CRAIG WRIGHT BTFO

[Anonymous No.16857845]

Proven a fraud and trying to bury the court with 24k documents

[Anonymous No.16857902]

>>16857845
It's all he knows how to do. Obfuscate, distract, being generally vague, but presenting himself as overly confident while doing it.

[Anonymous No.16857933]

January 14, 2019 (2019!)

[Anonymous No.16857948]

>>16857845
Craig is going to jail. 10 years minimum

[Anonymous No.16857958]

>>16857845
>>16857902
love how they refer to him simply as Craig

[Anonymous No.16857959]

this is ridiculous, how long has this case been going on? his plan is obviously to just stall forever until he finally gets btfo, then go into appeals claiming BS procedural errors

[Anonymous No.16857961]

>>16857902
It's over 16,000 different addresses with about 50 BTC in each one

[Anonymous No.16857973]

>>16857959
Stall go to trial get dismissed

[Anonymous No.16858050]

>>16857958
Just noticed that, lmfao

[Anonymous No.16858103]

>>16857959
It’s gonna go on until he dumps his BSV bags.

[Anonymous No.16858226]

>>16857845
>Jew lawyers making false claims for his Jew client to a Jew lawyer

More news at 11

[Anonymous No.16858258]

>>16858226
So youre saying Wright partnered with a Jew but you dont care.

[Anonymous No.16858262]

chainlink is a scam

[Anonymous No.16858264]

Hmmmm...

[Anonymous No.16858267]

>>16857902
So he's basically a con artist

[Anonymous No.16858269]

>>16858226
>Craig, however, did not provide any information on the bounded courier, the company he/she worked for, when he/she came, or the message delivered.
Is this a false claim?

[Anonymous No.16858311]

>>16858269
>>16858226

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/377/kleiman-v-wright/

[Anonymous No.16858321]

>>16857958
>>16858050


cracking up so hard about this
>not Dr Wright
>just fuckin gay old Craig

haha this is legal documentation what a bunch of shit

[Anonymous No.16858352]

>>16857845
>trying to bury the court with 24k documents
Sounds like the strategy he uses to shill his shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.16858375]

>>16858352
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

[Anonymous No.16858376]

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR NINETY DAY EXTENSION OF PRETRIAL
DEADLINES AND FOR CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE

Plaintiffs’ case revolves around the existence of a partnership between Dave Kleiman and

Craig Wright to develop intellectual property and mine bitcoin. Unfortunately, Craig has engaged

(and appears to be continuing to engage) in conduct that has made it difficult to obtain discovery

related to these core claims. To be more direct, Craig has forged documents, submitted false

Declarations and perjured himself in open court – all in an effort to prevent the truth from being

revealed.

After a thorough examination of Craig’s “antics” in a series of hearings about the

identification of the bitcoin Plaintiffs alleged was mined as part of the parties’ partnership, Judge

Reinhart entered a sanctions Order in which he made comprehensive findings documenting Craig’s

misconduct. The sanctions entered included deeming many of the facts supporting Plaintiffs’

claims established and striking many of Defendant’s affirmative defenses.

Shortly after Judge Reinhart issued this Order, on September 11, 2019, the parties reached

an agreement in principle to settle the case. Discovery was abated for nearly two months as the
>Craig Wright to develop intellectual property and mine bitcoin. Unfortunately, Craig has engaged

(and appears to be continuing to engage) in conduct that has made it difficult to obtain discovery

related to these core claims. To be more direct, Craig has forged documents, submitted false

Declarations and perjured himself in open court – all in an effort to prevent the truth from being

revealed.

>After a thorough examination of Craig’s “antics” in a series of hearings about the


>Craig's antics

[Anonymous No.16858387]

>>16858376
STIFF

[Anonymous No.16858425]

Seems like a lot of retards are misinterpreting this pleading as being an Order or something written by the Judge.

This is a Plaintiff's motion. Of course they're going to belittle Craig. Not saying they shouldn't or that it isn't funny, but people are making much ado about nothing here. Craig's actually doing a pretty good job of deflating this lawsuit. He truly is a master charlatan.

[Anonymous No.16858451]

>>16858425

[Anonymous No.16858470]

>>16857845
>statement from plaintiffs

[Anonymous No.16858488]

>>16858269
>plaintiffs wish

[Anonymous No.16858597]

>>16858425
>craig claims to have full access to all satoshi coins and complies immediatly with court order which causes massive pump
>all he's provided is 16k public wallet addresses
why would 1million coins need to be in 16k wallets? which was like an average of $50 in each wallet back then. why would 10 or 50 wallets not suffice?
he has unironically picked 16k wallets that havnt been touched in 8 years and submitted them knowing they:
>plantifs would take months sorting through them
>public address's will not be released to public for anyone to sign the addresses he grabbed
>cant legally move any coins in address's that are "under review" in the case
the dude literally just bought 3 months of stalling time after pumping his personal shitcoin 200% in the last 3 days. all from submitting freely available public knowledge.

i hate that faggot but ill give props where they are due

[Anonymous No.16858652]

>>16858597
>why would 1million coins need to be in 16k wallets?
Why do I have 100s of guns? Because fuck you. That's why.

[Anonymous No.16859032]

>>16858425

Imagine you put all of your coins on one wallet and someone found randomly your private key: you are fucked.

16 000 wallets with coins coming from the first blocks... Jews can't decide.

[Anonymous No.16859178]

>>16858425
16K KEYS