given the never-ending upwards trend of LINK

[Anonymous No.15837848]

...where do i sell this? i'm looking to sell my 16500 linkies around EOY when link is roughly $75/each. where is the optimal place to sell and what should i keep in mind when realizing my absolutely huge gains?

[Anonymous No.15837853]

>selling link
ever

[Anonymous No.15837854]

>Selling LINK
sir it seems you are under the misplaced belief that you can cash out of crypto, much less LINK

[Anonymous No.15837990]

>>15837854
>>15837853
>nulinkers arent aware
exit my thread please good sirs before i send my butler to remove you from the premises

[Anonymous No.15838289]

>>15837848
>selling the asset of the genetics that make possible ALL future smart contract-driven events and services
that alone is a bad move—but, consider also:
>thus, selling the asset that enables truly decentralized, government-free commerce
>thus, selling the asset of anarcho-capitalism
>thus, selling the asset of the freedom of disassociation movement, and self-governing ethnic and ideological enclaves, whether they be white enclaves, or libertarian enclaves, or communist enclaves (lol), or fascist enclaves
i get the feeling that there REALLY ARE some original linkies that don't understand that "never selling" isn't just a meme, and that it's not just some elaborate way to screw over nulinkers or the naive
if you sell (especially at $75), you ARE the naive; you'd really have to not understand why exactly chainlink is as valuable as we often make it out to be, but hold a significant position in it anyway
if you swing and win, that's all well and good—but if you already hold so much that staking will net you more than enough income to utterly thrive and even make investments in the upcoming smart contract bull run (POWERED BY CHAINLINK, by the way) anyway, then what the hell's the point?
there are whales on exchanges that have HUGE stacks of tether that are literally WAITING WITH SALIVATING CANINE MOUTHS HANGING OPEN for you to sell, so that they can buy you and a bunch of other swingies out and then chad fad the price up to a much greater high, and hopefully get you and other swingies to buy in again—then bring the price down some, rinse, and repeat. for as long as there are swingies, the whales will always win with this strategy.

tl;dr - "never sell" isn't a meme; if you sell, you're naive

[Anonymous No.15838313]

>>15838289
I wonder if the real staking gains will be accessible to us or if big business will figure out a way to shut us out and essentially force us to sell if we want to cash out in any meaningful way. That’s my only fear with LINK.

[Anonymous No.15838328]

>>15837854
All those silly add-ons give you no tactical advantage whatsoever

[Anonymous No.15838329]

>>15837848
>Selling before the next industrial revolution

[Anonymous No.15838332]

>>15837848
Anything above 100k USD will require OTC selling from big exchanges. For that you need to do KYC, I suggest going into a stable coin first and getting an accountant so your money doesn't get stolen by the gubment as soon as you cash out.

[Anonymous No.15838337]

>>15837848
>around EOY when link is roughly $75/each

It'll be $1k EOY, though.

[Anonymous No.15838370]

>buy LINK so as to never have to wageslave
>wageslave while you wait for LINK moon
>never sell LINK
>always wageslave

[Anonymous No.15838942]

>>15838313
given the nature of crypto, it would be very difficult for any entity to do this; they would need to go so far as preventing bitcoin transactions from taking place between private individuals.
for them to succeed in this, we would have to be very weak.

>>15838370
lel
staking link will be possible in the very near future
link is probably one of the only projects with staking economics that make logical sense, being not developed on a proof-of-stake model—because link truly ISN'T proof of stake, in any sense of the term
because of this, link's economics aren't rooted in the fallacy that "staking is better than working", either because it "burns less energy" or is "less centralized than proof-of-work" (which is such a fundamentally broken argument if we're talking about your stake giving you the same control over the network as an analogous network with a PoW model rather than PoS) or whatever
you stake your link, and no matter what the price of link, people pay the same to use the network—and no matter how much link you hold, you don't *necessarily* have any more control over how things operate than someone with zero link
it's a lot like bitcoin in that sense, in that having bitcoin doesn't necessarily grant you more power over the bitcoin network—but having more hashing power does
the magic to link is that if you want power over the link network, you have to produce good data feeds—and naturally, the more link you have, the more incentive you have to make sure good data feeds are on the network; this is not a coin of socialist rent-seeking, wherein people are buying and jacking the prices of existing properties rather than building new ones—rather, this is a coin of capitalist wealth creation, in which people are incentivized to build new houses and in turn bring the price of housing down, which raises the value of the entire currency.
if there aren't good data feeds, you not only don't get much link, but the link that you do get is worth less.