DAG

[Anonymous No.16432354]

Don't miss your chance.

[Anonymous No.16432428]

>>16432354
shut up nigger

[Anonymous No.16432459]

>>16432428
>t. man currently living in poverty

[Anonymous No.16432494]

Hello satsgang

[Anonymous No.16432507]

>>16432354
DAG will moon hard very soon

[Anonymous No.16432510]

>>16432494
Go buy Fantom or whatever you stinky Indian

[Anonymous No.16432516]

>>16432494
Hello gay paki. Karma is a bitch, no shame in being poor, but you are poor for a reason.

[Anonymous No.16432553]

>>16432354
amazing how being so far up in the green clouds my judgement. im so far up because of this project and somehow even when it dips a little i feel so weird.
that said mainnet etc coming up has me feelign weird too. what if mainnet fails?

[Anonymous No.16432573]

>>16432553
Mainnets are not bullish, senpai. I adore this project but do not hype up another mainnet launch. The truly bullish part of DAG is after token swap and mainnet they are going to start listing on new exchanges.

[Anonymous No.16432591]

>>16432573
>and mainnet
Meant "after mainnet".

[Anonymous No.16432782]

>>16432591
problem is it coincides with tax basis to trade for eth etc

[Anonymous No.16432873]

The prospects of an investment in DAG are from bullish. They lost all their original investment and cant afford to hire staff to support their operations or growing their product. They have 4 staff in total, and it is clear they have no money to spend.
If you think this is bullish you are a full blown retard or a paid shill here scamming on low IQ biztards

[Anonymous No.16433158]

>>16432873
To be fair mate you kind of are just pulling shit out of your arse.

[Anonymous No.16433238]

>>16433158
Name more than 3 full time employees besides the CEO. You cant. Because they don't exist.
If this tech is so incredible any CEO with half a brain would staff their company with more than what can fit in a kebab stand.

This is the part where you take a big night of curry and then ignore the facts staring you in the face.

[Anonymous No.16433335]

>>16433238
They hire contractors when required. Why on Earth would they take on a huge team of full-time employees this close to token swap/mainnet? Seems wasteful.

[Anonymous No.16433454]

>>16433238
Can confirm only 4 total
CEO Ben
CFO Matthias
CTO Wyatt
BD Diiggles

Everyone else was let go including cofounders, developers, and marketing people. To me this proves what most us have known for a long time. Funds are gone

[Anonymous No.16433821]

>>16433335
Can you name one company that outsources development of it's core product to low cost third party providers in a different country? Especially when business development efforts are focused on US military.
>Why on Earth would they hire full time developers?

You have to be really stupid to ask this question. Or you are paid to come here and misinform. Name one company anywhere with $33M investment funding and 4 employees.

Protip you can't because you are an idiot and a paid shill explaining away a massive problem with braindead responses only the lowest IQ dumbfuck would fall for

[Anonymous No.16433909]

>>16433821
But it does involve the US military and there's not a thing you can do to change that.
Check the github, there are still commits being made to this day from multiple developers. Quite frankly, the team has reached a milestone with their technology and its only a matter of time before the major growth potential comes to fruition. It's EXTREMELY bullish, much more bullish than projects that have already topped out on hype with heavy bags.

[Anonymous No.16434016]

>>16433335
This is cringeworthy cope anon. I used to work in a tech startup with $500k in funding. We had 7 full timers and outsourced a little. Our product wasn't nearly is big or complex as DAG. You can't explain why the team only has 4 employees with this much funding unless they lost their funding. There is no logical explanation other than money is simply gone.

[Anonymous No.16434038]

>>16434016
>"used to"
Key phrasing here. Where are they now?

[Anonymous No.16434108]

>>16433454
>Can confirm only 4 total
>CEO Ben
>CFO Matthias
>CTO Wyatt
>BD Diiggles
How can you confirm?

[Anonymous No.16434144]

>>16434016
>unless they lost their funding. There is no logical explanation other than money is simply gone.
That's why professional investors invested, ryte? In a team that lost 33 million USD within months. You have clearly no tech experience. No business experience.

[Anonymous No.16434154]

>>16432873
>They lost all their original investment
That's what you said one year ago. Clearly you lied, as you lie now.

[Anonymous No.16434187]

>>16433238
A normal investor with a brain looks at products and production. Not employees. They are rolling out their mainnet now, on time, with excellent business connections, media exposure etc. You can't fud that at all, so what you do is spread your low IQ gibberish about completely irrelevant accusations, even if true. No wonder you lost all your money, gambler-boi, with your retarded financial analysis.

[Anonymous No.16434197]

>>16433821
>4 employees
Have you seen their github at all? Do you even understand basic tech?

[Anonymous No.16434203]

>>16434038
Acquired in 2018 and now part of a bigger company. What is your point? I get the feeling you don't know much about the technology business. 4 employees with $30 million funding is a joke.

>>16434108
Company communications, LinkedIn, telegram, and I've seen people get instabanned for asking.
I know your a paid shill so let me help you do your job. Go to telegram and ask the remaining 4 guys if they have a 5th full time employee. When they ban you or tell you NO, come back so I can laugh at you

[Anonymous No.16434211]

>>16434203
Constellation has 10 employees, sometimes 12 when they hire contractors. Do your research and stop talking out your ass.

[Anonymous No.16434233]

>>16434203
>Company communications, LinkedIn, telegram, and I've seen people get instabanned for asking.
You said you can "confirm" and all you gave me was generic rambling. Show me how you LOGICALLY reached your conclusion that you can confirm. Based on github alone, it's clear that you pull all your stuff right out off our ass. Prove me wrong.

>I know your a paid shill
How do you "know" that, pajeet? Used your tarot cards and crystal ball again?

[Anonymous No.16434251]

>>16434203
>Go to telegram and ask the remaining 4 guys
They said long time ago that they only list leaders and key persons as part of their team, as every other serious tech company does. You clearly lie through your teeth about you being from the tech industry. Selling pirated porn DVDsis not "tech", douchebag.

[Anonymous No.16434281]

>>16434144
How much money did professional investors give them? I think you are a paid liar. Please show us how much.

>>16434154
I didn't say anything one year ago nigger

>>16434187
A normal investor doesn't give money to failed businesses. And that's why you can't show me how much any investor has given them because it never happened

>>16434197
You are one dumb fucking nigger if you think GitHub proves anything of value

im not paid to be here lying to people, that's your job. Do you guys just target the dumbest people on the board. Like who the fuck falls for this shit?

[Anonymous No.16434288]

>>16434203
>Company communications, LinkedIn, telegram
What kind of psychotic freakshow would follow all their company communications, LinkedIn, and telegram without being an investor?

[Anonymous No.16434306]

>>16434281
>How much money did professional investors give them?
The very fact that they invested CLEARLY render your insane rambling that they lost all their 33M USD within months, null and void. How much is irrelevant and just you trying to weasel yourself out of your web of lies and false accusations. Tragic and stupid, must be tough to be you.

[Anonymous No.16434315]

>>16434281
>I didn't say anything one year ago nigger
Sure you did. Same stupid accusation. Same stupid wording and phrasing. Same stupid running away from any kind of documentation.

[Anonymous No.16434322]

>>16434281
>because it never happened
Yeah, and you have of course NO documentation, yet again take stuff right out off your smelly ass and present it as facts, while completely ignoring a company statement on Twitter from both party. Are you insane?

[Anonymous No.16434335]

>>16434281
>You are one dumb fucking nigger if you think GitHub proves anything of value
Right, you have surely worked a lot in tech. Super duper trustworthy. Its obvious that you have no clue and lie through your teeth. Give it up loser.

[Anonymous No.16434360]

>>16434211
This is a lie

>>16434233
Shutup glownigger

>>16434251
Lies. Just ask them if they have a 5th full time official constellation employee. Post results here and I will accept it's true. Protip you can't and you wont

[Anonymous No.16434361]

>>16434288
>>16434306
>>16434315
>>16434322
>>16434335
bro why you quintuple posting

[Anonymous No.16434371]

>>16434361
To make sure that he does not run away from each point, but answer them.

[Anonymous No.16434387]

>>16434360
>Just ask them if they have a 5th full time official constellation employee.
How is that relevant, as long as they are rolling out mainnet, have github and commercial contract with USAF. Do you run around on the Telegram of other privately owned tech companies and demand that they give you their financial data. Are you high?

[Anonymous No.16434391]

>>16434371
Lol you must be a troll. You don't make points you just lie and ignore facts. You are paid by Constellation to lie to us, so just continue, im out of here

[Anonymous No.16434422]

>>16434387
>How is this relevant

Show me one startup in the history of all the world with $30M in funding a 4 workers.

I know your paid to misinform and cover up this scam but please don't play stupid. Companies building big tech require more that 4 employees to operate. You simply can't explain it

[Anonymous No.16434424]

>>16434391
>Man paid by nobody, not even himself because of bad investment skills accuses everyone of being a paid shill
And now you're running away after regurgitating someone else's fud you passively absorbed on /biz/ instead of doing your own research.
>Pic related

[Anonymous No.16434433]

>>16434391
>ignore facts
You have given zero facts. I have asked you to document your utter rubbish that you claim you can "confirm". You claim to be a tech industry insider, but you have clearly zero clue and understanding. The paid troll is clearly you. Pic.

[Anonymous No.16434439]

>>16434422
Why are you asking people to disprove unproven assertions? Are you fucking braindead?

[Anonymous No.16434452]

>>16434422
So your one psycho personality had to give up, Raphael and right away you are her with a new one, thanks to our VPN? Within seconds. That's pretty psychotic. Pic related.

>4 employees to operate
That's a lie. Document your claim.

[Anonymous No.16434489]

>>16434433
LinkedIn you fucking braindead nigger. If you think people work in tech in SF and don't have LinkedIn you are a filthy Indian who's never been out of Calcutta

[Anonymous No.16434543]

>>16434489
>If you think people work in tech in SF and don't have LinkedIn
Vitalik never had one, until scammers impersonated him, so he opened one account stating he is not there. Cyberpunks are rarely on LinkedIn, paki homo. If you were not a third world troll, you would know that. Sorry that you lost all your money and now have to see DAG moon to one B MCAP. That would drive anyone mad, I guess. But your vile attempts to drive down the price with lies, deceit and scam is despicable. You are not a very nice human being.

[Anonymous No.16434593]

>>16434543
How many rupees did they pay you to post that nonsense?

[Anonymous No.16434607]

>>16434593
I stated facts, go and check Vitalik on LinkedIn if you don't believe me. You have nothing but empty scam and spam. No wonder you idiot panic sold DAG.

[Anonymous No.16434644]

>>16434593
>t moron who lost all his money in crypto, basing his tech analysis solely on LinkedIn and not tech production/market segment

[Anonymous No.16434652]

>>16434607
Wow you shills are really shooting for the dumbest investors. Do you really believe DAG has multiple employees that secretly work there and nobody mentions them and they also don't have LinkedIn profiles?
Stinks like curry in here. I hope they pay you enough rupees to make up this fake bullshit

[Anonymous No.16434720]

>>16434652
Are they delivering the product or not, paki homo? Your only four employed rambling has zero relevance and only exposes you as an utter moron with no understanding of tech. How many employees did Bitcoin have and how many on LinkedIn? Please tell me, gay paki psycho. Then try Monero. Ignorant idiots like you should stay the hell away from /biz/. Paki scammer

[Anonymous No.16434806]

>>16434720
Aiming at brainlet tier yards are you? I guess we can make the argument _______ (insert literally any shitcoin here) has hundreds of employees, billions of dollars, and delivering amazing tech.

Holy shit you are stupid and really searching for the dumbest. This reminds me of the Nigerian Prince scam emails purposely using spelling mistakes to avoid wasting their time on intelligent people

[Anonymous No.16434855]

>>16434281
Next level sperg FUD is bullish AF. the amount of emotion and energy around this project is unparalleled.

[Anonymous No.16434876]

>>16434855
This

[Anonymous No.16435186]

>>16434876
>>16434855
>>16434720
Seriously how much do they pay you to post misinformation all day Denny? You get paid in DAG or ETH?

[Anonymous No.16436154]

>>16435186
Bump, please tell us how much they pay you to spread lies for the benefit of the constellation Labs team and you personally. Asking for a friend

[Anonymous No.16436187]

>>16432573
based. mainnets are dump fests. when mainnet?

[Anonymous No.16436253]

>>16436187
Mainnets are only bullish for scammers dumping on brainlets. Hence why DAGs paid pieces of shit are here pumping mainnet