[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 26 KB, 768x192, E1BBA344-13FA-4C62-A756-4AD5135F5C0C.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17529985 No.17529985 [Reply] [Original]

Imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $240.

>> No.17530003

>>17529985
>the real bitcoin
>BCash SV
pick one

>> No.17530013
File: 43 KB, 398x398, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17530013

Imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $240.

>> No.17530014

>>17530003
Why so salty, did you miss your chance on last little pump?:(

>> No.17530029

>>17530014
(You)

>> No.17530036

>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $400
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $300
--------You are here--------
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $200
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $100
>imagine not buying the real bitcoin under $1

>> No.17530530

>>17529985
Shitty fork of a shitcoin, kys

>> No.17530541

>>17530530
>giant cope because didnt buy at $80

>> No.17530623

>>17530541
I would never ever buy this shit, even if someone guarantee me 100x.

>> No.17531197

>>17530623
kek, stay poor.

>> No.17531230

BSV
>tends to centralized mining with terabyte blocks
>government can shut you down with censorship this way
>no validation of sound money by user, need to trust miners
>will end up being BTC Private where miners minted additional coins because noone was verifying blockchain
>not to mention all the Craig being a faggot, a fraud and lying

yeah, """real""" bitcoin

>> No.17531304

>>17531230
It's cute that you think the gubment can't shut down BTC if it wants to.

>> No.17531331
File: 140 KB, 705x515, whitepaper quotes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17531331

>>17531230
BTC
>digital gold not peer to peer electronic cash
>chain of hashes not chain of digital signatures
>payee can't verify chain of signatures
>thinks a node is something without hashpower
>thinks you need to run a node to verify transactions
>No Simple Payment verification
>replace by fee
>144mb/day adoption limit
>lightning network
>disabled op codes

>> No.17531413

>>17529985
Imagine still posting about Bsv for $2 / day in rupees instead of joining your poor fag bretheren on FRM which will do what XRB did and you will miss the boat YET. AGAIN.

>> No.17531640
File: 1.92 MB, 320x514, 38407829-10E9-4238-BB15-30E4F7E17A35.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17531640

>>17529985
Pic related - it’s the real Bitcoin and he hasn’t been $240 in YEARS

>> No.17531650
File: 80 KB, 642x749, 1558884944548.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17531650

>>17530623

>> No.17531679

>>17531304
it literally can't because everyone can have validation node in their home unlike in BSV

>>17531331
>implying whitepaper matter at this point
what BSV does wrong is that it perfomer hard fork and you need to trust miners. They could manipulate coins cap to 48 millions and people couldn't do anything. Even if Craig was satoshi it would be WORSE for BSV. BTC is a neutral protocol with community validating it's real money, in BSV you need to trust block explorer or miner...

>> No.17531705
File: 231 KB, 986x452, 1579072646871.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17531705

>>17531679
>bitcoin isn't specified by it's whitepaper

>bsv needs to trust miners
the irony is it's only with segwit and a lack of spv is there a need to trust miners

you need to trust miners to not make segwit transactions with hashes of arbitrary signatures.
you need to trust miners because without spv your transaction aren't peer to peer they're peer to miner to peer

>> No.17531728

>>17530036
Lad, we've been here before. It went to almost $450 then down the shitter. Creg is full of bullshit.
>Binance not shut down
>Bitcoin not kill EOY 2019
>BSV not $1200 EOY 2019
>BSV not the dominant chain
>No patents have been enforced

>> No.17531743

>>17529985
imagine not buying into the paypal founders coin at 7mil cap.

>> No.17531750

>>17531705
whitepaper is from 2009, literally beta. Why not stick to caves when there are houses?
In BTC when miner does something wrong he literally gets worthless shitcoins because user nodes verify it's wrong. He forks off.
We talking about situation where every user has spv because blocks are small and it's manageable. In Bitcoin miners don't have incentive to fork off, because they lose reward in BTC thanks to users veryfing blockchain.
In BSV you don't have that, can't do anything about forking off with 1 terabyte metanet blocks lol

>> No.17531774

>>17531705
you can literally run pre-segwit node and it's compatible with consensus.

>> No.17531857

Fuck the whitepaper. Its 10 years old now, everyone is hanging on to it as if its the bible. Piece of shit

>> No.17531877

>>17531750
>>17531857
>btc is not specified by the whitepaper
bsv is

>>17531774
irrelevant to everything I wrote

>> No.17531882

>>17529985
Fake pump

>> No.17531901

>>17531877
yeah, in bsv everything is irrelevant

>> No.17531914

>>17531857
fuck us constitution also then lmao

>> No.17531940

>>17531901
you say the whitepaper is irrelevant

>> No.17532048

>>17531940
how is it relevant when it was released before source code, it was literally introduction to bitcoin for cypherpunk community and nothing more. There was a lot of features that weren't mentioned in it. There's no coins cap in whitepaper, does it mean you can change it because it's right with whitepaper, what about difficulty algorithm being different than in whitepaper? Satoshi himself didn't bother to update the whitepaper later on as he was more focused on live code.

>> No.17532173

>>17532048
>bitcoin: peer to peer electronic cash
no it's digital gold
>we define a coin as a chain of digital signatures
segwit is not a chain of digital signatures it's a chain of hashes
>the payee can verify the chain of digital signatures
with segwit the payee gets a hash of a signature and can't
>each node works
non mining nodes are nodes
>you do not need to run a full node to verify transactions
if you increase the blocksize no one will run nodes to verify transactions

btc disagrees with nearly every aspect of the whitepaper.
btc has disabled most of the op codes
btc encourages use of an entirely different networks (lightning)


bsv is returning to the original difficulty adjustment period. I would've prefered it if they did it with genesis. I reckon if they did it now it would force miners to show their hands, the daa means miners don't have to commit to a chain
no I don't think the supply cap or op codes in the original implementation should be changed

I have no problem with a cryptocurrency aimed at being digital gold that has 144mb/day adoption limit, no chain of signatures, no op codes, segwit, replace by fee, pay 2 script hash, high fees, no 0 confirmation security but it's not bitcoin

>> No.17532212

>>17532173
your post doesn't make sense and doesn't refer to anything I posted, lol
you just write the same thing over and over again without thinking...

>> No.17532607

>>17531914
Fuck americucks in general, waste of air