[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 15 KB, 300x300, V-ID_icon_1000x1000-1-300x300.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16357104 No.16357104 [Reply] [Original]

Validation ID Token (VIDT) is the next 250X in 2021-2022, unironically.

>> No.16357279

>>16357104
T minus 2 hours. Prepare for lift off.

>> No.16357594

>>16357279
Thanks, just bought 100K

>> No.16357608

$1 EOY. CAP THIS

>> No.16357656

>>16357104
ACRONIS ACRONIS ACRONIS

>> No.16357659

>>16357656
penis penis penis

>> No.16357676

Just loaded 20k more. This is a true hidden gem. Brainlets are too dumb to calculate and think how great chance this shitcoin does have to make you rich.

>> No.16357797
File: 181 KB, 1190x592, 50000X clients.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16357797

Validating 50,000 documents a month, like AmSpec is doing, means it costs nearly one million dollars a year with V-ID to validate hashes on the blockchain versus $99 a year with Acronis (or less than $1000 if you use a server). And you only need one copy of Acronis per office: https://notary.acronis.com/

Acronis Notary costs $99 for the whole year and comes with a cloud backup solution, HDD image creation, and all the validations are free. That's right. Free. Because 99% of people who buy the cloud backup solution are not using notary services in the first place and they're subsidizing the transactions of those who do need the service.

Why would any company choose V-ID over Acronis is beyond me. Not only is it cheaper, but Acronis also works with over a hundred Fortune 500 companies.

VIDT is a scam. Token not needed. They created VIDT for the sole purpose of raising money. Service idea came first and then VIDT got shoehorned into it. They needed a utility coin for an ICO, as otherwise it would have been a useless security token and have no chance of being listed on exchanges or being legal. They knew no one would want to invest in a "1 VIDT = 1 Validation" scheme because that would make it a stable coin and have no speculative value. Which also means that VIDT price doesn't matter to V-ID at this point, they already got their million dollars. Unless they want to dump. All buybacks are scams to raise the price, so you give them your lunch money and create liquidity to dump into when the time comes.

>> No.16357810
File: 25 KB, 1088x295, vidt-is-a-scam.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16357810

The V-ID team even admits right on their website that the token is an illegal security, that they created the coin for its speculative value, and that the tokenomics were "praised" by pajeet moonboys. Even they know it could have been a stable coin. Then the founder lies in the face of bagholders on Telegram and says it's a utility token and two unknown lawyers have confirmed it as such.

>> No.16357825
File: 66 KB, 1185x589, vidt-stole-this-idea.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16357825

Make a clone of V-ID and own 100% of the token supply: https://www.udacity.com/course/blockchain-developer-nanodegree--nd1309
>Learn to identify fundamental transaction types, build a web service and API, and secure digital assets with your blockchain identity. Create a private blockchain, and a notarization web service. Use your blockchain identity to secure digital assets on the Ethereum platform with a smart contract.
>notarization web service
The course uses CryptoJS, which is also being used by V-ID. You could literally create a V-ID ripoff in one month without ANY blockchain developer knowledge.

>> No.16357848

hahaah we shilled this shit so hard all the way to 50 cents and dumped on the noobs
now you guys out here posting threads to get rid of MY bagz hahahahaha

>> No.16357856

>>16357797
KEKW dont tell them let them hold the bags for life

>> No.16357876

VIDT 2$ timestamp expensive af (even monthly subscription) Hybridverse Timestamp costs 0.07$

>> No.16357916
File: 155 KB, 480x589, me-irl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16357916

>>16357876
Imagine thinking anyone wants to pay $2 to validate a 512 kilobyte text file or JPEG on the blockchain. Imagine thinking a photographer like Pim wasn't paid off or got the service for free.

>>16357848
Pic related.