China Live Stream

[Anonymous No.16179988]

https://www.8btc.com/wbc-2019/?lang=en

[Anonymous No.16179994]

[Anonymous No.16180002]

https://twitter.com/Chainlink_INFO/status/1192669619233779712?s=19

[Anonymous No.16180045]

So in how long is the stream?

[Anonymous No.16180048]

Why is he the only one looking down and away 100s if photos and he is the only one too shy to look at the goddamn camera

[Anonymous No.16180050]

>>16180045
2 hours

[Anonymous No.16180058]

>>16180045
google exists

[Anonymous No.16180285]

>>16180048
real question is why are they using a pic from like 2016?
and the answer is, of course, Sergey body doubles.

[Anonymous No.16180358]

Here we go boys get ready for the chink pump +500%
Also what you think about this?
>https://www.theblockcrypto.com/linked/46388/banking-giant-standard-chartered-joins-enterprise-ethereum-alliance

[Anonymous No.16180421]

>>16180048
Why the fuck don't they use the latest picture

[Anonymous No.16180436]

>>16179988
>12 months test net
>4 months main net
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
>(with proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan)
>Linkers: this is bullish!

[Anonymous No.16180474]

So were def going to spam tienimen squar in that chat right?

[Anonymous No.16180489]

>>16180474
Make tibet great again

[Anonymous No.16180498]

>>16180002
>4pm UCT+8
So in 45 minutes.

[Anonymous No.16180510]

>>16179994
>MakerDao
nice

[Anonymous No.16180521]

Nobody cares about Pajeet link anymore

[Anonymous No.16180841]

And of course the chink stream no workie.

[Anonymous No.16180868]

>>16179988
streams never fucking work, it's just like their network 0 user we've been chinked once again

[Anonymous No.16180887]

>>16180868
The translation link works: http://lm.enewie.com/h5/GIJFVF

[Anonymous No.16180905]

>>16180887
not working on computer

[Anonymous No.16180923]

>>16180905
what?

[Anonymous No.16180934]

>>16180887
All im hearing is some chinkoid rambling in broken engrish with no video

[Anonymous No.16180938]

>>16180934
That's the translation.

[Anonymous No.16180943]

WHEN IS SERBEGEY

[Anonymous No.16180947]

>>16180938
why would a translator translate Sergey's autist english to broken engrish?

[Anonymous No.16180950]

>>16180947
This probably isn't Sergey, is it?

[Anonymous No.16180956]

>>16180947
>>16180950
Maybe when Sergers starts, the audio will simply switch directly to the floor mic.

[Anonymous No.16180979]

>>16180950
Sergey's English deteriorates proportional to the time he spends in China times the adelyn factor2

[Eddiegayman No.16180989]

Before you buy, let me tell you a story.
I was visiting San Francisco to see one of my friends. We went to a strip club, and while I was there, I saw Sergey, surrounded by women. He was throwing tons of money at them, but not just bills. It was stacks upon stacks of $10,000, sealed up with the white paper bands, like he had just come straight from a bank.
I went up to him and congratulated him on the success of Chainlink as of late (this was about a month ago), and he started laughing. He took a hefty swig from a bottle of Dom Perignon, and said, "Yeah? You think I care, stinky?"
Confused, I asked what he meant, and said that he had obviously put a lot of work into LINK and he should be proud.
"Fundamentally, I don't give two fucks about Chainlink, kid."
He was about to say something else but one of the strippers tapped him on the shoulder. Sergey pulled out from his pocket the biggest ziplock bag full of cocaine I've ever seen in my life. It looked like one of those gallon bags, almost bulging at the seams. The stripper ran off into a back room with it.
He then pulled out a Zippo lighter.
"You wanna know what I think about Chainlink?"
He snapped his fingers and a stripper handed him a bottle of Hennessy. He then pulled about 20 stacks of bills from a duffel bag, threw them on the floor, poured cognac all over them, flicked his Zippo, and dropped it onto the pile. Almost instantly the whole stack caught.
I stared at him, speechless.
"It's called a 'PUMP and DUMP,' kid."
He laughed as he watched the pile burn before losing interest and going into a back room with his entourage of strippers following carrying duffel bags full of what I assume was money and coke.
This is the man you are supporting by buying LINK.

[Anonymous No.16180990]

THE EAGLE HAS LANDED

[Anonymous No.16180991]

SERJEE NAZAROV

[Anonymous No.16180999]

>audio craps out half a minute before Sergey starts talking

As soon as the chink translator's audio started breaking up, I thought to myself "oh, Sergey must be up next".

[Anonymous No.16181001]

>>16180990
better announce some shieeet

[Anonymous No.16181008]

NI HAO, WEALTHY CHINAMAN!

[Anonymous No.16181009]

>>16180999
cleared up now

[Anonymous No.16181013]

>>16180999
>crappy mic for foreign round eye
same old shit, they really don't want us in their club

[Anonymous No.16181037]

FUNDAMENTALLY

[Anonymous No.16181043]

>We are proud to announce sta *KRRR KRRR* and we are acquiring Micros *KRR KRRRR KRRR* tomorrow we start our first worldwide transaction through SWI *KRRR KRRRR KRRRRR*
what the fuck is going on

[Anonymous No.16181044]

[Anonymous No.16181047]

Did he just confirm development of zkps? Has he said that they were in development before?

[Anonymous No.16181052]

>>16181047
don't know the audio quality is absolutely disgusting

[Anonymous No.16181053]

MY FUCKING EARS CHINA U FUCKERS

[Anonymous No.16181061]

>>16181047
>Did he just confirm development of zkps?
It looks like he literally did.

>Has he said that they were in development before?
I don't think so.

>>16181052
I refreshed the tab and it works perfectly aside from some distortion.

[Anonymous No.16181077]

>>16181047
>>16181061
What is or are zkps?

[Anonymous No.16181081]

>keybase
Third-party KYC services confirmed

[Anonymous No.16181083]

>PROVEN THEIR IDENTITY
NODE OPERATORS NEED TO PROVE THEIR IDENTITY
FUCK THAT

[Anonymous No.16181090]

>>16181077
Zero Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs)
A ZKP is a cryptographic technique which allows two parties (a prover and a verifier) to prove that a proposition is true, without revealing any information about that thing apart from it being true

[Anonymous No.16181093]

HE FUCKING SAID IDENTITY AGAIN
SERGEY IS KEKED

[Anonymous No.16181094]

>>16181077
zero-knowledge proofs

He mentioned another thing they were going to be working on, but I didn't quite catch that since someone just started talking to me at that point.

>>16181083
They don't need to you moron.
He said nodes "can" do that.

[Anonymous No.16181099]

DATA-DRIVEN WEB OF TRUST

[Anonymous No.16181106]

>>16181090
>>16181094

Sounds like an Ari Juels Special to me.

[Anonymous No.16181111]

>>16181093
Large companies are going to demand KYC nodes.
In Chainlink this is available as an option.

[Anonymous No.16181113]

what a flacid coc of an ending

[Anonymous No.16181118]

>>16181094
Homomorphic encryption I think.

[Anonymous No.16181120]

>>16181094
Sounds like fake news
Why would he even consider KYC driven nodes in the first place? It sounds like he's implying that LINK cannot be sybil resistant without some KYC, and that is BAD news.

[Anonymous No.16181122]

>>16181113
XIE XIE ROUND EYE

[Anonymous No.16181124]

>>16181118
Yes that was it.
He implied this is coming in the future.

>>16181120
>Why would he even consider KYC driven nodes in the first place?
Because some people like KYC, for example large companies will demand it.
Nothing wrong with giving people options.

[Anonymous No.16181128]

>>16181120
The first oracle network could never be sybil resistant without KYC since nobody trusts oracle networks, since they've never existed prior.

[Anonymous No.16181134]

>>16181124
>Because some people like KYC
Oof. Not really.
>for example large companies will demand it.
Maybe if your technology couldn't work 100% accurately without it...wtf lmao you really have zero clue what the point of decentralization is

[Anonymous No.16181137]

>>16181120
It’s not

[Anonymous No.16181139]

>>16181128
fake news

[Anonymous No.16181141]

>>16181134
Found the coomer whos never had a big boy job before

[Anonymous No.16181153]

>>16181128
Then how could RLC do it without KYC?

[Anonymous No.16181156]

>>16181134
>Oof. Not really.
Yes really.
Large companies adore their KYC.
Hence why they're so attached to their permissioned chains.

>Maybe if your technology couldn't work 100% accurately without it...
Blockchain does work 99% accurately, probably better than any permissioned chain.
The point is companies love the idea of KYC because they feel it gives them accountability.

[Anonymous No.16181165]

>>16181153
>muh KYC fud coming from an RLCfag
Like clockwork.

Protip: Chainlink works perfectly without KYC; it's just that certain parties want that option.

[Anonymous No.16181181]

>>16181156
>Yes really.
>Large companies adore their KYC.
>Hence why they're so attached to their permissioned chains.
This is a massive cope.

>The point is companies love the idea of KYC because they feel it gives them accountability.

Oh yea I'm SURE companies just LOVE having any sort of accountability LOL fucking boomer

KYC IS GLOWNIGGER SHIT FUCK YOU FAGGOTS

[Anonymous No.16181189]

>>16181165
I'm not a RLCfag you fucking nigger I just know everything about the competition for LINK's oracles.

If it "works perfectly" then why the fuck is he acting like it's a requirement? I'm heavily invested into LINK and this pisses me the fuck off.

[Anonymous No.16181201]

>>16181181
>This is a massive cope.
The fuck are you talking about.
Large companies LOVE LOVE LOVE their KYC, the proof is in the fact that they're so insistent on using permissioned chains.

>>16181189
>I'm not a RLCfag
Oh yes you are.

>I just know everything about the competition for LINK's oracles.
Ok, so explain what RLC does differently from Chainlink that obviates the need for KYC.

>If it "works perfectly" then why the fuck is he acting like it's a requirement?
He literally isn't.
He's saying it's possible to implement KYC.
Chainlink's documentation LITERALLY says KYC is optional.

[Anonymous No.16181204]

>>16181181
>have to chose between :
>unknown node operator
>certified node operator that went through KYC
for sure big company will take your node you dumb faggot

[Anonymous No.16181205]

>>16181189
>I'm heavily invested into LINK and this pisses me the fuck off.
Chainlink's KYC option has been known since May 30th you absolute retard.

[Anonymous No.16181212]

>>16181181
KYC is glownigger shit forced onto big businesses due to the money flowing through them. The big businesses want accountability so they can push it OFF on other parties, instead of being solely liable were shit to go down and no other names could be found (to blame) due to decentralization.
You want as many names as possible so you have lots of people pointing fingers at each other and wasting time until something else happens and take the heat off of this particular incident.

[Anonymous No.16181215]

>>16181201
>Ok, so explain what RLC does differently from Chainlink that obviates the need for KYC.

I don't know WHY or how but I do know that they are using their algorithm to do it. I don't know how that enables it to work 100% without any KYC nodes at all. It seems like magic to me considering what I understand right now with LINK it needs at least SOME KYC'd nodes to maintain the overall network.

>He literally isn't.
>He's saying it's possible to implement KYC.
Idk man it really sounds like he doesn't know how to solve the oracle problem without KYC at the core of the network..
>Chainlink's documentation LITERALLY says KYC is optional.
Show me

>for sure big company will take your node you dumb faggot

BUT THE FUCKING POINT OF ORACLES IS TO BE TRUSTLESS YOU FUCKING NIGGER RETARD

[Anonymous No.16181221]

>>16181212
Yeah and that's what makes KYC bad because what happens if all the KYC nodes are compromised somehow? Then it's real bad for EVERYONE and maybe even the overall LINK network

[Anonymous No.16181236]

>>16181189
>gets pissed off now at an option released at mainnet launch
Imagine being this slow and retarded.

[Anonymous No.16181241]

>>16181215
>I don't know how that enables it to work 100% without any KYC nodes at all.
Protip: there's NOTHING fundamentally different from how Chainlink does it.
The simple fact is that large companies CRAVE their KYC, so Chainlink offers that option.
End of story.

>Idk man it really sounds like he doesn't know how to solve the oracle problem without KYC
Nice Chainlink fanfiction.

>Show me
https://blog.chain.link/chainlink-live-ethereum-mainnet-connected-consensus/
"We also intend to have an optional identity review available to node operators"

[Anonymous No.16181244]

Lads... I just need to say this. 动态网自由门 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Free Tibet 六四天安門事件 The Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 天安門大屠殺 The Tiananmen Square Massacre 反右派鬥爭 The Anti-Rightist Struggle 大躍進政策 The Great Leap Forward 文化大革命 The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution 人權 Human Rights 民運 Democratization 自由 Freedom 獨立 Independence 多黨制 Multi-party system 台灣 臺灣 Taiwan Formosa 中華民國 Republic of China 西藏 土伯特 唐古特 Tibet 達賴喇嘛 Dalai Lama 法輪功 Falun Dafa 新疆維吾爾自治區 The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region 諾貝爾和平獎 Nobel Peace Prize 劉暁波 Liu Xiaobo 民主 言論 思想 反共 反革命 抗議 運動 騷亂 暴亂 騷擾 擾亂 抗暴 平反 維權 示威游行 李洪志 法輪大法 大法弟子 強制斷種 強制堕胎 民族淨化 人體實驗 肅清 胡耀邦 趙紫陽 魏京生 王丹 還政於民 和平演變 激流中國 北京之春 大紀元時報 九評論共産黨 獨裁 專制 壓制 統一 監視 鎮壓 迫害 侵略 掠奪 破壞 拷問 屠殺 活摘器官 誘拐 買賣人口 遊進 走私 毒品 賣淫 春畫 賭博 六合彩 天安門 天安门 法輪功 李洪志 Winnie the Pooh 劉曉波动态网自由门

[Anonymous No.16181247]

Wow it's fucking nothing haha stupid linkies

[Anonymous No.16181250]

>>16179988
This a bearish!!!!

No one wants it in the west, so he's shilling it in China!!!

[Anonymous No.16181248]

>>16181221
>that's what makes KYC bad
t. not a large company.

>what happens if all the KYC nodes are compromised somehow?
What?
Literally what?

[Anonymous No.16181258]

>>16181244
Based

[Anonymous No.16181259]

>>16181241
>Protip: there's NOTHING fundamentally different from how Chainlink does it.
RLC DOESN'T HAVE KYC THOUGH SO HOW THE FUCK???

>"We also intend to have an optional identity review available to node operators"

Okay well then we will see if it leads to a bunch of centralized oracles. I'm just saying that could be bad.

[Anonymous No.16181271]

>>16181221
>KYC bad
Tell that to the massive corporations using Hyperledger, Corda, etc.

[Anonymous No.16181278]

>>16181271
>KYC bad

>KYC good

[Anonymous No.16181297]

>>16181259
>RLC DOESN'T HAVE KYC THOUGH SO HOW THE FUCK???
Chainlink works perfectly without KYC, it's just an option.

>Okay well then we will see if it leads to a bunch of centralized oracles
Each node in itself is "centralized", yes.
The same is true for Bitcoin, ETH, ... nodes.

[Anonymous No.16181306]

>>16181278
Options good.
Especially options massive corporations want.

Also, you still have to explain how this is only pissing you off now, 5 months after announcement.

[Anonymous No.16181311]

>>16181297
>Chainlink works perfectly without KYC, it's just an option.
If chainlink really worked "perfectly" without KYC it wouldn't need KYC as an option because then it would be 100% trustless and companies would not care since it''s 100% trustless.

[Anonymous No.16181312]

>>16181311
>If chainlink really worked "perfectly" without KYC it wouldn't need KYC as an option
You don't know what an "option" is, do you?

My god you're retarded.

[Anonymous No.16181314]

>>16180048
This photo is a still from an interview of him in '14

[Anonymous No.16181315]

>>16181244
So why is this spammed around? Will it stop the chinamen from coming here?

[Anonymous No.16181323]

>KYC
>Decentralized

Choose one and only one stinkies.

[Anonymous No.16181327]

>>16181311
>companies would not care since it''s 100% trustless.
Explain why large corps use permissioned chains like hyperledger.

[Anonymous No.16181328]

>>16181323
Are you saying Hyperledger Fabric isn't decentralized?

[Anonymous No.16181337]

>>16181323
Also, KYC is optional.
So you're wrong twice.

[Anonymous No.16181491]

>>16181323
If all the eth nodes had to kyc
How would it be less decentralized?
Also kyc nodes are optional and i understand why institutions with high value contracts would be interested in this
Maybe it even turns out to be more secure to choose 1000anonymus nodes than just a few kyc nodes

[Anonymous No.16181588]

>KYC
>Decentralized

Choose one and only one stinkies.

[Anonymous No.16181592]

>>16181588
see >>16181328
>>16181337

Stay seething though.

[Anonymous No.16181599]

>>16181311
>>16181323
>>16181588
Kill yourself, promptly.

[Anonymous No.16182350]

>>16181588
Yeah, I don’t agree.
I’m happy you fuckers aren’t node operators. I want Sergey to have 1k+ hand vetted and then let you anime titty fucking never touch a woman in your life as niggas run it out the gate

[Anonymous No.16182462]

>Russian Sergey radio
>kyc orc is an option and available
>non kyc orc is an option and available
If you are a crop farmer in eastern Ukraine taking out a smart contract for weather insurance against the crop ... do you really care about paying a premium for a kyc Oracle to get accurate weather data for a payout? No because a non kyc Oracle will probably deliver the accurate data from an international body.
>what is market efficiency?
LINK $10000

[Anonymous No.16182507]

Nothing burgers get your nothing burgers here

[Anonymous No.16182658]

queue the red light saber sounds