/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.18296158]

What coins legit have x1000 potential?

No memes/ironic posting plz

[Anonymous No.18296182]

Reserve.org

[Anonymous No.18296192]

>>18296158
Whatever coin is most likely to end being a pump n dump

[Anonymous No.18296194]

XTZ, ADA and BNB

[Anonymous No.18296196]

Bitcoin, unironically

[Anonymous No.18296211]

>>18296194
>bnb
Lol

[Anonymous No.18296223]

>>18296158
Idena

[Anonymous No.18296228]

>>18296158
trtl

[Anonymous No.18296229]

>>18296158
none have x1000 potential in a 100 year framework

[Anonymous No.18296233]

>>18296194
>Fucking BNB
Kek matey

[Anonymous No.18296265]

>>18296158
Leveraged naked calls on biotech firms. If you want to gamble, better not half ass it.

[Anonymous No.18296303]

>>18296158

Ethereum has the best and most Dev's

Its also fortune 500 backed.

It will also be the blockchain with the most users on boarded. ID2020 will be mandatory with vaccines around fall and this also happens to be around the same time the scaling issues with Ethereum will be fixed. Its basically a digital identity pushed by Microsoft, Bill Gates, UN, Enterprise Ethereum Alliance.

You won't be able to travel without a blockchain vaccine certificate so hell ya it will on board a ton of users to Ethereum.

[Anonymous No.18296320]

LINK and NANO

[Anonymous No.18296334]

>>18296158
>no mention of Idena

Even skelly money is shilling proof of humanity, you have to be an ultra retard for not buying this one.

[Anonymous No.18296340]

>>18296223
Didnt see this one, based and redpilled.

[Anonymous No.18296380]

>>18296320
>NANO
nobody will wake up to the fact that blockchain has no real future and acyclic graph chains are the solution.

[Anonymous No.18296388]

Only one i see is XRP. The only thing people can FUD about it are Ripple developers and Jed dumping it. But you have to take in account all the government and bank connections Ripple has. The connections are endless. Wont bother listing them out because it would be an hour of digging. The XRP community is huge outside of 4chan if you bother looking it up on reddit or twitter, so i see exposure alone pumping the price.
>>18296303
Many people dont even want to touch ETH till 2.0. And there are more ETH killers than ever. I think it was kind of unwise of Ripple to begin bridging to the ETH blockchain, because I honestly see it dying some day. Also, dApps are fucking useless LOL.
>>18296334
MoneySkelly outright shills for Omisego and Kleros in his own name. So by that logic, we should all go all in on those

There is only one thing to know; do the opposite of what /biz/ says, and I dare anyone to find any other coin shitted on as XRP as much on /biz/

[Anonymous No.18296407]

>>18296380
true. its sad. there are people fighting out there between BTC, BCH and LTC when NANO does everything better. Of course not comparable to XMR because XMR has a private ledger, but when it comes to public ledger crypto currencies NANO destroys all of them easily and its ridiculous that DOGE has 3x the market cap of NANO.
This is why i threw some money at NANO last week, while i was all in LINK before.

[Anonymous No.18296451]

>>18296380
>Many people dont even want to touch ETH till 2.0.
That's why now is the time to accumulate if you haven't yet. they have huge names lined up to use their chain, they just need to fix scalability which is a matter of time and ETH will be big in the next years even if ID2020 is just schizo theory
>>18296380
>>18296407
a quick rundown on why this acyclic graph is better than blockchain? i'll look into it later but i assume the public realising this will take at least a couple years before it takes off no?

[Anonymous No.18296489]

>>18296451
The problem with 2.0 is that with all the info we got on it, people are still not impress. All the ETH killers study 2.0 and working everyday to surpass it, and the tech just wont be that impressive seeing how TPS will still be inferior to Ripple and many others.
I think there internal conflict with ETH too. Vitalik hates ChainLink so much and shills for better solutions while his team loves chainlink is onboard. Ic ETH is split, how can they ever succeed.

[Anonymous No.18296501]

>>18296388

Say what you want but my nose for sock puppets and shills is better then most.

I follow money and dev's not noise.

PhD's are all getting hard over Zcash and flock to it. Corpos are all over Ethereum to a scale that would creep you out.

Best to just hold rather then speculate.

[Anonymous No.18296528]

>>18296501
What are other good ones you see besides eth and zcash

[Anonymous No.18296529]

>>18296489

Bro I am a Blockchain dev and that LINK is a scam. You do not need a useless utility token to have a Oracle aggregator.

I bet you would have bought the Airswap token just because the technology makes sense. Uniswap is just Airswap without a pump and dump scam same will happen to link.

Plus that guy is a scam artist. His last project was NXT but the attention span on 4 chan is so low no one seems to remember that exit scam.

Ima save you soft brains some trouble and say just buy Ethereum and Zcash.

[Anonymous No.18296578]

>>18296528

Nothing at the moment. Now is not the time to be speculating.

Not even joking I work on these projects as a hobby and everyone is trying to scam you even us Dev's.

Zcash is where genius go to stroke themselves off trying to create a perfect anonymous system. They do not shill or sock puppet so its low visibility. The team litteraly gives no shit about investors or speculators. I only say buy because they are really working hard to spend z addresses within Ethereum smart contracts and that will be huge.

Ethereum is basically just the project that the fortune 500 decided to throw money at. It's not universally good or bad just the project that the Corpos all agree to fund and use.

No other project has a good future. Even poor old bitcoin is fixing to get shit on. 80% mining pool in China and all ASIC miners made in China. CCP Coild shit on it any day or pleases them.

[Anonymous No.18296606]

>>18296158
>he doesn't know
WaykiChain is about to go parabolic

[Anonymous No.18296607]

>>18296158
zano. no meme the literal inventor of cryptonote made an hybrid pos/pow with true privacy

[Anonymous No.18296608]

>>18296529
I agree LINK is useless. But you cant ignore the ETH team is onboard to start integrating LINK while Vitalik is avoiding it still to this day. Either Vitalik fires his team or he bends a knee

>ZCash
I have not seen one person describe how its better than Monero. Monero seems objectively better in everyway

[Anonymous No.18296642]

>>18296451
I don't know anything about nano, but an acyclic graph is a data structure where elements point to each other in a particular direction, with none pointing backwards (which would form a cycle, not allowed in a DAG).
Git is structured on top of a DAG. If you don't know what Git is, it's the version control system used by nearly all programmers. Github is a web interface for a Git node. The way it works is everyone can do their own work and "commit" their work as a snapshot, then push that work to their peers. Conflicts are handled during a merge operations which may require manual intervention. In the end you have an authoritative history of all changes made and who made them.
I can see this working in a financial system. You'd have one straight line of checkpoints done with POW, and at any point a person could branch from the main checkpoint into their own world. In this world they can modify the ledger with a sequence of their own free checkpoints, and later submit this sequence back to the main sequence for merging. An automated process will ensure there are no collisions (double spends), and reject the branch if there is one. The person would have to correct their error before resubmission.
Such a system could take a huge amount of work off the main ledger by allowing outside transactions to be merged in all at once. The outside system will need it's own system of trust to ensure they don't end up with a failing merge with no recourse (someone paid you with a double spend and now they're gone). It's also possible to have a "fast-slow" system as well, where an official branch is always operated between any two main checkpoints, and this branch runs much faster than the main branch but with less security. For most transactions this is probably fine. Larger ones will want to wait for the next main checkpoint. I've seen this behavior in some coins. I wonder if this is the implementation.

[Anonymous No.18296921]

>>18296608
Lol bro I am a blockchain chain dev and if I was in the inner Ethereum circle I guarantee my ears would be so full of chainlink money I wouldn't hear Vitalik and his voice of reason either. Just because you see chainlink symbols in github files and stuff doesn't mean shit. Devs have to eat and I do this as a hobby so of someone was paying me I would shill it to.

Vitalik can just ignore LINK its basically a nothing burger he only hates on it because the dude is legit. The corpos are not going to use link and everyone knows it. They all use Hyperledger systems that can directly interface with the Ethereum main net so they will bypass link entirely.

[Anonymous No.18296938]

None , crypto is done

[Anonymous No.18296959]

>>18296608
Zcash is better then Monero because the Corpo's will use it. The Zcash team and Ethereum are very close and work together alot. Electric Coin Company is Zcash and they are Based in the USA. Biggest thing for Zcash is they are working with Ethereum to make Z addresses spend able within Ethereum smart contracts. That let's corporations use trusted Smart contracts without exposing financial information or even who is involved.

Nothing wrong with monero it's just only used for drugs and only ever will be. Basically it has less growth potential.

[Anonymous No.18296982]

Link, XTZ

[Anonymous No.18297015]

Only one is DGTX.

[Anonymous No.18297039]

1000x will never happen again. But 10-50x runs will happen. My secret gem: LCX - Less than 1mil marketcap for a potential 50mil mcap coin

[Anonymous No.18297093]

XTZ and SKY

[Anonymous No.18297106]

>>18296388
>MoneySkelly outright shills for Omisego and Kleros in his own name. So by that logic, we should all go all in on those

Are you implying both of them didn't pump?

[Anonymous No.18297141]

BSV

[Anonymous No.18297158]

>>18296642
Thanks for this, picrel is making sense with your description and I think I understand most of it and yes I know the basics of git and github. I still don't understand how this tech is superior to using sidechains though. Feels bad being a brainlet
>>18297039
overall yeah I don't think 2017 is happening again but I think there's still some potential left for a couple x100s and to make it

[Anonymous No.18297168]

MCO and CRO