[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 57 KB, 400x500, 1509884969922.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17000331 No.17000331 [Reply] [Original]

https://decrypt.co/17652/chainlink-has-three-big-reasons-to-feel-good-about-2020
>Sergey Nazarov. Speaking to Decrypt, he highlighted three key reasons why Chainlink will continue to be a project to watch during 2020.
>On the enterprise side, you're going to continue to see us working with large enterprises in different ways
>The number of data networks enabling smart contracts to access data on BTC, ETH, LINK, BAT and many more, is growing rapidly. There are now almost 30, and Chainlink plans to publish the full list very soon.
>In fact, the rapidly expanding number of node operators has pushed Chainlink to become the second largest consumer of gas in the Ethereum ecosystem after Tether.
>DeFi projects have often started out by creating their own oracles. aggregating data such as interest and exchange rates off-chain. Nazarov argues that many are coming to the conclusion that entrusting this to Chainlink is time and cost effective, not to mention up to 20 times more secure.
>“As we're building and bunching these networks, we've arrived at economics that makes sense—it costs less for a user to use one of our oracle networks, with seven to 21 nodes, than it does for them to broadcast from one node,” he said.
>“Insurance is slowest—a very complex industry with a lot of moving parts and a lot of regulation,” he said, but he hinted at an announcement in that area soon.
>The applications integrating Chainlink are now increasing almost on a daily basis (to the extent that Decrypt has given up on updating its list).
>In recent months, Chainlink’s also collaborated with some seriously big players, such as Swift, Oracle and Google.
>“On the enterprise side, you're going to continue to see us working with large enterprises in different ways,” said Nazarov.

>> No.17001213

>>17000331
i invest in sergey

>> No.17001224
File: 1.90 MB, 490x478, 1506224632110.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17001224

>>17000331
is 6k linkies enough to make it?

>> No.17001237

>>17001224
How does 6 Big Macs sound?

>> No.17001243

>>17001224
How's $425,000,000 sound?

>> No.17001248

>>17001224
I damn hope so

>> No.17001263
File: 159 KB, 444x477, 435637734657.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17001263

>>17000331
>Namek doesn't know.

>> No.17001270

>>17001243
how the hell did you calculate that?

>> No.17001284

>>17001270
>$70,833.3333333333333333333 per LINK
Can't into math, anon?

>> No.17001297

>>17000331
>>17001213
>>17001224
>>17001237
>>17001243
>>17001248
>>17001263
>>17001270
>>17001284

Good golly, I'm just so very happy for all of you!

>> No.17001298

>>17001224
no one knows.

>> No.17001302

>>17001284
under what insane basis did you come to that projected price? i want to believe

>> No.17001329

>>17000331
>it costs less for a user to use one of our oracle networks, with seven to 21 nodes, than it does for them to broadcast from one node
does this imply working threshold signatures?

>> No.17001345

>>17001302
Sell now, it’s a trap!

>> No.17001370

>>17001284
Anything under $100,000 per link is a steal.

>> No.17001406

>>17001302
Deloitte recently published an internal memo projecting dlt overall mkcap to be 1 quadrillion by 2030. Link is the greatest utility value capture within dlt. Even if link only has 90% of the total token supply sequestered in mode it only needs 10 trillion of that 1 quadrillion to reach 100k/link.

>> No.17001437

>>17001406
link to the memo?

>> No.17001493
File: 624 KB, 750x649, 1567165351488.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17001493

>>17001406


>100k per link

>> No.17001706

>$2.63

>> No.17001748

>>17001406
newfags take a hard look here
they say ridiculous shit like this so that lies like 1k eoy seem reasonable by comparison

>> No.17001776

>>17001748
$1000 is literally FUD, bro. Read a book about the 4th industrial revolution dude

>> No.17001780

>>17001748
Imagine whiteknighting and spooky feeding for newfags. Look here newfags perfect example of a goodgoi bigger simp

>> No.17002112

>>17001748
Ngmi

>> No.17002597

>>17001329
Check the pivotal

>> No.17003069

>>17001224
If you don’t make it I don’t make it

>> No.17003199

>>17001776
>>17001780
>>17002112
cope

>> No.17003334

>>17001370
Probably realistic if cl does what it says it does and 5-10 years of real world network use

>> No.17003941

>>17001224
The amount has always been 30k to make it with double that at 60k to make it stress free

>> No.17003950

So is this the update that we were meant to get in 2017?
An announcement of announcements? Pathetic.

>> No.17004008

>>17003199
>cope
nigger im up 1100% from my intitial

>> No.17004143

>>17004008
you are still a copelet

>> No.17005196
File: 180 KB, 1599x999, F3568A79-FF73-472A-B45E-1A21B7A35235.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17005196

>>17001406
>only needs 10 trillion

>> No.17005231

My sides are in orbit, fucking $100k per LINK

>$2

top kek

>> No.17005233

>>17004143
>COPE

>> No.17005805

>>17000331
It's all so tiresome. How much longer must we wait? Can we at least get to $10 sometime this year?

>> No.17005837
File: 104 KB, 1080x462, ACCFFE80-6CBB-4599-9522-2C6E8A6C7006.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17005837

>>17005231

>> No.17005993

>>17001748
1k is fud, fag.