/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.16699172]

When moon

[Anonymous No.16699282]

Project sounds pretty gay but someone said vitalik is bullish on it? Anyone have screen caps of the tweets?

[Anonymous No.16699303]

>>16699282
https://twitter.com/vitalikbuterin/status/1207344008306937857

https://twitter.com/vitalikbuterin/status/1179323484318687232?s=21

[Anonymous No.16699311]

He also mentioned on his blog, ctrl+f kleros.

https://vitalik.ca/general/2019/11/22/progress.html

[Anonymous No.16699343]

>>16699311
Cool thanks.

Why does he like Auger more than Link?

[Anonymous No.16699462]

>>16699343
I don't know but..

>The largest known instance of a decentralized oracle running is Augur, which has processed outcomes for millions of dollars of bets. Token curated registries such as the Kleros TCR for tokens are another example. However, these systems still have not seen a real-world test of the forking mechanism (search for "subjectivocracy" here) either due to a highly controversial question or due to an attempted 51% attack. There is also research on the oracle problem happening outside of the blockchain space in the form of the "peer prediction" literature; see here for a very recent advancement in the space.
>Another looming challenge is that people want to rely on these systems to guide transfers of quantities of assets larger than the economic value of the system's native token. In these conditions, token holders in theory have the incentive to collude to give wrong answers to steal the funds. In such a case, the system would fork and the original system token would likely become valueless, but the original system token holders would still get away with the returns from whatever asset transfer they misdirected. Stablecoins (see #10) are a particularly egregious case of this.

[Anonymous No.16699523]

>>16699343
Do you know why?

[Anonymous No.16699545]

>>16699523
I don't get it

[Anonymous No.16699567]

>>16699545
Kek that's me

[Anonymous No.16700116]

>>16699172
no one will use this