[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 135 KB, 1024x768, IMG_20190722_062315.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16121117 No.16121117 [Reply] [Original]

Hypothetically, if BSV were to flip BTC, how would you feel?

>> No.16121131

i would undress and run as long as i could

>> No.16121242

>>16121117
If hypotethically btc miners did a 51% attack on that shitcoin with their massive hashrate

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-btc-bsv.html

How would you feel?

>> No.16121300 [DELETED] 

>>16121242
How to get some free BTC

1 - simply go to bitcoin-generator dot online
2 - put your wallet address
3 - select how much Bitcoin you wanna receive
4 - click start, then confirm
5 - wait for the process complete
6 - receive your free BTC

>> No.16121391

>>16121117
bretty gud

>> No.16121397

>>16121117
Like a millionaire. Because I'd buy one.

I'd go and buy a Porsche 911.

>> No.16121420

>>16121397
*be one

>> No.16121958
File: 47 KB, 987x495, flip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16121958

In 2017 flip was quiet close. Big FOMO turned on when people start thinking BCH is real bitcoin

>> No.16122074

>>16121242
THIS
bsv is a zero hashrate unsafe double-shitfork

>> No.16122085

>>16121117
Pretty gud desu senpai

>> No.16122092

>>16121242
hahaha do a 51% attack, there will be no legal repercussions I promise

>> No.16122100

>>16121242
And yet they don't. It's almost as if they're keeping their long term options open.

>> No.16122106

>>16122092
>there will be no legal repercussions I promise
MOMMY CHINKS ARE STEALING MY TOYS
good luck in court, consensus say 51% is right and 49% is wrong

>> No.16122123

>>16122092
51% attacks aren't illegal.

>> No.16122128

>>16122092
>the attacking nodes were from Russia

>> No.16122141

>>16122123
>>stealing and falsifying information isn't illegal

>> No.16122147

>>16122141
WAT?
are you retarded son?

>> No.16122169
File: 26 KB, 640x427, download (6).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16122169

>muh basic NLP techniques (how do you feel)
>shilling so blatantly

Craig Wright allowed
Immutable Child Pornography
on BSV

>> No.16122227

>>16122092
>legal repercussions
>KYC IN SHITCOIN
>Legal shitcoin

The fact that bsv retards are so focused on laws , lawsuits and governments show you fuckers are nothing more than a shit attack on cryptocurrencies.

>> No.16122253

>>16122100
of course they don't , they can put old asics to mine this shitcoin once they are no longer competitive due to asics using smaller nm chips outperforming them.

Then they mine the shitcoin and craig and his scamgang get retards buying it.

It's a good business for miners but the bsv hashrate will eventually become so small relative to btc that all you will need is one rich miner becoming pissed of craig to destroy this shitcoin.

>> No.16122258
File: 82 KB, 1024x576, 1556740503248.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16122258

>>16122227
Satoshi and The Original BitCoin BSV know that the law require KYC and that BitCoin exchanges who fail to comply with this will be shut down. You may not like the law, but if a exchange are in breach of it they will be targeted by the government. The laws are what they are no matter how much you want it to be different. It is just a harsh fact of reality that every grown ups learn to understand.

The law will of course apply equally to SegWit Coin BTC as we see examples of right now. Time to get your head out of fantasy land and realize Crypto is part of the real world and not some abstract dimension where law doesn't apply

>> No.16122264

>>16122253
Cope. Hashrate is increasing.

>> No.16122269

>>16122092
Also >legal repercutions

Who the fuck is going to sue who?Even if that happens no one has ownership of the blockchain it's like sueing a company that managed to create artificial gold because they reduced the price of your gold.

It's such a retarded concept and shows how bsvtards have no understanding of cryptocurrencies in any way.

>> No.16122299

>>16122141
"falsifying information" isn't a crime. besides, blockchains are fully transparent. you can't falsify information, you can only change the data itself.
also, not all 51% attacks involve stealing. a proof of concept double spend to your own wallet isn't illegal. neither is bricking the entire chain by blocking all transactions.

>> No.16122315

>>16122264
>Cope. Hashrate is increasing.

It's not relative to btc hashrate it's now absurdly low in the sha256 miner sphere.

https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-bsv.html

>>16122258
Oh fuck off my governmenet banned yesterday bitcoin purchases and we won't give a shit.
Bitcoin was designed to bypass the law and retarded capital controls and regulations.

>You may not like the law, but if a exchange are in breach of it they will be targeted by the government.

Good exchanges are not needed they are centralized points that have been a curse for crypto.

p2p is where the game is and here in argentina everyone trades p2p in cash.

>The laws are what they are no matter how much you want it to be different. It is just a harsh fact of reality that every grown ups learn to understand.

Go suck a dick bitcoin was created to prevent tyrany and force politicians and central bankers to self moderate it's the only thing preventing a cashles fiat society right now and your fucking bsv boomers won't destroy it.

>Time to get your head out of fantasy land and realize Crypto is part of the real world and not some abstract dimension where law doesn't apply

Fuck you boomer , if the venezuelan government passes a law saying you are a fucking slave you cucks would obey it.

My generation won't take this shit any longer , you cucks have ruined the west with your slave mentality.

>> No.16122330

>>16121117
Baffled befuddled hoodwinked confused runamock

>> No.16122332

>>16122315
It really doesnt take much for the house of cards that is btc to come crashing down. One too many hashing whipsaw and it's all over. Profitability and price on BSV is only increasing.

>> No.16122353

>>16122332
hashing is irrelevant a collapse of 50% in the hashrate means we will see blocks every 20 mins until the network difficulty adjusts , not to mention that old asics would make a shitton of money again so a 50% collapse in hashrate would probably last for a week as old asics go online.

>> No.16122356

>>16122332
how much hashing power is there on BSV compard to BTC?

>> No.16122372
File: 32 KB, 540x720, 1571917105389.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16122372

>>16122356
https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-btc-bsv.html

>> No.16122377

>>16122372
Seems to be completely insignifcant.

>> No.16122385

>>16122353
Sustained loss or even whipsawing is enough to cripple the network. Especially while everyone is rushing to the exits. It would be a complete nightmare.

>> No.16122393

>>16121117
I would feel at peace. Finally I would be able to sell my last crypto and go all in on stocks like a normal functioning member of society.

>> No.16122463

>>16122385
Small blocks guarantee that if everyone is rushing to the exits high fees will happen which will trigger high hashrate as even 2016 asics would be proffitable thus increasing the hashrate again.

Also a sustained loss is irrelevant , a 100% loss mean the network will adjust in a month instead of two weeks.

>>16122377
it is and it's becoming smaller as a percentage of sha256 mining to the point that a few miners could do a 51% attack.

I dislike the fact that bch is also exposed because it's a good project a shame they don't want to move to another algorithm that let's them be safe of sha256 miners.

Small blocks give btc a total dominance of sha256 mining since the fees are massive even with empty blocks since some people want to do fast transactions no matter the cost.

What bsvtards see as a weakness it's the greatest strenght , btc will become a reserve currency and a global p2p bank.

The place for a global cash is open tough since btc will fail at that , bch and bsv could take the place but as long as the retards remain in sha256 they won't.

Litecoin seems to be the one that will take that market.

>> No.16122524

>>16121117
Vindicated.

>> No.16122690

>>16122269
>>16122123

They are illegal if you doublespend an exchange with one.

>> No.16122733

>>16122690
read my post again, brainlet.

>> No.16122748
File: 61 KB, 599x566, 2020 is going to be a rude awakening.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16122748

>>16122463

You think way too small. The caveman miners of today will not resemble the highly specialized data centers of tomorrow. Hashing, Merkel trees, block propagation will all be done by different entities. This is how Bitcoin scales. And it's way more decentralized than 14 mining pools on BTC hashing the entire network.

>> No.16122755

>>16121242
i wouldn't care, because that is what calvin, craig and bsv users understand and want
they want competition, they would up their hashpower

>> No.16122759

>>16122463
>high fees insures high hashrate
No

>> No.16122771

>>16122690
exchanges require 50/100 block confirmations anyway
they are also delisted from some major exchanges, so it is not really a real life problem
the funny part is that bsv mongoloids still thinks 0conf is feasible

>> No.16122772

>>16121117
I'd feel pretty dumb. Because that would mean crypto went to 0 and I lost everything.

>> No.16122779

>>16122733

Your post has nothing to do with BTC today. There are 15 or so mining pools, they are all highly connected to each other so they can propagate faster. If any of them tried to pull a doublespend, it would not be a secret to anyone.

>> No.16122786

>>16122463
if everyone is rushing to the exit, miners will validate their txs to exchanges first

>> No.16122788

>>16121117
STIFF

>> No.16122842

>>16121117
All of BTC's and BCH's transaction histories are being replayed. All will be wrapped in BSV. BTC and BCH will still exist, but only inside of BSV. There needs to be a 'new' layer 1 in security for literally everything in the world. That layer 1 will have the most advanced AI in BSV with the Genesis upgrade. There won't be anything more secure in the world other than BSV. The AI will be able to detect in real time if there is a threat, kind of like if I was to poke you with a stick. You'd feel it and neutralize the threat, just as a living AI will on the BSV chain.

>> No.16122853

>>16122759
>https://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-btc-bsv.html

Stiff

>>16122771
I still remember that poor anon that fell for the bsv meme and was about to cash out when the btc price fell from 10.5k to 7k.

The fucking exchanges don't want to touch bsv with a fucking stick so this anon was trapped until the exchange got like 30 confirmations and by that time he had lost 50% of his money kek.

Feel pretty bad for him.

>>16122786
>Implying that miners can choose their own blocks and it's not random of who get's there first.

>> No.16122863

>>16122842
wow this is some serious single digit IQ non-sense technobabble

>> No.16122882
File: 3.70 MB, 480x360, 1571835008809.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16122882

>>16122842
>kind of like if I was to poke you with a stick
i...is this the power of BSV?
m-my god..

>> No.16122883
File: 151 KB, 1004x234, 1569008747921.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16122883

>>16122863
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/indians-have-smaller-brains-reveals-study/articleshow/71798234.cms

>> No.16122892

>>16122842
>kind of like if I was to poke you with a stick
you need beaten with a stick
a large and heavy stick

>> No.16123029

>>16122779
jesus fucking christ at least learn how ids work before you shill on /biz/

>> No.16123128

>>16123029

If you doublespend an exchange, that's fraud. It's literally trying to steal money from them. Code is not law, actions have consequences.

>> No.16123153
File: 6 KB, 250x250, 1565453457909.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16123153

>>16122853
>Miners on the network (sometimes referred to as nodes, but not quite the same!) select transactions from these pools and form them into a ‘block’. A block is basically a collection of transactions (at this moment in time, still unconfirmed transactions), in addition to some extra metadata. Every miner constructs their own block of transactions. Multiple miners can select the same transactions to be included in their block.

>> No.16123169

>>16123128
read this
>>16122771
>>16122853
doublespend on bsv is impossible anyway
no exchange on this planet is going to trust such close-to-zero hashrate shitcoin without waiting block confirmations for at least 6 hours
>Code is not law
CODE DOESN'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT LAW
BTC IS GLOBAL AND LAW IS NOT, THERE ARE 200 NATIONS ON EARTH, GOOD LUCK ENFORCING YOUR WISHES

>> No.16123206

>>16123153
They do can select their own but not if they will make a block so it's irrelevant , also one transaction can have many outputs so it's not like miners have a lot of transactions.

Coins like litecoin shows that miners do probaly 12k tx per day if not less.
The entire argument that if btc bottlenecks miners will have priority is retarded.

>> No.16123338

>>16123206
aye your probably right, miners are likely already dumping because at a 6.25 block reward btc won't cover their electricity costs and they probably know that already
if i recall correctly btc will need to go above 30k to be profitable

>> No.16123460
File: 187 KB, 1650x1800, 1566279913761.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16123460

>>16123338
>if i recall correctly btc will need to go above 30k to be profitable

Of course at current inflation we need 16m of new money to enter the market to mantain the price.
At 6.25 block rewards that will mean that to mantain 9300 usd per coin we need 8m new usd per day.

This mean btc will do 100% increase in price without any problem.
Only reason ltc collapsed after it's halvening is because it's not a fiat ramp into crypto nobody buys ltc with fiat.

It's incredibly how you bsv cucks go from anti btc to anti crypto when exposed.

If btc could not mantain it's hashing rate at 6.25(with high fees) , what could you expect from bsv.
But then again when you let anyone upload things like child porn into your fuckin blockchain it's very clear that your entire shitcoin is an attack into the concept of cryptocurrency.

>> No.16123523

>>16123460
both are fucked unless they get adoption, bsv is positioned better to grow through high volume but low tx fees
btc is swinging on a hope and a prayer that someone comes along and pumps everyone's bags
high fees = bad for customers
low fees = good
why do you think amazon does so well? super saver delivery option of course, people are fucking tight and don't want to spend $5-10 on postage fees
>This mean btc will do 100% increase in price without any problem.
why?

>> No.16123529

>>16123460
actually a lot of people buy ltc with fiat because it's on 99% of entry exchanges like coinbase, fees are low and it's fast.

>> No.16123651
File: 456 KB, 582x582, 1570184928907.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16123651

>>16123529
Yea but coinbase or binance are not actually entry gates into crypto , in most of the world it's local exchanges or localbitcoins.

Roger Ver is probably one of the few first worlders crypto dudes that understands it which is why he shilled to create local.bitcoins

Local litecoins is dead as fuck.

>>16123523
>both are fucked unless they get adoption, bsv is positioned better to grow through high volume but low tx fees

BTC is not fucked it's getting 16m in new money every day , after the halvening it will do 100% easy.

BSV is colosally fucked , bch is suprisingly gaining users , ltc would be fucked but it's on scrypt safe from sha256 asics meaning it will be safe too.

>high fees = bad for customers
>low fees = good

This is a very brainlet position , most payment methods use fees as percentage of the payments like 5% while btc fees are fixed per tx.
This means that btc fees are lower the more money you send , which is why btc is positioning itself to be a global p2p bank and wire system.

BCH and bsv are playing a retarded game trying to take the crown from something they can't anymore , btc will always have the hashrate massive dominance because there is a massive market for big transactions and to keep money safe away from banks or regulators.

Litecoin could take the place of digital cash but it seems to be dead , dash also seems to be trying to fight that market and sadly it's bch which is gaining it , and it's sad because due to the sha256 hash dynamics eventually it will be rekt 51% attacked if they don't leave sha256.

>> No.16123701

>>16123651
the math doesn't work out with another subsidy halving. btc is on borrowed time.

>halves
>price "suddenly doubles" for what reason? yeah nah
>miners realise they aren't profitable at all
>many die from costs

>> No.16123706

>>16123523
>bsv is positioned better to grow through high volume but low tx fees
math doesn't add up, right now sv has the same tx count as btc roughly. btc is only 100 times more expensive yet the fees the miners take home worth a 1000 times more on btc.
so that means you would need to go 1 gig block to even match btc miners fee reward. but in the meantime btc will keep on appreciating and you will never ever catch up.

>> No.16123712

>>16123651
>btc fees are lower the more money you send
yup buying coffee is expensive sending over a million dollar is fucking cheap.

>> No.16123731

>>16123701
you keep pretending that we never had a halving before...

>> No.16123752
File: 131 KB, 1024x1024, 1571090139342.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16123752

>>16123701
Your iq is a little low but let me explain.

At the current inflation rate bitcoin creates btc worth 16M per day.
If the price is stable today it's because 16M of new usd entered bitcoin.

After the halvening Bitcoin will be creating 8M worth of bitcoin at today price , this means that if the 16M are still entering the market but 8M are created per day the price goes to the fucking moon.

It's the same shit that happened every time , it's not math , it's economics.

>>16123706
tx is irrelevant if it's some weather app doing them , what matters is gateway money entering from fiat into crypto.

>so that means you would need to go 1 gig block to even match btc miners fee reward. but in the meantime btc will keep on appreciating and you will never ever catch up.

This right here is wisdom, this is one of the reason bch left 32mb as the maximum blocksize , even to get full blocks there they would need a decade.

>>16123712
>yup buying coffee is expensive sending over a million dollar is fucking cheap.

Again more wisdom from this anon , not only it's cheap it's also cheap to store wealth and the network is so fucking secure that it's safer than most banks in the world specially if they go full negative interest meme.

And wires are fucking cheap , western union could take 50 usd fees for sending 600 usd , banks the same shit internationally , paypal fees as a percentage no matter the money , cards also percentage.

BTC you can send millions with a dollar fee , this market is fucking massive , what does sadden me is that there is a market for the muh coffee meme and the retards are trying to take it using sha256 and are going to get rekt.

And litecoin which can take that market seems to be dead as fuck.

>> No.16123764

>>16123701
You dont understand all BTC supply comes from miners do you? If the block reward halves, miners are going to want to sell what they create at a higher price..

>> No.16123770

>>16123752
>even to get full blocks there they would need a decade
you do realize it literally doesn't matter what your blocksize limit is if you don't have full blocks there is no fee market. if there is no fee market mempool will be empty and block space will be incredibly cheap. and that means funnily enough your miner profitability will lose to btc.
it fucking doesn't make sense at first but then it hits you... only scarce assets are valuable.

>> No.16123825
File: 64 KB, 925x750, 1570691100065.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16123825

>>16123770
I am very aware i was pointing that you are correct , without a fee market the coin with the smaller blocks will dominate it's algorithm , which means the smartest choice for bch or bsv is to move to another algorithm.

Otherwise litecoin will take the second place eventually since it dominates scrypt.

>> No.16123826

>>16123770
It helps to think of it like RAM. Unused RAM is wasted RAM. You WANT to be using as much of the capacity as possible to be cost effective

>> No.16123853
File: 260 KB, 1344x1406, bitcoin-log-log.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16123853

also i have been thinking long and hard how btc could increase the block size to accommodate growth without giving up the fee market...

btc needs to use this regression as baseline for fee usd values. the blue line may not be totally accurate every time but close enough long term.

so the miners can check the last 100 blocks fees multiplied by the blue line at the date and determine how much the average tx fees were worth and use that to adjust the block size limit for a valid block up or down. if the average tx fee is higher than $1 for 100 days increase the block size, if lower then 50 cents decrease it... for example. 0 fee tx-es don't count into this equation if any included. this can actually be worked into the consensus algo. no need for oracles and shit.

i'm sure it can be improved a lot finding the correct constant values would take some time.

>> No.16123917

>>16123651
>btc fees are fixed per tx.
this is wrong though, btc will forever be congested in the mempool (today are 17k tx waiting) due to 1mb blocksize and people will pay increasing fees to get their transactions completed
with bsv it can be done in the very next block at a fraction of the cost with the unlimited blocksize and potentially billions of transactions per block.
hashrate is actually quite unimportant without scaling, users are important and much more important with every halving, the more halvings we have, the more miners are going to rely on fees to fund their farms rather than the minted block reward.
this is where the potential for bsv comes to take over., once we pass the threshold for profit from fees vs block reward it is game over for btc because users wont want to pay its fees, and the miners will follow the users money to take their cut.

>> No.16123929

BTC is shit and headed down the toilet. The sooner the better.

>> No.16123956

If BTC dont incrase block size and drop fee it will be dead chain. Even dogecoin is better coin.

>> No.16123965

>>16123917
a few minutes ago it was only 700 what are you smoking? sure there are periods where low fee tx-es have to wait, but it works just fine for now.

my only issue with this is we are at "bitcoin is boring again" phase. not the middle of an obvious bullrun.

>> No.16124389

>>16121117
$1000 bsv rofl the absolute state of that double digit (soon) shitcoins bagholders

>> No.16125133

>>16122269
There are humans behind these financial decisions. They live in jurisdictions.

>> No.16125153

>>16122315
>Argentina = West
>laughs in Iberian

At least Argentina is ruined.

>> No.16125224

>>16121117
To all BCH/BSV/high throughput blockchain preachers

The market has spoken unilaterally that high throughput, low fee transactions are absolutely not desired at this time. There is no use in the current market sphere for these applications, that is why you see all of these dime-a-dozen blockchains offering “infinite” tps worth pennies, struggling for user adoption. Nobody wants to use crypto for this purpose in the current environment. The clear favored use case of crypto currency is a decentralized, store of value system, that is decoupled entirely from traditional financial markets and government reach. You are selling a service nobody wants and incorrectly think bitcoins features are flaws. People vote with their wallets, the clear frontrunner is bitcoin and the gap widens each day.

>> No.16125881
File: 68 KB, 1200x675, D8PPCy1XsAAcqD5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16125881

>>16122315
>Bitcoin was designed to bypass the law and retarded capital controls and regulations.

Can you show me where in the original WP where it says it is designed to bypass the law and capital control?

Also, BSV is technically bitcoin- when it reverts to the original genesis, without capped block sizes. You know that blockstream changed the code and fucked it up, right anon? Unironically, BSV is true to the WP and is peer to peer electronic cash, and amongst other things, will be the IOT.

Have you seen how many patents Dr Stiff has? How the fuck will BTC cope when companies upon companies jump onboard BSV? How do you expect to grow BTC when you cant even send 4btc correctly via LN???

I hope you get stiffed real good, son.

>>16122463

Also, how can you expect peer to peer cash, IF BTC becomes $50,000. Those fees, those small blocks. ... Muh LN. Again, nobody will use it. If ANYTHING, btc will be the onramp for normies to buy other shitcoins. PERIOD.

>> No.16125910

>>16123460
>Only reason ltc collapsed
It's a fucking shitcoin.

>> No.16125941

>>16121117
an hero

>> No.16125942

>>16123764
To what buyers?

>> No.16126648
File: 97 KB, 1000x1000, 1566432971208.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16126648

>>16125881
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=287.msg7524#msg7524

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671.msg13844#msg13844

"Yes, [we will not find a solution to political problems in cryptography,] but we can win a major battle in the arms race and gain a new territory of freedom for several years.
Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own.
Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper"

>> No.16126659
File: 8 KB, 225x225, 1570465477745.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16126659

>>16125133
And who are they going to sue if once bch has 0.05% of btc hashrate is 51% attacked?

The owners of the miners?Bitmain?The owners of a pool?Craig for fucking up?

>>16123917
Full blocks are needed for a fee market that or infinite supply like monero has.

>> No.16126673

>>16122141
that’s not how nakamoto consensus works, dickhead.

>> No.16126677

>>16126659
>once BSV

but bch will be under the same problem sadly.

>> No.16126684

>>16122690
>They are illegal if you doublespend an exchange with one.

and yet your cult leader craig wright threatened to double spend exchanges during the so called hash war.

>> No.16126753

small update from your scammer god bsv'ers.

craig again BTFO:
bankrupt aussie nigger larping as billionaire. haha what a fucking joke.

see pic related.

>> No.16126757
File: 296 KB, 640x825, 072837C1-AF2E-490E-A320-E1EC3D590BF5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16126757

>>16126753

>> No.16126778

>>16126753
Why should he pay? He isn't Satoshi right?

>> No.16126794

>>16126778
btw this "seeking satoshi" guy is someone with too much free time.

he investigated the satoshi question very long and drew recently up a (quite
professional) list of potential candidates for being Satoshi (included dozens (!) of criteria). just fyi: craig scored the second lowest out of like 20 candidates. he had a near total mismatch with all the data consistent with being satoshi.

>> No.16126800
File: 9 KB, 280x180, stiffed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16126800

>>16126648
>https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=671.msg13844#msg13844

satoshi>"Bitcoin isn't currently practical for very small micropayments"
.So raise the cap and not worry about the micropayments (so BSV)

satoshi>"If we started getting DoS attacked with loads of wasted transactions back and forth, you would need to start paying a 0.01 minimum transaction fee."
.So implement a blockchain with no cap to handle spam attacks (BSV), or pay a higher fee to get it moved quickly (fees could be as high as 100 USD during 2017, with the 1mb bitcoin cap) as stated by old mate
Gavin >"main.h: // To limit dust spam, require a 0.01 fee if any output is less than 0.01"

satoshi>"The eventual solution will be to not care how big it gets." (blockchain)
.To deal with more transactions, with small fees and not worry about congesting the network

satoshi>"Bitcoin would be convenient for people who don't have a credit card or don't want to use the cards they have, either don't want the spouse to see it on the bill or don't trust giving their number to "porn guys", or afraid of recurring billing."
.This is no different to now. You subscribe to pornhub+ and it shows up on your credit card. Buy porn with a BSV address you have, and be hidden behind a wall that cant be traced from the provider of such porn. On the back end, however, you can be liable for such purchases. So you cant get away with buying weapons or laundering money (Safu). Satoshi said convenient, not illegal. Use XMR if you want to be anon. If you want bitcoin, use BSV.

Also, none of the links you posted matched your quote. And I asked for the white paper, not bitcointalk.

If anything, you only proved and strengthened BSV's argument to be more legitimate form of bitcoin.

>> No.16126808

>>16126800
Satoshi put the cap retard and he did it in secret because he realized it would lead to centralization.

>> No.16126817

>>16126808
satoshi>But for now, while it's still small, it's nice to keep it small so new users can get going faster. When I eventually implement client-only mode, that won't matter much anymore.

Did you even read the links you posted??
1mb was a starting point, retard.

>> No.16126927

>>16126757
who would have thought craig will not pay? i'm personally shocked.

>> No.16127130

>>16126794
LMFAO the corecuck cope reaches new heights.

>> No.16127205

>>16127130
yeah i'm sure it's just that. go ahead and keep worshiping your retarded idol that can't code a hello world.

>> No.16127240

>>16126648
THIS
anyone thinking CSW is satoshi is a complete retard

>> No.16127286

>>16127130
>>16127130

I cant wait until he reveals the flaw in Segwit, by then it will be too late for people to buy BSV. Then we can post green wojaks while everyone else is hanging from trees

>> No.16127297

>>16127286
he'll be in jail
>>16126988
S O O N
O
O
N

>> No.16127322
File: 128 KB, 1200x1047, C38C4BAA-00EF-4F6B-8EAE-A36632FB8E7C.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16127322

>>16127286
>I cant wait until he reveals the flaw in Segwit
I guess you will be in a very strong delusional state when 2020 is here and tulip trust is not unlocked cause it doesn’t exists and no SegWit flaw is revealed cause he was just larping and making money out of dumb bsv bagholders

>> No.16127480

>>16127322
>and no SegWit flaw is revealed
actually the flaw in segwit was revealed by a long time ago by peter rizun. faketoshi of course has no idea what he is talking about.

>> No.16127494

BSV is pedo coin
Craig is complicit

>> No.16127512
File: 161 KB, 829x1312, 1572378239625.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16127512

>>16127494
Weak FUD.

>> No.16127588
File: 61 KB, 413x395, 1310483412100.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16127588

>>16122074
>bsv is a zero hashrate unsafe double-shitfork

>> No.16127600

>>16127512
truth isn't FUD. CRAIG WRIGHT allowed immutable CHILD PORNOGRAPHY to be stored on BSV

>> No.16127610

>>16127480
>flaw
there is no practical flaw
there is a reason why consensus adopted it and it's because the benefits are way bigger than the cons
51% attack is a pre-requirement in order to abuse segwith, which is not going to happen in any case since it's an economical suicide for the attacker for many reasons

>> No.16127709

>>16127610
>51% attack is a pre-requirement in order to abuse segwith
watch his video! he explains pretty clearly why and how a minority attack could be possible because of the perverse incentives segwit introduced.

if it's gonna be fatal or even practical or not time will tell i wouldn't bet on bitcoin going anywhere.

>> No.16127760

>>16127709
the gist of it if you are too lazy to watch is that a minority of the miners could force the majority to defect from enforcing segwit rules based on bitcoins natural incentives by not or late propagating the witness. any miner that doesn't drop his work and starts building on the new found block will suffer the consequences of getting his work constantly reorged. however once miners measurably stopped enforcing segwit rules the malicious group of miners can start abusing the system.

>> No.16127996

>>16127760
>implying large miners have interest in colluding into a cartel and exploit segwith
good luck shooting at your feet
they are basically the ones having the biggest interest to keep bitcoin safe and avoid any drama since they have bills to pay

>> No.16128033

>>16121117
>>16121117
sad, not because of money but because the battle would have been lost for which bitcoin was created.

it won't happen though, bitcoin is the most resilient currency there is, who in their right mind invests in a coin controlled by few....

>> No.16128072

>>16127996
just watch the video! the large miners will not want to collude and i expect unlike rizun that they will raise hell if they get reorged more than once like this.

>> No.16128088

>>16127996
anyhow this is the flaw in segwit. you all have to decide how much it matters. there is no other flaw. smarter people than craig tried to find one.

>> No.16128216

>>16125942
All of them, you dumbstruck.

>> No.16128774
File: 55 KB, 709x1024, 1572514268238.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16128774

>>16127286
>Flaw in segwit
>Every coin is using segwit already since it not only reduces transaction size but it prevents miner centralization by using asicboost

>> No.16128818

>>16121117

Craig pumped his public surveillance coin.

Wants to force it on you to watch your every move.

>> No.16128962
File: 35 KB, 300x400, 1572632111447.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16128962

Craig Wright:
Immutable Child Pornography
forever on BSV

>> No.16129599

pretty fucking great.

>> No.16129608

>>16122141
noob

>> No.16129625

>>16128088
>you all have to decide how much it matters
very little
the benefits of segwith are anyway bigger than this "flaw"

>> No.16129634
File: 76 KB, 519x600, 18F395F1-ED05-41B8-9E4B-8087061C8F94.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16129634

>>16121242

HAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.16129743

>>16129625
sure. the theoretical impact of messing with the incentive structure of bitcoin is far more severe than the practical impact of this possible scenario.

>> No.16129918

>>16123529
yes, I once put my funds in one eu exchanges, bought LTC and then moved to my wallet pretty fast.Then I moved it to big exchanges to get what i want.
LTC is faster on that, low fees. and you get like numbers, numbers before dot. With btc, it's complicated, if sum is not that big, you are looking at 0000 after a dot and trying to get hold of what you just acquired. When you see a fee, you start to think they trying to take 30% of your btc, because everything looks so miserable after a dot.
LTC is great middle men between fiat and crypto.

>> No.16130341

>>16121117
Neet. I would buy an urbit galaxy and sell planets as a side income.

>> No.16130369

>>16121958

No.

>> No.16130396

>>16121117
I would be happy. I'm not in either, but the core shills and maxis piss me off to no end. Small block crippling of btc and the narrative change from digital cash to
>Muh store of value
Is the most transparent kikery I could imagine.

Based Schiff is right, it doesn't store value , it's not used to transact. What does it do?
You hodl and hope it goes up so you can sell for $$'s

>> No.16130413
File: 63 KB, 664x651, SmugDoggo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16130413

>>16121242
>assumes BSV uses BTC's ancient obsolete hashing algorithm xDDD

>> No.16130419

>>16121117
It's probably gonna happen eventually, but not before BCH and ETH flip it.

>> No.16130434

>>16130413
Yes bsv uses sha256 and is exposed to all of btc asics due to having 1% of it's hashing rate.

>> No.16130481

>>16130413
rofl you can't be serious

>> No.16130546
File: 83 KB, 320x278, 320px-ALBW_Triforce_Artwork.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16130546

>>16130481
Its quite obvious really, the sha-256 antminers can only ironically mine BTC. Its not even marketed as BTC/BSV/BSH

>> No.16130599
File: 9 KB, 215x235, 1517712539111.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16130599

>>16130546

>> No.16131549

bumping.

check em

>> No.16132238

Bumping for bitcoin

>> No.16132489
File: 35 KB, 680x339, 483D4F06-B2AC-430C-B10D-0347AAB3BC85.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16132489

>>16122092

>thinking you can sue distributed anonymous number crunching machines that are decentralized for crunching numbers you don’t personally like

You’re definitely a craggie

>> No.16132516

>>16122092
there are many ways to do a 51%... for example a miner could choose not to double spend but to dos the chain. for example he starts mining 2 gigabyte blocks full of garbage and no actual user tx included and keeps doing that constantly reorging anyone that would try to mine and bloat the chain with useless data and congest the mempool at the same time.

and this would all be completely legal under the protocol.

>> No.16133301

>>16123770
the "fee market" you think of is completely unnecessary, it is a construct imposed by developers. The real fee market begins at the physical limit miners can operate on, not an arbitrary value. Increased fees are undesirable. This technology is about how much CAN you do, not how much SHOULD

you guys completely fucking ignore that the ORIGINAL ARCHITECT of bitcoin literally fucking spelled out that the mining nodes are supposed to grow into huge data centres, not fucking cripple floppy disk machines

>> No.16133369

csw = satoshi
bsv = bitcoin
small blox + high fees = a terrible idea
blockstream = social engineering
my iq = 200

>> No.16133374

>>16127600
this is just faggot propaganda greg
anyone who has been around long enough knows cp is on many block chains and the absolute retard who committed the data to the blockchain is going to cop it the next time he makes a aml kyc tx with the change address

>> No.16133527

I cant wait until this madman has all his 1500 patents approved. BTC will be btfo so hard. Feb 2020 when genesis is released will be the tell tale

>> No.16133675

>>16123752
>If the price is stable today it's because 16M of new usd entered bitcoin.

price dont move because no volume or bid met ask

>> No.16133863

>>16133369
My IQ is 201 and CSW is faketoshi

>> No.16133957

>>16133863
Then tell me, how will the price rise 200% at the halving? Are you also going to give the brainlet response?
>miners want to sell for 200%
>price will rise 200%!

>> No.16134348
File: 102 KB, 2179x1062, epstein.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16134348

bsv is based, unlike btc

>> No.16134373

a lot of fudders hate on weather.sv

With all this politicization of weather, don't you think having a trustworthy source of weather data is useful?

>> No.16134378

>>16121117
STIFF

>> No.16134680

this thread is sad

>> No.16134683

I would neck myself thankfully this will not happen in a million years