/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.16590226]

This fucking scammer promised to pump bsv to 1200 and I bought at 240 because of that. Now it's at 80. FUCK THIS LIFE. I had 60k now I have 20k. STORE OF VALUE.
LOL
KYS

[Anonymous No.16590258]

it's utility token you retard. Store of value = tether

[Anonymous No.16590262]

>>16590226
Waited for such posts. Ah, karma

[Anonymous No.16590266]

>>16590226
cope moon boi lmfao

[Anonymous No.16590269]

>>16590226

I feel you OP. Creg talks smack and Calvin dumps. Fucking clowns.

[Anonymous No.16590279]

>>16590226
thank fuck I only put $12k at $200 in his shitcoin.

[Anonymous No.16590289]

>>16590258
> tether: a token printed out of thin air by a shady shell company pegging its value to the inflationary us dollar
Store of value my ass

Also fuck BSV curries, they are getting what they had coming all along

[Anonymous No.16590297]

>>16590226
Ahh yes I remember my same struggle with litecoin many moons ago. Might as well have set the cash on fire and flushed the ashes down the toilet.

[Anonymous No.16590325]

>>16590226
I bought at 140 and told myself unequivocally I would sell at 99....so glad I did...gladly take the 40% loss to have that dumb fucker out of my life.

[Anonymous No.16590334]

Imagine thinkind December 17 2019 is EOY

[Anonymous No.16590342]

>>16590334
god i hate you scammers so much. you should really be hunted down and put into jail.

[Anonymous No.16590369]

>>16590334

Imagine imagining that 13 more days are gonna make a difference.

[Anonymous No.16590401]

Hey anon I promise you'll get rich just give me whatever money you have and sit back and relax.

[Anonymous No.16590407]

>>16590401
address?

[N No.16590430]

>>16590342
Seethe more you low IQ poorfag

[Mr. Fag No.16590440]

>>16590226
>I bought at 240
iktf fren

[N No.16590484]

>>16590226
>I'm down so much money, I'm financially ruined
>Picks absolute top BSV USD value to shill with
>Posts thread telling anons to kill themselves
How is your day going fellow Jew?

[Anonymous No.16590491]

TICK TOCK
ITS THE RETARD CLOCK
>>16590226
>>16590325
>>16590440
>>16590430
>>16590484
>it ticks for (You)

[Anonymous No.16590596]

>>16590226
How does it feel to be this retarded?

[Anonymous No.16590971]

>>16590226
>He actually fell for the Pajeet scammers

Holy shit, if not a LARP you're an absolute RETARD

[Anonymous [O1G] No.16591259]

>>16590226
toadyouso

[Anonymous No.16591266]

>>16590226
ohhh nooo you had jack shit and now you only have 1/3 of that jack shit poor baby

[Anonymous No.16591590]

>>16591266

Shit ain't funny though, some people actually believed in the tech. And 60k ain't jack shit either.

[Anonymous No.16591627]

>>16590226
It will be fun in January when he still can't unlock the coins he's been claiming he had the keys to since 2016.

[Anonymous No.16591756]

>>16590258
>tether

[Anonymous No.16591866]

>>16591627
>in January
when you were as Rich in buttcorn as creg, you wouldn't need to hold yourself to No Cunts deadlines anon. Not even when you were the cunt that invented them

[Anonymous No.16592266]

>>16590226
>Buying an obvious cam even when 4chan tells you it's a scam.

You have to lurk 1 year in biz before buying

[Anonymous No.16592268]

>>16591627
it's a larp even the us justice system can't believe how retarded the larp is.

[Anonymous No.16592332]

>>16591866
this dude can't stop lying

[Anonymous No.16592366]

>>16590226
>>16590325
nice larp, why would anyone buy this scam? Craig has been debunked many times

[Anonymous No.16592380]

>>16592266
Biz told me bitcoin was a scam in 2012

[Anonymous No.16592381]

>>16590334
Haha this all over

[Anonymous No.16592395]

>>16590226
hahahahaha get fucked bsvtard

[Anonymous No.16592406]

>>16592366
>The science is settled

[Anonymous No.16592431]

>>16592406
When "Satoj's" coins go walkabout this new year Bitcoin will be restored
Put me in the screencap

[Anonymous No.16592460]

>>16592406
kek. I really hope you're a bot or larping, otherwise you'll lose a lot of money or good oportunities.

[Anonymous No.16592484]

>>16592431
Based
>>16592460
You seem simple

[Anonymous No.16592849]

Posting rare Craigs

[Anonymous No.16592859]

>>16592849

[Anonymous No.16592862]

>>16592859

[Anonymous No.16592872]

>>16592862

[Anonymous No.16592888]

>>16592872

[Anonymous No.16592895]

>>16592888

[Anonymous No.16592896]

>>16592849
>>16592859
>>16592862
>>16592872

How much do you get paid to spam this?

[Anonymous No.16592926]

>>16592895

[Anonymous No.16592946]

>>16592896
Low fees and unbounded scalability make micro transactions quite worth it on BSV. You ought to try.

[Anonymous No.16592951]

>>16592926

[Anonymous No.16592965]

>>16592951

[Anonymous No.16592967]

>>16592946

No thanks, not holding a liability. BSV dumps more than most of the to 10 coins every time the market dumps.

[Anonymous No.16592969]

>>16592965

[Anonymous No.16592978]

>>16592967
If you can't see the upward potential, I guess there's no helping it.

[Anonymous No.16592986]

>>16592951
>>16592965
>>16592969

Continuously spamming won't help you make a case for BSV, Price matters, simple as that.

[Anonymous No.16592991]

>>16592978
Done

[Anonymous No.16593001]

>>16592986
I spam in case anyone wants some rare Craigs, or if others have some I don't and wish to post.

You seem like someone who is bad at predicting the future if you only judge reality on current prices.

[Anonymous No.16593009]

>>16592849
these are in every fucking sv thread about as rare as dogshit

[Anonymous No.16593030]

>>16593001

Memes are not financial advice.

[Anonymous No.16593071]

>>16590226
It's not a fucking store of value, it's a P2P electronic cash system. It's not money, it's not a currency, it's a digital token that can be traded back and forth.

If you can't handle speculation, stay out.

[Anonymous No.16593080]

>>16590334
This, but unironically.

[Anonymous No.16593141]

> he sold
Time to go all in BSV. Thanks for the bottom signal

[Anonymous No.16593175]

>>16590289
The whole market is down idiot. You act like it’s only BSV. You can blame BTC and the general scam market. I hope BSV goes to 5. I’ll buy buy buy

[Anonymous No.16593181]

even lawyers don't think twice about calling this cunt out now. And its good fucking night, creggy boy

[Anonymous No.16593434]

>>16593071
5 dollars

[Anonymous No.16593435]

>>16593181
Is this like the CNN legal analysts calling Trump a tHrEaT tO oUr dEmOcRacY!?!?

[Anonymous No.16594498]

>>16593435
>Is this like CNN
no, its like lawyers stating as FACT in Court Filings creg is a forger and perjurer. And the trial hasn't even started yet.
Glad we could clear that up tho. Has our frog yet noted, the water around him is getting fucking warm ?

[Anonymous No.16594663]

>faketoshi

[Anonymous No.16594941]

KEK the dump is picking up speed.

[Anonymous No.16594962]

>>16590226
Dont worry! He gets his 100 million bitcoin from his faggot trust in 2020! Surely he will market sell his bitcoin (the REAL bitcoin, BTC) to dump the price while simultaneously pumping the piece of shit faggot retard bitcoin (BSV) that everybody considers a stupid annoying tired old joke ran by a gay compulsive liar larping as satoshi and a fucking creepy old pedo that fucks Cuban children

[Anonymous No.16594976]

>>16590226
You should sue him for it. Seems to be what that dickhead likes to do. That post he made should be more than enough evidence right?

[Anonymous No.16595929]

>>16594498
Dude you are reaching so hard lmao are you getting paid for this cooked shit?

[Anonymous No.16595951]

>>16590226
fuck even people who arent into crypto mustve realized the bitcoin forks were just a way of bitcoin whales to print extra money for themselves under the guise of muh adoption.

[Anonymous No.16595963]

>>16592380
I never said you have to trust biz i only said you have to lurk one year before buying.

Eventually you can notice the shills without even reading the posts and you will be aware of what is true and what's a scam

[Anonymous No.16595989]

>>16590226
This is why you dont fucking fuck with alts

[Anonymous No.16596076]

>>16592406
Wow, a soijack, so based! Clearly Craig is very based and redpilled like Trump lol. Hodl BSV and own the libs my fellow redpilled based indian.

[Anonymous No.16596786]

>>16595929
>is confirmed perjurer and forger, FACT
>about a million down in awarded costs - $650k + his own - already
>barely out of fucking discovery
oh, I'm not 'reaching' here. trust me.
how much more badly can one man lose already ?

[Anonymous No.16597130]

>>16593181
I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you that someone named (((Freedman))) would be autistically kvetching about Craig
>>16596076
Here's your (((You)))

[Anonymous No.16597744]

>>16590226
No crypto has more adoption in actual payments than BCH. BTC has more but is crippled by fees.
Cashshuffle makes BCH reasonably private without overdoing it. Its fast and cheap to transact and has a cultish following and you can buy actual stuff for it.

BSV has a cultish following as well. BSV is right now primarily attacking the storage niche and storage of apps with metanet. Whether this will gain real industry adoption remains to be seen but it is HIGHLY shillable since you can just send somebody a link of a website or app "hosted on muh blockchain". They have great PR and paid shills and the most delusional real shills of all. highly agressive. Unwriter is a real asset as well

- They are competing for different markets for now
- They both will have a halving soon
- They have absolutely delusional communities and nicely shillable products


Anons who do their research hold both bad aussie and deluded ancap Bitcoins. BSV and BCH will be the largecaps with the hardest pumps this bullrun. They are the perfect middleground between high risk shitcoins and boring largecaps. Higher gains and higher risk but not suicide shitcoin risk. They aren't going to die anytime soon and have deluded shills and are usable for things.
Its the perfect storm for massive gains.

TLDR; Buying both corn forks is the perfect choice if you want to outperform BTC and dont go for shitcoin-level risks.

[Anonymous No.16597871]

>>16597744
ethereum already makes that all obsolete

[Anonymous No.16597902]

>>16592849

[Anonymous No.16597907]

>>16597871
Im here to make money and both WILL pump in a degenerate fashion. Whether you love or hate Craig or Roger or think ETH or some other shit will pump as well is irrelevant to these gains.

[Anonymous No.16597938]

>>16590279
>only put $12k at $200
>only
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA FUCKING JUSTICE! PAJEETS WIN AGAIN!

[Anonymous No.16598016]

>>16597907
deluded. bsv is way overpriced. BCH is less overpriced but youll be very lucky to catch the microsecond pump that lets you get out with decent gains.

[Anonymous No.16598032]

>>16598016
Everything will pump next year. You can go for mediocre BTC gains or 100X by picking the right shitcoin. Or you can go for BCH, BSV and LINK for higher than BTC but not retard risk gains

[Anonymous No.16598124]

> Run Sybil attack
> Generate false social consensus
> Fear - *insert person* says $5 shit coin
> Shame - *insert laughter* feel for scam
> Doubt - Brigade and highlight negative events
> Discourage Research - It's a known fact
> Guilty by Association - Make people afraid to associate by relentless ridicule and laughter
> Never argue over technology, we will lose

[Anonymous No.16598534]

Of all the nonsense spouted by the paid BSV shills, "industry adoption" is the most laughable.
Calvin can't even travel to USA, Craig is a proven forger. No compamy that matters will touch this project with a 100 yard pole.
The absolute state.

[Anonymous No.16598554]

>>16598032
shut up you faggot. ethereum makes all of the bitcoins look like a fucking joke. get rekt

[Anonymous No.16598689]

>>16598124
>>16598534

> laughable
Shame check
> proven forger
Discourage Research check
> totality of statement
Never argue technology check

[Anonymous No.16598693]

>>16598554
>he thinks I care about the tech
kek

[Anonymous No.16598756]

>>16597744
>crippled by fees
i kek every time this retarded meme is uttered.
the fees will save bitcoin the shitcoins will die.

[Anonymous No.16598764]

>>16598756
>muh 7 TPS is enough
lel

[Anonymous No.16598771]

>>16598124
> Never argue over technology, we will lose
yes you will as you lost every fucking time the last year or so. cashies eternally btfo.

[Anonymous No.16598782]

>>16598764
it will grow no worries. small blocks are the way to go be them 4mb or a 100mb they have to be full at all times that's what's important.

[Anonymous No.16598807]

>>16598782
>based economically illiterate anon posts again

Corecuck devs will never increase blocksize since they have no financial incentive to do so. Their incentive is to push all economic activity to blockstream sidechains like Liquid and LN.

[Anonymous No.16598821]

>>16598124
>>16598771
>yes you will as you lost every fucking time the last year or so. cashies eternally btfo

> Generate false social consensus
> Discourage Research - It's a known fact
> Never argue over technology

[Anonymous No.16598879]

>>16593181
>>16594498
that's kleiman's lawyer, as if they are anything but biased. opinion discarded
0/10 greg

[Anonymous No.16598918]

>>16598689
Here's your (you), paid shill. Or even worse, bsv baghilder top kek.

[Anonymous No.16598925]

>>16590226
HAHAHAHA THE WORLD NEVER RUNS OUT OF RETARDS HAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.16598942]

>>16598918
Someone who own's BSV has motivation to post in these threads.

What is the motivation of someone who doesn't own BSV to post BSV threads and FUD in them. Really gets the almond going

[Anonymous No.16598947]

>>16598807
not a choice "core devs" entrenched in the bitcoin protocol any more than your favorite ice cream.

[Anonymous No.16598973]

>>16598821
oh boy you want to start it now?

what bitcoin is:
- a trustless permissionless publicly auditable ledger that is also secure
- a non-custodial peer-to-peer electronic payment system
- a network of nodes enforcing a common ruleset shaping a common reality in a trustless manner
- the longest blockchain under the consensus ruleset with the largest commulative hash proven by a specific form of proof of work
- a protocol that describes how consensus is reached on ordering transactions and how difficulty and coinbase supply adjusts over time
- a greater consensus on the ruleset that governs the protocol
- a standard reference client implementation created by nakamoto and maintained as an open source project
- an unspent transaction output spendable to a script returning true

what bitcoin is not:
- a whitepaper
- a gargantuan garbage dump of stale data stored immutably forever
- whatever satoshi said in a forum post
- whatever faketoshi dreams up in delirium
- whatever sv jeets shrill and rave about currently

the point of bitcoin and the pow blockchain is not to store every last transaction forever but to provide a mechanism to build the correct utxo set in a trustless manner. the utxo is the only thing that truly matters. long term the data embedded in the transactions is absolutely useless garbage even the witness (sigscript) is useless junk what matters is that you can build the correct utxo from scratch without trusting anyone.

so the blockchain will eventually shed all the junk. and this includes old transactions even. we can't do it yet but we will do it in the future when pruning the chain becomes the norm.

btc utxo size is about 100mb right now the last 100 blocks are an other 100mb and around 50mb is the block headers up till that. you need 250mb to run your own full node and that's quiet reasonable.

[Anonymous No.16598989]

>>16598821
bitcoin was meant to solve one problem in particular: how to build and maintain a trustless permissionless ledger, and how to make transactions trustless and permissionless.

everything else is either bullshit or a technicality. the blockchain is a means to an end not the end itself the immutability of the bitcoin blockchain is a means to an end, the pow is a means to an end not the goal.

bitcoin was born to store and transact value information that is released to the public has zero value. anything put on a blockchain has zero value. the transactions themselves have zero value after the utxo set was updated and confirmed sufficiently.

the future is pruing. once a block is pruned by the network there is no way to tell what was segwit and what was legacy tx. all there is is the utxo set. signatures and ultimately after a while tx-es too. they are all a technicality how a distributed trustless consensus is reached on the utxo set and how you can transact in a secure and permissionless manner.

if you think segwit changes bitcoins nature then you are a brainlet who doesn't get bitcoin. if you think bitcoin blockchain was meant to be an immutable garbage heap of stale data you are beyond saving.

[Anonymous No.16598995]

>>16598973
>he thinks BSV wont prune

[Anonymous No.16599005]

>>16598821
you fags think you will be able to force enterprise on your shitty blockchain to put their audit trail and transaction receipts and everthing on it.

the fact is creating an audit trail for transactions in an erp or mes system is very performance prohibitive even with rdb triggers let alone external systems or god forbid a fucking blockchain.

you fags never dealt with systems like that and that shows in your naivete. the amount of data a single small to medium production company produces in electronic evidence trail is in the 100gb per years magnitude. there are about 200 million companies worldwide. which would add up to about 20 exabyte annually if you tried to put it on a global blockchain. the entire public internet is in the few exabytes range.

shit is retarded all the way. your idiotic dreams about companies putting everything on a shitty blockchain with 10 min confirmation time will never come to pass.

[Anonymous No.16599017]

>>16598973
>>16598989

The definition of bitcoin is literally the whitepaper, and your first statement is to throw out that definition and proceed to use your own fabricated definition of bitcoin.

Great argument.

[Anonymous No.16599037]

>>16598995
bsv chain and the circlejerk about what it will do is all pointless if you start pruning.

[Anonymous No.16599048]

>>16599017
a bitcoin is an utxo not a chain of signatures. nor was it ever since first release. satoshi wrote that paper in 2007 but in the first release he already added scripting and smart contract support.
>digital coin is defined as a chain of digital signatures
>Segwit breaks the chain of digital signatures
is a coinbase a bitcoin or not?
because based on that definition it's not bitcoin. but that's evidently wrong.
>We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures
then https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/9b0fc92260312ce44e74ef369f5c66bbb85848f2eddd5a7a1cde251e54ccfdd5
is not bitcoin. there is no chain of signatures it's just an utxo

sorry for your loss try again next time.

[Anonymous No.16599055]

>>16599005
>he assumes businesses would put every little databyte they produce on a blockchain
why are you going full retard
they would only put parts of it, where visibility would be beneficial like shipping data, customer's signature for receiving delivery or whatever and so on

[Anonymous No.16599075]

>>16599055
that was just the audit trail, i work with erp and mes systems so i can see what a small company produces just in track&trace and the future is even more data in evidence trails even more detailed.

it's simply not possible to make this a global burden. not a tenable way to go at it.

[Anonymous No.16599090]

>>16599075
and even if it was possible it would be retarded and unnecessary.

[Anonymous No.16599103]

i have to go but i will be back later and dig up some more technical arguments why sv is utterly retarded absolutely not bitcoin and how you are all stupid! have fun seething in the meantime!

[Anonymous No.16599115]

All the data the currently is stored and redundant in datacenters won't be able to fit on storage in datacenters!

Do people not realize all this data is already being stored somewhere in a data center? Why do they think it would magically no longer be able to fit on storage in a datacenter just because the datastructure around it's storage changes? Are people really this stupid?

[Anonymous No.16599116]

>>16598989
>>16599005
Thank you for being the voice of reason in the retardsphere that is crypto

[Anonymous No.16599157]

>>16599037
wrong

[Anonymous No.16599234]

>>16598124
>>16598689
>>16598821
>>16598942
Based and PoSM pilled
>>16598973
>>16599005
>>16599037
>>16599048
>>16599075
>>16599090
>>16599103
Lame pasta. OC or GTFO, obsessed retard
>>16599116
>voice of (((reason)))
Maybe get a new bag of rhetorical tricks. You people are too transparent and the hour grows late. Tick-tock.

[Anonymous No.16599322]

>>16599234
He's right about some things but then I scrolled up and I regretted making up that comment

[Anonymous No.16599385]

>>16599234
This is not Twatter. Get out, BSV shill.

[Anonymous No.16599499]

>>16599385
I come and go as I please, faggot.

[Anonymous No.16599505]

>>16590226
>Buys scam
>Is surprised it's a scam
Yikes

[Anonymous No.16599522]

>>16590226
>I had 60k now I have 20k.
Hold up, did you come here & read the ironic Craig posting? Think this looks legit, and buy?

[Anonymous No.16599553]

>>16599499
You don't belong here. All other BSV fags already left for Twatter.

[Anonymous No.16599569]

>>16599499

5dollar
now get lost

[Anonymous No.16599591]

>>16590226
>This fucking scammer promised to pump bsv to 1200 and I bought at 240 because of that
you deserve to involuntarily put all your assets into bsv and then crash to zero, no survivors

[Anonymous No.16599595]

>>16599569
>>16599553
>GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT

[Anonymous No.16599692]

>>16590258
>utility token
>Calling others retarded
its a scam like all 'utility tokens'

[Anonymous No.16600714]

bump

[Anonymous No.16601372]

>>16599234
>Lame pasta. OC or GTFO
very detailed technical arguments and reasoning based on deep understanding of the bitcoin protocol. as expected from sv cucks.

btfo!

[Anonymous No.16601404]

>>16599157
not wrong it it's not an immutable data dump kept forever it has no special purpose that would distinguish it from the billion other shitcoins.

also the pruning sv cucks want to use for censorship is retarded. if you prune a single tx from a block it becomes worthless. since it can no longer be used to build the correct utxo set the chain becomes faulty and broken. there is absolutely no point in partial pruning of a block. either you keep all or just keep the header!

[Anonymous No.16601411]

imagine being so 89iq that you'd believe anything that comes out of that scammer's mouth

hope he gets jailtime

[Anonymous No.16601421]

>>16601404
on the other hand segwit on btc allows for only discarding the witness which has the script and any data embedded in the script like OP_RETURN. which is actually not needed to build the utxo. quiet genius.