[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 1.71 MB, 2509x1215, paymentAPI.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16829400 No.16829400 [Reply] [Original]

>https://www.insureblocks.com/ep-90-securing-oracles-for-smart-contracts-insights-from-chainlink/ (skip to 25:05)

skim these slides
>https://www.slideshare.net/MarketingTeamr3/swift-gpi-linking-swift-gpi-with-trade-platforms-the-first-results


Can anyone guess what the "Payment Initiation API" and "Payment Confirmation API" are referring to in pic related?

>> No.16829432

>>16829400

Then why isn't link mentioned by name in those slides, idiot?
SWIFT is a confirmed bust, chainlink PAID THEM to develop the old poc, and there is ZERO evidence that link will be used by swift going forward. Sorry about your brain damage from hopium addiction

>> No.16829446

>>16829400
Aaand it's fucking nothing.

>> No.16830342

>>16829400
gpi link is not chainlink has nothing to do with it.

>> No.16830363
File: 396 KB, 2048x2048, E0F1AF09-4EDD-4BAD-B295-9BC4A4C0A159.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16830363

“Enterprise grade oracles”

>> No.16830380

>>16829432
This is 100% correct. I hid in Rory's duffel bag during their last closed doors meeting. Sergey paid SWIFT in link tokens to use their name on the website. He even planted that webinar "gpi CHAINLINK" fiasco. Ffs you people are stupid.


Vitaliik said it best when he said "I don't wan eat boger non hungre"

>> No.16830767

>>16829432
>>16829446
>>16830342
>>16830380
"We're proud to be working with SWIFT on their own SWIFT Smart Oracle. Allowing smart contracts on various networks to make payments, send governance instructions, and release collateral with over 11,000 banks." Front page of smartcontract website.

gpiLink is Link.

>> No.16830774

>>16829400
test

>> No.16830858
File: 60 KB, 540x540, 5A80305C-A9E8-43CA-B8AA-12E45785F6F1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16830858

>>16830767
Don’t forget WEF’s upLink. Swift wants every payment to be on boarded to this by end of 2020. Barring any delays we could see the network usage explode EOY, for real this time.

>> No.16830988
File: 106 KB, 413x797, energy web ecosystem.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16830988

>>16830858
https://energyweb.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/EWF/pages/762970125/Oracles+with+Chainlink+and+the+public+price+oracle

>> No.16831012

>>16829400
GPI Link is not LINK, this has been covered at length

>> No.16831031
File: 490 KB, 900x977, 1578418383668.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16831031

>>16831012
>>16830767

>> No.16831039
File: 423 KB, 808x805, 1501755550349.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16831039

let's stop fooling ourselves and admit the truth: LINK IS DEAD.

AND NO AMOUNT OF EFFORT POSTING LINK ARTICLES THAT VAGUELY MENTION SMART CONTRACT DATA WILL CHANGE THAT.

WE SHOULD HAVE SOLD. WTF ARE WE STILL HOLDING THIS SHIT FOR??? FUCK THIS CUBE AND THE MAGICAL SPELL IT HAS OVER ME. I LITERALLY CANNOT BRING MYSELF TO SELL IN.

In short: FUCK YOU

>> No.16831101

>>16831039
Neither you nor most of your cadre of "had two years" friends have enough money for a link position at this point.

>> No.16831177

>>16831012
you mean fudded at length?

GPI LINK is unequivocally using LINK, and you have no evidence to the contrary

>> No.16831452

>>16831177
No, there are proofs that they are using R3 Corda. What remains to be seen is if Corda is using Chainlink or not

>> No.16831500

>>16829432
I can't believe we shit on the same street.

>> No.16831532

>>16831452
did you click the podcast link in the OP?
a chainlink team member literally says they are integrating with r3 corda, are you saying you think he's lying?

>> No.16831555

>>16829400
low iq

>> No.16831571

>>16831532
no one believes anything that idiot johann has to say

>> No.16831580

especially after the SWIFT debacle

>> No.16831592

>>16831571
>>16831580

What SWIFT debacle? Is this the part where you make up something that never happened?

>> No.16831614

>>16831592
dyor nulinker, you'll find it

>> No.16831635

>>16831614
>just trust me bro

kys, I've been in LINK longer than you've known about it

>> No.16831638

>>16831592
actually im feeling generous
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8OYsHaOoF8&feature=youtu.be&t=930

>> No.16831640

>>16831500
underrated pajeet bashing

>> No.16831654

>>16831635
clearly not paying attention then

>> No.16831657

>>16829400
1k... eoy?!?!!?

>> No.16831676

>>16831571
Teal ID bought LINK at $4.50 and got ass raped like the faggot he is kek seethe harder faggot you were always destined to be poor

>> No.16831678

>>16831676
nonsensical post that refutes nothing that i said. as expected

>> No.16831687

>>16831452
R3+Corda, Corda using Accord, Accord using link oracles - gpi Link was before any of this AFAIK

>> No.16831695

like i said, people in the know don't believe anything johann says as he's BS'ed us before (SWIFT)

>> No.16831714

>>16831638
>>16831654
>>16831678
>>16831695

>partnership with SWIFT

This has been on the chainlink website since 2017 when it was a 2 man team, and it is restated in every single blog post by protocols and platforms announcing an integration with chainlink, which means it is proof read and green-lighted by the chainlink team.

Literally everything he said was correct

>> No.16831720

>>16831695
people in the knew were onto gpi link a year before johann was on the team

>> No.16831729

>>16831714
and yet SWIFT has NEVER confirmed this partnership. After the POC, there has been 0 confirmation of a continuing partnership on SWIFT's end.
And here comes the bullshit about NDAs yadda yadda yadda

>> No.16831751

>>16831729
>And here comes the bullshit about NDAs yadda yadda yadda
How old are you?

Why do you feel so entitled to expect the staple financial organization for cross-border payments to let you know about their latest integrations before they even go public?

Have you ever worked at a real company in any meaningful position before?

>> No.16831810

>>16831729
0 confirmation doesn't say one thing or another
If anything the continued incluscion of SWIFT's logo on their website may tell you nothing has changed.
Could be that the longer it's up, the more work is being done.

Personally, I'm all in.

>> No.16832005

>>16830767
BUT, is the Link token still being used as collateral? Useless if not.

>> No.16832139

>>16831678
>refutes nothing that i said
You've said nothing of substance to refute.

>> No.16832282

>>16830767
>If something says link it means chainlink

Holy shit I can only imagine the size of your bags faggot lmao

>> No.16832411

>>16831810
If Swift had ended the partnership, Sergey would have put the Google and Oracle partnerships above Swift on the Chainlink homepage.

The fact that he left Swift first tells us that the partnership is ongoing and more involved than the work they are doing with the other companies.

No way would you put Google second if Swift had gone with someone else.

>> No.16832587

1k eoy the aaa lasted prophecy right now he still very surprised

>> No.16832681

>>16831751
>latest integrations before they even go public?

well they do mention a lot of projects by name... it stands to reason that link wold be included with the others and not kept secret

>> No.16832715

>>16829400
>json parser sitting between DLT (corda) and legacy data silos (commercial and investment banks)
>such json parsers will be legally required to be decentralized
topkek lmao this reality isn't real

>> No.16832828

>>16831532
He's talking about Shane Leenk not Chainlink

>> No.16832855

>>16831571
>that idiot johann
calm down there guy. Johann is legit as fuck, and a super nice guy irl.

>> No.16832861

>>16832855
johann seems good but he unironically should work on his accent

>> No.16832875

>>16832861
>unironically should work on his accent
he's based in France and works with french speakers a lot. I don't disagree, but he's very understandable

>> No.16832911

>>16829400
>>16829432
>>16829446
>>16830342
>>16830363
>>16830380
>>16830767
>>16830774
>>16830858
>>16830988
>>16831012
>>16831031
>>16831039
>>16831101
>>16831177
>>16831452
>>16831500
>>16831532
>>16831555
>>16831571
>>16831580
>>16831592
>>16831614
>>16831635
>>16831638
>>16831640
>>16831654
>>16831657
>>16831676
>>16831678
>>16831687
>>16831695
>>16831714
>>16831720
>>16831729
>>16831751
>>16831810
>>16832005
>>16832139
>>16832282
>>16832411
>>16832587
>>16832681
>>16832715
>>16832828
>>16832855
>>16832861
>>16832875
its XRP

>> No.16832995

>>16829432
You foggots realize SWIFT has an economic incentive to keep their mouth shut right? Like every other player in the ecosystem, they have to buy tokens as collateral. Why the fuck would they ever announce to the general public they are utilizing said token? Why would they voluntarily drive the price up by announcing? You realize they have every incentive in the world to stay mum as long as possible right?

>> No.16833163

>>16832911
You're xrp

>> No.16833505
File: 760 KB, 2852x1378, 1572963084905.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16833505

>>16829400
ISO 20022 uses Corda Settler, which needs pricing oracles. Who the fuck else do you think they will use for their oracles?
https://youtu.be/pqbIBeP_0m8?t=45

>> No.16833527
File: 167 KB, 2048x562, .jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16833527

When I started researching clearance and settlement of stock trades, was amazing how janky and wasteful the current process is. See this https://gendal.me/2014/01/05/a-simple-explanation-of-how-shares-move-around-the-securities-settlement-system/

by the CTO of R3, maker of Corda enterprise blockchain.

Basically like 10 different players each with their own records that have to be reconciled. whenever stocks trade hands. Takes like 100ths of a second to EXECUTE a trade but then it takes 3 DAYS for the shares to actually change hands, aka "settle."

Handling this with DLT and smart contracts seems BEYOND obvious. So, question to ask yourself is, when this goes live, and cost of trading on ASX goes down by 100 (or maybe 1000) and number of errors (which are super fucking costly to deal with b/c the require labor intensive reconciliation by players that do not trust each other) goes down by 1000, what does that do to place of Australian Stock Exchange in the world. How many stories in WSJ will be written about this?

What does THAT do for adoption of smart contracts and DLT in every other industry, with boards at Disney, and ExxonMobil, and you name it saying to CEO and CFO and CTO -- why the fuck aren't YOU jumping on this to get 80% cost savings.

All these bullshit stories in the press about how "everyone is over the hype of blockchain and it doesn't do shit" are TOTALLY fucking missing the point.

It's all right there. But it's going to start at the enterprise level.

>> No.16833554

>>16831177
Checked

>> No.16833589
File: 105 KB, 1315x605, 123.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16833589

>>16829400

>> No.16833590

>>16832995
Swift owns the 650 million links already, they are not buying more

>> No.16833673
File: 79 KB, 1133x371, battle fatigue.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16833673

>>16833527
trivializing account reconciliation and eliminating custodians, this is the power of blockchain, it seems so boring and simple but it will save firms untold amounts

>> No.16833676
File: 39 KB, 959x413, imtired.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16833676

>> No.16833738

when moon I'm so dull & dopamine running low

>> No.16833772
File: 927 KB, 740x900, 1550769157401.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16833772

>>16833738
tomorrow

>> No.16833773

>>16833589
Please tell us what you think that means.

>> No.16833967

>>16829400
At 25:05 in the video he states pretty clearly that the Chainlink network will be providing on chain data for Corda and Hyperledger. Swift is using Corda so I'm assuming Chainlink-Corda-Swift?

>> No.16833978

>>16832911
brb just de-risking

>> No.16833980

>>16829400
>Innovation product manager
It's nothing