/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.16286325]

Do you have a good reason not to think he is Satoshi?

[Anonymous No.16286335]

>>16286325
He's not Satoshi.
But I'm all in BSV anyway.

[Anonymous No.16286488]

>>16286325
hey ranjesh, show your bsv stack fucking street shitting faggot

[Anonymous No.16286503]

>>16286325
if he could he would have signed 5 years ago.

[Anonymous No.16287491]

>>16286325
SHA256

[Anonymous No.16287499]

>>16286325
No
/thread

[Anonymous No.16287524]

simply can't sign transactions or use the simple security feature that he so called "invented" to prove he's satoshi.


so no fuck off.

[Anonymous No.16288014]

>>16286503
and pay all taxes :)? Only moron would signed

[Anonymous No.16288046]

>>16288014
is that the latest cope?
craig contacted the ato eager to pay taxes (this is reasonably well documented altho no mention of he tulip trust at the time only a few millions tax returns) on his bitcoins. did he change his tune about being a law abiding tax paying citizen?

[Anonymous No.16288053]

>>16286325
>Lifelong history of fraud/making up stories
>On the run from the Australian government
>Doesn't have genesis keys
>Freudian slip where he talks about reading the whitepaper for the first time

A better question is why anyone would think he IS Satoshi. He doesn't have genesis keys, any of the old Satoshi email addresses, the Bitcoin talks account, zero proof. The real Satoshi would prove it by taking two minutes to sign something, but he won't because the real Satoshi has always been and plans to stay, anonymous

[Anonymous No.16288059]

>>16288046
and that was in 2010 or 11 i'm not sure i will try look it up when i have time. craig was a gox baby he indeed had some bitcoins there and he filed for tax returns in relation to said (also mostly imaginary) bitcoins.

[Anonymous No.16288075]

>>16288014
also he could sign and keep plausible deniability to any legal authority. so your argument is worse then shit.

[Anonymous No.16288093]

>>16288014
>repeatedly claims to be Satoshi
>repeatedly claims to be able to (eventually) access coins
>these claims are unambiguous, public, non-disavowable
>"Haha he totally dodged those tax goons, with no signature they can't get him! He's completely safe. Satoshi is so clever."

[Anonymous No.16288098]

I think he might be an alcoholic

[Anonymous No.16288127]

>>16288093
yeah and even if satoshi signed a message "i'm craig wright btw" craig could still claim satoshi (or some hacker) is fucking with him nobody could prove otherwise. he has made wilder claims in court or in media before so what would stop him from wiggling out? this is all bullshit.
craig can't sign and that is the end of the story.

[Anonymous No.16288192]

>>16288127
yes yes he cant
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNZyRMG2CjA

[Anonymous No.16288206]

He's caused too much drama with no substantive proof.

[Anonymous No.16288233]

>>16288192
he can't he has demonstrated that multiple times.

[Anonymous No.16288278]

>>16288233
any proof he cant? You dont have any.

[Anonymous No.16288288]

>>16286325
>acts like a moron
>talks like a 3rd rate intellect
>doesn't just sign
>posts don't read like satoshi's
>rude, narcissistic, crude

Do you have a good reason to think he is?

[Anonymous No.16288338]

>>16288278
i have: anyone can sign the way craig signs.
r: 8e01c1fe941d89bbe9d0dca65a47b2f816dd565a0579c257982b9f3e0a96ad26
s: bb010590e060b575eeb09da77287d148966cd232eae619e6ce6227b17e8f58a6
h(m): 6ecae1c5d358f540dfae1d69bbf7bf839fb56804ab2cbe39bee4f13898ef3223
check it out for yourself should validate to the 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa address
https://pastebin.com/tNdZRCrW

the reason people demand a public signature is because private signings are meaningless they offer dozens of ways to cheat or just misrepresent facts even if they are shown as valid by tools.

if you have to destroy your signature it's 100% sure you pulled some sneaky bullshit.

[Anonymous No.16289050]

>>16288338
"I was going to prove it publicly but, but, it was too scary I couldn't go through with it, I'm sorry. I'm still Satoshi though."

[Anonymous No.16289115]

>>16289050
yeah no it takes 2 minutes to sign right and proper verifiable by anyone.

the important things to remember:
signature is worthless without the message.
anyone can produce a ""H(m)"" with an R and S for a known public key.
but only the one owning the private key can produce S for R, m.
also with a computer under control of a scammer, he can make you see whatever he wants.
but even if the tools are valid even if the signature checks out it's child's play to run a fake private signing seance.

which is why a signature needs to be public m, r, s. absolutely no excuse to do it any other way.

[Anonymous No.16289928]

>>16287491
BASED

[Anonymous No.16290010]

>>16286335
this

[Anonymous No.16290331]

His name is literally Craig.

He's white, and Satoshi is a Japanese name.

[Anonymous No.16290338]

>>16286488
hey you! We Indian folk don’t like insults calm down friend. There will be lots rupees for everyone ! Go bsv

[Anonymous No.16290541]

why on earth does anyone care whether he's satoshi? why would it matter? i dont get it

[Anonymous No.16290657]

>>16290541
you wouldn't care if satoshi turned out to be a gay ass boot licking alcoholic liar and a fraud not to mention a fucking abrasive aussie shitposter cunt??

[Anonymous No.16290767]

>>16290657
totally in denial

[Anonymous No.16290825]

>>16290657
that would be pretty funny imo.

So the people who constantly make these threads are just trying to discredit bitcoin/satoshi? is that it?

[Anonymous No.16290939]

>>16286325
There's no good evidence to suggest he's not Satoj. You can take him on his word. After all, that's what this whole thing is about: trust. Bitcoin is all about trust.

[Anonymous No.16290965]

>>16286325
Can you prove this man is not Satoshi OP?

[Anonymous No.16290970]

>>16286503
richard heart is not a paladin, if anything he is also a scoundrel. he launched his own shitcoin, admitting it's a shitcoin and just a simple way to get money

[Anonymous No.16291012]

>>16288278
Do you have any proof this guy can't?

[Anonymous No.16291020]

>>16286325
>cant sign addresses he claims to own
>cant login to the forums and post as satoshi
>cant move any of the coins he claims to own
>extremely different personality and posting style from satoshi
>releases bitcoin under MIT licensee only to patent it 10 years later
>has not contributed a single line of code to BSV while supposedly writing the entire original BTC
>came out as "satoshi" while claiming to want to "just be left alone" and "i will never do another interview or media again!"
>partners up with online gambling billionair tycoon and gay right activist lawyer, which is a good fit for a narcissistic drunk con-artist
>mispronounces the name of the person he claims to have made his sudoname from. this being someone who is supposedly very influential on craig
>been in legal trouble in multiple countries, house was raided in australia. sounds like an honest guy
>couldnt provide an accurate list of his own address's to the court, also submitted modified documents to the court
>did his absolute best to avoid answering questions that could indict him during the trial, even the judge called him a liar with the quote: “Oh! What a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.”
you need any more reasons OP?