>>16220262
I think maybe you're translating your expertise in another field here, because you're speaking confidently and making very little sense.
>21 million BTC in existence.
Okay, definite supply means definite possibility of control.
>You'd have to buy up every single
No, that's not how any of this would work. You would only need a controlling stake, enough that people would come to you for the provision of financial services such as loans.
>people would notice
And?
>you can't seize bitcoin
You think like an engineer. You can seize people. You can write new laws.
If anything, this proves a significant vulnerability in widespread use, unless a central authority dictates transition to a new currency. Bad actors are everywhere, and definite supply and indefinite destruction are a bad combo.
Yes, we're all excited about cryptocurrency, that has nothing to do with this.