[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 382 KB, 690x584, 1549550231802.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16396880 No.16396880 [Reply] [Original]

It blows my mind that there are people here who still are not all in Quant.

It's a different breed, on and off the charts. We haven't seen anything quite like this before. Absolutely beautiful growth.

>> No.16396910

>>16396880
Fuck off

>> No.16396935

>>16396910
>Fuck off


Why didn't you Make It in the third major crypto cycle, daddy? Surely it was obvious by then how to play the game?

> Well, Timmy, whenever someone gave me good advice I just told them to Fuck Off, haha.

>> No.16397009

Wasn't this a confirmed exit scam?

>> No.16397089

>>16397009
>Wasn't this a confirmed exit scam?

Confirmed scam, Gilbert is announcing it officially at QuantX next Tuesday.

>> No.16397127

>>16396880
Fren, I'm torn between splitting my Linkies into this for long-term or not. It just seems to be that Quant needs LINK to succeed, and both probably will have around a similar ROI. Thoughts?

>> No.16397177

>>16397127
>Quant needs LINK to succeed

Meaningless and a nonsense statement in so many ways. Do you just repeat what you hear in link threads without wondering whether it makes sense?

>>16397127
>both probably will have around a similar ROI.

No, LINK is already about 11x bigger than QNT. Even pretending for one minute (sorry, let me compose myself) that they are of a similar quality and scope... then QNT is the better buy.

As it happens, QNT is so far beyond anything else - yes, including Stink - it can hardly be described. Get out of the Linkshill echo chamber and see how your brain works. I can see through pajeetery and never fell for the stinktards here and on telegrams.

What is your total stack value as it stands right now?

>> No.16397201

>>16397127
just look at the marketcap, better token economics go for qnt man

>> No.16397202

>>16397177
>No, LINK is already about 11x bigger than QNT
you said it yourself pajeet

>> No.16397242

>>16397177
Fucking dumb Pranjal nigger gives an incoherrent response when he had the chance to actually shill.

>>16397201
Another issue with QNT is normies probably won't understand how it works to pump it so high during a bullrun. What type of price/marketcap you think this could hit in a bullrun?

>> No.16397349

>>16397242
>he had the chance to actually shill.

oh please, great vishnu, grant me another chance to beat these spastics into doing what's good for them!

>>16397242
>What type of price/marketcap you think this could hit in a bullrun?

You will see five figure QNT and you will remember this post and weep.

>> No.16397361

>>16397349
Have sex, Pranjal.

>> No.16397410

Boggles my mind people really aren't accumulating at these prices. They deserve to stay poor.

>> No.16397440

>>16397127
>>16397009
Posts like these are why /biz/ is shit now