/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.16135234]

>b-b-but what if you stake Link and then the price of Link changes?
There's an oracle for that.

https://medium.com/secure-data-links/hackathon-link-total-return-swap-24d7a33a105d

[Anonymous No.16135265]

>$2.67

[Anonymous No.16135281]

>>16135234
Development is about to explode, isn't it.

[Anonymous No.16135286]

>>16135281
Sure is

[Anonymous No.16135292]

>>16135234
Convoluted trash

[Anonymous No.16135300]

>>16135234
>Virtual project
>Virtual
>number of user = 0 (zero)

[Anonymous No.16135303]

>>16135281
Wait until people realize how insane the network effect is on Chainlink.
Oracles providing external data are just the tip of the iceberg.
There will be tons of oracles providing services to other oracles: mixicles, reputation contracts, threshold signatures, these "total return swaps", fiat-crypto-fiat so normies don't have to buy Link off Binance, etc. etc. etc.

>>16135292
It's called network effect.
I predicted this very use case back in 2017.

>>16135300
Cope.

[Anonymous No.16135306]

>>16135303
Normies have zero reason to buy link

[Anonymous No.16135313]

>>16135306
Which is exactly why there will be fiat-Link-fiat smart contracts running in the background of nearly every end-user smart contract.

[Anonymous No.16135315]

>>16135306
They had 0 reason to buy ETH too but they still did.

[Anonymous No.16135320]

>>16135313
Doubt it. Zero reason for any of that. Link isn't even decentralized.

[Anonymous No.16135322]

>>16135320
Stay seething.

[Anonymous No.16135328]

>>16135315
Comparing link to ETH LOL

[Anonymous No.16135332]

>>16135322
Devs own 65% of the supply and nodes require kyc. Imagine thinking it's decentralized

[Anonymous No.16135337]

>>16135332
>>16135328
>imagine being this seething

They only own 30% (see pic), and KYC is literally optional.

[Anonymous No.16135343]

>>16135303
When will people realize? You’ve already been featured everywhere and still have 0 users, 0 dApps, and 0 real partnerships.

Will it take another $32 million in an Caribbean account and multiple 700k dumps on his own investors for people to realize? Will Sergey go MIA like he did for all his other projects leaving investors hanging? Nobody is going to use this vaporware garbage.

[Anonymous No.16135344]

>>16135337
Holy shit the cope. They own 65% retard

[Anonymous No.16135349]

>>16135344
30%
See pic in: >>16135337
This pic is from before the ICO btw.

[Anonymous No.16135354]

>>16135349
35% is the public token sale therefore they own the other 65 IMAGINE THE SMELL

[Anonymous No.16135359]

>>16135320
During the KYC exam Sergey personally inspected my penis. When I asked him why he winked at me and said "gotta know your customer".

[Anonymous No.16135363]

>>16135343
>0 users, 0 dApps, and 0 real partnerships
Look at all this headcanon.

>>16135354
35% public sale
35% for future node operators (to keep initial buyers from monopolizing tokens)
30% for future development

This has been common knowledge since before the ICO.

[Anonymous No.16135376]

>>16135343
This
>0 user
>0 dapp
>1B$ MC for an estimate smart contract value of 200M$ in 2021
It's a brilliant idea on paper for sure, but there's no need and demand for it.

[Anonymous No.16135382]

>>16135363
LMFAO keep coping. They own 65 however you want to frame it.
Muh node incentives. Shit network

[Anonymous No.16135401]

>>16135382
The real demand is penis inspections during the KYC stage. Adelyn and Sergey work round the clock and even use WeChat to inspect penises in China. In a recent interview Sergey said "hey it's a dirty job but someone has to do it".

[Anonymous No.16135407]

>>16135376
>but there's no need and demand for it.
Tell that to Google Cloud.

>>16135382
>They own 65 however you want to frame it.
They own 30%.

[Anonymous No.16135415]

>>16135407
Right and the magical sky nigger owns that other 35 for "node operators" right? Stay delusional.

[Anonymous No.16135422]

>>16135415
>the magical sky nigger owns that other 35 for "node operators"
Yes.

[Anonymous No.16135428]

>>16135407
Google isn’t touching this shit with a 10 foot pole. Go ahead and post your Tweet about the meetup. Before you do, post the Tweet from Google announcing this...you can’t. Google ain’t doing shit with this garbage.

[Anonymous No.16135435]

>>16135407
>tell that to Google cloud
Are they using it? No.

[Anonymous No.16135446]

>>16135428
>still claiming google is fake news

[Anonymous No.16135448]

>>16135428
>Google isn’t touching this shit with a 10 foot pole.
WHOOPSIE

[Anonymous No.16135457]

>>16135435
They literally are using it: https://docs.chain.link/docs/big-query-chainlink-testnet

[Anonymous No.16135526]

>>16135448
So what happened with this? This is more of an Eth centered post and not even the one I'm referring to. I'm sure if they actually did something with Google, they wouldn't be picking obvious scams as start up partners. Try harder.

[Anonymous No.16135537]

>>16135457
>Posts a Chainlink Google docs
S-see they're using it!

[Anonymous No.16135561]

>>16135526
>So what happened with this?
It's being developed.
There was Foam (acknowledged by Allen Day): https://discourse.foam.space/t/map-osaka-with-foam-in-built-with-google-cloud-platform-chainlink-and-blocklytics/1049
And there's the derivatives meetup at Google HQ that's building on this.

Things are heating up bigly.

>This is more of an Eth centered post
Chainlink is mentioned 40% more times than ETH.

>if they actually did something with Google
There's no "if".
I posted the literal proof. You just have to get over your cognitive dissonance.

>they wouldn't be picking obvious scams as start up partners
Chainlink is decentralized, they have no say in who picks them.

[Anonymous No.16135573]

>>16135537
1) go to https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/building-hybrid-blockchain-cloud-applications-with-ethereum-and-google-cloud
2) ctrl+f "our documentation for requesting data from BigQuery via Chainlink" (emphasis on 'our')
3) this phrase is a hyperlink, click it
4) ???
5) mind blown

[Anonymous No.16135629]

>>16135561
> 9 people used it
> Cartographers will foam at the penis for this
I mean is there any point to this beyond what google already offers for maps?

[Anonymous No.16135657]

>>16135306
You have no idea how link works

[Anonymous No.16135669]

>>16135629
Jfc you had 2 years.

[Anonymous No.16135699]

>>16135669
> Be me
> Go on pivotal
> Check project history
> 100 weeks plus
> Steve deleting epics and other tasks nonstop
> Mfw

[Anonymous No.16135727]

>>16135629
It was a nifty little experiment that was only announced during Devcon itself.
And if you don't understand the value of user-input maps, then lmao@u.

>>16135699
Tell us what you think that means, anon.

[Anonymous No.16135738]

>>16135234
Based. We're all gonna make it.

[Anonymous No.16135745]

>>16135727
It all sounds big but its all so tiresome anon
Constant redesign to incorporate new ventures/ changes to initial thoughts on approaching issues and problems and so on.
What do you think geographic data can be used for?

[Anonymous No.16135765]

>>16135745
>It all sounds big but its all so tiresome anon
>Constant redesign to incorporate new ventures/ changes to initial thoughts on approaching issues and problems and so on.
Chainlink is a lot like a duck: calm and poised above the waterline (5 months of steady but bullet-proof mainnet development), while paddling furiously below the waterline.

>What do you think geographic data can be used for?
User-generated maps offer countless benefits over centrally-created maps.
Not just in terms of things like actually interesting spots and real-time traffic data for instance, but also in terms of censorship resistance.