/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.17521993]

>mfw all these nubizzers unironically thinking that they can win big on scams, either to get more chainlink or bitcoin or whatever than they otherwise could have or to "reinvest" on other scams
>mfw all these honorary pajeets participating in airdrops for scams
just throwing it out there that you guys are gonna get utterly destroyed
none of you have any principles and you'll have totally earned your impending sleepless nights spent on the spiraling staircase of the poorhouse of perpetual impoverishment

[Anonymous No.17522013]

>>17521993
There's no volume on it. It's literally just one pajeet spamming the board.

[Anonymous No.17522041]

>>17521993
Chainlink just hit a triple top, good luck with your scam.

[Anonymous No.17522045]

ROFLMAO!

you shouldn't use the word "scamlink" in the same sentence as bitcoin.

Bitcoin is a real project. scamlink is a fucking token. a token that the loser creator has 65% of the supply and is just waiting to dump bags on unsuspecting victims.


65%

[Anonymous No.17522253]

>>17522013
while the second >mfw does in fact refer to "nulink" and the airdrop threads put up by the retards running it, i'm also talking about stuff like vidt, harmony, pnk, and a bunch of other projects that are shilled and /biz/ for a month and then disappear that might have lukewarm futures a decade or so down the line, but whose only relevancy in the here and now is for their tokens to be the subject of pump-and-dump scams

>>17522041
do you care at all about the quality of this board? if you do, you're just encouraging more cigarette-combustion-residual-tier posts
i have heard—and as always, held through this rhetoric being spouted by so many flavor-of-the-month shitcoin promoters such an extraordinary number of goddamned times that it baffles me that there are so many newfags who haven't simply browsed through the warosu archives and noticed this format being played out
if you're part of a group that's been behind this shit since the days of the 2017 bullrun, you're gonna wind up living an awful, lonely life; if you operate on bad principles, you live a life in which reality punishes you

>>17522045
>TRIPLE line break
how's the sex over there in reddit gulch
i suppose a more relevant question would be "how are the streets over there in bombay"

[Anonymous No.17522277]

I have 250k of nulink, spent $2-3 bucks total.
OP is a Ching Chong Nig Nog

[Anonymous No.17522287]

>>17521993
>oracle SELLER, I'm telling you, bring me your most decentralised data!
>MY DATA IS TOO DECENTRALISED FOR YOU!

[Anonymous No.17522496]

>>17522277
the only application your particular massive bag of waste will ever have was to scam you out of ~$3
the absolute state of this board
i will say, your post reads like that which an unhygienic ninth-grader might make; i wouldn't be surprised in the least if you thought that going all-in of nulink was the best use of the $3 that you somehow managed to get into crypto

>>17522287
nice observation, top-tier lel

[Anonymous No.17522513]

>>17522253
I just want this place to move on to a new scam buzzword and scam token. Link already failed and it's dragging this entire place down.

[Anonymous No.17522551]

>>17522513
get new material

[Anonymous No.17522566]

>>17522513
Not gonna happen Durgesh

[Anonymous No.17522870]

>>17522551
Why?
>>17522566
Why not?

[Anonymous No.17523732]

>>17522870
first of all, "link already failed and it's dragging this entire place down" is not an argument of any sort, and it's observably false; LINK has so far arguably been one of the most interesting topics of discussion in all of 4chan's history (a literal band of technically inclined neets who have nearly given up on society changing their outlook entirely in being given a huge opportunity to invest in and become part of a technology that will change global commerce at an extremely fundamental level—trust)—and this is so totally obvious, given that the likes of you make it THE BENCHMARK OF REFERENCE for every one of the shitcoin scam projects that you may have a part in propagating, ALWAYS being dragged into your shilling as if the garbage you promote is even remotely comparable to to near-godliness of LINK. it would be DAMNED to argue that chainlink is not THE META for crypto discussion on /biz/ as a result of its enormous relevancy to the decentralization of finance; i would DIE to see a cretin like you try to put enough words together to attempt to make that argument—it would be like watching evolution in the making.
if link is a "buzzword" as you claim it is, then it's one of the most enduring and persistent "buzzwords" in all of crypto, ranking up there with bitcoin, ethereum, and monero—even fucking vitalik, who seems to hold resentment towards LINK (probably for its pretty much guaranteed overshadowing of ETH), has a damned hard time denying its immediate relevancy.

[Anonymous No.17523769]

>>17522870
first of all, "link already failed and it's dragging this entire place down" is not an argument of any sort, and it's observably false; LINK has so far arguably been one of the most interesting topics of discussion in all of 4chan's history (a literal band of technically inclined neets who have nearly given up on society changing their outlook entirely in being given a huge opportunity to invest in and become part of a technology that will change global commerce at an extremely fundamental level—trust)—and this is so totally obvious, given that the likes of you make it THE BENCHMARK OF REFERENCE for every one of the shitcoin scam projects that you may have a part in propagating, ALWAYS being dragged into your shilling as if the garbage you promote is even remotely comparable to to near-godliness of LINK. it would be DAMNED-NEAR IMPOSSIBLE to argue that chainlink is not THE META for crypto discussion on /biz/ as a result of its enormous relevancy to the decentralization of national, and international finance; i would DIE to see a cretin like you try to put enough words together to attempt to make that argument—it would be like watching evolution in the making.
if link is a "buzzword" as you claim it is, then it's one of the most enduring and persistent "buzzwords" in all of crypto, ranking up there with bitcoin, ethereum, and monero—even fucking vitalik, who seems to hold resentment towards LINK (probably for its pretty much guaranteed overshadowing of ETH), has a damned hard time denying its immediate relevancy.

[Anonymous No.17523770]

[Anonymous No.17523805]

>>17523769
Didn't even read that wall of vomit

[Anonymous No.17523863]

>>17523805
>no arguments
>"trolling"
it may surprise you, having been on such a long losing streak that you've forgotten what winning feels like—but trolling doesn't work if you're getting beat down like a post. stay stupid, cunt.