[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 31 KB, 1505x1259, Bitcoin_Cash.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16678869 No.16678869 [Reply] [Original]

Lol who the fuck is buying this trash?

>> No.16678875

>>16678869
dunno investing in cash is an oxymoron

>> No.16679900

>>16678869
Literally every bitcoin millionaire and early adopter, you 2017 newfag brainlet.

>> No.16679905
File: 80 KB, 246x138, 3243534.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16679905

>trash
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61kQ4-0a1p8

>> No.16679991

>>16678869
me, I use it a lot. Most places that accept BTC also accept BCH. So why should I chose to use the one that has high fees and long wait times?

>> No.16679996

Me I 500 bitcoin from my sick rig

>> No.16680008

>>16678869
BCH is great vs BTC tech and commerce wise. I'd still rather use/buy ETH but BTC is absolute trash in comparison.

>> No.16680031

Faggot OP can't comprehend that people can actually buy coins to use them rather than speculating on them.
That's because he's a degenerate gambler whose fav shitcoins have nowhere near the UX that BCH can provide.
And it is why he'll be forever poor and his coins - forgotten in less than half a decade.

>> No.16680043

>>16679900
Nah. They got their free bcash and sold it for Bitcoin and never looked back at btrash.

>> No.16680046

>>16679905
>Calling turds products.

>> No.16680048

>>16680043
You aren't fooling anyone but yourself, redditor/twitterfag.

>> No.16680052

>>16678869
It makes perfect sense that bcash pumps as bsv's credibility goes down the drain. The market for Bitcoin alts will consolidate around BCash

>> No.16680053

Btrash is even worse than bcore

>> No.16680058

>>16679991
Because you already hold it? No one holds bch, it loses value constantly. You'd need to trade before every purchase, making the fees of bch way higher.

>> No.16680063

>>16679900
2012 bitcoiner here, you couldn't be more wrong.

>> No.16680070

>>16680063
>2012
do you think you're not a newfag or smth?

>> No.16680072

>>16680053
You are correct
There is nothing here to buy
Maybe some niggers

>> No.16680076
File: 66 KB, 315x400, ohboi.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16680076

>>16680058
BTC is technically cripple and the room for growth is small. There is much more coming for BCH while BTC has been stuck dieing with the "litenin netwerk" which now has been shown to work better on BCH. LMAO.


only the tech illiterates are still in the BTC camp

>> No.16680077

>>16680058
>bought at 0.06 after the fork, which btw was the price where everyone but Roger bought
>sold some before the hash war, doubled the rest by selling BSV
>overall ahead in sats just by holding
Not to mention all the goodies I got from being in the community. I literally got $5000 in airdrops just for being an early user of CoinEx. I'm way ahead, why wouldn't I hold lmfao.
>>16680063
Name 1 public figure who is an early adopter and sold his BCH.
Most sold their BTC, the Winklevoss twins hold both.
But NOBODY sold their BCH for BTC lmao, stop larping.

>> No.16680129

I'll tell you one thing... I've been watching the whole thing for quite a while, and few coins have as many geeks among the supporters as BCH. Most coins simply have a dev team making announcements, and hopeful holders. Only ETH has an army of active, contributing geeks, and BTC somewhat (for legacy reasons). But BCH comes close. This fact alone has something incredibly bullish about it.

That being said, I would still hold BTC too because I have a fear BTC might copy BCH developments in the future.

>> No.16680152

>>16680129
they can't copy BCH in the future. Well they can but it will be too late. BCH is making great advancements with very cool stuff you can do with the tech.

The truth of the matter is.

if you can use BTC (to pay) for it you can also use BCH.

BUT not the other way around.

BTC has lost 5 years on Lightening and arguing.

they can never recover from this even if they decide to just copy what BCH is doing.

BCH is way ahead now.

and the $200 million fund is not even propping up the future developments.

Blockstream has spent all theiir capital and time on LN. Something that could never work cause of various issues (routing problem).
Blockstream is broke af and desperate af.

BCH has $200 million development fund coming + Bitcoin Jesus + Jihan mega billions support.

I did my research well over the past few years.
BTC will reign one or two more 4 year cycles.
THen something else will take the throne and the original buttcoin will wither away.

>> No.16680177

>>16678869
Riddle me this, why would you buy Bcash over Litecoin?

>> No.16680180

>>16678869
>who the fuck is buying this trash?
Every thinking man while pajeets are swinging their worthless scamcoins.

>> No.16680187

>>16680177
As I said >>16680129, BCH has a MASSIVE number of old-fashioned tech geeks among its supporters, surpassed only by ETH

>> No.16680191

>>16679905
Twenty products...? Is that all?

>> No.16680196

>>16680177
asking this just shows how technically retarded and not up to date with the history of the coin you are. no one wants the charlie lee copy and paste pump and dump bags for good reason., only tech tards buy em.

>> No.16680234

>>16680177
>ltc tech is copy pasted btc tech
>no dedicated dev team
>ltc marketing = bootlicking btc and trying to sell itself as digital silver
>chink manchild founder who shits on bagholders and openly admits he has no interest in anything except btc
I'm still going to buy some ltc once it bottoms, but comparing bch to btc testnet is pretty retarded. Dogecoin is a better choice for that.

>> No.16680249

>>16680187
Let the moonboys chase BTC, they don't understand value creation. We can build out of the spotlight until the paradigm shift.

>> No.16680298

>>16678869
Chinese, American and Indian porkies

>> No.16680401

>>16680129
By the way, BSV has much less nerds in comparison. It tends to attract schitzo/technobabbler types somehow. BSV has some techies few and far between, but very specific ones obsessed with number fetishism, they're not very productive. BSV also pursues an unrealistic goal ("making governments more honest" as opposed to p2p cash) where it cannot compete with permissioned DLTs, so BCH has a more realistic end goal and value proposition.

>> No.16680483

>1 bcash = 0.03 bitcoin

>> No.16680590

>>16680401
BSV has two "smart looking" devs but neither of them can deliver something.
They can only envision how things CAN be potentially. But implementation is boring for them and they suck at actual coding.
I've had similar devs apply to positions in my company, I never hired there retards.

>> No.16681296

bump

>> No.16681353

>>16680191
its 20k dipshit