/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.16666243]

In the film terminator genisys, the skynet starts with the start of genisys, BSV is upgrading their genesis upgrade soon, the end is near.

[Anonymous No.16666467]

Its gonna be crazy

[Anonymous No.16666571]

>>16666243
it's almost like the fags running the shitshow called sv are trying to meme themselves into some relevance.

[Anonymous No.16666590]

>>16666243
STIFF

>>16666467
STIFF

>>16666571
VERY STIFF
>you gonna get raped

[Anonymous No.16666629]

>>16666590
Does Craig yell "stiff" before he gets fucked in the ass?

[Anonymous No.16666650]

>>16666243
>the end is near.
you promised that 20 years ago

[Anonymous No.16666660]

>>16666590
how many times i heard that... and nothing ever happens.

[Anonymous No.16666676]

>>16666571
>Student: Ok. Well will you now answer my first question. Why does the rest of the cryptocurrency world hate BSV so much?
>Master: I will answer. There are two reasons.
>The first reason is this. It is a threat to them. If BSV succeeds, by necessity, it will take value away from the other coins. If you own BTC, and BSV on-chain scaling actually works just like Satoshi originally stated all those years ago, then your coin BTC will go down in purchasing power. Many of those who are all in on BTC for whatever reason know that BSV succeeding is an existential threat to their wealth.
>Student: They don’t say this. They say it’s a joke that will die and go to zero.
>Master: Why don’t they say this about Songcoin?
>Student: What is Songcoin?
>Master: A project that actually died and went to zero.
>Student: I’ve never heard of it.
>Master: The BTC advocates focus so much on BSV, rather than all the projects that are actually failing, for a good reason. If BSV actually was a joke, just like Songcoin, they would pay it the same mind they pay Songcoin; zero.
https://personacryptona.com/essays/why-do-so-many-people-hate-bitcoin-sv

[Anonymous No.16666690]

>16666666
kek

[Anonymous No.16666716]

>>16666666

[Anonymous No.16666754]

>>16666676
more like
>student: Why does the rest of the cryptocurrency world hate BSV so much?
>master: The first reason is it's a lie. The second reason it's ran by literal criminals and faggots. The third reason is the incessant low quality shilling.

[Anonymous No.16666781]

>>16666754
Why aren't you counter-signalling Songcoin or Dentacoin?

[Anonymous No.16666817]

>>16666781
anon you know very well why not: never heard of them in my life the only shitcoin that's in my face every day when i try to chill here is this sv crap.

[Anonymous No.16666866]

>>16666571

We've been here for years nigga

Big blocks have always been popular, it's how bitcoin was designed

[Anonymous No.16666895]

>>16666666

[Anonymous No.16666961]

>>16666817
So what other "shitcoin" threads do you go into to counter-signal and how long have you been engaging in this behavior?

[Anonymous No.16666994]

>>16666866
big blocks were not popular but the only option until small blocks were actually proven to be a better alternative.

[Anonymous No.16667005]

>>16666676
I hope this person publishes these essays in a book so I can burn it

[Anonymous No.16667006]

>>16666961
which ever i feel like usually pick the most idiotic and obnoxious ones whenever i feel bored.

[Anonymous No.16667013]

>>16667005
Triggered
>>16667006
Name one

[Anonymous No.16667045]

>>16667013
>>16579512

[Anonymous No.16667074]

>>16666754
R3 Corda. BSV is dead on arrival.

[Anonymous No.16667083]

>>16667013
i like to push the shit in for linkies for their useless token and ethards whenever they start ranting about pos. sometimes i shit on the other pathetic attempts at scamming people. but mostly chime in to discussions about scaling i don't care for outright ponzies like hex they come and go and too many to even count.

[Anonymous No.16667087]

>>16667074
i don't think enterprise would ever care for sv either but where did that come from anon? you just felt like randomly chiming in?

[Anonymous No.16667090]

>>16667045
>He thinks the original bitcoin model tx throughput is currently meaningfully limited by hardware constraints
Feels like 2015 in here. Do you really have no new talking points?

[Anonymous No.16667107]

>>16667090
my newest one is "let's kill all BSV'ers"

[Anonymous No.16667121]

>>16667083
Shame. BTC maximalism is the most basic bitch of all the crypto archetypes.
>>16667087
He comes into every BSV thread specifically to countershill by pretending some private blockchain "solution" is in any way meaningful. I think he is genuinely stupid and/or scared because you don't see the same countershilling elsewhere, which is exactly the point you miss.
Say whatever you want, the fact that the back and forth over BSV has been sustained for this long - longer than any other coin except maybe LINK, which is a special case - is meaningful in a way that makes people like you uncomfortable. Basic psychology suggests that BSV would have faded away by now if it was just another pump and dump, yet here we are.

[Anonymous No.16667136]

>>16667107
See, this is what I'm talking about. The naked hate and frustration. You really can't get it anywhere else and if that doesn't give you pause you are beyond help.

[Anonymous No.16667148]

>>16667136
“People like you are dangerous and need to be exposed before someone in a position of power actually believes that you know what you are talking about.”

[Anonymous No.16667279]

>>16667121
>BTC maximalism
i was not a btc maxi for a long time. i only became one when we were starting to drown in the sea of pointless shitcoins in 2017. you can't even evaluate project by their actual merits anymore as shilling in social media became the primary weapon in their arms race.
>Basic psychology suggests that BSV would have faded away by now if it was just another pump and dump, yet here we are.
i will give you that anon it's pretty obvious that calvin actually put his money where his mouth is. i have no doubt how it all ends nevertheless. the fundamentals of sv are shit. the value proposition is retarded. no amount of shilling and memeing can correct that.

[Anonymous No.16667373]

>>16667148
>NOOOOOOOO!! We have to stop the signal before someone important actually believes these evil naz- I mean BSVjeets!
>>16667279
>you can't even evaluate project by their actual merits anymore as shilling in social media became the primary weapon in their arms race
Well at least this we can agree on. Proof of social media needs to go.
>calvin actually put his money where his mouth is
In terms of mining, yes. "Paid shills" not so much. It's not necessary since there are enough passionate real people who will do it for free. "All BSVers are jeets" is a cope.

[Anonymous No.16667428]

>>16667373
I don't really know what to say to that other than I unironically want you dead

[Anonymous No.16667623]

>>16667373
nah sv crowd is all smoke no fire. there are a handful of autist that actually try to make some sense of that garbage dump of a scaling proposition. but mostly it's just producing infographs filled with obvious lies and pajeet tier memes.

the market will sort it all out eventually. the most important thing is the halving i want to see what happens to all 3 forks after.

[Anonymous No.16667628]

>>16666243
>upgrade

You mean hardfork? :)

[Anonymous No.16667632]

>>16667623
and the other thing i want to see is sv mining hundred megabyte blocks for a sustained period of time god damnit wtf are you fags doing mining 1mb blocks?

[Anonymous No.16667664]

>>16666629
>>16666629
>>16666629
>>16666629
Answer the question BSV fags

[Anonymous No.16667768]

>>16667664
Stiff

[Anonymous No.16667854]

>>16666676
Thank you just read all of them, especialy one with the club and the islands.

Make me bullish for...

[Anonymous No.16667890]

>>16667768
So Craig says STIFF.when he gets ass fucked got it

[Anonymous No.16667927]

>>16667890
stiff

[Anonymous No.16668021]

>>16667121
>by pretending some private blockchain "solution" is in any way meaningful
It actually IS meaningful, you deluded moron. It's a massive improvement over traditional accounting. Now consider that private DLTs can interact, exchange data with each other and form a single global network - and voila! No institution or enterprise needs public meme chains, especially junk like BSV.

[Anonymous No.16668352]

>>16667373

There are no paid BSV shills, there never have been any besides the people attacking them.

[Anonymous No.16668523]

>>16668352
of course of course you are innocent like newborn babies

[Anonymous No.16668530]

>>16666243
Movies aren’t real anon

[Anonymous No.16668539]

>>16666754
Also, this.

[Anonymous No.16668653]

>>16667428
Good. I probably don't have as much experience on this godforsaken planet as some other anons, but one thing I've noticed is that when what I'm doing triggers angry little faggots like you, I'm on the right track. This is doubly true for crypto, where buttcoiners have been wishing death on people like me since the start of this decade.
>In 2012, buy bitcoin
>"lol, get fucked nerd"
>In 2015, buy a modest stake in the Ethereum just in case it amounts to something
>"lol, kys retard"
>Hold BCH/BSV after the fork because its obvious that BTC is not scaling for stupid reasons
>"Drop dead, cashie!"
You are here
>>16667623
>>16667632
You sound okay, fren. Even though I don't agree that the scaling proposition of BSV is a "garbage dump," you have the right attitude. I also hold coins on all three chains, weighted towards BCH/BSV, and can't wait to see how this multi-year drama ends. Hope we both make it.
>>16668021
If you actually believed any of the nonsense you spout here, you would be working your way up the ladder at one of the dinosaur firms pushing the boondoggle of "private blockchain" instead of counter-signalling a coin that Mr. Shekelstein has never even heard of.
>>16668523
kek, after all these years I still love how bitchy you guys are

[Anonymous No.16668676]

>>16666590
>you gonna get raped
Based

[Anonymous No.16668751]

>>16668523

You will never find proof of paid BSV shills.

People have always been interested in big blocks because there are more use-cases. I dont mind fees, I'll pay $1 to send some BTC but when you get into sub-cent fees you can start to do really interesting things and make bitcoin a lot more private since you can have dozens of inputs and outputs for each transaction going to several different pubkeys and it will still cost less than a cent total.