/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.18120223]

Does anyone unironically think he is satoshi?

Ever since i've started watching his videos, he seems like a textbook Australian shitposter and turbo autist and actually starting to win me over. I always assumed the BSV shills were stupid, but from watching his speeches for some reason I'm starting to think its him. He seems to know bitcoin inside and out.

This video of him rambling and screaming at the host and opponent, and walking around the stage away from his lecturn makes him look like a coked up genius who may have actually invented it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-OekM65zPbc

[Anonymous No.18120388]

>>18120223
that? thats a man

[Anonymous No.18120422]

>>18120388
no its not
not until we see some proof
that's craig stephanie wright right there a well known transsexual woman who likes to tuck socks in her pants

[Anonymous No.18120427]

It's obvious

[Anonymous No.18120444]

>>18120223
>This video of him rambling and screaming at the host and opponent, and walking around the stage away from his lecturn makes him look like a coked up genius who may have actually invented it.
satoshi was not a crazy ass drama queen tho

[Anonymous No.18120453]

https://github.com/StackmyBCHup/SatoshiTimeLine
https://youtu.be/ATapuAYgEeI
https://ohmysatoshi.com/
https://ohmysatoshi.com/blacknet
https://youtu.be/Zssu63rKT0Y
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdJexAYjrDw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSikhu1X49M&t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNZyRMG2CjA&t
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHVWVP1WXmA&t=2s
https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/188871/aussie_achieves_world_first_audit_certification/
https://medium.com/@jonmatonis/how-i-met-satoshi-96e85727dc5a
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXdkczX5mR0
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=2682943
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdvQTwjVmrE&t
https://www.reddit.com/r/CraigIsSatoshi/top/?t=all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EQDiJ92VaI
https://youtu.be/QaafKXd9uK0
https://craigwright.net/blog/
https://youtu.be/mqWm6Kwf0KY
https://youtu.be/nASiBsNfYz0

[Anonymous No.18120469]

https://youtu.be/kUwlYlM4t2U

[Anonymous No.18120490]

>>18120427
thats from 2014 though i dont know what to believe

>>18120444
nice trips. he used australian/britishism's like 'bloody' in his forum posts which make it seem like he is non american


fuck someone tell me the answer

[Anonymous No.18120511]

>>18120223
Why do you think we're convinced he is? He understands Bitcoin better than anyone. Everything else is questionable.

[Anonymous No.18120579]

>>18120511
thats what i dont understand. he seems to understand it very well but just do crazy shit .


is there any reason he wouldnt sign the blocks?

[Anonymous No.18120782]

bro's please pull me out of the hole i think im starting to believe its creg and i dont know how to feel

[Anonymous No.18120800]

>>18120223
Looks like the rent boy me an my niggaz ran a train on weeks back
props to him tho he wanted more

[Anonymous No.18120819]

fuck off paid shills
i have a lot of bsv but you saps are shit at creating organic conversation.

[Anonymous No.18120839]

>>18120490
being non american and a gay ass drama queen is not the same thing. there are 8.6 billion non americans on this planet 80% of which are not gay ass drama queens 3 billion of them has access to computers no idea why would anyone like this faggot for satoy.

[Anonymous No.18120855]

>>18120579
this craig shows zero signs of actual deep understanding of technical issues involved

[Anonymous No.18120862]

>>18120819
dude i dont have any btv or bsv, but im an australian and started reading into creg because he is australian too. then i started watching him debate people and seeing how outlandish he is, but how he seems to know what he is talking about (i wouldnt know if he is lying or not) is sort of convincing

[Anonymous No.18120884]

>>18120223
>He seems to know bitcoin inside and out.
yep
that's why he didn't know what base58 was and couldn't stop talking about negative gamma (mathematically impossible)

[Anonymous No.18120891]

Tachyon Security Protocol uses asymmetric end-to-end encryption scheme and protocol simulation to prevent network sniffing.

[Anonymous No.18120919]

>>18120884
i wouldnt have a clue whats wrong or whats right, he just sounded well read to me and other people have told me he knows what he is talking about. could you explain the base58 and negative gamma stuff to me?

[Anonymous No.18120924]

>>18120862
he is bullshitting anon if you were a dev you would see right through it. unless you choose not to because it fits your preexisting bias. what craig does is called technobabble sounds technical but its all a bunch of handwaveium and buzzwords that don't mean a thing mixed with baseless assumptions and lies.

[Anonymous No.18120946]

>>18120223
watching this makes me want to buy bsv

[Anonymous No.18120952]

>>18120919
poltards like craig because he is a bootlicker and likes to bash communism. but just because someone bashes commies doesn't mean he is right on anything else. that would be a fallacy to assume such things.

[Anonymous No.18120966]

>>18120924
right. its bizzare to think someone would spend the whole life larping as satoshi if they are not actually him. i find it easier to imagine he is just 4d chessing everyone rather than just acting a fool on stage year on year. id kill to know what his endgame is.

[Anonymous No.18120968]

>>18120946
probably that is why they made it anon. everything they do and say is to make you fomo in and feel like an early adopter even as price drops from $450 to $100

[Anonymous No.18120974]

>>18120968
are those videos made for craig wright? is that what you mean by 'that is why they made it'?

wtf my mind is being blown right now.

[Anonymous No.18120981]

>>18120966
my opinion on this is following simple logic of elimination makes craig signing if he can maximize his gains while minimizing his liability compared to what he is doing "proving himself in court" which maximizes his liability and minimizes his gains.

[Anonymous No.18120986]

>>18120511
>He understands Bitcoin better than anyone
CSW in fact doesn't understand any of the true technical details of how bitcoin works. Even rather basic things like how transactions are formed he routinely gets wrong.
When its pointed out to him, he then goes on long rambling voodoo filled rambles about how he was 'misunderstood'
Anyone who thinks he understands bitcoin outs themselves as a pleb, like you just did.

[Anonymous No.18120989]

>>18120884
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_probability

[Anonymous No.18121005]

>>18120974
its to promote calvins scam project and his attempt to somehow misappropriate bitcoin and crypto ip and take a ransom from late moving tech giants.

its all a scam to control that shouldn't be controlled.

[Anonymous No.18121009]

>>18120986
didn't want to be this rude but you are correct

[Anonymous No.18121020]

>Has never given keys or proof that he is Satoshi.
>Satoshi was quiet and discrete.
>Creg "lookatmeboyos" can't cryptographically prove he is satoshi.

He is satoshi: trust me

[Anonymous No.18121046]

>>18120223
>he doesn’t know Nick Szabo is Satoshi and that BTC was facilitated by the N5A
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jfx7PnMtCeY

[Anonymous No.18121070]

>>18120223
>trusting an Australian

[Anonymous No.18121076]

>>18121020

[Anonymous No.18121084]

I don't think he is, I know he is because I performed writing syntax analysis on satoshis posts and Craigs rants and they share certain markers. I have 15bsv just in case.

[Anonymous No.18121090]

>>18120986

[Anonymous No.18121108]

>>18121005
Rightttttt, you've set me straight I think. I'll do some more research but I think it was those sets of videos I was watching originally.

Can I ask out of curiosity what crypto's you hold?

[Anonymous No.18121158]

>>18120919
satoshi invented base58 to make sure people wouldn't send bitcoin to the wrong address thinking you read an O instead of a 0

[Anonymous No.18121174]

>>18121076
>Gavin Andresen
This fucker raped Bitcoin functionality and didn't solve problems that are coming back to bite users in the ass, ten years later. Of course he's going to say that Creg is Nakamoto if that gives value to the shitty work he did.

One of the reasons I don't believe Creg is satoshi is that Satoshi left the stage in a dignified manner. Creg pushed himself back into the spotlight as the retarded aussie he is.

Also:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2qLI3VIHuKU

[Anonymous No.18121188]

>>18120223

Terry a davis was satoshi

[Anonymous No.18121222]

>>18121020
>be needy australian ego maniac
>sign every email with 15 titles
>see bitcoin in 2012....
>fuggthatshouldabeenme.jpg
>start buying on mtgox
>try and fail to become part of community
>start writing "bitcoin belle" via twitter dms
>tell bitcoin belle you love her and you invented btc to impress her
>needy roastie then starts pumping your story to others
>bitcoin belle gets you invites to conferences
>...you know the rest

now ask yourself a very very simple question. why did "satoshi" who was in direct comms with all the lead devs and thought leaders need bitcoin belle to "introduce" him to gavin, john, roger, mike h, etc? why didn't he just out himself to them as part of the normal email conversations they were having?

his bullshit scammer story only works on newfags who arrived at btc in last few years and don't see how preposterous the whole narrative is...

[Anonymous No.18121277]

>>18121174
craig was blackmailed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNZyRMG2CjA&t

imagine listening to that creep vitalik and his brainlet interpretation of signals theory as if there isn't a conceivable reason to not sign publicly
https://youtu.be/dC0wwFJ7cHM
I don't agree with craigs rational behind not publicliy signing (in that the law doesn't need him to protect it from setting a ridiculous precedent of having a signature be proof of who you are) but I don't care that he hasn't and don't think he needs to.

There is more evidence craig wright is satoshi nakamoto than anyone else on earth.
BSV is defined by this document https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf and btc is not

[Anonymous No.18121378]

>>18120223
Why would anyone unironically believe his lies when they could believe it for two rupees a post instead?

[Anonymous No.18121384]

>>18121277
>craig was blackmailed

>Intelligent enough to keep himself from being discovered by intelligence agencies but not enough to be blackmailed by the brother of a dead nobody.

>I won't sign keys because that would prove I'm the owner of the key. But I'm satoshi, My word is enough for it.

>I got bank statements and credit statements...
Satoshi hated banks.

Creg has had opportunity after oportunity to prove he is satoshi, even in a court of law which would bring him billions of dollars and the adulations of pretty much all humanity. Yet he choses to not do it, while at the same time screaming that we should believe him to be satoshi. Retarded

[Anonymous No.18121406]

>>18120223
This is how all Australians talk. Yeah he's Satoj.

[Anonymous No.18121407]

>>18121090
>imagine believing segwit transactions have no signatures
fucking svtards i swear... just because tx is structured differently nothing has changed. only nodes that don't see signatures are then ones that did not upgrade in 2017.

[Anonymous No.18121439]

>>18121384
>satoshi hated banks
zero evidenc of this

>Creg has had opportunity after oportunity to prove he is satoshi
define how someone proves they are satoshi

> nothing has changed
the payee does not receive a signature from the previous owner. It is not a chain of digital signatures.
ib4 witness
the witness is a hash of a signature which is not a signature

[Anonymous No.18121469]

>>18121439
are you driven to embarrass yourself publicly? heres the truth: you are a gullible and a scammer is taking your money. people try to point this out but you fight against them.
it will all dawn on you eventually but the pain will be too much to handle and you will kill yourself.

[Anonymous No.18121492]

>>18121439
Oh yeah. You convinced me that Creg is satoshi with absolutely zero factual evidence.
Thanks

[Anonymous No.18121499]

>>18121439
>the payee does not receive a signature from the previous owner
bullshit
>It is not a chain of digital signatures
never was tho i can give you countless examples of bitcoin with no chain of signatures.
bitcoin is an utxo that's all. it's spent to a script executing to true since the first release. it's yours if you can spend it. if it requires a signature to spend then you have to provide that signature. nothing has changed whatsoever. you guys are absolute brainlets.
>the witness is a hash of a signature which is not a signature
no the witness is literally a sigscript including a signature with a standard segwit tx. it's the old sigscript field that doesn't contain a signature.

[Anonymous No.18121502]

>>18121469
>zero arguments

if craig isn't satoshi I don't give a shit. my investment in bsv is not based on that

>>18121492
how would someone prove to you they are satoshi?

[Anonymous No.18121549]

>>18121502
>how would someone prove to you they are satoshi?
eas as pie
step 1
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
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=3FTe
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
step 2
sign properly with a known satoshi address and publish this signature with an intelligible and provably not reused message. something that references the time it was made and the intent.
step 3
provide backstory (optional)

[Unironically Greg No.18121558]

>>18120223
He’s a spastick and is going to prizon. Risk. Finance.

[Anonymous No.18121559]

>>18121499
>bullshit
nope.

>never was
pic related is wrong
>nothing has changed
why would you do it then?
>sigscript
the payee does not receive a signature

it also means you have to trust miners to only accept transactions that have the correct signature because segwit nodes don't need the signature to consider the transaction valid

>>18121549
so if an 11 year old signed you would believe they are satoshi?

[Anonymous No.18121560]

>>18121502
>how would someone prove to you they are satoshi?
Release a fucking signature to the public. Let every cryptographer in the world check if the proof is valid. It's that fucking simple.
Don't want to release it to the public? Invite all major cryptpographers and crypto creators to witness the proof. He could prove it and also get into every single dev team in the world.

>He can't because he was blackmailed and he doesn't wanna do it, and this is a cryptographic imposibilitye and...

Excuses

[Anonymous No.18121572]

>>18121549
This

[Anonymous No.18121575]

>>18121502
>zero arguments
and then your bait question
>how would someone prove to you they are satoshi?

face the facts. there is no proof that could be offered to you at this stage of your belief which could convince you. you realize this with your bait question.

this goes deeper than facts at this point. we could have a video of csw saying "I'm not satoshi i am scamming people out of their money because im sociopath with personality issues" and you would say "good ole satoshi throwing the haters off the trail"

the only point you will see the truth is in the moments before you commit suicide. you are locked into this now.

[Anonymous No.18121578]

>>18121559
forgot pic

[Anonymous No.18121613]

>>18121575
I'm pointing out how you retards think a public signature is sufficient evidence when it's not, it obviously is evidence but if a 6 year old signs the key are they satoshi? no

there is evidence here
https://github.com/StackmyBCHup/SatoshiTimeLine
https://youtu.be/ATapuAYgEeI [Embed]
https://www.reddit.com/r/CraigIsSatoshi/top/?t=all
the court case
and pic related Ian grigg, Gavin andresen, Jon matonis all believe craig is satoshi

[Anonymous No.18121620]

>>18121559
it is bollocks sorry, you have no clue what you are talking about.
>the payee does not receive a signature
only if he runs a very old client (his choice). otherwise this is utter bullshit.

>why would you do it then?
makes absolute sense. it saves block space separates the burden of booking the financial transaction from the data only required for validation of the transaction which is not needed after n confirmation because the ledger is immutable at that point thanks to the nakamoto consensus. also fixed tx malleability makes it easier and simple to build upon. also makes it possible to have very large and complex sigscipts that are only partially published (taproot)

>so if an 11 year old signed you would believe they are satoshi?
in that weird scenario i would believe he has satoshis keys access to his bitcoins and this makes it 99.999% likely he knows satoshi personally maybe it's his dad.
in case it's an older person who is tech literate or an accomplished dev i would assume he is satoshi especially if he says so until someone else signs or any contradicting information surfaces.

[Anonymous No.18121630]

>>18121578
yeah that picture is not accurate. its not how bitcoin works or ever worked. it's dumbed down and simplified for that 7 page essay which is not bitcon.

[Anonymous No.18121631]

>>18121613
>the court case
Creg lost the case. Also falsified documents
Yep. He's Satoshi

[Anonymous No.18121634]

>>18121613
>ive constructed a bizarre obtuse argument that exist in my fantasy world, which you must admit is absurd therefore this means creg is satoshi.

[Anonymous No.18121651]

They are trying really hard to convince people so they can control the uncontrollable.

[Anonymous No.18121738]

>>18121620
it's not debatable a receiver of a bitcoin from a segwit transaction does not receive a signature.
>signatures are only needed at the time of validation - peter wuille https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/hong-kong/segregated-witness-and-its-impact-on-scalability/

>>why would you do it then?
was obviously pointing out the contradiction between it changed nothing and it's an improvement.
malleability is a feature not a bug
Just increase the blocksize instead of breaking the fundamental definition as a chain of digital signatures

the 11 year old is just proof your digital signature = satoshi nakamoto is dependent on the other evidence as all of human history has been.

>>18121630
>btc is not accurately described by the whitepaper
I know

I don't care if you want to make 144mb/day digital gold but that is not Bitcoin a peer to peer electronic cash system a chain of digital signatures with nodes that solve hash puzzles and users do not need to run a node to verify transactions and pic related

[Anonymous No.18121827]

>>18121549
so you're saying that as long as someone has the key to your house, that means they own your house

[Anonymous No.18122313]

>>18120444

Craig wasnt a drama queen back then either, go read his old forum/newsletter posts pre-2009... he was basically just a regular geek. money changes people.

[Anonymous No.18122467]

>>18121827

or how about, he just doesn't want to sign. its simple as that. he doesn't have to. there's obviously some kind of game going on here and he's made a lot of enemies. it's a lot of money at stake. i dont blame the guy. who knows what happens when the world knows hes satoshi.

[Anonymous No.18122580]

>>18121827
no i mean you own the bitcoin that you can spend. home ownership is a legal construct crypto is not based on legal framework thus it is trustless and permissionless. otherwise it would make no sense.

the bitcoin is only yours if you can spend it. and that is the definition of it's ownership that only you can spend it.

[Anonymous No.18122607]

>>18120388
what you just say you cunt?

[Anonymous No.18122647]

>>18122467
that was the exact point I was making, so no idea why you're addressing me and not him

[Anonymous No.18122660]

>>18122580
that's not even remotely how it works
trustless doesn't have anything to do with it, and Bitcoin is not permissionless, never was, and never will be
courts of law will always have the ultimate authority over who has the legal ownership of an asset

[Anonymous No.18122728]

>>18122660
>that's not even remotely how it works
that's exactly how it works almost nobody can show any legal documentation to his bitcoin ownership. and it's not needed either. you prove ownership by fulfilling the contract defined in pubkey script to the utxo with a valid sigscript. that is how it works.

[Anonymous No.18122745]

>>18122660
>courts of law will always have the ultimate authority over who has the legal ownership of an asset
they can try, and you are free to comply if you are a cuck

[Anonymous No.18122755]

no no thats a scam

[Anonymous No.18122762]

>>18122728
no, that's not how it works
if that were how it works, I could steal your Bitcoin and become the legal owner
legal ownership is established in a court of law, nowhere else
>>18122745
mining operations worth millions of dollars will have two choices
1) comply with court order
2) get shut down
not hard to understand which one they will choose
you people are apparently completely detached from reality

[Anonymous No.18122789]

>Imagine someone stole something from you. You can’t get it back, but if you could, if it had a kill switch that could be remote triggered, would you do it? Would it be a good thing for thieves to know that everything you own has a kill switch and if they steal it, it’ll be useless to them, although you still lose it too? If they give it back, you can re-activate it
>—Satoshi

[Anonymous No.18122933]

>>18120223
>He seems to know bitcoin inside and out.

Yeah, Craig Wrong is so educated about Bitcoin.
The only thing he doesn't know: Satoshi Nakamoto wallet keys.

Many years ago he got ahold of Nakamoto's encrypted hard disks, and has unsuccessfully been trying to bruteforce the password since then. He even tried to buy vintage BTC wallets - pic related.

[Anonymous No.18122950]

>>18120223
Why would you not think satoshi is dead? his account has never moved. Sorry but he fied

[Anonymous No.18123136]

No. Stop talking about this bullshit. It's embaraaaaaasing.

Neyma from UND is probs satoshi.

[Anonymous No.18123189]

>>18120453
>Posting 100 mile long lists of "proof" when he could just sign

Lol

[Anonymous No.18123288]

>>18122762
>if that were how it works, I could steal your Bitcoin and become the legal owner
if you can you will be the owner. no question about that. legality is local bitcoin is global. but of course you can't. so it's a moot question.
>mining operations worth millions of dollars will have two choices
or just ignore the fuck out of it and tell the court they are unable to comply if they bother with a reply at all. if any court could even find out who to send it to...

don't be stupid, pools don't own the hashpower. there are tens of thousands of individual miners that hold the hashpower. noone ever will be able to subpoena them in time for anything. you won't have a court order within half a year anyhow. by that time yottahashes would need to be reorged. it's just silly beyond anything to imagine courts have any pull on bitcoin miners.

[Anonymous No.18123297]

>>18120223
>Does anyone unironically think he is satoshi?

[Anonymous No.18123311]

>>18122933
>Many years ago he got ahold of Nakamoto's encrypted hard disks
speculation nigga he probably has absolutely nothing but ego.

[Anonymous No.18123314]

>>18120223
hes a bit loopy but the blockchain tech looks solid

[Anonymous No.18123367]

>>18120223
he's unironically a boomer weaboo autist who invented bitcoin

his house is full of japanese shit

satoshi is unironically craig

[Anonymous No.18123560]

>>18123189
would there be a realistic situation where he couldn't sign? could he have just lost his own private keys?

[Anonymous No.18123582]

>>18123560
satoshi called people that don't backup their private key or ever delete a wallet morons year before craig farted into the bitcoin space. satoshi was not stupid. he was not an attention whore queer ass faggot that only does technobabble and can't code. this much we know.

[Anonymous No.18123617]

>>18123582
thanks for providing all this information in the thread to retards like me. Whats the go with deleting a wallet? Why is that such a big deal?

[Anonymous No.18123639]

>>18123582
Also who do you think is actually satoshi?

[Anonymous No.18123641]

>>18123617
because if anyone ever sends bitcoins by accident or purpose to an old address you used and deleted then it's lost forever. not to mention you could accidentally delete a wallet you didn't want to. so his advice was never ever under any circumstances delete a a bitcoin wallet since it doesn't take up any measurable disk space anyhow..

[Anonymous No.18123662]

This man is practically the dictionary definition of a closeted homosexual. He's like a closeted fag from the pre-Stonewall era, all repression and overcompensation and cognitive dissonance, like Don Birnam in The Lost Weekend, or the faggier of the two drunks in Shut Up, Little Man.

[Anonymous No.18123702]

>>18123639
there are two distinct possibilities
3% it was the nick szabo, ian grigg, hal finney trio. however the timezones worked commited and satoshi posted in do not support this theory. linguistic analysis does and the expertise is there.
97% someone younger at the time that we don't know by name satoshi was pretty damn careful.

what is absolutely sure it was not craig the retard at the time bitcoin was created went to uni in australia. and satoshi most certainly worked from london time then pacific +5 time zones.

[Anonymous No.18123743]

>>18123702
-6 and -7 sorry not +5 i always mix this shit up.

[Anonymous No.18123757]

>>18123702
You are really tripping me out. So you reckon we don't know who it is and they potentially could still be alive? Do we have any idea at all?

Is it you bro? semisrs ahahaha.

[Anonymous No.18124165]

>>18123757
we probably don't know him because he didn't want to be known. he went to great lengths to be unknown and his work sprees suggest he may have been a student in britain pulling all nighters when he had the time.

we know a few things about satoshi one of them is he was an accomplished and prolific c++ coder. his code was not beautiful but not awful either. and he coded a fucking lot and we also know he single handedly kept mining bitcoin through all 2009 pretty much while other miners came and went away. we pretty much suspect the make and model of his cpu that he used a single core of to mine btc and keep the network going.

[Anonymous No.18124254]

>>18123757
if you want to be freaked out check this out!

r: 8e01c1fe941d89bbe9d0dca65a47b2f816dd565a0579c257982b9f3e0a96ad26
s: bb010590e060b575eeb09da77287d148966cd232eae619e6ce6227b17e8f58a6
h(m): 6ecae1c5d358f540dfae1d69bbf7bf839fb56804ab2cbe39bee4f13898ef3223

https://pastebin.com/tNdZRCrW

Public key: (0x678afdb0fe5548271967f1a67130b7105cd6a828e03909a67962e0ea1f61deb6, 0x49f6bc3f4cef38c4f35504e51ec112de5c384df7ba0b8d578a4c702b6bf11d5f)
Signature: r=0x9aaf4ee1c48adf04afcf18816f4a2ede63edbd7e6dd324113070afc20fe952d5, s=0x5ac43481ca1d7d93c848147a6c716713bdb9ae0f9d6d1f0060fc82015671b13
H(m): 20963263850230950175255265505713730077647297319299372054537156005789460166266
Signature valid? True
key_hash = 62e907b15cbf27d5425399ebf6f0fb50ebb88f18
checksum = c29b7d937e3049e279391e62fdf00c12def7444013ddf6215808d10e9f2d5996
key_hash + checksum = 0062e907b15cbf27d5425399ebf6f0fb50ebb88f18 c29b7d93
bitcoin address = 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa

[Anonymous No.18124309]

>>18123757
>>/biz/thread/S16264677#p16270493
>>/biz/thread/S16264677#p16270983

[Anonymous No.18125550]

For me it's incredible to think someone thinks he's not satoshi if they have done any research at all. It's so obvious at this point it's laughable how few people get it.

[Anonymous No.18125642]

>>18120223
He literally is Satoshi you fucking braindeaded retards. Thats why we are shilling it to you so you can get in early too. God It's infuriating being an oldfag and these newfags never understands that the board literally tries to help them get rich sometimes and give back. Fuck

[Anonymous No.18125755]

>if I CSWspam enough my bags will pump

[Anonymous No.18125881]

>>18123314
>>18123367
>knowledge of the tech seems solid

he has a laughable grasp of the technical aspects of bitcoin. he is nearly always wrong in spectacular ways that are cringeworthy to watch (turing complete, etc).
the fact that you just said that outloud says a lot about you: (a) shill, (b) totally clueless idiot. which is it?

[Anonymous No.18125921]

Okay

>Bitcoin is Turing Complete in Three Different Ways
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ1DTeexpvA

[Anonymous No.18125928]

>>18120223
he's good at convincing people who are fairly deep into the tech that he's satoshi, but anyone serious knows he's full of shit
he's entertaining as fuck though i'll give him that

[Anonymous No.18125945]

>>18120453
take your meds

[Anonymous No.18126064]

>>18120952
/pol/ likes him because he's an asshole. Its a common power fantasy to get to be the asshole who doesn't need to be graceful under pressure. Other example: our president, and before him Nixon

[Anonymous No.18126181]

>>18120966
There's a fortune at stake and a lot of power associated with being Satoshi. That's the endgame for pretending to be your dead colleague.

If you'd rather believe a 4d chess scenario, go ahead.

[Anonymous No.18126202]

>>18125921
>post video of certified schitzo social media influencer being spectacularly wrong about simple CS concepts.
Okay

[Anonymous No.18126350]

>>18125928
i tried to listen to his rants for entertainment value but it's just annoying.

[Anonymous No.18126462]

>>18126202
Okay

>Turing Complete Bitcoin Script White Paper
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3160279
>A Proof of Turing Completeness in Bitcoin Script
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3265157
>Bitcoin: A Total Turing Machine

[Anonymous No.18126477]

>>18125550
And most others don't.

You should see Glider's response when asked why he thinks that. He kinda just said "well I met him and we started talking and I just got a good feeling about it"

[Anonymous No.18126489]

>>18126202
Okay

>Turing Complete Bitcoin Script White Paper
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3160279
>A Proof of Turing Completeness in Bitcoin Script
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3265157
>Bitcoin: A Total Turing Machine
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3265146

[Anonymous No.18126592]

>>18126477
Okay

[Anonymous No.18126877]

Satoshi has a 200 IQ also BSV is the only real bitcoin

[Anonymous No.18126905]

Craig is Satoshi

[Anonymous No.18127008]

>>18126905
If he isn't i don't care but BSV is bitcoin let others pay the huge segwitcrapcoin transfer fees and wait 390 days for a transfer.

[Anonymous No.18127023]

>>18126592
That image applies to you.

I'm actually open to creg being satoshi, but the evidence doesn't line up and I more believe satoshi was his colleague Kleiman who died. My theory is that creg knows this and that satoshi can't come out and refute him. This seems to line up with the evidence and economic incentives

[Anonymous No.18127083]

>>18127023
>making up conspiracy theories to not have to accept craig is satoshi
That's really sad anon.

[Anonymous No.18127100]

>>18120223
yes he is satoshi
but he's vision is stupid
BSV = bitcoin stupid vision

[Anonymous No.18127779]

>>18126489
one can prove bitcoin is not turing complete in 2 sentences

[Anonymous No.18127818]

>>18127100
satoshi is no fool craig is a liar a fraud and an imbecile definitely not satoshi

[Anonymous No.18127855]

>>18126489
>*loops* blocks your path

[Anonymous No.18128339]

>>18124165
>>18124254
>>18124309

thanks for the info anon

[Anonymous No.18128515]

>>18121277
BSV has still the EDA enabled, i wonder why they didnt revert it....hm....

[Anonymous No.18128559]

Why does it matter who Satoshi is? The point is that block sizes shouldn't be cucked. When btc was young only regular users were running nodes, now we have miners dumping millions of dollars into hardware that is only good for one thing: mining bitcoin. Why would they willingly kill their cash cow? Economic incentives secure the network, let the miners mine and the users use

[Anonymous No.18128596]

>>18120223
Nobody does

[Anonymous No.18128654]

I was wondering where all the BSV threads had gone. :) Okay, I'm a bit of a normie and I got into crypto as an online casino affiliate when some of Calvin's brands started paying commission in BTC. Currently I hold 50 BTC, 1000 BSV, 100000 XRP, 21 ETH.

So I feel like CSW has to know that he can't be disproven to be Satoshi. Like, if someone else could sign at any moment, he wouldn't be doing what he does. So either Craig is Satoshi, or he knows Satoshi is dead.

Anyways, Calvin has made me a lot of money by forcing me into crypto, and I've already cashed out once, so I'm willing to hedge my bets and take a position in BSV. And If CSW does exactly what he has said he's going to do at the time of the halving...

Feel free to tell me why I'm wrong/stupid, etc..

[Anonymous No.18128979]

>>18128559
you think they miners are unable or unwilling to raise the block limit if it suits their interest?

[Anonymous No.18130442]

>faketoshi