/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.17031708]

the worst and only mistake I made in crypto, what do I do with these faggot bags

[Anonymous No.17031712]

use them to gamble

[Anonymous No.17031715]

Sell for Kleros.

[Anonymous No.17031718]

>>17031712
He already did

[Anonymous No.17031749]

>>17031712
I was thinking this, why the fuck not at this point

>>17031718
But also this.

Any 50-100x shitcoins out there?

[Anonymous No.17031763]

>>17031708
my bag was worth 1k at one point
now it's not even worth 30$

[Anonymous No.17031803]

>>17031763
I was a naive as fuck retard to think this would take off. Product is there but they’re not advertising it because it has no market appeal. Cyber nerds would rather gamble without kyc, and the conventional users who would use kyc are too retarded to figure it out.

[Anonymous No.17031975]

Are you guys having fun yet?

[Anonymous No.17031987]

>>17031975
FUNCHADS

[Anonymous No.17032031]

>>17031803
the core problem of all shitcoins is that they could be replaced by USDT and the whole thing would work the same minus the fluctuating value

[Anonymous No.17032045]

I bought 100k for 1 btc when it was 13k$. Sold at 450 sats

[Anonymous No.17032325]

>>17032031

The dollars buying power only drops over time.

[Anonymous No.17032337]

>>17032325
Turns out FUN drops even faster

[Anonymous No.17032363]

>>17032325
fun literally dropped 99% in 2 years

[Anonymous No.17032469]

the worst and only mistake I made in crypto, what do I do with these fun bags

[Anonymous No.17032471]

Go check out the subreddit. Devs actively avoid that place. Announce another useless game every month or so. The whole community is dejected. Weird seeing something apparently promising devolve into a ghost town.

[Anonymous No.17032489]

>>17032031
that's right. every eth utility token out there was a scam money grab. ICO's were just a way to raise money, so everyone tried to shoehorn some kind of utility into a token so that they could cash out. there is absolutely no reason for any of it to exist. ffs, fun could launch the same exact product without fun tokens and just accept ETH, but they didn't, because if they didn't, they'd have had to of build the platform without first securing themselves millions of dollars. sounds like work. where's the fun in that?

[Anonymous No.17032538]

>>17032489
how could star fox man betray us

[Anonymous No.17032548]

>>17031708
>not getting the one YUUUUGE pump on FUN a few years ago then getting the hell out of dodge
it's like you want to stay poor

[Anonymous No.17032560]

>>17032471

[Anonymous No.17032573]

>>17032548
I was naive thinking FUN had lasting potential like other platforms. Now it’s just increasingly obvious that the devs may run out of funds before it gains any steam.

[Anonymous No.17032580]

>>17032560

[Anonymous No.17032584]

>>17032548
fun had a pretty conservative pump compare to some of the shit coin out there

[Anonymous No.17032698]

>>17031708

Fun's not so bad, what's wrong?

I like FUN

[Anonymous No.17032768]

>>17032489
>ICO's were just a way to raise money, so everyone tried to shoehorn some kind of utility into a token so that they could cash out. there is absolutely no reason for any of it to exist
This is true in the vast majority of cases, but not all of them. Take things like LINK, RSR, and PNK. These have specific economic models that require a dedicated token in order to function properly. Trying to build them without a dedicated token would break the operating model. With RSR for example, it is part of a dual-token algorithmic stablecoin model. You can't just replace it with ETH (or USDT, etc) because the economical interplay between the tokens is part of what makes the system work.
For things like FUN and a shitload of others you are 100% right and the token could be replaced with a stablecoin without affecting the economic model.