I do not think LINK will even 2x your money at this point

[Anonymous No.17150384]

LINK has entered the 1 billion club, right. And just think, only 3 cryptos in the world have a market cap pass 10 billion right now. So at best, LINK will 10x your money.
>10x my Money???? sign me up right now!
well, just think about who LINK is exactly competiting against now.

These arnt the days where LINK was a sub 80 market cap coin and their own competitors was shit like FUN, REQ, SIA or WALT. Not even NEO anymore.

No, in order LINK to even reach a 2 billion market cap, LINK would have to prove it has more use than Stellar, Cardano, Tezos and biggest one Monero. Those coins are infinitely more useful than a REQ, Tierion, or Holo. Its going to be extremely difficult for LINK to prove its merit over those coins.

And even if you do 2x your money with LINK, you are going to have to prove you are worth more than Binance coin; probably the biggest normie exchange ever next to coinbase.

To 3x your money, LINK has to have more merit than both bitcoin forks and EOS

im not going to comment on the probability giant centralized institutions will use the ChainLink network over their own oracle solutions. I am just giving the facts.

For LINK to even 5x your money, the market has to be proven it has more use cases than half of the top 5 cryrptos in the world.

[Anonymous No.17150390]

>>17150384
>top 5
top 10*

[Anonymous No.17150401]

>>17150384
Link was at 1bil like 5 months ago and 700mil 4 months ago. It’ll retrace.

[Anonymous No.17150415]

>>17150384
You typed this post the same way you type ya pnk post. sloopy job abnash!

[Anonymous No.17150432]

>>17150384
a 1 billion market cap at the near bottom of a bull market is nothing

[Anonymous No.17150458]

>>17150384
bro NEO was 10bn

[Anonymous No.17150498]

>>17150432
>>17150458
you are talking about an overrall bullrun market.

If the whole market is in a bullrun, that means there is 0 point in holding LINK over any other coin, since every other coin would go up with it.

think of it this way, lets say every single coin 10x right now, and LINK was 10 billion market cap. For LINK to go to 20 billion, it would have to prove its usecases to the market is greatar than Stellar, Cardana, Tezos, and Monero. And those whales are not giving up their stash

[Anonymous No.17150535]

>>17150498
>it would have to prove its usecases to the market is greatar than Stellar, Cardana, Tezos, and Monero
this is what we've been betting on for 2.5 years, welcome

[Anonymous No.17150538]

>>17150498
you're literally retarded

[Anonymous No.17150550]

>>17150498
Nekk yourself idiot

[Anonymous No.17150553]

Until there is a working product, it's all speculation. Imagine you're standing on a boat. A small boat. On the ocean. Now put 30 cats on that boat. Those cats represent your fellow traders/ "investors"/ speculators. Now introduce some kind of volitility. Could be a wave, could be a distant helicopter, could be a lightning storm, could be the gentle lapping of the waves against the boat or the cracking open of an ice cold beer. How do the cats react? Is there any rhyme or reason to the apparent chaos they're feeling? Is there any genuinely reliable information we can learn from our fellow traders, the cats, apart from apparent serenity one minute and mindless panic the next? Of course not.

Crypto trading makes as much sense as those cats' reactions do on that little boat.

[Anonymous No.17150592]

>>17150498
>it would have to prove its usecases to the market is greatar than Stellar, Cardana, Tezos, and Monero
That's the plan.

[Anonymous No.17150598]

>>17150498
No one is going to buy your pathetically weak fud just so you can buy in at $3 you tremendous and boisterous faggot

[Anonymous No.17150662]

>>17150498
>>17150535
It's not even gambling when you can see and understand what Sergey is doing.

[Anonymous No.17150747]

>>17150498
>there is 0 point in holding LINK over any other coin
lol
bullshit
link went from a top 90 to a top 20 over the course of a year
the price is tied to sats less and less as network usage grows (currently 2nd most gas consumer) and a single unit becomes more scarce.

[Anonymous No.17150781]

Fcking absolute state of biz. Thus is the most retarded fud I seen. At least oldfag puts in a semi effort.

[Anonymous No.17150798]

>>17150384
This post alone makes me want to go all in on chainlink

[Anonymous No.17150809]

>>17150781
agreed this is very low effort FUD.

also all tripfags should be ignored until roped

[Anonymous No.17150853]

>>17150535
No. LINK has been competiting against sub 20 marketcap coins. Really think about LINKs competition a year ago. For LINK to jump from rank 90 to rank 20, it had to beat Digibytes, Kucoin, Waves, Omisego, Algoran, DOGE COIN, Nexo, Sia coin

Do those coins sound like fierce competition? Is it really such an amazing feat LINK is worth more than a Decred or Lisk?

Now, in order for LINK to 2x your money right now, LINK has to be worth more than Monero and or Stellar. And Stellar is partnered with IBM.

>>17150538
not an argument
>>17150550
not an argugment

>>17150553
I only respond to crypto analogies and crypto facts, not Aristotle metaphors

>>17150592
okay, but you do realize all those coins have 100x more use cases than the type of coins LINK has been competing againt, right?

>>17150598
not an argument

>>17150662
And you do not see how easy it is for a company to make their own private oracles.
Linkies think Chainlink is the only thing that can be an oracle. Wrong.

>>17150747
see above

>>17150798
not an argument

>>17150809
you do not know what a tripfag is if you think im using a trip

[Anonymous No.17150937]

>>17150384
Your fallacy is thinking the crypto market cap won’t change, you’re wrong.

[Anonymous No.17150960]

Your a self defeatist loser op . The market grows = chainlink grows

[Anonymous No.17150970]

>>17150937
Link has a 1.1 billion dollar market cap right now.

Monero has a 1.4
Stellar has 1.4
Tron has a 1.4
Tezos has 1.5

For LINK to 2x your money right now, it would have to prove to be better than all of those coins

>BUT ANON, ALL THOSE COINS HAD 10+ BILLION MARKET CAPS AT ONE POINT
in. a. bull. run.

If we are in a bull run right now, every single coin will go up, whether you hold chainlink or not.

>>17150960
yes. if the market grows, that means all the coin above chainlink will moon with chainlink; meaning chainlink has no purpose to be held over something like Monero.

[Anonymous No.17150987]

durrrrr burrrrrrrrr durrrrrrrr blurp blrurrrrrrrrp durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

[Anonymous No.17150989]

>>17150987
not an argument

[Anonymous No.17151010]

>>17150747
Bingo

[Anonymous No.17151034]

>>17150970
Link has a 1.1 billion dollar market cap right now.

Monero has a 1.4
Stellar has 1.4
Tron has a 1.4
Tezos has 1.5

For LINK to 2x your money right now, it would have to prove to be better than all of those coins

>BUT ANON, ALL THOSE COINS HAD 10+ BILLION MARKET CAPS AT ONE POINT
in. a. bull. run.

>Youre proving LINK is bullish AS FUCK. LINK has never been below 17/18 ATH's through ALL the bear markets. ur shit coins P.U.M.P.E.D H.A.R.D. LINK didnt and look where we are today. The tortise wins the race faggot. You're proving yourself wrong,lol.

[Anonymous No.17151036]

>>17151010
you are stating that fallacy that going from #90 on market caps to #20 is harder than a #20 going to #5 in crypto.

This is wrong. pls read here>>17150853

[Anonymous No.17151040]

>>17150853
this shits a literal ocean of api's becoming public
if you don't see the value then nobody has time explaining it to you.

[Anonymous No.17151059]

>>17151040
Im not here to debate the use of "decentralized oracles" as opposed to companies making their own oracles for the blockchain

I am stating the simple fact. For LINK to reach 2 billion market cap right now, it would have to be proven bettwe than Stellar, Monero, Tron, and Tezos since those coins are ranked higher and are 1.5 billion market caps

[Anonymous No.17151062]

>>17150498
>it would have to prove
It already has. Multiple times retard

[Anonymous No.17151070]

>>17151036
I see you conveniently skipped the second point he made of chainlink being the current number 2 consumer of gas soon enough it will be number it is a given with its use case try making better fud or go through the archives for some copypasta u absolute bait fag

[Anonymous No.17151073]

>>17151062
Exactly. He is saying LINK isn't enough of a buzzword for boomers right now to buy in.Who cares?

[Anonymous No.17151090]

>>17151062
But can you accept that it will be 10x harder for LINK to prove to the market is has more use cases than the top 20 coins than say a KuCoin or Omisego?

>>17151070
i did not skip it. Its a mute point. None of the top 20 coins use Ethereum gas. they do not need Ethereum gas at all so there is no comparison.

>>17151073
>who cares
Who do you think controls all the money right now, the millenials or the boomers?

[Anonymous No.17151225]

>>17150853
>Stellar is partnered with IBM
This means literally nothing, IBM's entire blockchain team is ready to leave them because the company is full of boomers who have no vision and don't understand the potential of crypto. There is barely anything stopping a bunch of institutions from preferring LINK overnight and creating many use cases just because institutions suddenly understanding the security of the service LINK provides and then seeing that they have meme attention from MIT, Cornell etc.

[Anonymous No.17151251]

>>17150384
post screenshots of filled Link sell orders

[Anonymous No.17151290]

>>17151225
IBM is partnered with Stellar, and thats beside the point, LINK would still have to prove its worth more than Monero, Tron, Cardano, and Tezos to double your money.
>There is barely anything stopping a bunch of institutions from preferring LINK overnight and creating many use cases just because institutions suddenly

yes, and there is nothing stopping institutions from announcing their own oracle system overnight either because Chainlink has never once been tested in a real market.
>>17151251
never owned. Just doing this inb4 LINK stays sub 10 market cap for the next 5 years

[Anonymous No.17151409]

>>17151290
>there is nothing stopping institutions from announcing their own oracle system overnight
I think you are underestimating how incompetent institutions are when it comes to figuring out how to use crypto and how much of an advantage companies who are in any particular space already have. The fact that Chainlink has been working at solving this issue for years now and has a team of respected academics means that any big corporation will be predisposed to using them instead.

That's why everyone holding LINK bet on them. So far it's working based on all the puff articles I've seen in Forbes, Yahoo Finance and Business Insider from 2019.

[Anonymous No.17151461]

>>17151409
You are under the indication that LINK is some how the only thing that can solve an oracle problem. You think every single major company in the world is going to agree with LINK's oracle system that is not even decentralized. All the major firms will use the KYC feature and only trust KYC sources which is not decentralized, and there is no point in doing this instead of just making their own oracle systems whcih is nothing more than a parser. LINK is far from the only oracle solution in crypto, look at REP and RLC.

Everyone laughs at RLC now because its sub 90 market cap. But LINKies do not find it ironic even though they were sub 90 market caps at one point.

I do not even own any RLC at all even. I am just saying, the road from rank 20 market cap to rank 10 is going to be much much much like 100x harder than to go from rank 90 to rank 10.

The only thing LINKies can shill over REP and RLC is their google connection. You want to know what other coin had the same nepotism? Litecoin. And LINKies do not see any fault or scam in the fact the only thing that boosts their price is nepotism. They do not even know what other oracle solutions there are like RLC and REP

[Anonymous No.17151497]

>>17150384
You are a complete retard. If link is a complete miserable failure it will only go to $300. That number is literal retard fud. There is no logic in existence to refute this. You are a dumb piece of shit and the fact that you think anything else is even remotely possible invalidates any other opinions

[Anonymous No.17151519]

>>17150384
Low IQ post from a low net worth brainlet.

DRNS

[Anonymous No.17151544]

>>17151497
>it will only go to $300
based on what?

I think LINK at this point will only go up if the whole market goes up. I do not see LINK beating Monero, Tron, Cardano, or Tezos. And I especially do not see LINK over taking the Bitcoin forks. All of which would be required for LINK to 10x people monies right now.

I especially do not see this, when companies can do their own parser to create oracle systems, as the major financial institutions do not see a big emphasis on decentralization. And also, RLC is a more decentralized oracle service than LINK

>>17151519
i have $400,000

[Anonymous No.17151546]

>>17151090
Tether uses gas u absolute faggot last time I reply get fucked with your no make it stack nulinker

[Anonymous No.17151553]

>>17151546
Tether is not an investment. Tether is Tether

[Anonymous No.17151579]

>>17151461
Not all the major companies agree with the decentralized oracle system, but so far all the centralized projects have been abysmal failures. And when it comes to the decentralized systems you just mentioned, no one will touch Augur because of the possible bad legal press associated with it and RLC hasn't gotten much institutional press. You're also wrong about all institutions preferring centralization, there are many project heads who believe decentralization is the future.

LINK was getting media attention from MIT back when it was still a shitcoin with almost no value, show me RLC having that happen and maybe I would take it seriously. Chainlink has gotten way more attention than just the Google thing, just do a Google search and see how many articles about it can be found in major finance publications.

Something that even the Linkies don't seem to talk about much is that many institutions are going to just go with whatever company appears to be leading a particular field, check all the boxes for academic respectability and have decent press in financial media. LINK has all of those, therefore it is currently the most logical bet if you are taking a guess about who an institution might pick to help them run an oracle system.

[Anonymous No.17151595]

>>17150384
Don’t try to is logic most link holders are retards waiting to get rich it’s literally a pyramid scheme. Everyone is waiting for staking which will not happen anytime soon

[Anonymous No.17151630]

>>17151579
At least centralized systems have been tested before and you can study and see the faults. LINK has had 0 commercial use at all. No one has any idea if we tried LINK out right now, that it wouldnt be a total catastrophic failure.
Yes. LINK has gone up through pure nepotism. Sergey has big connections. His connection to swift is impressive, but sergey has been in the crypto gain for a long time. hes been the ceo of a crypto company before link, where he amass a shit ton just to fund his connection with SWIFT.

To say RLC is a LINK killer isnt a batshit insane statement.

>>17151595
i know. i want to do an inb4 years in advance, when its 2021, and LINK still hasnt breached the top 10 market caps. Even if im wrong, at least it would make LINK's feat all the more pressive seeing how much of hurdle it will be.

[Anonymous No.17151631]

>>17151544
Your logic makes no sense. Link has more speculative value than most of the top 10 caps right now. Whether you like it or not, speculation drives crypto. On the other hand, link has more real potential value, IF the project can realize what its suppose to do.

You’re asking marines to prove link will pump harder than the other top 1-16.... we can’t. But then again, you can’t prove it won’t either.

Link has more room to grow, best chart in all of crypto. So fuck off fren, we’re not selling. Too much tax to pay, would re set my long term capital tax status too. Gladly accept a 10x, instead of holding shit like Trx

[Anonymous No.17151639]

>>17150384

Well it’s a scam so i doubt it will 10x since people are wising up

[Anonymous No.17151643]

>people unironically responding to a nu link holder fudding his own bags so he can understand link better since he didn't do his research

yikes buddy

[Anonymous No.17151669]

>>17150384

The problem with link is it’s just another scam coin with no use case other than tricking noobs into purchasing it to sell it back to another round of incoming noobs.

The only altcoin worth anything is monero. Deal with it dumb fucks.

[Anonymous No.17151679]

>>17151643
Nah, just shit posting to pass the time. Everyone’s waiting for the next leg up.

[Anonymous No.17151687]

How can someone post such a sit tread...

[Anonymous No.17151704]

>>17151643
>Anyone who doesn't shill my shitcoin is actually a holder who is FUDing on a Mongolian throat singing forum with a grand total of 50 non-shill posters.
Seems like a legitimate thing to do and totally not a waste of time. Thanks for opening my eyes Anon!

[Anonymous No.17151717]

>>17150384
>he doesnt know
LINK is the only crypto with any real world use, and your dumb ass is in luck, because it’s dragging the rest of crypto with it into the real world. Its market cap will be more than all other coins combined, and without LINK those other coins would go to zero. It is THE missing piece to this puzzle.

[Anonymous No.17151736]

>>17150384
fuck
an intelligent investor on my /biz/? how did this happen

[Anonymous No.17151747]

>>17151717
if the oracle problem was such a big deal, Vitalik would be working on implementing it to Ethereum 1st thing. The hard truth is the oracle problem is a fantasy Linkies have in their head. They think Oracles is some mystified legend that is ungodly and like nothing before it. when its not. Even though Vitalik is notorious for undermining values, he said the oracle problem is not even worth 30 million dollars. All the swift and google partnerships is 100% connections and nothing more. if you were to ask the CEO of google what he thinks chainlink, he could not give the slightest fuck.

[Anonymous No.17151757]

Why are people still here continuing ruddying link I don’t get it haha

[Anonymous No.17151759]

>>17150384
Bought at 0.5
isn't it like 3$ now?
Chain link gave me 6x, lets suppose it reaches 4.5$, now that my friend is 9x FOR ME!
You are a big guy for trying to fud.
I told everyone the other day, board was just to euphoric on chainlink, and then later in the evening you see swinglinkers show up. Today we get you. Prepare to see post like these till 2 dollars. Cycles never changed, but shitposters change.
All the nonsense you talk about market cap, forget it. Market cap is nothing in crypto.
btw, good job for getting fags involved in stupid discussion.

[Anonymous No.17151776]

>>17151747
Vitalik doesnt want the Oracle problem solved because it means people dont have to hold his digital cryptographic super money to use smart contracts on his platform. How smooth is your brain, exactly?

[Anonymous No.17151790]

>>17151630
Centralized systems are not the future, the potential reward of controlling markets worth trillions means someone will eventually figure out how to replace them with more efficient decentralized. You are right that there is a lot for LINK to overcome if they want to succeed but they are the best placed to actually make it.

The connections Sergey has will mean his company gets to the table before anyone like RLC was even considered. Unless RLC pulls off a super important use case I can't see it happening, networking is everything in business even if your product isn't the best.

[Anonymous No.17151791]

>>17151747
>mentioning old fud that has been dealt with over and over.
How much link do you have fren?

[Anonymous No.17151794]

>>17151759
Good for you. Do you own 7 million dollars hoping to turn that into 10? if not, fuck off. because a 30% increase means nothing.

Just because LINK went from rank 90 to rank 20, means nothing. LINK had all the connections in the world. SWIFT and GOOGLE had to step in and say they are using LINK just for it to reach rank 20. if the SWIFT and Google connection didnt exist, LINK would fuck off to sub rank 100. Crypto rank 20 to 90 are the shittiest of shit coins ever. shit like Omisego, Kucoin, Doge, were LINKs competition.

>>17151776
LINK is 100% dependent on Ethereum right now. its only a theory of it even migrating off ethereum kek.

[Anonymous No.17151799]

>>17151747
Get it through the thick skull of yours. The value of link right now is speculative. Crypto is overall still speculative. Your dumb ass logic can be applied to almost all of the top 16 in front of link right now. Vitalitk sold, Charlie lee sold, booth thought it was over valued. We don’t care what he thinks about the value of an Oracle. Speculation and the market will drive up price. Real world adaptation and usage will stabilize. If Sergey never finish the project, then you gtfo before the nulinkers.

[Anonymous No.17151800]

>>17151794
The solution to the oracle problem will be worth more than all of crypto

[Anonymous No.17151804]

>>17151790
>centralized systems are not the future
Chainlink uses KYC centralization.
>KYC is optional
then its vulnerable to sybil attacks
>Then use KYC then
THEN ITS NOT DECENTRALIZATION

>>17151791
I have $400,000 in crypto right now.

[Anonymous No.17151811]

>>17151794
Yeah smooth brain confirmed. You don’t understand what “blockchain agnostic” means despite having it crammed down your throat in every LINK thread since 2017. Do me a favor? Dont buy any LINK, and if you have any, sell it.

[Anonymous No.17151820]

>>17151799
> The value of link right now is speculative.
no its not. All of LINK's value is 100% having to do with the SWIFT and Google partnership and you know it. Speculating would be the market hoping LINK becomes partnered with Google one day. When LINK already is. There no more news that will boost LINK as high as Google using it.

If the top 16 coins got a google partnership announcement right now, they would shoot through the roof

[Anonymous No.17151822]

>>17151794
I can’t wait 10 years from now when you COPE so hard you eat lead. I made a 5x already, try gaining some money.

[Anonymous No.17151835]

>>17151804
Go ahead and explain to me what you think a sybil attack is. I need a good laugh.

[Anonymous No.17151856]

>>17151822
Okay, i have $400,000, so try to catch up with me first. I can say the same to you. What if LINK stagnates in sub 10 market caps for the next 10 years?

You do realize, top 10 coins like Monero all started a low level market ranks just like LINK. LINK isnt some special coin

>>17151835
You explain first how a crypto wont be vulnerable to sybil attacks if its not KYC centralized under Link's system

[Anonymous No.17151861]

You're retarded but I'm not even bother explaining why. I could get into first moving network effect, blockchain agnostic dynamics, the speculative impact of inevitable legacy enterprises announcements, derivatives, the coming smart contracts bubble, etc. But all logical arguments could be reduced to kek wills it and only a fool would bet against kek.

[Anonymous No.17151867]

This is a fucking LINK board and your faggot fud isn't going to stop a massive breakout on the logarithmic bullflag that's been being painted for months.

LINK in it's current infant state is FAR more useful then a Bitcoin fork and one people realize ripple is doing NOTHING, it's gonna be top 3.

OP's a faggot as usual, sage

[Anonymous No.17151873]

>>17150384
the old 'market cap of a is b so c can never go higher than d' has historically not been a very good one

[Anonymous No.17151875]

>>17151820
Fren, do you have brain damage? Link is pre revenue right now. How do you value a company, a network, a product or service when its incomplete, zero income besides token sells? Link price is purely speculative. What do you think VCs do? You go from link will pump less than the other coins, to now link is all pumped out. Make up your mind.

[Anonymous No.17151882]

>>17151875
>Link is pre revenue right now.
I did not realize ChainLink is company in the stock market and only goes up based on company revenue instead of it being a token

:^)

[Anonymous No.17151889]

>>17151856
I asked you first, because the sybil attack fud has always been based on a complete misunderstanding of ChainLink and crypto in general. Tell me what a sybil attack is in your own words.
>dis gon b gud

[Anonymous No.17151892]

>>17151873
i am simply proposing, it would be a lot more impressive if LINK surpasses a coin like Monero in marketcaps than LINK surpassing a shitcoin like Lisk

[Anonymous No.17151905]

>>17151867
Chainlink will never be top 3

[Anonymous No.17151906]

>>17151736
And yet I guarantee that you both hold LINK yourselves.

[Anonymous No.17151913]

>>17151889
The reason why its popular FUD is because no Linkie has ever given a rebuttle at all to it. Its never been disproven.

If you are not KYC centralized on the chainlink network, you are vulnerable to sybil attacks. If you use KYC, you are not decentralized.

Most major financial institutions would choose KYC, which means there is not point in using link over their own centralized oracle.

[Anonymous No.17151915]

>>17151892
LINK did pass Monero before you flaming newfag.

[Anonymous No.17151921]

>>17151892
because you're a newfag cuck that thinks marketcap is a relevant metric that holds some meaning in reality

i bought link when it was a lower mcap than dentacoin. even thinking in terms of marketcap is for absolute trenchbrains.

[Anonymous No.17151924]

SAGE THIS FAGGOT

[Anonymous No.17151925]

>>17151913
You clearly dont know what it is. Just admit it.

[Anonymous No.17151929]

>>17151915
not surpassing it anymore. and its going to stay that way.

XRP has surpassed ETH in marketcaps at one point, but that is never happening again either

[Anonymous No.17151938]

>>17151925
>Sybil attack fud is popular fud that has been disproven on many occasions

>still cant disprove it

Look, you all can hodl chainlink all you want. I am not going to shill what coin i am in.
I am simply making this thread as inb4, once LINK stays sub top 10 marketcaps for years after this.

[Anonymous No.17151968]

>>17151938
Just post the words: “I dont know what a sybil attack is” and i will stop embarrassing you.

[Anonymous No.17151972]

>>17151913
Do you even follow sergers speeches? CL is a oracle network, with layered security. The amount of decentralization and the amount security provided is determined by the contract creator. CL acts as a marketplace. Kyc nodes, nodes with good rep, nodes with no rep are/will all be available. True decentralization will never happen.

[Anonymous No.17152007]

>>17151968
post how not being kyc centralized will not lead to sybil attacks and i will stop replying to you
>>17151972
>True decentralization will never happen.
well there you go. If true decentralization is not happening, not much point for company to make their own oracles to connect to the blockchain.

Chainlink runs on the idea LINK will be the sole #1 provider of everything oracle related AND oracles are the missing key to all of crypto and the universes's greatest questions.
But if oracles are such a hot selling point, there would a be a shit ton of companies all trying to do their own oracles. Just like there are a shit ton of crypto all trying to replace ETH

[Anonymous No.17152021]

>>17152007
You are completely right anon everyone should just sell all of their link because you have proved it is a scam

[Anonymous No.17152043]

>>17152021
being ironic does not dimish my points. I am not even saying LINK is a scam, i am just saying that it is extremely unlikely LINK is going to break into the top 10 cryptos and that it would be much harder to do than it going from rank 90 to rank 20.

I also do not think the oracle problem is some major multi trillion dollar dilemma that only LINK can solve like all the shills here say

i am also not trying to convince anyone to sell link. You can keep holding all you want. I am simply posting this thread as an inb4, if LINK does not break into top 10 coins by year 2021.

[Anonymous No.17152088]

>>17152007
Because it will be cheaper to use the standard than to build your own oracle. Why is iOS or windows operating on nearly all the computers on the world? Cuz it’s the standard. WTH do you think Sergei is doing out there? He’s no coder. He’s hustling to make CL the standard. You make it to the point to where it’s cheaper and faster to implement it tha. To build ur own.... link marines are just here enjoying the ride. If it doesn’t work out, then I take my 10x and gtfo

[Anonymous No.17152102]

>>17150384

This is my first time entering biz in fucking months and you must be the most retarded poster i have ever seen in two fucking years, comparing link with cardano tranny coin and fucking reddit stellar, holy shit KYS

[Anonymous No.17152105]

>>17150498
you must be new.

[Anonymous No.17152108]

>>17150384
Based anon making stinky linkies SEETHE
this is gonna be a based from me

[Anonymous No.17152112]

>>17152088
>Why is iOS or windows operating on nearly all the computers on the world?
yes, but actual blockchain developers and companies working with blockchain have come out and said they do not need to use Link's oracle solution. There is not even a strong incentive to use link's oracles. companies will only invest in chainlink for the sole reason of saving money, and using Chainlink does not have a strong usecase for this. go ahead and explain how LINK, not oracles, is going to save companies millions

[Anonymous No.17152134]

>>17151794
some of the people in this thread have made 20X or more on their money with LINK, moron.

[Anonymous No.17152145]

>>17152134
unless they are a multi millionaires, their words have no merit when it comes to a money dick measuring contest

[Anonymous No.17152157]

>>17152112
>yes, but actual blockchain developers and companies working with blockchain have come out and said they do not need to use Link's oracle solution.

Some of them later recanted and now use the Chainlink network. It saves a lot of development time and money to use a network built by someone else for a fee than to try and reinvent the wheel.

[Anonymous No.17152175]

>>17152157
and some of them have come out and said chainlink is shit.

no one can explain how LINK is going to specifically save companies millions of dollars. all ive heard heard is
>my real world data
like that actually means something. I want to hear an exact scenario or example where LINK, not oracles in general, will save a company millions

[Anonymous No.17152187]

>>17152112
Nobody, not even jfc can be sure CL will become the standard. Until then, I’m just here enjoying the ride. You enjoy your koolaid, I’ll eat my Big Mac.

[Anonymous No.17152192]

>>17152175

>no one can explain how LINK is going to specifically save companies millions of dollars

Link can save companies money by allowing them to switch from analog contracts to digital ones. Right now, contracts need lots of human overwatch because there's no good way to automatically check the terms of the contract with the real-world events that are supposed to trigger the contract's execution. Smart contracts seek to make contract execution something that can be automatically and cheaply performed.

Whether it will work out - and whether LINK will be the one to profit off the switch - remains to be seen. But LINK is in a small pond and it seems to be the biggest fish in it.

[Anonymous No.17152199]

I dont hold link and I tend to agree with OP here.

[Anonymous No.17152203]

>>17152043
You're basing so much of your argument on such weird fucking propositions. Sure, breaking into the top 10 is hard. Guess what else is hard, multiplying market cap during a bear market. And yet, here we are. Every crypto, bar 2, that existed during 17/18 bull run has a chart that looks like a fucking disaster. The only 2 that look reasonably good are BNB and LINK, and the latter is far more attractive.

What that means is that the entire market has divined that LINK is one of the few diamonds in the shitpile. How can this possibly not bode well for it's future? When everything was burning, LINK drifts up the charts. You think people don't notice? What happens if market confidence rises and some good info drops. You think it wouldn't 2x over the market? All things being equal, that would put it above Tezos. Another 2x, right by Litecoin. Speculative, sure. Not an unreasonable scenario. Remember Google Big Query stuff blindsided everyone. And for most holders, it's already a 10 bagger.

Then you look at all the wallet data showing how much LINK is being shipped off exchanges and consolidated in big wallets. You think that doesn't indicate intent? The people with means are locking LINK up.

I'm not even gonna take usecase because that shit has been done to death. If you know, you know. But to deny the potential upside of LINK just seems retarded in the highest order.

[Anonymous No.17152204]

A swinglink poofter made this post.

[Anonymous No.17152235]

>>17150384
>prove it has more use than Stellar, Cardano, Tezos and biggest one Monero

basically LINK has to prove it isn't a shitcoin having more than a shit-toy use case.
it would be easy, if LINK wasn't a shitcoin having at most one shit-toy use case.

Oops. Did I talk about "use-cases"? Yes, those things that transform a concept into a business. Seems like no industry wants to put their money where their cryptomouth possibly is.

Oops. Did you talk about "making it"? Yes, that thing that transforms a loser into a richfag. Sorry to redpill you, lad: 2017 is over. And if a 2017 was at all possible, it was because there wasn't a huge shitload of people craving to get rich overnite.

[Anonymous No.17152250]

>>17150384
written like a true ESL fucktard who clearly hasn't done more than 5 minutes of research
another thread for the hide pile

[Anonymous No.17152273]

>>17152203
>Every crypto, bar 2, that existed during 17/18 bull run has a chart that looks like a fucking disaster. The only 2 that look reasonably good are BNB and LINK, and the latter is far more attractive.
this is straight up lying. i saw LINK during 2018.

LINK dipped and stayed 17 cents for most of 2018. It only went to 40 cents during march 2019. And then in summer 2019, EVERY COIN MOONED. go ahead and check the chart for random cryptos during summer 2019 and you will see the mini bullrun. Link only had the perfect storm of the google announcement and mainnet. But otherwise, every coined mooned.

And guess what. Link shat back down to sub $2 again in fall 2019, while other coins were rising.

Do not pretend or sell this lie that LINK was rising against most of the market. I remember 2018 disctintively well, LINK was 17 to 25 cents for most, if not, all of 2018

[Anonymous No.17152320]

This guy owns a fat bag of link. This entire thread is shilling to nolinkers who don't understand what makes link so great.

[Anonymous No.17152392]

>>17152273
Then why isn't EVERY crypto on pic related?

Never post on my board again.

[Anonymous No.17152437]

>>17152273
Ok now I know you're lying you little weasel. Open the fucking charts for each top 20 crypto on CMC right now faggot. Trace out the Sats and USD lines with your little incel fingers. The LINK chart is objectively superior, it has held USD and Sats value since that ~May 2019 rise. There are some coins that can claim to have had a similarly good recent 6-9 months. But none look as good long term as LINK does. You can pick some specific date ranges and you see good progress, such as BCH or ETC, but overall, it pales in comparison.

>Do not pretend or sell this lie that LINK was rising against most of the market.

Open chart, trace your finger along the sats line. Find me another crypto that's done that since 2017.

I love that you think that you can discount the success of things Google, Mainnet, Oracle etc as that is a counter point to the rise in price. That's like saying, "yeah sure the Lakers won the 80% of their games during the season, and won the championship pretty easily, but they aren't actually a good team". Who would have thought, when a crypto actually makes forward progress with its product, the price rises. INCONCEIVABLE!

>>17152392
Based

[Anonymous No.17152461]

>>17152392
because LINK, never mooned once before 2019. Thats what Linkies do not realize. They will never ever know the the horrid ROI of LINK during 2017, during december, when everything but fucking LINK mooned. LINK only went to $1.40 during the 2018 alt bullrun, while everything else was fucking 20x (how i made my money). LINK's ATH for 2 years straight was $1.40 which was fucking nothing. then it went down and fucked off to 17 cents for 2 years, and it took Not just SWIFT, but fucking GOOGLE partnership to make it finally fucking moon.

>>17152437
sats mean nothing to USD. LINK tanked sub $2 in fall. do not deny this.

you new fags do not know what mooning is because you were around for 2017, when LINK was giant laughing stock. LINK never even 10x yet. but because of a fucking google partnership that only makes it 5x, you act like its the holy grail of gains.

[Anonymous No.17152496]

>>17152461
>never 10x yet
>but Muh 17 cents at one point
that was the sub ICO release price. LINK after its ICO was 40 cents.

That means LINK has not even 10x from its ICO. You can not even comprehend how pathetic that is compared to all the coins in the top 20 range.

[Anonymous No.17152533]

>>17152496
Aight dude, it's been fun. Go kys and all that. I'm go set up to fuck some qt tinder bitches and you can enjoy being mad on /biz/ while I keep making free money. But you win the internet argument, so go tell mum to fire up the tendies in celerbration.

:^)

[Anonymous No.17152543]

>>17152533
okay boomer

[Anonymous No.17152587]

Neck urself nolinkers

[Anonymous No.17152593]

>>17150498
>would have to prove its usecases to the market is greatar than Stellar, Cardana, Tezos, and Monero

So its just a matter of time?

[Anonymous No.17152609]

>>17150384
“Strong” tomboys are for mind break and rape
Change my mind

[Anonymous No.17152633]

>>17152609
the tomboy hair cut only looks hot on cute anime girls. Actual tomboys irl look like straight up dykes. Do not deny this. And no. The short hair artsy girl is NOT a tomboy. A tomboy is a girl who actually has a male hair cut; aka a dyke.

[Anonymous No.17152675]

>>17150384
They will all bend the knee

[Anonymous No.17152686]

>>17152633
Point still stands

[Anonymous No.17152737]

>>17150384

Link should be at position 3 or 4. The reason you should still invest in link instead of in some random shitcoin, is because link is as sure as eth and btc to go up, but the gains will be greater. You are right, a 1000x-100x from here are unrealistic, but i would rather go allin in a sure 10x than in a possible 100x that might go to zero.

[Anonymous No.17153124]

>>17150384
Typical normie who has a little intelligence but not enough IQ or vision to see the bigger picture. Sell now while the high IQ anons and low IQ anons smart enough to follow the memes and energy created by the smart anons hold LINK till its number one. The scale of this project is so far above anything else in development.

[Anonymous No.17153139]

>>17153124

The meme rings so true

[Anonymous No.17153153]

>>17152461
>when LINK was giant laughing stock.

Okay Ranjeet...also that image is fake and gay

[Anonymous No.17153181]

>>17153124
Chainlink is outperforming everything. You can point out small time frames where coins outperform but then they dump back down because they just don't have underlying value. The odds of you timing all your trades perfect and outperforming our 5-10x per year is slim to none. Also, the odds of a 100x gem out there right now is almost none. If there was, biz would form a decentralized consensus about it and not stop talking about it. But that isn't happening. It's still all about Chainlink still as we all know how big it's going to be.

[Anonymous No.17153304]

>>17151461
Almost all of the "Link killers" and other oracle solvers are now literally part of the Chainlink ecosystem.
Remember when Provable (formerly Oraclize) and RLC were talking shit about Chainlink? Their knee status is now bent.

[Anonymous No.17153310]

>>17152496
>sub ICO release price
>40c after ICO

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

>$400k in crypto

AAAAAAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA SIRS HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.17153333]

>>17150384
you're missing the big picture
a) crypto is still filled with scams, underfunded startups, or simply ideas with no real world application. Even good projects can easily run out of money, exit scam, lose team members, etc. Link has been vetoed for 2+ years, the team has a lot of funding and they have a lot of work to show. This gives them credibility, a good solid reputation that immediately makes it a mush safer, less risky investment than a shit load of other projects
b)liquidity: even during the bull you can have mega pumps, you swipe your folio and see this enormous amount of money and then you go check the orderbook and...it's empty. And if it isn't, you will have to fight against other whales and be able to take profits sooner than them. It's a much riskier game vs link which has enormous amount of liquidity.
c) you still undervalue link. a lot of projects during the bull will go on runs, including the ones that are in front of link memecap today. You need to take into account that too, just so you can understand how much space link still has to grow. Eth alone memecap is 24x link one right now. I fully believe this ratio during the bull will be much lower, and there's really no argument against believing eth alone will x10 during the bull. a 10$ right now, without moving ratios against other shitcoins would put link right around binance coin, which is still fucking nothing.

[Anonymous No.17153355]

>>17150498
Is this a bad joke?

[Anonymous No.17153367]

>>17153333
Checked

[Anonymous No.17153373]

>>17152461
Chainlink never partnered with Google, don’t say this.

[Anonymous No.17153377]

>>17150384
>34 posts by this ID
>fudding LINK
at which point you will shill devery or jibrel

[Anonymous No.17153390]

>>17150384
hehe look at this retard

[Anonymous No.17153467]

>>17153181
>5 - 10x per year
did i hear this right? LINK HAS ONLY 5x ONE YEAR. What is this per year bullshit? LINK has only mooned once in 2019 and it took the sheer force of a google partnership to cause it to moon

[Anonymous No.17153480]

>>17153304
RLC does not have a knee bent despite what you partnership shills say. RLC is still active token. That would be like saying Ethereum has a knee bent to LINK

[Anonymous No.17153511]

>>17151905
It's gonna be a top 3. And it won't be the third one.

[Anonymous No.17153513]

>>17153181
Chainlink has not outperformed shit. Its not even 10x up from its ICO price. Chainlink mooned only during the summer 2019 and a shit ton of other cryptos mooned too. Even HOLO 2x during summer 2019. LINKies only have an ego because they compared themselves to the shittiest of shit coins possible like REQ and small projects like RLC. But they have been stacked up against the T20 cryptos since June 2019, and notice how their reign seems to stop.
LINK is no longer a high growth potential coin anymore. even Sergey right here >>17152461 stated the end goal for the price of LINK is a cup of coffee.

And its going to be true for the months and years to come. LINK will never be a T10 coin.

[Anonymous No.17153514]

>>17151717
Monero is the only crypto with any real world use you massive tard. It's actually used right now unlike your garbage scam token vaporare. Fucking kill yourself retarded linktard.

[Anonymous No.17153530]

>>17153511
*It's going to be top 2 and won't be second

[Anonymous No.17153564]

kek

[Anonymous No.17153814]

it is time to get yourself some Tachyon Protocol, it a bull run season

[Anonymous No.17154051]

>>17153514
I use ethereum every day lmao.
Its either voting on courtcases, playing lottery, gaming, selling real estate etc..

[Anonymous No.17154864]

>>17150384

Holy shit i cant belueve how salty you made the faggot link token holders with this post, thanks for this lol.

It’s over guys time to sell, we all know you idiots aren’t going to do the hard work of building out a network and running nodes or anything difficult like that kek.

[Anonymous No.17154875]

>>17154864
fuck right off with your BUIDL shit wagie
I'm an investor

[Anonymous No.17154892]

>>17154875

So you’re investing in nothing? You need to be running a node for your network to be decentralized you absolute child

[Anonymous No.17154978]

>>17153511
Checked

[Anonymous No.17154993]

>>17153564
You seriously posting this? Its a marine fudding plebbit tards

[Anonymous No.17154995]

Chain link is worth more than cripple the ripple.
And cripple went to 123 billion last bullrun.
I’ll be able to buy a house

[Anonymous No.17155019]

>>17153513
Ico price was 0.10 and it is currently at 3.35 so it's actually up 3350% or a 33.5x

Also you fail to acknowledge that when link was out of the top 100 yes it had to beat literal shitcoins. So let's say the market cap was $50MM. Well for it to go from 50MM to 500MM is a 10x. Now it's at 500M and in the top 20, well for it to go to 5B is still a 10x but for buyers who got in at 50MM it's a 100x so I dont see you're argument for not holding chainlink.

[Anonymous No.17155060]

>>17153564
>He fell for the reddit fud unironically
lmao

[Anonymous No.17155182]

>>17153564
oh just another retard guys move along

[Anonymous No.17155350]

>>17153373
Why google is on their testnet?

[Anonymous No.17155388]

>>17150853
>companies could just make their own private
they could

or they could "just" hand over some money to an existing node operator and not have to pay salaries and etc for their own private node to be made, which would be more expenisve.

[Anonymous No.17155605]

>>17153564
Lmaoooooooo, reading through this thread I was ready to give you the benefit of the doubt, but god damn this is just sad

[Anonymous No.17156045]

>>17154993
yeah this copy pasta is part of the corps history. newfags are trash, reddit is trash, OP is trash

[Anonymous No.17156106]

>>17150384
>#5 in your amazing top 5 to "beat" is BSV

[Anonymous No.17156206]

>>17152533
>TSLA in id
give us your prophecy

[Anonymous No.17156502]

>the reddit copy pasta is such old FUD
>no one has disproven it to this day

[Anonymous No.17157296]

This entire thread reads of fucker who is mad anons got in on this project before him.

Guess what, the rules of "superiority" don't ring true anymore. We are the Godfathers of the 4th Industrial Revolution. You don't see this kind of wealth transfers unless you're a fan of history. And, if you happen to be a fan of history, you know what the next saga will entail.

Some of you folks are going to be remarkably wealthy. Better start virtue-signaling now.