/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.16722070]

why didn't Craig Wright/satoshi just take over and invade the original BTC github repositories from Greg Maxwell faggot to make it like BSV?

[Anonymous No.16722078]

>>16722070
read atlas shrugged. bsv is atlantis, btc is the old world, Craig is John Galt, I am Henry Rearden

[Anonymous No.16722095]

>>16722070
He can flippen most of his suicide stack now and get 100-1 gains retardo.

[Anonymous No.16722234]

>>16722070
>Greg
>Craig
>BSV
>Another fucking thread
Holy shit shut up already

[Anonymous No.16722714]

>>16722070
Who?

[Anonymous No.16723064]

>>16722070
worst part is even if satoshi came back blockstream could still prevent him from fixing the project (increasing the max block size).
too late now though, blockstream successfully held back bitcoin from becoming anything and now we're out of time

[Anonymous No.16723166]

>>16723064
how? it's a completely opensource project. if you cloned it to your own repo changed it and gained community support blockstream would be completely powerless.
don't be stupid no dev is locked in by the protocol. satoshi would have social consensus whenever he comes back. but that would ruin his experiment.

[Anonymous No.16723417]

>>16722078
>Craig
>John Galt

Suck my dick faggot.

[Anonymous No.16723476]

>>16723417
I don't see how your pic refutes craig being john galt

[Anonymous No.16723508]

>>16723476
Galt is maybe literature most famus anti-interventionist. creg on the other hand is a govt. cock sucker. Oddly, because its that same Government who are going to deny him his liberty, not unless another Government gets around to it first. Still, it won't be Government cock the fat fucking fraud will need to be sucking in jail. Will it

[Anonymous No.16723517]

>>16723508
meanwhile the devs in btc wants to (and do) centrally decide how many transactions the miners are allowed to process

[Anonymous No.16723556]

>>16723517
you still don't get consensus do you? after all these years. you think a single person can decide anything in bitcoin? lol.

[Anonymous No.16723558]

>>16722070
Can you please elaborate on the tenets of homosexual fascism? Is it forcing everyone to be gay like Craig by threat of violence?

[Anonymous No.16723568]

>>16723558
something like that jimmy will personally supervise the conversion camps for kids.

[Anonymous No.16723582]

>>16723556
Bitcoin is competitive. It's not about a group of developers all talking to each other, holding each other's cocks in a circle and fucking jerking onto biscuits and eating them afterwards. I'm Australian, that's what circle jerk means and that's what it is
-Satoshi Nakamoto, 2018

Timestamp 15:04
https://youtu.be/vzCrsem5syg?t=904

[Anonymous No.16723583]

>>16723508
This

[Anonymous No.16723630]

>>16723582
it's all true and that is when sv will never be bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.16723639]

>>16723630
well except for the satoshi nakamoto part the fat fraud is not satoshi obv.

[Anonymous No.16724690]

>>16722070
why not just log in to bitcoin talk and tell everyone off?
why not just sign the satoshi PGP key and tell everyone off?
https://web.archive.org/web/20110228054007/http://www.bitcoin.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc

I know why

[Anonymous No.16724697]

>>16723064
blockstream doesn't develop bitcoin lol
blockstream doesn't even develop LN
OPtech is the new sheriff in town

[Anonymous No.16724716]

Delusional BSV homos. Do you know who has won? That's right, you already know.

[Anonymous No.16724721]

>>16723508
Craig Wright is not a gov. cock sucker
he is against government

proof:
https://cypherpunks.venona.com/date/1996/09/msg01451.html

[Anonymous No.16724742]

>>16724721
>he is against government
no he is not. He is against socialism and commies. Big difference

[Anonymous No.16724768]

>>16722070
He tried with his Arnhem speech, but Jihan stabbed him in the back. By then Segwit was added and it was too late for BTC, they destroyed the chain with unfixable fatal flaw by forking away from the BitCoin protocol. So the real BitCoin continued on for a while under the BCH ticker, until faggot devs again fucked the protocol and forked away with CTOR and DSV. So BitCoin continued on under the BSV ticker.

you commies and anarchists and jews can keep trying to corrupt BitCoin but all you are doing is forking away every time, allowing based white autists to continue accumulating the real BitCoin every time.

[Anonymous No.16724773]

>>16724742
Governments will never touch your vaporware chain. Do you know who killed Craig's dream?

[Anonymous No.16724806]

>>16724768
>Arnhem speech
link?

[Anonymous No.16724822]

>>16724768
exactly. We can hate and also thank Greg for his efforts.

[Anonymous No.16724834]

>>16724768
It's already clear that a bunch of literal satanic homos and pajeets at nChain will never onboard government and institutions no matter what claims about scalability and compliance they make, this battle is permanently lost

[Anonymous No.16725083]

>>16724742
>commies
>china
China is the most capitalistic country in the world
US is pure financial socialism, just look at FED repo (trust me bois, it’s not a QE!)

[Anonymous No.16725100]

>>16724806
here you go fren, pure Satoshi kino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgqtcu0zo-k

[Anonymous No.16725112]

>>16725083
>China is the most capitalistic country in the world
where did I mention China?

>US is pure financial socialism
Where did I say it is not?

[Anonymous No.16725123]

>>16722070
Segwit transactions are in the blockchain forever, senpai. You cant undo certain types of damage. Also this route bankrupts evil people.

[Anonymous No.16725127]

>>16722234
You should try reddit.

[Anonymous No.16725192]

Silly BSV faggots still think any of this matters... Look at who designed Corda, realize the scale of what's going on and comprehend the impotence of your vaporware. Your dream is dead.

[Anonymous No.16725263]

wouldn't it be hilarious if this seething faggot >>16725192 was mike hearn trying to shill his worthless private excel sheet because he know satoshi is about to BTFO him eternally

[Anonymous No.16725333]

>>16725263
You have no idea how deep the rabbit hole goes and how fucked you are. BSV is vaporware that can never fulfill Craig's promises. "Fiat currencies on BSV", "Ethereum as a sidechain", "nChain's patent portfolio"... His dream was completely destroyed.

[Anonymous No.16725363]

>>16725333
>"nChain's patent portfolio"

This is a reality though. Loo them up on google. I mean the faggot was even granted the original BTC patent. Hearn has nothing.

> "Fiat currencies on BSV", "Ethereum as a sidechain"

Both possible.

A private/ semi-public blockchain is inherently flawed and will fail. If you don't understand why you shouldn't be commenting on this thread.

[Anonymous No.16725400]

>>16724834
>nChain will never onboard government and institutions

They don't need to. You are thinking too small. BSV can simply outcompete Visa and Mastercard anyway. We drink your milkshake.

[Anonymous No.16725461]

>>16725363
>>16725400
You seem to be ignorant of both the current affairs and the technical underpinnings. To start with, BSV is technologically inferior and unfit for institutional adoption by design. But worst of all, talks about "issuing fiat on chain" and "institutional bitcoin mining" are pure cope at this point. Do you realize the scale and power of R3 Corda? Do you understand who designed it? Things are devastating for a BSV aficionado.

[Anonymous No.16725528]

>>16725127
No please by all means, post seven more threads discussing BSV, that's what biz needs right now. I can't go more than a second without seeing Craig's or Greg's face, please don't keep me waiting.

[Anonymous No.16725568]

>>16725461
> To start with, BSV is technologically inferior and unfit for institutional adoption by design

Yet you cannot explain why! I can tell why R3 is shit.

"Current affairs" will mean nothing in a year or two.

>talks about "issuing fiat on chain" and "institutional bitcoin mining" are pure cope at this point.

You can already make secure, immutable, instantaneous payments with BTC on the BSV chain. Of course fiat it the next logical step. Why would China go near a private blockchain for this purpose?

I like how you ignored my comment re patents. N Chain are going to make a killing in royalties from Hearn.

[Anonymous No.16725606]

>>16725568
Wrong. Educate yourself:

https://medium.com/corda/corda-top-ten-facts-8-pluggable-consensus-447545e6cb0d
On top of that, you can implement bitcoin, a public chain with PoW mining on Corda (but not vice versa):

>So whenever a new asset or contract is initiated onto the Corda ledger, it is tagged with the consensus service that will govern it. A high value asset might be tagged with a multi-part byzantine fault-tolerant consensus pool. And updates to an ephemeral document being managed by several firms who trust each other might be just fine to be confirmed by a crash-fault tolerant cluster operated by those firms themselves.

>This has the really useful side-effect that it allows Corda to support multiple different consensus pools on the same network. Which enables Corda to achieve really high network-level transaction rates. You can even move assets from one consensus pool to another to enable complex multi-asset transfers in a single transaction.

>Now, it so happens that nothing stops people from implementing probabilistic finality notary pools on Corda, of course — proof of work, proof of stake, delegation to the bitcoin blockchain even… take your pick… the notary pluggability design is massively flexible.

[Anonymous No.16726095]

>>16724742
talking about canines...

[Anonymous No.16726871]

>>16726095
cope

[Anonymous No.16726887]

>>16726871
i'm sure you will
eventually

[Anonymous No.16727038]

>>16726095
Satoshi signed already that the Japanese fool isn't Satoshi.

Funny he hasn't done that to craig,makes you think

[Anonymous No.16727286]

>>16724768
>allowing based white autists to continue accumulating the real BitCoin every time.
You're a pajeet tho

[Anonymous No.16727369]

>>16727038
no such thing happend you lying cuck.
satoshis forum account was compromised between 2010 and 2011 it's pretty obvious other people posted with his account after satoshi left before it got suspended.

[Anonymous No.16727561]

>>16724768
why are all bsv faggots spelling it BitCoin even faketoshi himself, when it is clearly wrong according to their holy whitepaper?

[Anonymous No.16727588]

>>16727561

[Anonymous No.16727647]

>>16727561
it's a coping mechanism resulting from craig misspelling it a long time ago showcasing his ignorance.

[Anonymous No.16727685]

>>16724768

[Anonymous No.16727722]

>>16727647
well the post is most likely a forgery based on internet archives tho so i can't really tell who came up with the meme.

[Anonymous No.16728204]

>>16723166
community support... everything you said makes sense in theory but in practice it's all bullshit. because a fork to preserve satoshi's plans already happened. in fact it even happened once before the bch fork as well, and miners agreed that btc was going down the wrong path but still stuck with btc because of money.

even if satoshi came back from the dead, had all the right signatures, moved some early coins, and then said "remove the fucking max block size" btc would persist. he can fork as much as he like.

[Anonymous No.16728221]

>>16728204
miners go with social consensus because that's where the money is. simple as that.

[Anonymous No.16728253]

>>16728221
miners goes with "let's not rock the boat and just do whatever blockstream says because otherwise income might go down".

[Anonymous No.16728295]

>>16727722
Satoshi did >>16727588

[Anonymous No.16728351]

>>16728204
good. That's a good thing we don't deify satoshi. He was a guy with an overall good idea but plenty of bad implementations that have thankfully been ironed out. The original protocol allowed sending btc to ip addresses. Fucking lol. Maybe we shouldn't be trying to implement every single idea that satoshi had like it's gospel. Blockstream is not a god either, it's a company that works on bitcoin and has to keep in good graces to everyone that participates in the system. If they over step their boundary they will be squashed like every attempt of overtaking bitcoin before them.

[Anonymous No.16728456]

>>16728351
some of us actually wanted digital cash for the whole world and not some meaningless hodl asset with 50 dollar transfer fees. blockstream succeeded in destroying adoption and split the community. satoshi didn't even want to put a block size limit in place, it was hal's idea.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=946236.msg10388435#msg10388435
>But all 3 of us agreed that 1MB had to be temporary because it would never scale.

[Anonymous No.16728514]

>>16728253
that's where the social consensus is. maybe one day you will get it.

[Anonymous No.16728529]

>>16728295
you mean the readme intresting tho because satoshi did not misspell it anywhere else not in the whitepaper not in the source not in forum posts and there is no actual proof he made that readme.

but sure it's the sort of indirect ""evidence"" that craig tries to find his angles with all the fucking time.

[Anonymous No.16728548]

>>16728514
maybe someday you will get it.

[Anonymous No.16728549]

>>16728456
indeed but later on he saw the wisdom of it and put it in there with his own hands. the funny thing about dos protection is bitcoin no longer needs it only the shitforks do.

[Anonymous No.16728572]

>>16728549
well there is two types of attacks involving block size and one is done by a miner bitcoin is protected from that having majority hash that is well distributed the other type of attack is a block extension attack can be done by any node to dos the network and yeah it's better if bitcoin retains some dos protection too.