Haircomb

[Anonymous No.16788259]

Honest question, is this shit a scam or a new breakthrough in blockchain?

[Anonymous No.16788674]

delete this before others discover this, I'm not finished claiming

[Anonymous No.16788682]

It's a scam

[Anonymous No.16788702]

The btc isn't provably burnt op is the dev and hes gonna sweep all wallets whenevr he feels like it
The .exe is botnet trojan with miner in

[Anonymous No.16788736]

>>16788682
>>16788702
fud this more I am claiming 400 comb this month alone. This will be a million dollar marketcap easily.

500 dollars EOY

[Anonymous No.16788766]

>>16788736
Price EOY: $0

[Anonymous No.16788814]

>>16788766
we are not afraid, as long as people are sacrificing bitcoin to get this this never goes to zero

[Anonymous No.16788842]

>>16788259
What is this project doing?

[Anonymous No.16788900]

>>16788842
quantum strong coin - impossible to crack with quantum computer, on bitcoin blockchain - same assurance about transactions like bitcoin, awesome anonymity - history is private, infinite scalability - you can pay to as many receivers as you wish by funding only 21 addresses, stealth addresses - harden your privacy

it is the real hashcash

[Anonymous No.16789069]

>>16788900
Sounds useful, how can i get them, or claim them?

[Anonymous No.16789087]

>>16789069
generate key, then view your claiming stealth address and pay to it 0.00000546 BTC

and be sure to fully save your wallet

[SAGE No.16789093]

>>16789069
False flag discord tranny

[Anonymous No.16789099]

to continue claiming or not that is the question

[Anonymous No.16789100]

There is literally no way a project with that logo is legit. Don't even need to research it.

[Anonymous No.16789109]

>>16788259
it's neither
it's a clever sin

[Anonymous No.16789113]

>>16789100
seethe and cope

[Anonymous No.16789126]

>>16789109
coinburn and parasitic blockchain on bitcoin
two of the 7 mortal sins of crypto.

[Anonymous No.16789136]

>>16789087
I'm a noob, where can i find more info?

[Anonymous No.16789150]

>>16789136
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5195815.0
>>16789126
*sins*

[Anonymous No.16789161]

>>16789126
it does not require coinburn, miners can mine it without coinburn

and it's a graph not blockchain

>>16789136
bitcointalk

[Anonymous No.16789182]

>>16789126
1 thou shalt not larp as satoshi
2 thou shalt not issue or shill shitcoins
3 thou shalt not fud bitcoin
4 thou shalt not burn bitcoin
5 thou shalt not pile garbage on blockchain
6 thou shalt not subscribe to cashie fallacies
7 thou shalt not blame your weak hands on others

[Anonymous No.16789193]

>>16789150
where you found that? my understanding is that claiming always requires you to send bitcoin to an address you can't retrieve it from. miners don't pay fees for it if they choose to claim that's all.

[Anonymous No.16789216]

>>16789193
miner can put to coinbase an output of 0 BTC with haircomb claiming address on it
it will effectively issue new coin without a burn because it's the first qualifying output in the block according to haircomb rules

[Anonymous No.16789243]

>>16789216
where did you get the 0 output? specifically?

[Anonymous No.16789268]

>>16789243
i tried to find any source on skipping the 546 sats but came up with nada...

[Anonymous No.16789286]

>>16789243
It's not about the coinburn at all. If users could make 0BTC P2WSH outputs like they can create op returns then they could claim just for fees.

The whole point of claiming it is an open auction. The miner mines a block, miner does not know what comb is, miner decides to not keep it, and the comb goes to the first claimer (usually the highest fee bidder) .

[Anonymous No.16789293]

>>16789286
again sauce? cause wherever i look i find the exact opposite of what you are saying.

[Anonymous No.16789339]

>>16789293
look at what the modified bitcoin core is doing, it's open source.

it's simply sending all P2WSH from the block to the haircomb core disregarding any burn amounts.

[Anonymous No.16789460]

>>16789182
hmmm

[Anonymous No.16789545]

>>16789339
if you make me dig into the comb source to prove you wrong i will find you and beat you with 50 shoes motherfucker

[Anonymous No.16789568]

546 satoshi to the mining address is needed to be able to later send this comb. Just unseen p2wsh has the potential to be awarded the comb, but still need it to be specifically the mining address generated from the wallet in order to later send this comb from one to another.

As far as miners not including other ppls fees and instead including their own transaction. Thats the same as them paying the fee to themselves.

Asfar as skippjng the 546 satoshi burn, i dont think that will work because most btc clients verify the transactions to be valid, and the dust requirement is a minimum of 546 satoshi.
I doubt they will risk their block not being valid in somebodies client for a mere 546 satoshi.

Interesting points though! All worth questioning them on the main thread for dev to reply.

I dont think dev frequents here.
Also dev gave their proton email in the thread, feel free to email them.

[Anonymous No.16789577]

>>16789545
I believe that, because comb itself isn't even open source. We would literally have to disassemble it.

[Anonymous No.16789636]

>>16788259
It's called fucking haircomb dude

yeah I'm thinking it's shit

[Anonymous No.16789688]

>>16789577
yeah i just noticed the github only has binaries i thought at least the code is there zipped but hell no.

[Anonymous No.16789711]

im still claiming idgaf

[Anonymous No.16789878]

Not open source so ppl dont clone. Eventually will be open source. Thats going to be the last time we hear from the dev.

[Anonymous No.16789900]

>>16789545
>beat you with 50 shoes motherfucker
Hello Ahmed

[Anonymous No.16790044]

>>16789568
>As far as miners not including other ppls fees and instead including their own transaction.
i'm pretty sure they can take all the fees and still get the comb

[Anonymous No.16790069]

last thread someone said less than 2k in circulation

[Anonymous No.16790243]

>>16788259
Lol. This makes smelly coin look like antshares.

[Anonymous No.16790250]

>>16790069
you can probably make any number of comb tokens with different iterations. the commitment is the only thing giving it any "inherent value"

[Anonymous No.16790271]

>>16790250
so what

[Anonymous No.16790328]

>>16790271
it probably means the circulating amount means nothing imo

[Anonymous No.16790365]

>>16790328
but it would take time for someone to make a clone and this is already out now and being claimed each block?
if there are high fees then it will cost more to claim

[Anonymous No.16790846]

>>16790044
right, but once ppl see that miners are sidemining this, meaning they are including their own transaction to be the first unseen p2wsh, they can even put it as the first tx where the block subsidy is.

then ppl will stop attempting to claim since there is no use, since the miners are already including their own comb claims, and since only 1 comb claim per block. its useless for ppl to claim.

in the future the miners will claim. its just a matter of time. it literally cost them nothing. unless they see more gain from the fees of others claiming. but eventually the price of comb rises and they just sidemine it by including their own unseen p2wsh into each block.

yes no need to clone as the distribution of this is one of the fairest ive ever seen in any crypto. its very slow and very long. currently about 1.59 comb per claim and very very slowly that diminishes over time. comb will be inflationary for hundreds of years to reach the max cap of 12mil or so. that means you can get in anytime and still be able to claim pretty much almost as much as anyone did long before.

no reason to clone, first mover advantage will always be best.

[Anonymous No.16792009]

bump

[Anonymous No.16792115]

call me when you can mine it instead of some weird meme 546 stat tipping shit

[Anonymous No.16792905]

>>16792115
You can already mine. You need to mine your own bitcoin block tho

[Anonymous No.16793942]

>Safety feature - history export now requires a minimum of 6 (or 7 - to be determined?) confirmations in order to export your transaction. This means that you will not expose your commits by accident and won't give a malicious counterparty a chance to destroy your funds.

>Never send your fully saved wallet to anyone. I will never ask you for your wallet, I will request only the transaction history.

What did the dev mean by this?

[Anonymous No.16793952]

and this

>Loss of funds due to a confirmed doublespend - due to changing your mind about the destinations while a transaction was ongoing.
>Unlike in Bitcoin, you cannot change your mind if the 21 addresses do not confirm on the blockchain. You need to retry paying again later to the same 21 addresses with higher fee. If you modify the transaction you get different 21 addresses, never show these to anyone and never pay to them. The point of no return is revealing the first 21 addresses made from a key to the public.