[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 23 KB, 236x419, daaaayum.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18209192 No.18209192 [Reply] [Original]

why have so many bizlets gone to www.reddit.com/r/mainstreetcrypto?

linkies strategically tryin to make it their plebbit new spot for hype campaign/fud campaign cycle right before April pump? explain

>> No.18209223

>>18209192
thats a man in a hat

>> No.18209244

>>18209192
>>18209223
This latest scandal has done it for me. I’ve endured 2 years of sybil fud, toilet fud, JSON parser memes, fake google pnd, 700k dumps, literal dump to zero, fake partnerships (looking at you MOAB), the same slides over and over, stiff competition arriving (BAND, Tellor, UMAprotocol). I’ve endured it all, but this was the straw that broke the camels back. The Link dream is dead friends. We will go down in history as one of the most epic meme campaigns, but unfortunately reality has caught up with us. It was nice knowing you all, I wish you all good luck.

>> No.18209342

>>18209244
this makes me sad.

>> No.18209424
File: 12 KB, 564x155, Vitalik Endorses Chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18209424

>>18209244
How do you explain Vitalik's tweet then where he endorses it?

>> No.18209474
File: 2.83 MB, 820x720, rachel staying hydrated.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18209474

>>18209192
WTF how did you get pics of my gf?

>> No.18209629

>>18209474
she mine

>> No.18209670

>>18209192
>>18209474
daaaaaaaaaaaayyummm white males look like THAT????

>> No.18209693

>>18209474
>>18209629
>>18209192
It’s a man

>> No.18209783
File: 41 KB, 460x575, link.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18209783

>>18209693
what a beautiful man, looks exactly like a woman!

>> No.18209859

>>18209424
FYI - Vitaliks endorsement means the project is going to fail. You'd know this if you didn't come here after '17.

Also that laughing emoji, you might be ok, that doesn't look like an endorsement.

Probably still a scam though

>> No.18209868

>>18209223
the livechat is now full of link marines reporting in kek

>> No.18209996

>>18209859
I think he was actually serious tho

>> No.18210047
File: 159 KB, 1200x630, artificial-camel-toe-fashion-featured.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18210047

>>18209783
trannys are crafty these days

>> No.18210081

The cryptocurrency related subreddit known as cryptocurrency has banned all forms of pnd they are even Shadow Banning text so that your post will not be live. P&d used to work on Reddit because of the sub Reddit cryptocurrency however that shity Reddit that you posted will never work to pnb and Reddit will never again work to pnd goodbye

>> No.18210083

>>18210047
LMAO

>> No.18210209

>>18210081
well the mod just called WAVES earlier today and now it's up +32% so..yeah

>> No.18210338

>>18210047
is this even real?

>> No.18210583
File: 12 KB, 220x220, murr_derrr_imadumbass.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18210583

>>18210081

>> No.18210851
File: 16 KB, 511x264, btcchart___.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18210851

>>18209192

>> No.18210888

>>18209474
shes on the 1 gallon per day of cum cleanse

>> No.18210916

>>18210888
bahahaHAHA

>> No.18210994

>>18210916
go back zepelin

>> No.18211140

>>18210994
People should get the full story of r/bitcoin because it is probably one of the strangest of all reddit subs.

r/bitcoin, the main sub for the bitcoin community is held and run by a person who goes by the pseudonym u / theymos. Theymos not only controls r/bitcoin, but also bitcoin.org
and bitcointalk.com
. These are top three communication channels for the bitcoin community, all controlled by just one person.

For most of bitcoin's history this did not create a problem (at least not an obvious one anyway) until around mid 2015. This happened to be around the time a new player appeared on the scene, a for-profit company called Blockstream. Blockstream was made up of/hired many (but not all) of the main bitcoin developers. (To be clear, Blockstream was founded before mid 2015 but did not become publicly active until then). A lot of people, including myself, tried to point out there we're some very serious potential conflicts of interest that could arise when one single company controls most of the main developers for the biggest decentralised and distributed cryptocurrency. There were a lot of unknowns but people seemed to give them the benefit of the doubt because they were apparently about to release some new software called "sidechains" that could offer some benefits to the network.

>> No.18211170

>>18211140
Users, developers and businesses (which at the time was pretty much the only real bitcoin subreddit) started to discuss how we should solve the problem r/bitcoin. There was significant support from the users and businesses behind a simple solution put forward by the developer Gavin Andreesen. Gavin was the lead developer after Satoshi Nakamoto left bitcoin and he left it in his hands. Gavin initially proposed a very simple solution of increasing the limit which was to change the few lines of code to increase the maximum number of transactions that are allowed. For most of bitcoin's history the transaction limit had been set far far higher than the number of transactions that could potentially happen on the network. The concept of increasing the limit one time was based on the fact that history had proven that no issue had been cause by this in the past.

A certain group of bitcoin developers decided that increasing the limit by this amount was too much and that it was dangerous. They said that the increased use of resources that the network would use would create centralisation pressures which could destroy the network. The theory was that a miner of the network with more resources could publish many more transactions than a competing small miner could handle and therefore the network would tend towards few large miners rather than many small miners. The group of developers who supported this theory were all developers who worked for the company Blockstream. The argument from people in support of increasing the transaction capacity by this amount was that there are always inherent centralisation pressure with bitcoin mining.

>> No.18211202

>>18211170
For example miners who can access the cheapest electricity will tend to succeed and that bigger miners will be able to find this cheaper electricity easier. Miners who have access to the most efficient computer chips will tend to succeed and that larger miners are more likely to be able to afford the development of them. The argument from Gavin and other who supported increasing the transaction capacity by this method are essentially there are economies of scale in mining and that these economies have far bigger centralisation pressures than increased resource cost for a larger number of transactions (up to the new limit proposed). For example, at the time the total size of the blockchain was around 50GB. Even for the cost of a 500GB SSD is only $150 and would last a number of years. This is in-comparison to the $100,000's in revenue per day a miner would be making.

Various developers put forth various other proposals, including Gavin Andresen who put forth a more conservative increase that would then continue to increase over time inline with technological improvements. Some of the employees of blockstream also put forth some proposals, but all were so conservative, it would take bitcoin many decades before it could reach a scale of VISA. Even though there was significant support from the community behind Gavin's simple proposal of increasing the limit it was becoming clear certain members of the bitcoin community who were part of Blockstream were starting to become increasingly vitriolic and divisive. Gavin then teamed up with one of the other main bitcoin developers Mike Hearn and released a coded (i.e. working) version of the bitcoin software that would only activate if it was supported by a significant majority of the network. What happened next was where things really started to get weird.

>> No.18211252
File: 230 KB, 492x534, 1585607002723.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18211252

>>18209859

>> No.18211338

>>18211140
>>18211170
>>18211202
So, not only you are a redditor, zepelin. You are a BSV shill too. Who woulda thunk?

>> No.18211351

>>18211338
>>18211338
bsv LOL. no way in hell. EVER

>> No.18211395

>>18211351
I'm still a bit out of the loop but didn't andersen say that csw is satoj?

>> No.18211431

>>18211351
Also is it just me or are you banning people and threads/replies?

>> No.18211534

>>18211431
nah it's completely censorship free, no bans, free speech

>> No.18211621

>>18209424
typical linkies can't recognize when they're being mocked

>> No.18211716
File: 15 KB, 1774x116, plebbit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18211716

>>18211534
Shall we see about that free speech? That website is notorious for not allowing all opinions to be voiced.

>> No.18211750

>>18211395
he certainly did, and hasn't retracted that statement
so did Ian Grigg, not just once, but twice, with a year in between the two statements
and so did Jon Matonis too

>> No.18211893

>>18211750
CSW is still a charlatan scammer

>> No.18211928

>>18211716
that's automod built in the chat dumbass

>> No.18211950

>>18211750
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDRwgbWkxFw&feature=emb_title

>> No.18212069

>>18211750
watch this video with Gavin and tell me what you observe

>> No.18212127

>>18212069
great find, thanks

>> No.18212141

>>18212127
yeah it's very telling

>> No.18212160

>>18212141
back then they didn't know, but now years later it's like they're describing Craig to a tee

>> No.18212238

>>18212141
it's still telling me that csw is a self centered asshole much like the blockstream retards. Fuck off blindedzeppelin

>> No.18212279

>>18212238
Craig is indeed a self-centered asshole, something has repeatedly made very clear himself
still the biggest genius of computer science and economics living today, and without a shadow of doubt the guy who invented Bitcoin

>> No.18212329

>>18212279
Why not sign tho? Why is everyithing he's doing making him even more suspicious of being a scammer? It's been fucking years already

>> No.18212388
File: 32 KB, 400x400, cosmicallystiff.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18212388

>>18212329
information asymmetry
he has absolutely nothing to gain from signing for you
all the people relevant to him already know he's Satoshi, so by deliberately not giving in to people he doesn't care about's desperation for him to sign he is making a statement
in short, the people who suspect that he's a scammer are irrelevant to him, and he couldn't care less
stiff

>> No.18212489

>>18212329
it was probably David,who was the brains (The Wozniak). Craig was more of a businessman (the Jobs) and wrote the WP.


After David passed and Craig probably is trying to get all the btc, a part of it was probably his.

>> No.18212565

>>18212489
not even remotely the case, Craig isn't a businessman at all, he's a knowledge enthusiast and computer scientist
in fact, the exact opposite of what you just wrote is the case, Craig was the genius who came up with the system from a mathematical and computer scientific background, while Dave likely wrote most of the code and the whitepaper (Craig isn't a very good coder at all, as he's even admitted himself; note that computer science is not synonymous with programming or computer engineering, you can be the most genius computer scientist of your era without necessarily being very good at actually programming)

>> No.18212632

>>18212388
>>18212565

spoken like a tru bsvtard. The judge who handles his case should know whether he is satoj or not. It's not about proving it to me or you idiot. And the judge is someone he should care about if he doesn't want to end up in jail. Also bring me some dressingm that word salad was tasteless

>> No.18212642

>>18212565
just my take

>> No.18212815

>>18212565
could be wrong, but I don't think I am. David was the genius. Craig was talented and very smart as well, but David was the genius.

>> No.18212873

>>18212815
Dave wasn't a genius at all, and there's nothing about his previous work which indicates that
he was a good programmer, better at writing than Craig was, but that's about it
Craig on the other hand is a certified genius with almost 20 degrees in various fields, particularly subfields of computer science and cybersecurity as well as law, economics, and philosophy

>> No.18212919

>>18212873
https://www.amazon.com/s?i=stripbooks&rh=p_27%3ADave+Kleiman&s=relevancerank&text=Dave+Kleiman&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1

>> No.18212948

>>18212919
yes, like I said, a decent programmer, and he and Craig were likely united by their shared interest in computer forensics
there's still wide chasm between the above average programmer Dave and the verifiable genius Craig

>> No.18213781

>>18212948
idk maybe you're right. maybe I am. guess we'll never know...

>> No.18214190
File: 602 KB, 500x269, aBeautifulmind_NAsh_Satoshi.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18214190

>>18212873
some people think NASH could have been Satoshi

>> No.18214673

>>18209244
Switch to PNK anon, shill PNK in this pasta and I'll join you in posting it

>> No.18214789

>>18214673
what is PNK

>> No.18215838

>>18209783
disgusting look at that wide chin and broad shoulders and how fake those boobs are
obvious tranny

>> No.18215879

>>18214190
So many signs for this one. I mean, look at when he died ffs.

>> No.18216166

>>18215879
2015? care to elucidate?

>> No.18216290
File: 168 KB, 1233x1548, linkmilly.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18216290

>>18215838

>> No.18216447

>>18216290
gibs

>> No.18216814

>>18216447
good music thread on there now

>> No.18217481

>>18215879
do you think he was satoshi?

>> No.18217565

>>18216290
If that’s a fucking man then I’m gay wtff

>> No.18217578

>>18209192
That's a man!

>> No.18217655
File: 2.70 MB, 720x1280, mainstreetcrypto.webm [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18217655

>>18217578

>> No.18217740

>>18217578
>>18217655
you were saying...?

>> No.18218001

>>18212948
Could Satoshi Nakamoto have come from the future?
Bitcoin came into existence at the perfect time, almost like humanity needed it. Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic and mythic figure seemingly disappeared without a trace, just as fast as he appeared, perhaps gracing the world with what little time he has left.

Went dark because Gavin went to CIA and didn't want them to dig too deep ?

Go into the past to gift humanity with the greatest financial invention in a century, have them mine for nearly 10 years, then when 2017 bull-run comes cash in?

How do we explain this hash?

00000000000000000021e800c1e8df51b22c1588e5a624bea17e9faa34b2dc4a.

Proof of time-dialtion?

There are many, many more oddities in this story.

What are you thoughts/ theories?

"If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry" - Satoshi Nakamoto

>> No.18218135
File: 445 KB, 1280x1254, YidwI03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18218135

>>18211140
>>18211170
>>18211202

>> No.18218351

>>18218135
and?

>> No.18218467

man she's hot and pretty. her nose is a bit weird imo, but other than that
also, wtf is this thread?

>> No.18218551

>>18218351
and pee pee poo poo

>> No.18218560
File: 87 KB, 800x600, dildo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18218560

they went to reddit bc they are retards

buy ogn if you're not

>> No.18218664
File: 188 KB, 966x1204, 1585696900654.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18218664

>>18218560
OGN?

>> No.18219262

>>18218560
hahaha

>> No.18221335

>>18219262
*coof* *coof*