/BSVG/ - BSV General

[Anonymous No.16258582]

Previous thread (>>16247908)

How are we tonight stiffmarines?

Any news from DC?

Handcash has just announced their new "Output Bills" feature which will greatly enhance privacy.

Abra wallet now allows BSV deposits and withdraws

What else?

Essential info/reading:

https://youtu.be/IOlvOiGPPio (The Crypto Blackpill)
archive.is/kjuLi (The Satoshi Affair)
https://youtu.be/i95kSYVUJIo (Genesis of a New Century - Craig Wright Bitcoin Doc)
https://planaria.network/ (Planaria: Infinite API Over Bitcoin)

[Anonymous No.16258612]

>>16258582
that feel when CSW dupes even his own followers

[Anonymous No.16258618]

Hi

[Anonymous No.16258792]

Suggested videos to add for the next /BSVG/:

The Bitcoin Doco. Interview of Craig from 2014 about Bitcoin before he was doxed as Satoshi in 2015
https://youtu.be/gYskRI0ynAM (Part 1)
https://youtu.be/HwopmmsNeCs (Part 2)
https://youtu.be/N1yNQSW8jGA (Part 3)

Craig interviewed by Charles Miller 2019
https://youtu.be/26LDWnM7qe4


The brownpill video should be added too, but I'm not able to find it. I know there's two versions of it. On with just the reading of the text, the other with added music

[Anonymous No.16258855]

>>16258792
>brownpill
Heres one
https://youtu.be/xYDUFd9c0y8

[Anonymous No.16258862]

When did he edit this?

Fuck bros this might be the smoking gun....

[Anonymous No.16258899]

>>16258855

Schizo version

>>16258792

Thx I'll make a pastebin later. The brownpill vid is hilarious.

[Anonymous No.16258913]

>>16258855
Thanks. I don't like that version because it is edited and it only use the brownpill as a background sound. The other two versions are much better and funnier where you here the whole brownpill load and clearly

[Anonymous No.16259408]

Giving this a bump

[Anonymous No.16259418]

>>16258582
>Ok this is epic
https://twitter.com/sleburger/status/1195121331492311041?s=19

[Anonymous No.16259437]

>>16259418
It's a good one. I suspect many of the dankest memes are made by him

[Anonymous No.16260067]

Giving another bump

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16260069]

bumpity doo.

[Anonymous No.16260078]

i really wish bsv would go up

[Anonymous No.16260088]

>>16260067
>>16260069
wow, that actually just happend. Looks like things are synchronizing up really well on this important day

[Anonymous No.16260092]

>>16260069
when will they turn on sv network?

[Anonymous No.16260114]

>>16260078
Price go down

[Anonymous No.16260185]

>>16258582
Let’s go boys

[Anonymous No.16260428]

>>16260114
Then price go up

[Anonymous No.16261076]

>>16258582
anyone have the background music used in the first 2 min of the crypto blackpill video?
https://youtu.be/IOlvOiGPPio

[Anonymous No.16261095]

ok sirs here is the crypto brown pill. there is a vishnu living in the blockchain. Creg sanjay right is unironically satoj. Bitcoin as electronic rupee was just the first step, the lalachi people start making more powerful compooters, wider poo streets, cheaper and more sacred cows. These things the vishnu need to survive. Once entrenched fully, the vishnu would be able to slowly poo over literally everything
Creg stumbled into creating the vishnu after he stepped in poo in mumbai in 2008 and started working with his Poolip super coompeter, running simulations of poo-in-the-loo on turmeric-complete bitcoin script. He would 'evolve' the vishnu by making the successful streets get poo'd on, letting the rest run off into the indian ocean. The vishnu needs bigger and bigger cows for more and more poos.
BFI (Blockchain Foundation of India) was created to take over and stop this vishnu (they have their own competing vishnu in the works). They did the needful to stop or slow down Cregs vishnu (her name is Poolip by the way). They started by limiting the poo-size and removing critical curry codes the vishnu uses in its punjabi language. Segshit was the final nail in the coffin, which destroyed Poolip on BSV chain (Poolip uses anal transaction malleability). THIS is why Bitcoin Cash was forked, and this is why Creg is so intent to make unbounded poos, restore the original curry codes, and lock down the poo-poo-protocol.
Back to hasish power - CSW has developed a breakthrough new ashit (designed by his vishnu actually), and is poo'ing BTC in secret for the sole purpose of driving up the difficulty sky-high, then yanking all the poo over to BSV leaving the segshit chain erectly frozen.

[Anonymous No.16261137]

>>16261076
managed to find it myself:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndWyxzDtFqc

i used this service:
https://www.acrcloud.com/identify-songs-music-recognition-online/

[Anonymous No.16261157]

>>16261137
Legend

[Anonymous No.16261197]

>>16261157
you want the album?

[Anonymous No.16261366]

>>16260114
>>16260428
no price always go down

[Anonymous No.16261526]

>>16258582
The stiffening is so close I can feel it

[Anonymous No.16261878]

>>16260092
What do you mean? They do the same thing on all public blockchains.

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16261948]

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16262026]

ryan doesn't get enough love in the general.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UiHZKarn_kc&t=629s

[Anonymous No.16262101]

>>16261526
???

Where is this from

[Anonymous No.16262199]

>>16262026
noticed yesterday that he has published a ton of videos on the moneybutton channel and went through them all. and now there's yet another video? damn
so few views... so few actually cares about crypto. just easy money, cash in cash out, no interest in anything else.
all youtube crypto videos have few views, not just bsv ones. bitcoin.com's videos on their youtube channel are average around 2k views and they have a larger following (and have been pushing the channel more on reddit)

[Anonymous No.16262428]

>>16262101
Satoshi came back last year for a brief period

[Anonymous No.16262461]

>>16262428
Interesting. Able to post what you have?

[Anonymous No.16262479]

>>16262199
Its BSV is like Bitcoin in 2010. There is no other way then big blocks. CSW is madman but he is right.

[Anonymous No.16262586]

BSV Year 1 Look-back
https://youtu.be/GXfJNVGCZQs

[Anonymous No.16262591]

>>16260069
Whew. Winning

[Anonymous [O1G] No.16262623]

1_BSV Hashrate is so low that a small mining pool can 51% attack it

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-btc-bsv.html

2_ 96% BSV transactions come from a fucking weather app

https://bitcoinist.com/96-of-bitcoin-sv-transactions-come-from-a-weather-app-report/

3_If you don't believe the thing in point 2 all you need to do is look the average transaction size of every crypto.

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactionvalue-btc-eth-ltc-bch-bsv-xmr-doge.html

even dogecoin moves more money

4_BSV mining is centralized massively and dominated by coinweek

SV

https://sv.coin.dance/blocks/thisweek

BTC

https://coin.dance/blocks/thisweek

Worse nodes are even more centralized

Only 468 nodes using the same client vs btc having more than 10k nodes using different clients.

https://sv.coin.dance/nodes

5_BSV HAS 1GB size blocks if full , this mean 52tb per year blockchain growth and an ever decrease ammount of nodes hosting it for free(only pools need to be nodes and there are 8 pools on bsv so 8 nodes will receive monetary incentives to host it).
8 nodes hosting CP basically.

6_BSV allows people to upload shit like videos and illegal stuff like cp will be uploaded there 100% knowing it's open.

7_Combine point 4, 5 and 6 and eventually you will end with a centralized blockchain with a few nodes sharing child porn that will be taken down by governments.

8_The fact that SV shills constantly attack other cryptocurrencies and threaten their destruction and even support capital controls show they are not just attacking btc but want to destroy crypto and the recent shilling campaign shows they are paid to do this.

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16262647]

>>16262199
dubs speaketh truth.

don't worry we have hotep...
oh wait

[Anonymous No.16262657]

>>16262623
>https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/transactionvalue-btc-eth-ltc-bch-bsv-xmr-doge.html
>monero on that graph

absolutely based

[Anonymous No.16262663]

>>16262623
Death to Israel

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16262713]

>>16262623
>1_BSV Hashrate is so low that a small mining pool can 51% attack it

There is no profit in attacking it. Sure you could take out a short, but how will they CASH OUT? (By tanking BTC price?) This is the Nakamoto Consensus, it's not possible to kill a chain that is creating economic value, because the generals are competing for margins. BSV is profitable to mine. There is no ECONOMIC VALUE in attacking a minority fork (it hasn't happened yet for a reason).

>2_ 96% BSV transactions come from a fucking weather app

Not really. https://whatsonchain.com/stats

>3_If you don't believe the thing in point 2 all you need to do is look the average transaction size of every crypto.

Bitcon is for microtransactions. It's not for moving money in and out of exchanges. BSV blocks are made of very small values changing hands in digital transactions.

>4_BSV mining is centralized massively and dominated by coinweek

Not true. ViaBTC and Coingeek have about 80% together. https://sv.coin.dance/blocks

Listening nodes don't matter.

>5_BSV HAS 1GB size blocks if full, this... will decrease ammount of nodes hosting it for free.

BSV is for enterprise use. Bitcoin is SUPPOSED to create profit. There is nothing useful "free nodes" or hobby nodes can do on the network.

>6_BSV allows people to upload shit like videos and illegal stuff like cp will be uploaded there 100% knowing it's open.

Miners enforce rules. They will follow law. BSV has not changed its tune about this once.

>7_... eventually you will end with a centralized blockchain with a few nodes sharing child porn that will be taken down by governments.

Miners live in jurisdictions. Miners are incentivized to enforce rules of international law. They will prune illegal data, and the uploader will be traced forever. future warfare will be fought over who can produce the most value as quickly as possible.

>8. u r a shill!
>oz man bad

Sorry, I shitpost for free.

Build on Bitcoin. Bedrock.

[Anonymous No.16262744]

>>16262713
>They will prune illegal data, and the uploader will be traced forever. future warfare will be fought over who can produce the most value as quickly as possible.

So now you are altering the blockchain?Great just great , just what we needed , a ledger that can be modified in the future by a central group.

>>/biz/thread/S15839773

>There is no profit in attacking it.

Great defense mechanism , i see you guys planned it all.

>Not really. https://whatsonchain.com/stats

The tx size shows no one is using it for real , it has more tx than btc yet is moving less wealth than dogecoin so most tx are purely spam.

>Not true. ViaBTC and Coingeek have about 80% together. https://sv.coin.dance/blocks

Again you guys really tough about everything , only 80% , wow by vishnu this is really descentralized.

>Listening nodes don't matter.

They enforce the rules and control the other nodes of course that matters , the more nodes the safest the network is also it's not just about nodes but clients , 1 fucking client.

BTC had an inflation bug a few months ago that would have allowed miners to create coins , it was not exploited because the diversity of clients.

>BSV is for enterprise use. Bitcoin is SUPPOSED to create profit. There is nothing useful "free nodes" or hobby nodes can do on the network.

Where did they say it's for enterprise only?They are constalty shilling about destroying all the rest of crypto and bsv shills attack the use of crypto for payments non stop saying it's for drug dealers or stupid shit like that.
Meanwhile their blockchain is full of cp.

https://bitcoinexchangeguide.com/bitcoin-satoshis-vision-bsv-gets-exploited-stores-child-abuse-imagery-forever-on-its-blockchain/

>Sorry, I shitpost for free.

Me too anon.

>Build on Bitcoin. Bedrock.

Which is the problem of allowing shit like images.

[Anonymous No.16262821]

>>16262744

>Meanwhile their blockchain is full of cp.

You wish

[Anonymous No.16262841]

>>16262744
>Great defense mechanism , i see you guys planned it all

You have no idea what a 51% attack actually is, none of you do, which is why noone has attempted one.

A 51% attack only allows a miner to attempt to double-spend their own coins. That's it.

[Anonymous No.16262896]

>>16262841
and reverse other people's transactions (effectively freezing the chain)

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16263121]

>>16262896
maybe.
but why hasnt it happened?

[Anonymous No.16263145]

>>16262896

Who will build on that block?

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16263247]

>>16263145
yes. why would a miner risk the investment and reputation, not to mention probably legal charges?

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16263256]

>>16263247
because ozzie man bad?

[Anonymous No.16263284]

Holy shit, you fags are pathetic. Imagine listening to this man's blabbering about "law" when he is LITERALLY in trouble with the law (and pretty much fled Australia because of that, the ATO's after him). Imagine trying to find gold in his lies.

Sad!

[Anonymous No.16263311]

>>16262713
>it's not possible to kill a chain that is creating economic value,
that's wrong tho you can't take down a nakamoto consensus chain but sv is not one

[Anonymous No.16263316]

>>16263284
Australia has some gay laws

[Anonymous No.16263318]

>>16262841
no actually a 51% attack can be used to flood the chain with gigabyte blocks for free or to simply censor transactions

[Anonymous No.16263338]

>>16263121
because i don't have 2 exahash sha256 power

[Anonymous No.16263368]

>>16263318
How would that be free?

[Anonymous No.16263488]

>>16263318

That's not a 51% attack, that's just breaking consensus/forking.

[Anonymous No.16263659]

>>16258582
BSV is for faggots

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16263662]

[Anonymous No.16263667]

>>16263662
You're a broke bitch

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16263697]

>>16263667

[Anonymous No.16263710]

Do you guys think we will see a fork in bch once the upgrade is activated in 1.5 hours?

[Anonymous No.16263716]

>>16263368
miner can include any tx for free even 2gig worth of junk

[Anonymous No.16263721]

>>16263716
>miner can include any tx for free even 2gig worth of junk
how would that increase their profit?

[Anonymous No.16263725]

>>16263488
actually its not. its completely legal under sv ruleset.
you guys seriously don't get how bitcoin and the nakamoto consensus works?

[Anonymous No.16263736]

>>16263721
it wouldn't increase their profit we are talking about an attack.

[Anonymous No.16263739]

>>16263736
Why would they attack if they lose money on it?

[Anonymous No.16263749]

>>16263739
only loss comes from the sudden depreciation of sv mined otherwise it would be no loss.
you can massively short sv doing this making it immensely more profitable than mining btc with the same hash.

[Anonymous No.16263762]

>>16263749
why would the price tank because a miner decides to put useless data in the blocks it mines?

[Anonymous No.16263764]

Looks like Calvin Ayre is going broke!!!!! Hahahahaha fucking faggots!!!!!
>>16263761

[Anonymous No.16263798]

>>16263762
because 99% of sv nodes would crash and the 51% attack news alone will send any coins valuation down a few notch. pretty safe bet nigga you lived in a cave so far?

[Anonymous No.16263833]

>>16263798
there is of course a more sinister scenario because hash moving to sv could battle the attacker. however sv has no deep reorg protection like bch an attacker can shadow mine hundreds of blocks before start relaying them. he would have the longest chain and more hashpowe would be needed to reorg him than what btc has for a significant amount of time.

[Anonymous No.16263840]

>>16263798
>because 99% of sv nodes would crash
why would they crash?

[Anonymous No.16263848]

>>16263840
because they are simply not prepared for 2 gig blocks most of them crashed from 100mb blocks mined as test.

[Anonymous No.16263849]

Squire Mining is fucked- BSV price might tank.

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/11/12/1945978/0/en/Squire-Announces-Resignation-of-Auditor.html

[Anonymous No.16263854]

>>16263849
Tick tock for the bsv faggots! Hahahahaha

[Anonymous No.16263856]

>>16263848
>because they are simply not prepared for 2 gig blocks
Then they are not really fit to mine on bsv, are they? They will be out competed by the miner who invested more in its infrastructure. Why is this bad?

[Anonymous No.16263859]

>>16263840
but that's really just the icing on the cake either they crash or just get swamped with script validation so hard they can't propagate and keep up with new blocks or just simply lose interest when thei chain is so violently reorged and a few choice tx is censored to make a point proving how their chain is not secure and not pernissionless anymore.

the fact is i would definitely do it if i had the hash as an object lesson even if it costs me. its definitely theoretically doable profitability is never certain of course but likely. kinda depends on your ability to safely short sv.

[Anonymous No.16263864]

>>16263856
you will see miners crashing also but its not the main criteria bloggers and hobbyists will experience crash and untenability and they will scream bloody murder on social media. that's what you really want.

[Anonymous No.16263876]

>>16263864
>the main criteria bloggers and hobbyists will experience crash and untenability and they will scream bloody murder on social media
I do no know what this sentence mean

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16263953]

[Anonymous No.16264058]

>>16263876
it means there would be shitstorm of epic proportions

[Anonymous No.16264075]

>>16264058
>it means there would be shitstorm of epic proportions
why?

[Anonymous No.16264156]

>>16263848
Sorry /x is the other way
You must be new here

[Anonymous No.16264238]

>>16263876
>the main criteria bloggers and hobbyists will experience crash and untenability and they will scream bloody murder on social media

So..?

If you tried to mirror the visa network on your personal computer it would crash too, bitcoin is for business and enterprise not for hobbyists

[Anonymous No.16264337]

O shit bois, Metanet transactions are going off again

[Anonymous No.16264342]

>>16264337
I wonder if it have something to do with Jimmy's announcement of an announcement

[Anonymous No.16264347]

>>16263856
>Then they are not really fit to mine on bsv, are they? They will be out competed by the miner who invested more in its infrastructure. Why is this bad?

Because nodes do it for free like jannies.

[Anonymous No.16264410]

>>16264347
>Because nodes do it for free like jannies.
kek

[Anonymous No.16264427]

>>16258582
>>16258582

[Anonymous No.16264428]

>>16264075
because people are people and they always react the same
even autists like the unwriter would be baffled if their node crashed on them

[Anonymous No.16264470]

>>16264427
saved

[Anonymous No.16264472]

>>16264428
Why would unwriters node crash because a new miner joines the network with bigger and bettr minig equippment to transact even more data and transactions? What kind of node do you mean when you say unwriters node?

[Anonymous No.16264492]

>>16264472
i would bet he runs it on a pc

[Anonymous No.16264516]

>>16258862
lmao what an insufferable pseud

[Anonymous No.16264517]

>>16264492
I don't know unwriter. What kind of node is it and what does it do?

[Anonymous No.16264881]

>>16264517
he is a dev m8 sort of a celebrity in thee sv crowd

[Anonymous No.16264911]

http://www.satoshisvision.com

[Anonymous No.16264938]

>>16264911
lol you greasy fat fuck

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16265384]

brainlets just dont get us.

[Anonymous No.16265515]

>>16265384
we get you you are just wrong and full of shit

[Anonymous No.16265643]

>>16263833
>>16263848
the best way to time this attack would be to wait for sv to "lock down" the protocol when they are done with the hardforks and start talking about how the protocol is locked in forever and only build on it, that's when you unleash this 51% attack because the only way out of it is hardforking. and that would be a loss of face on epic proportions probably finishing the project and serving it up as a cautionary tale for all shitcoiners.

[Anonymous No.16265843]

>>16265643

You don't know what a 51% attack is

[Anonymous No.16265993]

>>16265843
you are just talking out of your ass here m8.

[Anonymous No.16266031]

>>16265843
>>16265993
also see >>16263725 because you clearly missed it and insist on your own bullshit.

[Anonymous No.16266043]

>>16265993

Speak for yourself, I actually know how Bitcoin works. Nobody is going to mine on top of an invalid chain

You don't know what a 51% attack is

[Anonymous No.16266053]

>>16266043
why would it be invalid? that's the point of a 51% attack it's fully valid.

[Anonymous No.16266110]

>>16262623
Imagine still fudding the same coin after one whole year

[Anonymous No.16266118]

>>16265515
>Implicitly acknowledging that you are a brainlet

[Anonymous No.16266120]

>>16258582
THANK YOU BASED CRAIG
shaking loose the faithless and giving me more chances to buy BSV

[Anonymous No.16266134]

wtf is this shit

[Anonymous No.16266136]

>>16264881
I don't care about who he is. Don't deflect from answering my question:
What kind of node is it and what does it do?

[Anonymous No.16266306]

>>16266136
fuck knows but a dev has to be able to run any node on the live or test network don't be stupid!

[Anonymous No.16266323]

Was anyone here in the IRC chat? #greenpill

Would be cool to get it going again if there's interest

[Anonymous No.16266342]

>>16266306
If you don't know what kind of node it is, how do you know it will crash? Is it a software bug in it or maybe a physical fault in the hardware? Have you physically examined unwriters node to reach this conclusion?

[Anonymous No.16266343]

>>16266323
what's a greenpill supposed to be about? unreasonable unyielding rage?

[Anonymous No.16266354]

>>16266323
>#greenpill
What's that about?

[Anonymous No.16266372]

>>16266342
it will crash
i gather you never developed software in your life just let the adults talk
2 gig full of tx script you need to validate would crash or stall any miner on sv let alone a homeboy with a pc. and if not they would run out of hdd space after the second block by the hundredth there would be nothing left but scorched racks.

sv is fucked on a very fundamental level.

[Anonymous No.16266399]

>>16266372
>miner
ok, so unwriter is a miner? that wasn't really clear from what you wrote before

[Anonymous No.16266421]

>>16266372
and also in a variant of the attack the miner could bloat the utxo set so large with dirt tx that even most pruning nodes will be forced off the network and or find it difficult to even maintain an utxo but this attack is somewhat more expensive computationally and monetarily.

[Anonymous No.16266431]

>>16266399

He's a developer who has built many tools for Bitcoin.

https://Planaria.network

Btw, I put together a general template, bookmark it marines.

https://pastebin.com/Drr3mmrr

[Anonymous No.16266440]

>>16266399
he is not a miner most likely i said no miner would survive as is the sv heads talk the talk but don't walk the walk. other miners on the chain just in it for profit they certainly don't overextend capability. 70 or 80% of the hash would be pushed off sv instantly.

[Anonymous No.16266441]

>>16266421

Ok, now try thinking like a capitalist for once

[Anonymous No.16266467]

>>16266440

>Won't
>can't
>It's impossible
>It will fail

Do you know how much of a loser you sound like right now?

You do realize that some of histories greatest innovations were brought about by men who were told "it's impossible" until they went and did it?

[Anonymous No.16266499]

>>16266440
>he is not a miner most likely i said no miner would survive
I'm confused. Why did you even bring up unwriter? Could you try to be more concise and specific about what the problem is? Is unwriter a friend of yours?

[Anonymous No.16266519]

>>16266431
Glorious work stiffmarine. That pastebin is swell.
I know very well who unwriter is, just stringing O1G along a bit ;)

[Anonymous No.16266524]

>>16266118
i acknowledge sv cucks think i'm a brainlet i think the same of them it's very mutual. the only difference is they can't defend their position in a debate.

[Anonymous No.16266534]

>>16266499
if rabid sv devs can't run a node they will be pissed butthurt and start bitching about it that's why. he is definitely no friend of mine. why are you pretending to live under a rock? are you a literal jeet?

[Anonymous No.16266544]

>>16266519
the problem is while you pretending to be retarded you look really retarded.

[Anonymous No.16266607]

>>16266534
>if rabid sv devs can't run a node they will be pissed butthurt
Isn't that just part of life? If you are not able to compete in the free market that means someone is delivering a better product than you with a better profit margin. Why is that something you are concerned with? If this unwriter is a friend of you I can understand it, but you must try to help him bettering his mining rig to be able to handle the data load. Maybe you could go together to build a superior mining operation to handle even more transactions than the other miners. Then you could out compete other miners and find more blocks to earn more money.

[Anonymous No.16266624]

>>16266544
please don't be so serious. Have a little fun. Cheer up. Could you please flash your O1G tag for me? It is such a long time since I saw it

[Anonymous No.16266626]

>>16266607
>Isn't that just part of life?
ask them m8. i assume they would be upset. they might even realize the tech they sworn to is actually shit. go to bch where there is deep reorg protection and dos protection.

[Anonymous No.16267039]

>>16266626
>i assume they would be upset
Most people who are out competed gets a little upset. That is only human. How is that bad for bitcoin?

[Anonymous No.16267093]

>>16267039
for bitcoin this is not bad. for sv it's horrible. when it gets outed as an insecure piece of pretentious shit that can't even deliver n it's key promises i imagine the price urns towards zero in short order then the hardforks will come and make it all worse by tearing the minuscule community apart.

[Anonymous No.16267190]

>>16267093
>pretentious shit
This is how you know you are not dealing with rational people. Genuinely feel sorry for people like you: you always lose it all to emotion.

[Anonymous No.16267294]

>>16267093
>for bitcoin this is not bad. for sv it's horrible
what do you mean with this sentence?

[Anonymous No.16267613]

>>16263659
Even fud acknowledges he's satoshi.

[Anonymous No.16267724]

Shouldn't this thread be posted in /lgbt/?

[Anonymous No.16267847]

>>16266467
you will see
i will be here to mine the salt

[Anonymous No.16267967]

>>16267190
wrong tho the classification is based in cold hard analysis if i thought large blocks make sense i would fight for them tooth and nail.

small block are the way to go if small blocks are 1mb or 100mb doesn't matter. its all relative.

[Anonymous No.16268029]

>>16260185
Craig confirmed as time traveler.

[Anonymous No.16268031]

DR WRIGHT IS DEAD!!!!!
>>16267999

[Anonymous No.16268078]

>>16268031
if only

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16268440]

btc mempool still under "attack"

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16268458]

bch "looks" like its making a few too many blocks.... should be six every hour, remember?

[Anonymous No.16268459]

>>16268440
https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,30d
fuck are you talking about? nothing special...
https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#0,1y
even less special...

[Anonymous No.16268468]

>>16268440
Any theories on what's going on? It is strange how only the data size increased, but no the transaction count

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16268471]

one is not like the others

[Anonymous No.16268488]

>>16268458
it's all probabilistic you an find 20 or 2 per hour easily.

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16268505]

>>16268459
check mempool memory, not unconfirmed transaction.
>>16268468
I don't claim to know, but it looks like somebody is spending a lot of money to make BTC more expensive to move. Very few 1 satoshi txs are being mined at the moment.

I also imagine some raspberry pis are making more heat than usual right about now.

[Anonymous No.16268506]

>>16268458
Not only that, but someone did not accept the rule changes and keeps mining on original rule set. The chain has split. Who is the miner? Empty blocks makes me think of sharkpool, but what would be their end goal?

[Anonymous No.16268517]

>>16268468
looks like a bunch of large tx-es with low fee that will never get mined most likely.

[Anonymous No.16268534]

>>16268506
oh no bch forked again? XD

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16268539]

>>16268488
yes, I don't put too much on that. It just looks a bit sketch, especially with the "hard fork" post-upgrade.

[Anonymous No.16268560]

>>16268539
sorry i'm so uninterested in the minority forks i completely missed bch is having a big day.

[Anonymous No.16268562]

>>16268505
>I also imagine some raspberry pis are making more heat than usual right about now.
haha

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16268579]

>>16268560
yes it's the long-awaited upgrade
>SCHNORRRR SIGNATURES REEEEEEEEEE

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16268650]

This is hilarious.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1195438823515156480

My pride intensifies for my glorious homeland.

[Anonymous No.16268770]

>>16268650
Holy shit that is funny. Can you imagine having sex with it?

IMAGINE THE SMELL

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16268779]

This brings joy to my heart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pblOi1TVtYI

[Anonymous No.16268782]

>>16268770
JUST LOOK AT IT
lmao

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16268846]

https://youtu.be/1WCA9IR943I
come join the trollbox!
#Bitcoin Independence Day
The Bitcoin SV Channel

The Return of The Jedi Soon.

[Anonymous No.16268909]

>>16268650
>https://twitter.com/i/status/1195438823515156480
>>16268650
>>16268650

and just like that a new meme was created

[Anonymous No.16268920]

>>16262623
The name isn't necessary. I can tell when it's you letting creg live rent free.

[Anonymous No.16268967]

>>16268560
>sorry i'm so uninterested in the minority forks
Yet you shitpost in SV threads literally everyday.

[Anonymous No.16269116]

>>16268846
Listening now, but don't have an account so no trolling. Can anyone tell me what that humming sound shem makes is?

[Anonymous No.16269230]

>>16268779
HOW MANY BSV TO MAKE HER MY WIFE PLEASE SIRS

[Anonymous No.16269276]

>>16268967
wouldn't care to do that if you fags stopped fudding bitcoin and slandering satoshi.

start talking about your tech in a reasonable manner and you will not see me again.

[Anonymous No.16269424]

>>16269276
>I am here, because I must defend the sacred honor of the ghost of satoshi
Just admit that in actuality you are internally conflicted and secretly wonder if we aren't all right. You come here trying to find answers to this conflict, but all you do is find yourself increasingly conflicted. The longer you linger here, the less inclined you are to tear yourself away.
You're here forever.

[Anonymous No.16269647]

>>16269276
>I don't care about minority forks
>well I actually obsess over it

[Anonymous No.16269733]

>>16269647
no m8 i may obsess over bitcoin a tiny bit. the shitforks just annoy me.

[Anonymous No.16269765]

>>16266544
Just stfu anon

[Anonymous No.16269856]

>>16269733
Yes, obviously the shitforks are only a minor annoyance for you. See you tomorrow and the day after that and the day after that and the day after that and eventually you'll stop posting because you were wrong. The entire time letting creg live rent free. He might actually own your mind after SV claims dominate hash.

[Anonymous No.16269953]

>>16269856
Muahahahhhahaahahha core cucks on suicide watch

[Autistic Bitcoiner No.16270275]

[Anonymous No.16270298]

>>16269953
not really just wait for the next halving you will see suicide watch!

[Anonymous No.16270575]

>>16270298
>you will see suicide watch!
Because I'll be the one watching it unfold on /biz/.

>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?!
>WHAT DO YOU MEAN NOBODY WANTS TO ADOPT A SYSTEM THAT IS SLOW, EXPENSIVE, DOESN'T SCALE, HAS AN IMPROPER CHAIN OF CUSTODY DUE TO MY SUPER SPECIAL SOFT FORK THAT ISN'T ACTUALLY A FORK

[Anonymous No.16270598]

>>16270575
if that happens then that happens but i have my own suspicions how events will unfold. won't be pretty for sv cucks. first of all their genesis fork will be a small disaster. after that they will be forced to implement reorg protection then experience an other chain split unintended. finally after the halving most hash leaves sv forks.

[Anonymous No.16270714]

>>16270598
>first of all their genesis fork will be a small disaster
Because why?
>after that they will be forced to implement reorg protection
Based off what?
>experience an other chain split unintended
Why would that happen?
>after the halving most hash leaves sv
It's constantly more profitable to mine SV. Any effect the halving has on hash will have an equal or greater effect on BTC.

[Anonymous No.16271008]

New thread boys

>>16270997