain then you're deluding yourself.

[Anonymous No.18333870]

>>18333716
partnerships ≠ price. none of this shit has any real use case right now, stop being disingenuous

[Anonymous No.18333890]

>>18333780
Can you list a few notable companies that have expressed interest in using the Tezos chain?

[Anonymous No.18333973]

>>18333890
can you list the notable companies who have expressed interest in BSV or Dogecoin? they have 3.5bil and 250mil marketcaps respectively. this space is all still speculation, no one is actually using this stuff. it definitely isn't the reason for the price of this shit except roping in retards like you

[Anonymous No.18334017]

>>18333780
Right except these bullshit articles are coming directly from the source, per EY, “ EY today announced the launch of the Baseline protocol, a new package of public domain blockchain tools that will allow enterprises to build and deploy procurement and other business processes securely and privately on the public Ethereum blockchain. EY developed the Baseline protocol in cooperation with ConsenSys and Microsoft.”

https://www.ey.com/en_gl/news/2020/03/ey-launches-baseline-protocol-an-open-source-initiative-for-the-public-etherum-blockchain

You are in denial anon, I get it. Microsoft and EY are literally telling you “we are building this protocol on the ETH chain and we are going to use it to onboard other enterprises onto DLT tech” and you are simply writing it off as another “bullshit article” and not a sign of what’s to come. Honestly, the saying has never been more true, not all of us could make it. Good luck anon