/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.18037812]

This has been weighing heavy on my mind for a while, but I'm going to say it: I don't like the coronavirus.

[Anonymous No.18037838]

It is only a placeholder. A scapegoat that's easily eliminated. If we all wanted, that is. We just don't have enough money. We need to work together to make it happen

[Anonymous No.18037883]

>>18037812
What if I to.d you that it disproportionally killed more niggers?

[Anonymous No.18037957]

>>18037812
That’s just like, your opinion. I for one love Corona-Chan!

[Anonymous No.18038057]

>>18037883
lol it's the complete opposite.

[Anonymous No.18038138]

>>18037812
>I don't like the coronavirus.
well the rest of us do so fuck off

[Anonymous No.18038235]

>>18037812
This virus is boring. I want something that turns people into zombies in 12 seconds. Now THAT'S a contagion.

>>18037957
BOOORING

[Anonymous No.18038323]

>>18037957
It was fun the first few weeks.
But being locked up even though I don't want to go out starts to make me tired.

[Anonymous No.18038423]

>>18037812
lucky for you, it doesn't exist
just another virus scare mass hysteria for fearmongering purposes
virus hoax starter pack
http://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf
http://www.whale.to/a/infectious_scares.html
https://youtu.be/3cnlynJZLtM
https://vexmansthoughts.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/bc3a9champ-or-pasteur-a-lost-chapter-in-history-of-biology.p

[Anonymous No.18038440]

but the coronavirus likes you, anon.

[Anonymous No.18038479]

>>18038423
cringe and >>>/x/ pilled

[Anonymous No.18038500]

>>18038479
no idea why people keep linking to the paranormal board
there's nothing paranormal about pathogenic viruses and infectious disease being a hoax

[Anonymous No.18038708]

>>18037957
I love you corona-chan

[Anonymous No.18038898]

>>18038500
Work in construction. It’s dirty as fuck. We haven’t stopped working. Young guys catching it and going home. Know an old head that’s dead from it. You’re a turbo autist. See more faggot.

[Anonymous No.18038912]

>>18037812
She likes you

[Anonymous No.18038976]

>>18037957
I do really love you Coronachan, more than you'll ever know, but can you still kill me anyway please? Make it brutal and painful. Amen.

[Anonymous No.18038995]

>>18038898
young getting sick, old die, so like the flu? better destroy society

[Anonymous No.18039000]

>>18038898
no one is catching anything, you don't seem to understand that pathogenic viruses and infectious disease are not real phenomena
young people will pretend to catch anything to get out of work
old people die of a variety of causes
meanwhile, the technique used to test for the virus is complete bunk, essentially a random number generator
http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
>The Coronavirus scare that emanated from Wuhan, China in December of 2019 is an epidemic of testing. There is no proof that a virus is being detected by the test and there is absolutely no concern about whether there are a significant number of false positives on the test. What is being published in medical journals is not science, every paper has the goal of enhancing the panic by interpreting the data only in ways that benefit the viral theory, even when the data is confusing or contradictory. In other words, the medical papers are propaganda.

[Anonymous No.18039027]

>>18037957
I love you corona chan

[Anonymous No.18039073]

>>18039000
>those digits
>that post
Pretty sure infectious diseases are in fact a thing, guy

[Anonymous No.18039154]

>>18039073
then you would be gravely mistaken
once you've gone through the material I've provided, you'll know for yourself that there is no such thing, the origin of this myth, and what certain groups of people stand to gain from perpetuating it

[Anonymous No.18039224]

>>18039154
So you’ve never had a cold, the flu, chicken pox, herpes, measles? Impressive

[Anonymous No.18039258]

>>18039224
physical symptoms and disease are real phenomena
the point is that they're not caused by pathogens

[Anonymous No.18039278]

>>18039000
i'm intrigued, please continue

[Anonymous No.18039288]

>>18039000
>Viruses aren't real, anyone who gets sick from a viral infection is just faking
Whew, that's a new one

[Anonymous No.18039317]

>>18039073
>He thinks that invisible tiny little bug things exist and can kill people.
Top kek. What a fucking smooth brain

[Anonymous No.18039357]

>>18039258
>>18039317
So what, miasmas? Foul odours? Mitichlorians? The evil eye? Help a brother understand

[Anonymous No.18039373]

>>18039278
I've provided tons of information in the starter pack
go through that information, and you'll know more than enough
here it is again
virus hoax starter pack
http://wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/article/Dismantling-the-Virus-Theory.pdf
http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
http://www.whale.to/a/infectious_scares.html
https://youtu.be/3cnlynJZLtM
https://vexmansthoughts.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/bc3a9champ-or-pasteur-a-lost-chapter-in-history-of-biology.pdf

[Anonymous No.18039444]

>>18039288
no one gets sick from a viral infection
people get sick first, the associated bacteria and viruses appear later
>>18039357
toxic "food" (almost no one has any idea about what humans are physiologically adapted to eat), toxic water, toxic air, radiation exposure

[Anonymous No.18039456]

>>18038057
Will you say that when it devastates Africa?

[Anonymous No.18039470]

>>18039357
not to mention, people actively poisoning themselves with drugs, most likely a reaction to repeated trauma throughout life and convincing oneself that they're pleasurable, when they're really just exacerbating any problem you might have and providing a short-term high from whatever neural mechanism they're hijacking in addition to the endorphins being released to assuage the pain you're inflicting on yourself

[Anonymous No.18039483]

>>18039000
>>18039444
STOP GETTING TRIPS YOURE FREAKING ME THE FUCK OUT

[Anonymous No.18039488]

>>18039444
And the fact that every living creature from bacteria to elephants has viruses that are adapted to hijack their wetware is a coincidence? Or somehow the bacteria plagued by bacteriophages is somehow eating the wrong diet? I don’t understand

[Anonymous No.18039518]

>>18039488
again, there are no such viruses, you are still making that flawed assumption
as for bacteriophages, the nature of what they are is thoroughly explained in the starter pack, read the article "Dismantling the Virus Theory" by Lanka

[Anonymous No.18039532]

>>18039444
You also believe the Earth is flat, bud?

[Anonymous No.18039555]

>>18039532
not sure why you're asking me that, as believing in pathogenic viruses, infectious disease, and the germ theory would be the biological equivalent of believing the Earth is flat

[Anonymous No.18039564]

>>18039518
Yeah, nah. I’m going to go ahead and stick with the consensus view on this one.

[Anonymous No.18039578]

>>18039564
willful ignorance is always a choice you're allowed to make

[Anonymous No.18039583]

>>18039555
You do understand that viruses are visible under a microscope, right?

[Anonymous No.18039602]

>>18039583
yes, actual viruses are indeed
however, none of the pathogenic viruses have ever been isolated and shown to exist in this manner
again, just go through the starter pack, all these extremely basic knee-jerk questions are all addressed in-depth

[Anonymous No.18039634]

Who here is the virus actually making their life better? Shit is great so far.

[Anonymous No.18039648]

>>18039578
Seems like a fairly elaborate conspiracy is what you’re suggesting. The whole point of science is that it’s intended to be tested and disproven: given the preponderance of evidence I’m inclined to believe that infectious diseases are in fact a thing and are caused by microbes. I’m not discounting that there are environmental effects that may predispose people to infection, sort of as you describe, but ultimately the evidence strongly suggests that pathogenic microbes are a thing and do cause disease. I’m willing to keep an open mind, but like I said, based on the best evidence available to me I think you’re wrong.

[Anonymous No.18039669]

>>18037812
No one does, for many reasons. Nothing we can do about it, though.

[Anonymous No.18039675]

>>18039634
The upside: my commute is fucking amazing. The downside: I still have to drag my ass into work. All in all I’d say I’m in the pro-corona camp so far.

[Anonymous No.18039685]

>>18039648
there is absolutely no evidence for such whatsoever
if you are willing to keep an open mind, you should at the very least take a moment of your time to go through some of the material I've provided and actually read some of it carefully

[Anonymous No.18039689]

>>18039634
I get to work from home. Have way too much food. Made more money from the markets. Also happy people get to suffer. I see nothing but positives so far.

[Anonymous No.18039770]

>>18037957
>I love you corona chan

[Anonymous No.18039864]

>>18038138
you might want to close that window fren

[Anonymous No.18039879]

>>18039685
I’m sure there are alternative explanations but the past 100 years or so of evidence have gone into building the consensus. As mentioned, I’m willing to change my mind but I can’t be bothered to read what you linked: I got cheques to chase.

[Anonymous No.18039914]

>>18039488
also, with regards to phages, in case you won't even bother to read the article "Dismantling the Virus Theory", here's an excerpt from it
keep in mind that the guy who wrote it is a PhD virologist from Germany
>On the detection of phages
>The existence of phages can be proved rapidly. First step: their presence is confirmed through an effect, namely the transformation of bacteria into phages, and also through an electron micrograph of those phages. The control experiments show that phages do not appear if bacteria do not change or if bacteria randomly start decomposing due to extrinsic sudden annihilation, without forming phages.
>Second step: the liquid containing the phages is concentrated and applied on another liquid, which has a high concentration at the bottom of the test tube and a low concentration at the top of the test tube. The test tube with the phages is then powerfully spun (centrifuged) and all the particles gather according to their mass and weight to the place of their own density. The density is the ratio of weight (mass) per unit of volume, expressed as Kg/l or g/mg, respectively. That is why this concentration and purification step for particles with the same density is called density gradient centrifugation.
>The layer where many particles of the same density gather becomes “cloudy”, which is called a “band”. This step is being documented, then the particles concentrated, purified and sedimented in a “band” are removed with a syringe needle. The extracted concentrated amount of particles is called an isolate. A fast and simple electron micrograph will confirm the presence of phages in the isolate, which at the same time is an indication for the purity of the isolate, if the micrograph shows no other particles but the phages. The appearance and the diameter of the phages will also be established with the help of this micrograph.

[Anonymous No.18039928]

>>18037957
I love you corona-chan

[Anonymous No.18039938]

>>18039488
>The control experiment performed for this step consists in treating and centrifuging the liquid from bacteria which did not form any phages, where no phages appear at the end of the procedure.
>After the step of successfully isolating the phages, the decisive biochemical characterization of the phages follows. The biochemical characterization of their composition is essential for identifying the specific type of phage, since different types of phages often appear to be similar. The isolate obtained through the density gradient centrifugation is now divided in two parts. One part is used to determine the size, type and composition of the nucleic acid; in a separate procedure, the other part is used to determine the amount, size and morphology of the proteins of the phages. Since the 1970s, these tests have been simple standard techniques that are learned by every biology student in his first semesters.
>These tests represent the biochemical characterization of the phages. In almost every case, these results have been and are being published in only one publication, since a phage has a very simple structure which is very easy to analyse. The control experiments for these tests use liquid from bacteria which do not form phages and thus cannot present any biochemical proof. The existence of approximately two thousand different types of phages was scientifically demonstrated this way.

[Anonymous No.18039955]

>>18037812
This also makes me sad fren. I have a milf fever a slight coof :(

[Anonymous No.18039999]

>>18039879
the hoax is much, much older than that
also, you should drop all pretensions of being open-minded if you can't even take a short amount of time to read something which challenges your fundamental assumptions, rejecting something you know nothing about is literally the definition of willful ignorance

[Anonymous No.18040018]

>>18039444
>toxic "food" (almost no one has any idea about what humans are physiologically adapted to eat), toxic water, toxic air, radiation exposure
You're so fucking retarded, holy shit. That's right, all those people died at home and in hospitals in identical ways because some global organization started pumping the same toxic food/water/air (chemtrail nutjob I guess) etc into them in the last few months.
Except if you self quarantine properly and consume the exact same food/water/air like everyone else you have no chance of getting Corona, this makes sense this toxic food/water/air avoids people who avoid contact with other people.
How can you live being so retarded all the time?

[Anonymous No.18040060]

>>18039999
>short amount of time
>just read some dipshit’s poorly translated doctoral thesis bro
I’m out

[Anonymous No.18040107]

>>18039999
If you stockpile on the toxic food they sell in supermarkets and stay inside your house drinking toxic tap water and breathing toxic air you have 0 chances of getting sick with Corona because you had no contact with infected people.
So much for your schizo theory, kill yourself. Even better go to the hospital and lick all the door handles to check if your shitty theory is real or not. What? Don't have the balls to do it?

[Anonymous No.18040112]

>>18040060
>3-page document
>"doctoral thesis"
>insulting a PhD virologist you know nothing about
>calling said person a "dipshit" while at it
>accusing document of being poorly translated when it's not even remotely so
doesn't really get much more willfully ignorant than this
being willfully ignorant is your choice, but it's hypocritical to be so while at the same time attempting to claim being open-minded

[Anonymous No.18040166]

>>18040107
you're just begging the question, i.e. assuming that there is such a thing as pathogenic viruses and infectious disease, whereas this assumption is false
in other words, it doesn't matter what you do, everyone has a 0% chance of "getting sick with Corona", because it's a completely fictitious disease, based on branding certain people with certain symptoms with it if they also test positively on what is essentially a random number generator
>http://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
>The Coronavirus scare that emanated from Wuhan, China in December of 2019 is an epidemic of testing. There is no proof that a virus is being detected by the test and there is absolutely no concern about whether there are a significant number of false positives on the test. What is being published in medical journals is not science, every paper has the goal of enhancing the panic by interpreting the data only in ways that benefit the viral theory, even when the data is confusing or contradictory. In other words, the medical papers are propaganda.

[Anonymous No.18040177]

>>18040112
What part of “I’m out” was outside your comprehension? Ad hominem attacks hardly make your argument more compelling.

[Anonymous No.18040204]

>>18040177
you're the one who just made a series of ad hominem attacks, I haven't committed any such fallacy at all
and you being out doesn't mean me being out, and clearly you're not out either since you decided to make another reply

[Anonymous No.18040282]

>>18040166
Holy shit you actually can't comprehend the discussion. Your chances of getting ''certain symptoms'' which are associated with corona is 0 if you stay inside and don't contact any infected person. When asked what caused those symptoms you said consuming toxic things, but if you stay inside and consume the same toxic things as everyone else you don't get those symptoms, while people that don't isolate do. Almost as if being in the vicinity of infected people has something to do with it. Almost. Nope, it's the fucking chemtrails after all, but the Illuminati has an AI that detects if you've been isolated and avoids feeding you toxic shit so they don't break the narative. YES! THIS MAKES SENSE! WE CRACKED THE CASE!

[Anonymous No.18040334]

>>18040282
incorrect, your chances of developing such symptoms is actually quite high, depending on what you do of course, but considering the completely ridiculous forms of "testing", tons of people who don't present with any symptoms at all get branded as "positive" and asymptomatic, and as such what you're saying doesn't make sense at all to begin with

[Anonymous No.18040335]

I just want to improve myself and not die is that too much to ask? I mean really...

[Anonymous No.18040430]

>>18040334
>your chances of developing such symptoms is actually quite high
It's actually quite not. If you stay inside for months by yourself your chances of developing fever, coughs, inability to breathe, phlegm is almost 0. Going by what you said people isolating and not isolating should have the same rate of symptoms which is a straight up lie.
Show me evidence of people isolating properly and developing corona like symptoms and dying out of the blue.

[Anonymous No.18040448]

>>18038423
I'm willing to give this a look with an open mind. Two things recently have given me this ability: the absolute blunder that was/is the lipid hypothesis has opened my eyes to the fact that the medical establishment can be 100% dead wrong and will silence all research that suggests it has been wrong.
Second is Grant Genereux's Extinguishing the Fires of Hell, which made me think the research on vitamin A points to exactly the opposite conclusions that have become foundational to modern vitamin theory.
I'm not saying you're right or not a nutcase, but I'll download and read your material. Thanks for posting, if anything else at least it's something interesting.

[Anonymous No.18040474]

>>18040282
in other words, think of it this way, and assume for the sake of argument that the testing yields a large number of false positives (as it indeed does, since it's a random number generator, and since there aren't any positives at all to begin with)
call "positively tested for the virus" for P, and symptomatic for S
then you have four possible outcomes for every person
1) only P, in other words someone asymptomatic gets told they have the virus despite appearing perfectly healthy, "trust me, I'm a doctor"
2) only S, the person is sick, but the random number generator says it's not the virus, so they're treated in other ways
3) both P and S, there will inevitably be a number of cases in which people both display symptoms and the number generator says they're positive, and these cases are the ones being touted as evidence for the reality of this contagion, but such cases are inevitable by the sheer virtue of numbers, some people are bound to both have respiratory symptoms due to lifestyle, toxic food, water, air, toxic environment, etc., as well as hitting the random number generator
4) neither P nor S, people who are clearly healthy, and managed not to hit the random number generator, and didn't end up becoming part of a laughable statistic

[Anonymous No.18040480]

>>18039456
Dude they deal with shit like aids and ebola on the regular without much access to medication
Corona is just a stronger flu bro
Africa has an average age below 30, they will be fine

[Anonymous No.18040553]

>>18040474
Alright broski, but I asked why the rate of symptoms differs in isolated/non-isolated people that consume the same food, water, air.

[Anonymous No.18040571]

>>18037957
Fuck chinks

[Anonymous No.18040574]

>>18040448
yep, all very true (although naturally occurring carotenoids in fruits, of which there are hundreds, are in fact very healthy), and glad to see someone whose eyes have been pried open by the farce that is the medical establishment
and that's a good attitude to have, that's actual open-mindedness, in contrast to the other person I spoke with
he said "I'm open-minded, but I refuse to even read this 3-page article"
you say "I'm open-minded, so I'll check out the information and see what I can find out"
that is true open-mindedness

[Anonymous No.18040657]

>>18040553
you cannot possibly control for that
some people might have bodily weaknesses they've inherited and not corrected, people who currently consume the exact same things and are exposed to the exact same environment could have vastly different backgrounds before the control time (e.g. one such person could have been a smoker, and it's well-known that many smokers don't start coughing up lots of phlegm until a while after they quite), but even the assumption that certain people really consume the exact same things and are exposed to the exact same environment is untenable, people tend to experience a large amount of variability in all those areas

[Anonymous No.18040727]

>>18040657
Yeah, it just so happens that people who stay inside alone during flu season and now corona season don't develop any flu/corona associated symptoms. It's all a big coincidence, ok? I think I'm done with this discussion.

[Anonymous No.18040759]

>>18040727
more erroneous reasoning, since as I've already explained, there are no clearly defined symptoms associated with it, some people test positive and are asymptomatic, while others are symptomatic and test negative, reread the comment where I explained that in detail

[Anonymous No.18040787]

>>18040727
>call "positively tested for the virus" for P, and symptomatic for S
>then you have four possible outcomes for every person
>1) only P, in other words someone asymptomatic gets told they have the virus despite appearing perfectly healthy, "trust me, I'm a doctor"
>2) only S, the person is sick, but the random number generator says it's not the virus, so they're treated in other ways
>3) both P and S, there will inevitably be a number of cases in which people both display symptoms and the number generator says they're positive, and these cases are the ones being touted as evidence for the reality of this contagion, but such cases are inevitable by the sheer virtue of numbers, some people are bound to both have respiratory symptoms due to lifestyle, toxic food, water, air, toxic environment, etc., as well as hitting the random number generator
>4) neither P nor S, people who are clearly healthy, and managed not to hit the random number generator, and didn't end up becoming part of a laughable statistic

[Anonymous No.18040808]

>>18037957
Joke's on you i unironically want to get infected

[Anonymous No.18040844]

>>18040759
>>18040787
You won't have any S in the population that stays isolated and you will have a lot of S in the population that doesn't. Regardless of what the computer program says you're infected or not with considering testing is faulty to begin with which I doubt.

[Anonymous No.18040854]

I like the corona crisis for the sole fact that people get to experience my life now.

[Anonymous No.18040893]

>>18040844
wrong, there will always be a ton of S in the population no matter how much they isolate, since the physical symptoms are caused by factors like lifestyle, what people consume, and the environment they're exposed to
conversely, there won't be a larger degree of people with such symptoms among people who don't isolate themselves
your reasoning is still based on the erroneous assumption that there exists pathogenic viruses and infectious disease, and that contagion is a real phenomenon, none of which is actually true

[Anonymous No.18041329]

>>18040893

Thanks for posting.
Very eye-opening material