BTC AND CHAINLINK QUESTION

[Anonymous No.15957066]

I have 30000 chainlink I bought between .16 and .70 cents. I have .66 of a BTC. Should I just take the BTC and buy more Link with it? I feel I will lose my second ticket to making it if I only have one over the other.

[Anonymous No.15957091]

>>15957066
Fuck link, I would go all in BTC, link will leave you broke and alone in the end with your ass in the wind and sergay's jizz running down your leg all while you cry and wonder how this could have happened

[Anonymous No.15957103]

Why

[Anonymous No.15957412]

>>15957066
im waiting on btc pump then convert 1+ btc to more link add to 30k+ link stack better play. i did the same with my ltc stash on the pump before last ltc dump

[Anonymous No.15957439]

Thanks for advice. Ill prob do the same.

[Anonymous No.15957958]

>>15957066
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15957975]

>>15957958
hey, I read that.

[Anonymous No.15957995]

>>15957958
>lies/fud
cool man

[Anonymous No.15958004]

>>15957958
i did not read this

[Anonymous No.15958111]

>>15957995
all proven facts

[Anonymous No.15958161]

>>15958111
Chekt. Pack it in, boys. Link is ogre