Imagine thinking after a scam vote that VIDT will fail

[Anonymous No.17381831]

I unironically, truly did “lose” 5k. But that was only because it pumped and I didn’t take profits. I’m still in the green.
>scam Binance vote CZ belongs in prison
Look at the facts anons, MBL pumped over 100% as soon as the news was announced about there being a vote. VIDT went up, but maybe 10% or something. They both had somewhere around $5 - $8m market cap at that time.
>after the vote
MBL down 42% in past 3 days
VIDT down 34% in past 3 days
>why VIDT is a great investment at this price
- Already being used in large scale industrial operations to track important data
- VIDT has a low max circulating supply of 47m and most already circulating (41m)
- They already have a business that has revenue. That’s why they already have so many business partners or collaborators, whatever you want to call them.
- Mini market cap with more collabs in the near future and a meetup in less than a week.
>This dip is a blessing
I’m loading up at this price and will keep loading if it goes down.

[Anonymous No.17381864]

>I’m loading up at this price and will keep loading if it goes down.

Spoken like a true cuck

[Anonymous No.17381903]

>>17381831
>but maybe 10% or something.
13c to 25c
Nice try.

[Anonymous No.17381933]

give up, it's dead.

[Anonymous No.17382049]

>>17381933
Like all the other crypto that has some the same thing

People like you didn't buy Link when it went from $1.50 to $0.15

[Anonymous No.17382063]

>>17381903
Dude. Cant you read? Hes talking about the price movement directly after announcing the vote.
MBL pumped immediately 100% and had suddenly a volume of 100M+ and Vidt had organic growth
They manipulated the price and volume in order to have a higher airdrop reward. BNB Holders voted for MBL because they dont care about the coin they just want a higher airdrop.
I hope they sold their pathetic airdrop now that its down almost 50%

[Anonymous No.17382272]

mbl pumping now

[Anonymous No.17382768]

>>17382272
-40% OH NONONONNONONONO

[Anonymous No.17382894]

>>17381831
> why VIDT is a great investment at this price
> - Already being used in large scale industrial operations to track important data
> - VIDT has a low max circulating supply of 47m and most already circulating (41m)
> - They already have a business that has revenue. That’s why they already have so many business partners or collaborators, whatever you want to call them.
this is all that matters, stfu with that binance garbage, it's like a retirement home for low caps desu
but I too am loading up to offset losing 5k, unironically expecting this to soar like it's 2017

[Anonymous No.17382941]

did it just now get not voted for?
ill load up in 2 weeks from now

[Anonymous No.17383123]

>>17382941
yes, vote ended 2 days ago and selfishly I could not have asked for a better outcome

[Anonymous No.17383148]

>>17381831
token not needed faggot. Imagine doubling down on that horsehite.

[Anonymous No.17383193]

>>17383148
Imagine being a tribal biz loser? You'll never make it with your mentality

[Anonymous No.17383422]

>>17383193
So do companies actually buy this token and use it for validation? Can someone explain this to a brainlet

[Anonymous No.17383511]

>>17383422
yes, no offense but the beauty of it all is brainlets can grasp it. Have a look for yourself: https://about.v-id.org/token/

[Anonymous No.17383547]

>>17383511
even boomer can understand the concept of vidt

Its just wonderful

[Anonymous No.17383681]

>>17383511
>>17383547
But how much would a company actually pay for a single validation? I'm not convinced it could be that high

[Anonymous No.17383794]

It's obvious that companies are not paying full-price for the tokens, otherwise AmSpec alone would generate one million dollars for V-ID and they wouldn't have had to unlock tokens.

[Anonymous No.17383821]

>>17383794
they have different payments plans on their site, for small brick and mortar businesses and for large scale companies/corporations. it’s literally on the site retard

[Anonymous No.17383831]

>>17383821

[Anonymous No.17384632]

>>17381831
Imagine thinking a blockchain whose only use case can be done by several other blockchains as a side project will succeed

[Anonymous No.17385322]

all the acronis fud is baseless. they have so many hidden fees and you pay waaaay more+the vidt team has already adressed this. funny how all the fudders went silent but not only that you all said its a great token when vidt was anounced it will be up for a vote.

[Anonymous No.17385395]

I bought more on the hard dip. Feels good. The Vidt team is too based to still not get on Binance. More announcements coming.

[Anonymous No.17385588]

What is one validation actually worth?

[Anonymous No.17385596]

they all lied, said about some gov projects and afghan gov, nothing, said about some global hardware player, nothing, just a scam, it was all to pump and dump

[Anonymous No.17385611]

>>17385322
>the vidt team has already adressed this
no they didn't, they permaban on telegram if you speak about acronis, no more lying poojeet

[Anonymous No.17385619]

>>17385322
>they have so many hidden fees and you pay waaaay more+the vidt team has already adressed this.
1. Name the hidden fees.
2. Quote the team. Also, V-ID will obviously never admit to Acronis being better.

>but not only that you all said its a great token when vidt was anounced it will be up for a vote.
Buy the rumor, sell the news.

[Anonymous No.17386048]

>>17385619
literally nobody will say acronis is better but you, lol. you are comparing two noncompeting entities.
you get btfo time after time, it's really just sad how devoted you are to this one low IQ strategy. let me repeat this because you have tethered yourself to the dumbest of takes:
literally nobody will say acronis is better but you, lol. you are comparing two noncompeting entities.
you get btfo time after time, it's really just sad how devoted you are to this one low IQ strategy.
>>17385619
ignore the lone, single, sneaky, relentless fudder, find the gem

[Anonymous No.17386115]

god i cant wait to dump this shit if i ever get back to BEP

fucking validating papers you faggots there will never be any liquidity. cool, it will work. but it wont do any volume and there wont be constant demand. vidt is a faggot coin. cap this please. never ever ever ever over 30 cents

[Anonymous No.17386167]

>>17385611
i have verified that you are a retard, but it's fun to imagine going to a telegram about an investment, not reading whatever info is surely provided in the channel, instead pasting fud from biz and hoping to be taken as anything other than a dweeb
no seriously, imagine you are investing money -- not your weekly allowance, let's say at least $50 -- and you literally are asking about the dumbest of repeated fud from biz of all places topkek
not asking something you really want to know about because it makes so much sense it escapes your IQ, but the corniest of all biz fud. the lowest tier of reached, recycled, so debunked you can look it up yourself type of trash
i want you to save your hard earned lunch money so the next time you have that inkling with anything you want to invest in, just don't invest in it. keep your lunchables fund or ask the off meds incel posting the same brainlet material time and time again to give you advice or share his bags
>>17385596
>he thinks a real business goes from announcement of a project to production in the same quarter
keep the lunchable money

[Anonymous No.17386189]

>>17386115
>this brainlet said BEP
>he uses binance dex
ahAhAhAhAhaha
>there wont be constant demand
>he thinks people don't know how to read etherscan
well, maybe you dont. BEP topfuckingkek

[Anonymous No.17386232]

>>17386189
break even you fucking un-educated 14 year old. where's the volume? where's the demand? where's the missing 50% of the market cap that was there 4 days ago?

[Anonymous No.17386306]

>>17386048
You made it all up. There are no fees and V-ID's only appeal is in them working with companies one-on-one. A single competent IT person can replace V-ID's customer service for a fraction of the cost. Training companies how to validate on the blockchain can be done in two weeks tops and is not something worth paying premium for year after year.

>>17386167
>>17386189
Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.17386360]

>>17386306
>A single competent IT person can replace V-ID's customer service for a fraction of the cost. Training companies how to validate on the blockchain can be done in two weeks tops and is not something worth paying premium for year after year.
?
so why have you spent hundreds of cumulative hours for the past year fudding this (incl on multiple ids in this thread) instead of copy pasting the idea to make money?
oh that's right you don't like logic
but do answer definitely please

[Anonymous No.17386370]

>>17386360
>(incl on multiple ids in this thread)
Take your meds.