[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 17 KB, 268x188, images (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16997362 No.16997362 [Reply] [Original]

Would you buy a slave if slavery still existed?They were $800 in 1860 or around $20,000+ dollars?

>> No.16997369

>>16997362
Jesus! Tell ya what, I’d breed those fuckers like a puppy mill and sell em to ya for half off.

>> No.16997375

>>16997369
Answer the question.

>> No.16997380

Well I'm not Jewish so probably not

>> No.16997381

How much for a young light skinned breeder with supple tits

>> No.16997385

>>16997381
No clue.

>> No.16997391

Why would I pay to be around a negro, as well as what can they even do for me in modern times?

>> No.16997404

>>16997362
No because its not the European way.

Looking at it from a business point of view though its a lot more economical than paying someone 20k a year when you could just get a lifetime of labour for 20k

>> No.16997419

>>16997404
Keep in mind they work for like $0.00 annually.

>> No.16997449

>>16997419
Well you have to feed them and house them so there would be some upkeep but still over 5 years I'm sure you'd save a lot of money. Nevermind 10 or 20

>> No.16997455

I would probably buy 1 busty, big hip and booty female ebony slave to clean and cook.
You know what gonna happen when I got my morning dick she be spreading them legs wide up in the air for the master to he can offload some stress inside her.

>> No.16997473

>>16997449
>feed them
You do?

>> No.16997474

There was a lot more labor that needed to be done around a household back then so maybe, if I was affluent. I don't think it's super immoral unless you're treating them terribly, at the end of the day minimum wage workers are probably compensated less for their work when you factor in cost of living lel.

>> No.16997485

>>16997449
you can have intercourse for free too

>> No.16997487

>>16997473
If you want to actually see a return on your investment instead of a decomposing corpse. Then unfortunately yes.

>> No.16997492

Probably, because my family has a large ranch and we hire Mexicans to help clear brush and split firewood

>> No.16997512

>>16997362

no.

>> No.16997527

>>16997512
>>16997419

>> No.16997728

I have a farm in Central America and pay 9$ a day, which includes food and shelter.... 20000/9$/313 days a year.... My workers use up those 20k in a little more than 7 years( what was average life expectancy on the cotton fiellds back then?), I don't have to pay the 20k upfront and don't import foreigners to my country... I honestly don't understand why it wasn't done that way before.

>> No.16997746

>if slavery still existed

If this wasn't a stealth /pol/ thread we could have some interesting discussion.

>> No.16997753

>>16997746
Answer the question.

>> No.16998145

>>16997362
Slavery still exists. Taxation and inflation

>> No.16998195

>>16997362
It still exists in Africa and the Middle East

>> No.16998199

not for $20k, I would look for a damaged one and negotiate the price, or try to make a deal like 3 for the price of 2

>> No.16998255

No. Slavery is wrong.
Maybe I would hire them and pretend they are slaves, but treat them nicely, because we are all human beings created in the image of Jesus Christ.

>> No.16998266

>>16997362
I'm black, but still yes.

Cheap labor, and I've got a house cleaner/worker/handy-woman/eyecandy?

I'm not morrally against slavery either, it's simply an economic system. If I don't buy em, someone else who's more evil than myself will. Plus, there's benefits such as loyalty if I treat them right, and as a human being. Literally, it'd just be room + board for work, and I wouldn't pay her the remainder of her works value.

So quite literally, I don't understand why it was even outlawed, there should just be regulations that slaves need to be treated well etc etc.

>> No.16998281

>>16997381
$20,000 fucking read

>> No.16998285

Slavery still exists retard

>> No.16998289

No, machines are better anyway

>> No.16998294

>>16998255
dubs of truth bro, check
Glory to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.

>> No.16998302

>>16997362
I would beat my nigger slave three times a day.

>> No.16998306

>>16997362
I'd rather do all the work myself than suffer having to keep and train a nigger.

>> No.16998307

Most slave owners weren’t outright terrible to the slaves. It was a master to servant relationship. Do your job, I’ll feed you, clothe you, and take care of you. It’s a better life than in Africa where you’ll die of malaria or eaten alive.

>> No.16998308

>>16997362
20k seems like a fair price when you factor in all the liabilities you are taking on with such a purchase.

>> No.16998309

>>16997404
ACTSHUALLY SOUTHERN SLAVEMASTERS STARTED SAVING MONEY ONCE SLAVES WERE FREED BECAUSE THEY WERE ABLE TO PAY THE NEGROS PENNIES INSTEAD OF HAVING TO GIVE THEM FOOD AND SHELTER

>> No.16998318

>>16997362
you can buy a car for 20k but a slave can last you a lifetime. Having a housenigger seems very convenient. I would teach him to speak french because that's very posh and civilised. I would call my housenigger an " evolué". translated ' the evolved one'. I am enlightened like that

>> No.16998336

>>16997362
I would never buy any product from a kike

>> No.16998350

>>16998266
t.anthony johnson

>> No.16998378

>>16998285
answer the question.

>> No.16998386

>>16998266
I respect the honesty black anon

>> No.16998409

Yes
I'd put him up in the room across from mine and get him a job at some factory and take his pay but in return keep him fed and healthy. On weekends he can have time to himself but no activities that might hurt him and as a result hurt my investment. I'll eventually buy him a female and have a whole stable of negroids.

Maybe I'm more racist than I thought.

>> No.16998412
File: 128 KB, 882x960, 1579689978134.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16998412

>>16997380
Based

>> No.16998448

>>16997362
No. The greatest mistake was ever bringing nogs to North America.

>> No.16998449

>>16997362
No, but I bet fast food restaurants and factories would be chock full of them.

>> No.16998462

>>16998378
The answer is obviously no since I don't own any slaves yet they absolutely exist in my city. Chink snakehead gangs smuggle people in all the time

>> No.16998468

Tough question. It would be very tempting especially if it was an attractive female but I'd opt out. I'd want at least 3 if I changed my mind. I'd just have them stay in shape and do maid things in sexy outfits.

>> No.16998552

Not African slaves. At 20k a pop, I’d buy a small harem of Slav girls, though.

>> No.16998558

>>16998294
Amen brother.

>> No.16998604

I'll take some Asian qts. We building a railroad cause I'm gonna pull a train on you sluts

>> No.16998654

>>16997728
Amerimutts couldnt resist big black booty

>> No.16998774

>>16998199
>Condition: For parts or repair
>Powers on, but has not undergone any further testing. No guarantees.
>Selling as-is, no returns or refunds

>> No.16998826

I wouldn't have a slave for that price. If it was $800, I would have one but my mom would have bought it.

>> No.16998906

I'd consider buying a sex wench, but I'd probably just keep on keepin' on with my puppers.

>>16997728
>I honestly don't understand why it wasn't done that way before.
Serious answer: because back then, no one was willing to work for farm wages. If you had nothing, you moved out into the wilderness and built your own farm. If you had an education, you stayed in the city and ran your own business. A very few people worked as clerks or laborers, but the general consensus was that being a wagecuck was for niggers.

>> No.16998918

if its black i wont trust it. will be on chains 24/7.

>> No.16999535

>>16997362
if it existed legally, enforced by the government? yes.

>> No.16999566

>>16997362
What the fuck they costed 20k, there are muslims who sell their daughters for around 1k in this world.

>> No.16999572

>>16997381
You had to make the lightskins yourself back in those days anon

>> No.16999671

>>16999566
Adjusted for inflation

>> No.16999680

>>16999566
160 years inflation is a killer

>> No.16999855

>>16998266
>So quite literally, I don't understand why it was even outlawed, there should just be regulations that slaves need to be treated well etc etc.
Because wage-slave labor made more profit. They literally bannished slavery in order to have more wage workers on the labor market, and because slaves competed with wage labor production (even if less efficiently).
Wage worker is the ultimate tool to create profit. They have nothing, no assets, but you take everything from them. Their time, their life. And they consent.

>> No.16999870

>>16999855
Good point desu.
Slavery only lasted as long as they liked it.

Inb4 we all get banned.
Link to 0
BTC to 1m eony

>> No.16999885

>>16997362
That was a bubble. The going rate was about 5$.
Or what, like 600$?

Unless you want a prime boxing negro,
Then that'll be something more a little more expensive, watch django to learn more about battleslave prices

>> No.16999917

>>16997362
No. That's expensive, plus I'd have to clothe and feed the slave. I doubt he'd bring me $20,000 + his expenses monetary value in a year. Sounds like only the rich could afford them, even if I was rich I'd rather not have a slave. It only takes 1 vengeful slave to kill you in your sleep.

>> No.17000478

whites in the south refused to do that sort of work until after the civil war left most destitute, you would really have no choice if you wanted to operate a plantation, the same as needing to buy a tractor or something today.

>> No.17000636

>>16997380
Jews owned more slaves per capita because they were smarter and therefore richer than gentiles, but the vast majority of slaves in the US were owned by white people. In b4 you quote literal Nation of Islam propaganda.

>> No.17000677

>>16997404
It really depends. Besides paying for all their living expenses, it's hard enough motivating blacks to work when they're getting paid. Getting them to work when they aren't is a fulltime job. Only really efficient at scale.

>> No.17000923

>>17000636
>they were smarter and therefore richer than gentiles
No, they were richer because they owned the slave trade itself. Look up the names of who owned the slave ships. Jews have always made their fortunes off the industries too immoral for gentiles to want to be involved with. They are not richer because they are smarter, but because they have zero scruples in what is an acceptable way to turn a profit. Even back when the continued ownership of slaves was accepted, the import of new slaves made peopoe squeamish because they knew what the middle passage involved, and the slave trade was abolished by every Western country decades before slavery itself.
>In b4 you quote literal Nation of Islam propaganda
Literally more accurate and reliable that the Jew propaganda you're posting.

>> No.17000956

>>16997362
I don't live an agrarian lifestyle so unfortunately I have no use for a slave. They would just end up as a NEET living at my house while I go to work.

>> No.17000968

>>16997362
fuck yeah! It's basically breeding free money

>> No.17000990

>>17000956
Send the slave to do your job for you while you stay at home and NEET

>> No.17001016

>>16997362
No that's fucked up

>> No.17001169

>>17000923
Other whites are certainly not more scrupulous than Jews. Read a book about Belgian atrocities in the Congo, or artificial famines in British India for a couple of obvious examples. And Jews never owned even close to the majority of businesses participating in the trans-Atlantic slave trade. The "scholarship" of that Nation of Islam book is utter shit, and if you fell for it you have an African-tier IQ.

>> No.17001211
File: 826 B, 120x160, whosbehindthispost.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17001211

>>17000636
>>17000677
>>17001169
Schlomo really trying hard today

>> No.17001242

>>16999855
that's probably true. with slave you have the added cost of food, housing, medicine, whatever else they life costs. if you just pay them $7.50 an hour though....it's up to them to figure it out for themselves.

>> No.17001268

>>16997362
No because slavery is immoral and even if it wasnt I wouldnt want more low IQ faggots around.