Stop being delusional

[Anonymous No.16515181]

This is not going to net you $400 a year per link or any of the other insane nonsense I see spewed here. I actually worry about the mental health of anons here. You can't put all your hopes on link mooning, which it already has. It 50x frens. That's insane. If you didn't sell at $4 you missed it. I'm sorry but that's just the way it is.

[Anonymous No.16515193]

>>16515181
>NO YOU CAN'T JUST MAKE MONEY ON CRYPTO, IT'S NOT FAIR
>basedwojack.img

[Anonymous No.16515199]

>>16515181
I actually worry about the mental health of anons here. You can't put all your hopes on btc mooning, which it already has. It 50x frens. That's insane. If you didn't sell at $50 you missed it. I'm sorry but that's just the way it is.

[Anonymous No.16515204]

Thanks for caring about my financials fren, you really saved me from a huge mistake. Market sold everything

[Anonymous No.16515217]

I'd be happy with $2 a year.

It'd probably put it around $25-$30 too which would be nice.

[Anonymous No.16515261]

[Anonymous No.16515262]

>>16515181
You're a retard.

[Anonymous No.16515316]

>>16515181
>$400 a year per link
imagine falling for this FUD
get out of here OP
no one believes you

[Anonymous No.16515347]

the filter always wins, its that easy

[Anonymous No.16515674]

>>16515181
Ethereum was .50 at one point. If we even repeat 20% of what it did I can probably retire, if we do half of what it did I can retire like a king.

[Anonymous No.16515703]

>>16515181
You had 2 years bud.

[Anonymous No.16515785]

>>16515347
This is, unironically, exactly what the poor anons at /g/ did before /biz/ was created.

[Anonymous No.16515850]

>>16515181

[Anonymous No.16516623]

>>16515785
Gas up the Honda, bro. We're going trolling for hookers.

[Anonymous No.16516803]

>>16515785
>sweet dreams are made of these reverberated through the car

[Anonymous No.16516811]

Pure delusion

[Anonymous No.16516996]

>>16516803
It's "this."
Sweet dreams are made of this.

[Anonymous No.16517085]

>>16515199
kek Chainlink is proven vaporware. It will never go to 50. Proof:
>1+ year test net
>5 months main net
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
>(with proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan)
>Linkers: this is bullish!

>>16515217
It literally has 0 users after 5 months and you think you'll ever make money from staking? How low is your IQ?

[Anonymous No.16517087]

>>16515674
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

>>16515703
you had 1 month to sell before people realized the Google partnership was fake and that Chainlink was vaporware bud

[Anonymous No.16517095]

>>16517085
Fucking idiot, you had two years to buy. Any LINK under $10,000 is cheap.

Any speculation on the price of LINK until staking happens is pointless.

[Anonymous No.16517207]

>>16517087
SOMEONE REPLY TO HIM REEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.16517211]

>>16517095

FUCKING RETARD KYS

[Anonymous No.16517216]

Can't wait to search for prices of boomer rocks or boomer colored paper or meme coins and it would say "thisndata is securely brought to you by Chainlink™"

[Anonymous No.16517223]

I work for ChainLink and i can confirm that 1'000$ is FUD. 2020 will be huge.

[Anonymous No.16517229]

>>16517223
> 88 poo colored ID
Kek confirms?

[Anonymous No.16517251]

>>16515785
>price of fucking milk advertised on the gas billboard
This has to be in some flyover state

[Anonymous No.16517678]

>>16515181
no ones saying 400$ per year the commonly accepted view is either 1% a month to 5% annually. Which means from 50$-120$ a year per link once 1k eoy

[Anonymous No.16517693]

Imagine there was a stock that went from 15 dollars to 400 dollars, and had no real product or service to speak of.

Would you think that stock was undervalued still?

[Anonymous No.16517696]

Kek
So many seething swinglinkers panicking in this thread.

[Anonymous No.16517704]

>>16517085

https://blockarca.de/

[Anonymous No.16517783]

>>16517085
Do your employer pay you to fud because he doesn't want newcomers to make it ?
Or is it pure masochism ?
I hope you won't commit suicide when you find out the project you were paid to fud could have made you rich.

[Anonymous No.16517796]

>>16517783
It is literally dumping right now

[Anonymous No.16517811]

>>16517796
+9% Link price in the last 24 hours while BTC did -2%...