IOTA BENDS THE KNEE

[Anonymous No.17242870]

https://status.iota.org/

>Investigating stolen funds on Mainnet
>Currently the Coordinator is halted until further notice to investigate reported issues with stolen funds. We ask you to keep the Trinity wallet closed for now until further notice.

>February 14th 2020 - 09:50

>We have found the exploit and are now working on resolving the issue. As expected, the exploit is related to the (user-facing) Trinity Wallet. The IOTA core protocol is - as already communicated before - not breached.

>We know that you would like to understand more details, but ask you to refrain from questions towards the Community Moderators due to the parallel ongoing coaction with law enforcement. The teams are currently developing the mitigation strategy. We will share all details about the exploit in due time and (of course) publish a complete incident analysis as well.

THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE TRUE DAG
THERE CAN ONLY BE NANO

[Anonymous No.17243245]

>>17242870
LOL

[Anonymous No.17243524]

>>17243245
I really hope none of you funny fuckers are in this centralized shitcoin

[Anonymous No.17243904]

[Anonymous No.17243960]

>>17243904
Inshallah brothers

[Anonymous No.17244246]

>>17243960
IOTA ACKBAAAAR

[Anonymous No.17244309]

>>17242870
old

[Anonymous No.17244426]

>>17244309
>February 14th 2020 - 09:50

[Anonymous No.17244952]

thanks for buying my bags in Jan 18, brainlets

[Anonymous No.17244987]

>>17244952
>to clarify, IOTA bags
NANO is THE cryptocurrency.

[Anonymous No.17245171]

>>17242870
professional response, quick fix, to the moon we go! choo choo!

[Anonymous No.17245222]

Continuing to fill my bags throughout crisis. The market hasn't even flinched in response because the iota investor crowd is as resilient as IOTA itself.

[Anonymous No.17245239]

>>17242870
hm yea sorry its not shitty raiblocks its fantom lmao

[Anonymous No.17245261]

>>17245171
All I ask, is but for you to kneel.

[Anonymous No.17245302]

>>17245239
You on the other hand, will not even be given the option.

[Anonymous No.17245305]

>>17245222
>the iota investor crowd is as rertarded as IOTA itself.
ftfy, nice trips

[Anonymous No.17245337]

>>17245261
Notice how IOTA is right where the prostate would be? Can't make this shit up.

[Anonymous No.17245808]

>>17245222
>network down
>cannot transfer to exchanges
>market hasn't flinched
serious cope, my guy

[Anonymous No.17245962]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3LvZAZ-HV4
>You hear that giant sucking sound? WHOOOSH! That is the sound of half of IOTA's marketcap being absorbed by NANO.

[Anonymous No.17246082]

>>17245808
Traders tend to keep their funds on exchanges; hodlers tend to keep their funds in wallets. If there was going to be a significant market reaction, we would have seen it. The good news far outweighs the bad here. Coordinated attacks have been made in the past against most other crypto. IF is handling this as transparently and professionally as anyone could hope.

[Anonymous No.17246318]

>>17243524
>reddit tabs
How am i supposed to take you seriously?

[Anonymous No.17246346]

>>17246082
hodlers generally dont like to hodl when their centralized coin gets both hacked and disabled by the devs. I don't really hate IOTA that much, I think it may have potential, but until they go through puberty and become fully decentralized they are just another project that is yet to live up to its expectations. After NANO moons again, if IOTA is still on the cheap, and they actually can reach decentral status, I will throw in a few chips. Same with FTM. But both of these projects have some things to prove first.

[Anonymous No.17246364]

>>17246318
bro do u see how many tabs I have open. That is one window of 7, and one browser of 3. I use every resource available to me. I only play vintage games too.

[Anonymous No.17246755]

>>17246346
The thing about nano is that it's rendered completely redundant by IOTA. IOTA is superior in every way. You can't do no-value data transactions with nano and there are no smart contracts in the roadmap. Furthermore, IOTA post-coordicide will be the world's first truly decentralized coin, while Nano relies mainly on a dpos like centralized bunch of servers with voting power proportionate to the number of nano held effectively creating a plutocracy with 80% of voting power held by devs. Then there's partnerships... I could go on and on but suffice to say that NANO falls short on every conceivable metric. IOTA is the superior coin.

[Anonymous No.17246797]

>>17246346
ugh can we please stop posting these monsters? The meme is fucking lame and looking at those revolting jokes of human beings makes me physically ill

[Anonymous No.17247135]

>>17246755
IOTA is centralized, bloated, requires a coordinator, is backdoored by the devs (just in case), and the whole network has just been frozen.

Decentralized my ass. NANO works NOW.

[Anonymous No.17247178]

>>17246755
80% of voting power by devs? Nano devs only kept 5% of the supply. They currently only have maybe 2% or less. You got some of your other info correct, such as NANO being purely for value transfers. This allows it to infinitely scale pretty much. Smart contracts can be executed via central services or in tandem with decentralized ones. The best tools are those that are specific for certain tasks.

One last question for you. I can send any amount of Nano, from fractions of a penny, to hundreds of thousands of dollars, with less than a second for full confirmation, without a single fraction of a penny as a fee for either.

Can you do that with IOTA right now? Why not?

[Anonymous No.17248004]

>>17247178
I am waiting... and as someone who uses Nano, waiting is not something I prefer to do.

[Anonymous No.17248330]

>>17245222
>>17246082
>>17246755
>high-tier shitposting

[Anonymous No.17248449]

>>17242870
ONE DAG TO RULE THEM ALL,
ONE DAG TO FIND THEM,
ONE DAG TO BRING THEM ALL,
AND IN THE BLOCKCHAIN BIND THEN

[Anonymous No.17248542]

>>17248449
Blockchains matter too bro