/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.17071225]

Daily reminder that Ian Grigg CERTIFIED that craig wright and dave kleiman were part of the satoshi team.

http://financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/001593.html

>I confirm Kleiman was a member of the team. [...] Satoshi was a vision, but Craig is a man. The two are not equal, not equivalent, not even close. Which is why the team aspect is so important to understand, something the world will not appreciate for some time. It is true that Craig is the larger part of the genius behind the team, but he could not have done it alone.

[Anonymous No.17071232]

>>17071225
based

[Anonymous No.17071249]

>>17071225
>Craig Wright has just outed himself as the leader of the Satoshi Nakamoto team.

>I confirm that this is true, both from direct knowledge and a base of evidence. CARS.

[Anonymous No.17071334]

>>17071225
Daily reminder that Jon Matonis confirmed Craig Wright is satoshi:

https://medium.com/@jonmatonis/how-i-met-satoshi-96e85727dc5a

>On June 4th 2015 during a conference, I arranged to meet fellow Bitcoin advocate, Craig Steven Wright, for a cup of coffee at the top floor of the AMP headquarters building in Sydney, Australia. After discussing many technical and economic aspects of the current Bitcoin protocol debates, I returned to my hotel room after an exhausting day. I remember saying to my wife that I had this weird feeling of having just met Satoshi.

>During the London proof sessions, I had the opportunity to review the relevant data along three distinct lines: cryptographic, social, and technical. Based on what I witnessed, it is my firm belief that Craig Steven Wright satisfies all three categories. For cryptographic proof in my presence, Craig signed and verified a message using the private key from block #1 newly-generated coins and from block #9 newly-generated coins (the first transaction to Hal Finney). The social evidence, including his unique personality, early emails that I received, and early drafts of the Bitcoin white paper, points to Craig as the creator. I also received satisfactory explanations to my questions about registering the bitcoin.org domain and the various time-of-day postings to the BitcoinTalk forum. Additionally, Craig’s technical working knowledge of public key cryptography, Bitcoin’s addressing system, and proof-of-work consensus in a distributed peer-to-peer environment is very strong.

>According to me, the proof is conclusive and I have no doubt that Craig Steven Wright is the person behind the Bitcoin technology, Nakamoto consensus, and the Satoshi Nakamoto name.

[Anonymous No.17071355]

Less than 24 hours

[Anonymous No.17071379]

Based and redpilled

[Anonymous No.17071396]

>>17071225
Daily reminder that Gavin Andresen confirmed that Craig Wright is satoshi.

https://gavinandresen.ninja/satoshi

>After spending time with him I am convinced beyond a reasonable doubt: Craig Wright is Satoshi.

>Part of that time was spent on a careful cryptographic verification of messages signed with keys that only Satoshi should possess. But even before I witnessed the keys signed and then verified on a clean computer that could not have been tampered with, I was reasonably certain I was sitting next to the Father of Bitcoin.
>During our meeting, I saw the brilliant, opinionated, focused, generous – and privacy-seeking – person that matches the Satoshi I worked with six years ago. And he cleared up a lot of mysteries, including why he disappeared when he did and what he’s been busy with since 2011.

[Anonymous No.17071410]

Whose your standard?

[Anonymous No.17071496]

>>17071410
XRP is a pre-mined shitcoin and has nothing to do with blockchain (trust me, i used to chat with David Schwartz around the time he released ripple, and he's a freaking scammer).

[Satoshi Nakamoto No.17071509]

Hi, Satoshi here. I've come out of hiding at last. I hereby aver that Craig Wright is a fraud

[Anonymous No.17071522]

>>17071509
Ah fuck

[Anonymous No.17071531]

>>17071225
post full res picture of that >girl.

[Anonymous No.17071627]

>>17071531
only if you say "Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi"

[Anonymous No.17071688]

>>17071531

[Anonymous No.17071694]

>>17071627
"""Dr.""" Craigh Rite is a lying piece of garbage and I'm this close to shorting bsv right now.

[Anonymous No.17071696]

>>17071249
He's confirming it's true that he outed himself, not that he's telling the truth. Lrn2English with nuance, fren

[Anonymous No.17071712]

I'm on the fence about creg and hold BSV and just want to know what is going to happen today.
Is he supposed to be moving coins from the Satoshi wallet or something?

[Anonymous No.17071745]

>>17071694
im sorry, you failed the iq test :( no fap material for you today, anon :(


>I'm on the fence about creg and hold BSV and just want to know what is going to happen today.
>Is he supposed to be moving coins from the Satoshi wallet or something?
Nah, nothing is happening today.
There is the genesis update in one day, and coingeek london in two weeks, but all of that is already priced in. He will not move coins until at least past the btc halving

[Anonymous No.17071759]

>>17071225
there was no fucking team you mongoloid
ask Dillinger if you want, he was with Hal when they audited the code
satoshi is one dude

[Anonymous No.17071803]

>>17071696
and what would be the point of that? Why would he do that? You brainlets can never think in terms of people's motives and that's why youll never make it.

You gotta act like a detective, figure out who are all the people involved in this, and what their motives are. You will see that one explanation is much more solid than the other. Craig wright was part of the satoshi group. No other explanation makes sense.

https://twitter.com/iang_fc/status/674722847160422400

https://twitter.com/iang_fc/status/674906592878415872

[Anonymous No.17071873]

>>17071803
there is no fucking group lmfao
kleiman is a forensics expert with no background in elliptic curve cryptography
craig is a deadbeat tax credit fraudster that tried to sell offshroe companies to pay his cancer bills
grigg is a nobody and has no type of proof to the shit he is selling, another attention whore

you can seethe more OP, call on the 'authority' of Gavin, who is the only guy with any credit that you mentioned by the way
and even gavinCIA got fucking booted out of the project for being a fucking lunatic double megabyte blocker

you should try to contact mike hearn next, see if he plays your game LOL

[Anonymous No.17071877]

>>17071803
>and what would be the point of that?
He's selling the CARS idea, and introducing the nuance of subtle word changes as its downfall.

Would you like me to tie your shoelaces for you too, or do they only let you use velcro laces now? What a brainlet - DYOR.

[Anonymous No.17072009]

>>17071496
This

[Anonymous No.17072046]

>>17071877
so by your explanation that whole blog post was just what, him trolling?

How about his full explanation of what happened on twitter
https://twitter.com/iang_fc/status/674722847160422400

And the fact that he got blackmailed too for defending Craig:
https://twitter.com/iang_fc/status/674906592878415872

Was this all some kind of elaborate play? Your explanation is built on extremely shaky foundations that do not withstand the faintest scrutiny.

>>17071873
you are never gonna make it, you are just parroting gmaxwell arguments word by word. The same gmaxwell who made multiple reddit puppet accounts in an effort to destroy craig wright's reputation. The same gmaxwell who's only accomplishment in life was to have created a botnet of sock puppet accounts on wikipedia to deface it, and get constantly banned.

>and even gavinCIA got fucking booted out of the project for being a fucking lunatic double megabyte blocker
man drinking gmaxwell sperm must not be good for your brain. I can't tell anymore if you are being ironic or just plain stupid. Gavin was booted for the only reason that he admitted craig wright is satoshi. Blockstream (and gmaxwell in particular) could not allow satoshi to take power back, and the fact that the person who satoshi appointed as bitcoin project lead publicly came out confirming craig wright is satoshi was too much of a threat to blockstream power, so they had to coordinate a coup and they banned him from the repo on the same day he confirmed craig wright is satoshi.
maxwell and blockstream have been shitting themselves since satoshi came back. They had to invest all their effort on discrediting him or they would lose their control of the bitcoin project

https://iang.org/papers/triple_entry.html

[Anonymous No.17072100]

>>17071509
Hi, I'm Barry Embezzlement-Smith and I believe this message is directly from Satoshi.

[Anonymous No.17072120]

>>17072046
>https://twitter.com/iang_fc/status/674722847160422400
Craig being extorted (probably by himself) doesn't mean Craig is SN
>https://twitter.com/iang_fc/status/674906592878415872
Ian defending Craig also doesn't mean Craig is SN.
Have you got any actual evidence?

[Anonymous No.17072150]

>>17072120
so lay out what you think is a plausible explanation for all these events. A credible story in which craig is not part of the satoshi team, which still explains all the events that unfolded. I'm listening

[Anonymous No.17072215]

>>17072150
I'm not the one asserting "Ian Grigg CERTIFIED that craig wright and dave kleiman were part of the satoshi team" so I have no need to do account for anything, especially as you've demonstrated no such thing.

[Anonymous No.17072233]

>>17071225
>Daily
nigger i read this board every day and this reminder isn't posted daily

also can we get a new voucher that isn't several years old?

[Anonymous No.17072379]

>>17072215
it is known there is no conclusive proof or bsv price would be higher than btc right now. So just like in any regular investigation with no 100% conclusive proof, you need to look at all the evidence and all the testimonies, and come up with stories that can fit all of them. Then you pick the one which is most likely.

story #1:
- Craig was part of the satoshi team, got hacked and blackmailed, when he refused to pay up the hackers outed him by dumping docs on news outlets and ato
this is a very likely story. Every single piece of evidence and motives for actions fit with this story.

story #2:
- there is a random dude involved in cryptography, security and finance all his life who somehow knows most about bitcoin than anyone else, by heart, even early private communications
- despite the early group of bitcoiners being very tight-knit, no one seemd to know about this person
- this person has declared bitcoins in his 2009 tax return, has started several businesses related to crypto and bitcoin, has gotten big loans and tax credits using his bitcoin as a collateral in 2011 onward
- this person (an early miner? Just somsone secretive who randomly knows a lot about bitcoin?) one day decides to dump a ton of his private documents related to bitcoin to a bunch of news outlets and the australian tax office, gets his house raided in return and has to fly the country
- this person somehow manages to convince people who were in touch with the early satoshi (gavin, ian) that he is satoshi without a trace of doubt
- also manages to convince a billionaire to bankroll him indefinitely on his project to bring bitcoin's original vision back, all the while filing multiple patents and whitepapers related to blockchain
- satoshi himself, who came out publicly stating that he was not dorian nakamoto, never said a word about craig not being satoshi.
The likelyhood of this is close to zero. Motives make no sense. Brainlets like you make no sense.

[Anonymous No.17072392]

>>17072233
>Daily
nigger i read this board every day and this reminder isn't posted daily

It will be posted daily from now on. So it is a daily reminder now.

[Anonymous No.17072396]

>>17072379
>it is known there is no conclusive proof or bsv price would be higher than btc right now
So you admit you lied in your OP, thank you. Given that, no need for me to read the rest of your tosh

[Anonymous No.17072415]

>>17072379
and in story #2, how would you explain him emailing dave kleiman's father right after his death, to let them know dave was a part of satoshi group and give them access to dave's fortune? Only to get sued for more money, what incentive could he have there, if he is just a conman pretending to be satoshi, with no relation to the actual satoshi?

[Anonymous No.17072446]

>>17072396
please point out the "lie" in the op you fucking brainlet.

That is exactly what ian Grigg CERTIFIED. Do you know what CARS is?
http://wiki.cacert.org/AssuranceHandbook2?action=show&redirect=CARS#CAcert_Assurer_Reliable_Statement_-_CARS

a testimony is still not conclusive proof. We only have a certified testimony from ian grigg, which among all the rest of the evidence, makes it clear beyond reasonable doubt that craig wright was part of the satoshi team, and dave kleiman was part of it too.

[Anonymous No.17072510]

>>17072446
Nope, what he said in common English can be read to mean he certified he made a claim, not that he's verifying the claim. Note that "Jim" made the same point in 2016, that Ian was in the habit of replying to comments at that time, and that Ian declined to refute that point even though the "CARS" footer was used.

You are utterly shit at arguing your side - and this is why BSV has lost 95% of its value vs BTC. Can you please send someone over who knows his shit? Maybe a boilerroom manager or something

[Anonymous No.17072617]

It's going to be funny as fuck when BSV stagnates and crag makes another fork to continue forever laddering between scam coins

[Anonymous No.17072674]

>>17072510
EXPLAIN MOTIVES. What would he gain from posting a whole blog of lies in your opinion, and only "certifying" that craig made a statement (everybody already knew about that anyway), why would he do that.

sure that one sentence can be interpreted in two ways. But you are willfully ignoring all the rest of the post.
Sure you can take the strictest possible autistic explanation, or you can read the entirety of the blogpost, piece it with all the additional evidence we have, and take that as you will.
I am actually happy that there are people as low iq as you, or I would never have an hedge on the market. Only people that can piece in information before the full truth is out can anticipate market movements. After all us smarter people need to get our gains from somebody, and it's the retards who buy the news rather than the rumor. You seem to fit that profile perfectly

[Anonymous No.17072693]

>>17071355
Checked.

[Anonymous No.17072709]

>>17072617
You are legitimately retarded. Ouch.

[Anonymous No.17072790]

>>17072674
I have no need to explain anything; it's you who are making the assertion.
>sure that one sentence can be interpreted in two ways.
Thus defeating the point of the CARS, AND admitting your OP is bollocks.

You've 15 posts to form a coherent defence of your assertion that CSW is SN and have not only failed, but successfully argued against your own position. I suspect you'll have to return the two rupees you've been paid. Have a good night

[Anonymous No.17072961]

>>17072790
sorry man, i dont any rupees. I've been in bitcoin since before bitcoin exchanges, before it had a price. I don't need money anymore. I already own houses and cars, i run a multi million business to keep me occupied and have a beautiful girlfriend, zero worries. I have reached a point in life where I don't need money anymore. But nothing makes me happier than being able to say "i told you" to stupid fags like you. You will come to understand once you reach my level, that after all shitposting is the greatest pleasure in life.

[Anonymous No.17073378]

[Anonymous No.17073486]

>>17073378
i didn't believe craig was satoshi until his catamite buttboi confirmed it all

[Anonymous No.17074451]

>>17072379
Story #3
Craig stole Satoshi keys

[Anonymous No.17074557]

>>17072120

Desperate cope, Ian Grigg literally cited Craig as the author of the whitepaper in his paper on AI

He's also speaking at the Coingeek conference