/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.16276088]

SCAM

[Anonymous No.16276282]

Airbus is a customer of Acronis, FYI. Airbus Defence & Space is a division and has an even smaller division in Netherlands. And V-ID hasn't fully rolled it out yet, even though supposedly they have been a client for over a year. Uh oh. Show one single proof that Airbus has collaborated with V-ID on a large scale or let alone name-dropped them.

https://www.acronis.com/en-us/cloud/service-provider/notary/
>Allows customers to notarize files of any type via a web console or API, generating a certificate that provides publicly verifiable proof of its timestamp, integrity, and authenticity.
>Easy to sell, upsell or bundle: Universal service that fits business of any size and industry
>Key improvements in the Acronis Notary Cloud service will allow service providers to easily enable data verification via a new public webpage – eliminating the need to use the Acronis Notary Cloud user-interface to verify files.

Acronis Notary costs $99 for the whole year and comes with a cloud backup solution, HDD image creation, and all the validations are free. That's right, motherfuckers. Free. Because 99% of people who buy the cloud backup solution are not using notary services in the first place and they're subsidizing the transactions of those who do need the service. Large companies that do thousands of verifications a month and don't need a backup solution only pay mere cents per validation. Cents.

Why would any company choose V-ID over Acronis is beyond me. Not only is it cheaper, but Acronis also works with over a hundred Fortune 500 companies.

[Anonymous No.16276290]

Validating your whole god damn hard drive with Acronis Notary takes less than 70 minutes. V-ID validations take over a day (sometimes there are days with no validations at all) and bagholders watch over Etherscan like a hawk to calculate the number of validations.

Here's a quote from the Acronis Notary user manual:
>The notarization process can take up to 70 minutes. To reduce the cost of each notarization, the notary service collects hashes throughout an hour, then builds a hash tree based on these hashes and sends the hash tree root to the blockchain database. After that, the notary service waits for the transaction to become confirmed in the blockchain database, and then changes the statuses of the files to Notarized.
$99 for a yearly subscription, as opposed to $600 a year. No nickel and diming like with V-ID, charging you over $2 per file. Imagine how much it would cost to validate a 100 files with V-ID, as opposed to using Acronis.

[Anonymous No.16276298]

>copypasta cuck that isn't vested in this project posting in every thread

[Anonymous No.16276308]

>>16276298
hows the asbestos tasting

[Anonymous No.16276328]

VIDT is a scam. Token not needed. They created VIDT for the sole purpose of raising money. Service idea came first and then VIDT got shoehorned into it. They needed a utility coin for an ICO, as otherwise it would have been a useless security token and have no chance of being listed on exchanges or being legal. They knew no one would want to invest in a "1 VIDT = 1 Validation" scheme because that would make it a stable coin and have no speculative value. Which also means that VIDT price doesn't matter to V-ID at this point, they already got their million dollars. Unless they want to dump. All buybacks are scams to raise the price, so you give them your lunch money and create liquidity to dump into when the time comes.

The V-ID team even admits right on their website that the token is an illegal security, that they created the coin for its speculative value, and that the tokenomics were "praised" by pajeet moonboys. Even they know it could have been a stable coin. Then the founder lies in the face of bagholders on Telegram and tell everyone it's a utility token and two unknown lawyers have confirmed it as such.

Don't question it though, or you might just get banned.

[Anonymous No.16276362]

>>16276298
I post in any /biz/ thread that catches my interest. You just don't know. But we do know that you bought into a dogshit illegal security scam.

[Anonymous No.16276589]

>>16276282
Show proof of Airbus namedropping Acronis. Show any proof where Acronis isn't the source

[Anonymous No.16276697]

>>16276290
>Validating your whole god damn hard drive with Acronis Notary takes less than 70 minutes
the point of vidt is that it's on blockchain

[Anonymous No.16276739]

Why are people so adamant on shilling this fuckcoin?

[Anonymous No.16276740]

>>16276697
Seems Acronis validates on the Ethereum blockchain. Which is worse than VIDT that does it on multiple chains.

There's really nothing to see here. OP os trying to put VIDT in a bad daylight to shill Acronis, but it's just a little side project by a literally who company that tries to get a piece of the crypto hype.

[Anonymous No.16276756]

>>16276589
>Show proof of Airbus namedropping Acronis. Show any proof where Acronis isn't the source
The proof is in the fact that Acronis is a billion dollar company with millions of customers who appear on national television and licensed their tech out to major tech companies, including Western Digital. They would get sued out of the ass for claiming they work with Airbus if they did not. Who has heard of V-ID outside of /biz/ and Telegram? Show proof Airbus namedropping Microsoft Excel. Retard.

>>16276697
Acronis is on the blockchain: https://www.acronis.com/en-us/cloud/service-provider/notary/
"Acronis Notary Cloud uses the fast-performing Ethereum blockchain, whose distributed architecture ensures verification is always available, and there is no possibility for fraud or interference."

Any more counter fud?

[Anonymous No.16276777]

>>16276740
>Which is worse than VIDT that does it on multiple chains.
Pure cope. Healthcare companies and government wouldn't want their sensitive data to be associated with unknown, unproven blockchains. Everyone has heard of BTC/ETH at this point. Even institutions allow you to buy those cryptocurrencies at this point. Who the fuck wants to trust the LTO blockchain?

[Anonymous No.16276819]

>>16276756
Rofl that's not proof at all.

[Anonymous No.16276918]

>>16276819
How do you think they manage to be a billion dollar company?

You're asking me to show you proof of one specific company out of 500,000+ name-dropping the number one backup solution in the world that is on the same level as McAfee, Amazon AWS, or Microsoft Excel. Companies are dying to reveal to the world what kind of cyber security features they have.

V-ID has more incentive to lie, as you do.

[Anonymous No.16276945]

>>16276739
>shilling
have you been paying attention?

[Anonymous No.16276967]

>>16276918
>Uh oh. Show one single proof that Airbus has collaborated with V-ID on a large scale or let alone name-dropped them.

I'm just calling you out on the fact that you call for proof of Airbus using VIDT and then get all defensive when the question is thrown back at you

>Companies are dying to reveal to the world what kind of cyber security features they have.

You just dismantled your own argument why there isn't proof of Airbus using VIDT.

[Anonymous No.16277054]

>>16276967
>I'm just calling you out on the fact that you call for proof of Airbus using VIDT and then get all defensive when the question is thrown back at you
I've answered your question, for the sake of other anons who might be reading this thread. I know Acronis is a better solution and top companies will trust it more than some dutch shitcoin startup. If they already have True Image software installed on all their computers, the number one backup solution, and Notary is built into it for free and all the validations are free, they're not going to jump ship.

>You just dismantled your own argument why there isn't proof of Airbus using VIDT.
I agree with you. There is no proof that Airbus is using V-ID.

[Anonymous No.16277218]

haha i love the fact that your life is so empty you basement dwelling money op. well i dont care what you say but thanks for showing people VIDT so they can do their own research and see that you are just a poor soul screaming into the void. Now go and write something stupid no one cares about and copy paste it 5 million times

[Anonymous No.16277260]

acronis is a scam you fudders, fudders made a website to make us dump

[Anonymous No.16277397]

>>16277218
S E E T H I N G

>>16277260
We've been found out. Acronis is all smoke and mirrors. Fudders snuck into every other fortune 500 company while they were on a sabbath and installed True Image on their computers. No paying clients, no revenue, no adoption. Balls.

[Anonymous No.16277779]

VIDT HOLDERS ON SUICIDE WATCH

https://medium.com/@pim_vee/v-ids-file-validation-process-explained-fc592782e14a

>Validation
>How can you know that the file you are verifying was validated by the actual rightful person or entity that represents the publishing organisation? Or in other words, how can V-ID be sure that validated files are not fakes? This is where V-ID’s validation service comes in.
>Validation can take place in two ways: validation by a certified V-ID employee and self-validation. The first way is presently used for V-ID’s client base. The second way, self validation, is under development and planned for release Q4 2019.
Q4 2019? LMAO. And you have to give your files to the V-ID team to get the hashes? Let's see what is coming later this year:
>Self-validation
This method allows an employee of the issuing organization to validate files at any time. First, an employee of the publishing organization is appointed to become a Validator. This person’s identity is then established on site by a V-ID agent and V-ID-appointed notary. After V-ID has created the Validator’s profile on the platform, he or she is able to log in at a Validation Terminal. The Validation Terminal has a user friendly interface, where files that need to be validated can simply be submitted by dragging and dropping.
BWAHAHAHAHAH. Not everyone validate after all.

[Anonymous No.16278258]

>>16277779
how is this a bad thing? in person verification is the integral part of the service, otherwise it's pointless

[Anonymous No.16278670]

>>16278258
How is this a bad thing? It means not every employee can upload files to validate, but only those who were appointed and known to be verified by V-ID. V-ID employees are processing the validations, which is why they're not instantaneous.

To get the same workflow experience as V-ID providing, Acronis only charges $99. You only need one copy, one computer, and one person. You don't need to have a third-party computer (V-ID) "verify" your trusted employee. You already verified them when you hired them and gave them a salary.