Why are they suppressing link?

[Anonymous No.15816951]

[Anonymous No.15816962]

judaism

[Anonymous No.15816989]

Talmudism

[Anonymous No.15817003]

>>15816951
israel probably

[Anonymous No.15817025]

>>15816951
How can anyone, besides Sergey, suppress LINK?

[Anonymous No.15817145]

>>15816951
they are shifting to rlc

[Anonymous No.15817149]

they cant allow Jokers become part of the ruling class

[Anonymous No.15817157]

>>15817149
>subhuman English
Thanks for playing, retard.

[Anonymous No.15817164]

>>15817157
English is my 12th language bucko

[Anonymous No.15817179]

>>15816951

[Anonymous No.15817182]

>>15817179
kek

[Anonymous No.15817200]

Looks like the chicken on a stick i ate at a Chinese buffet

[Anonymous No.15817249]

>>15817179
>bagholding something that Im more than x10 up on
nice cope

[Anonymous No.15817254]

>>15817179
How did I do?

[Anonymous No.15817967]

Imagine thinking LINK is being suppressed and not just naturally shit.

[Anonymous No.15818014]

>>15817967
>constantly outperforms every other crypto
>has better developement than any other project
cooooope keep coping you fucktard haha

[Anonymous No.15818089]

>>15816951
>Why are they suppressing link?
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15818147]

>>15818089
Lmfao at you actually being serious. Hope you realize that ~ 90% on this board are literal retards who think theyre smarter than everyone.

[Anonymous No.15818156]

Hyperledger will have some interesting things to say at devcon. Blogpost from chainlink any day now too

[Anonymous No.15818839]

>>15817145

[Anonymous No.15819324]

>>15816951
Cats don't give enough fucks about Link to bother suppressing it. You sir are retarded.

[Anonymous No.15820152]

>>15817179
>if you believe in the project the price now is of no concern
How is this wrong?

[Anonymous No.15820162]

>>15817164
>learning 11 other languages before learning the only one on the planet that matters
Retard confirmed.

[Anonymous No.15820215]

>>15818089

Pretty good points anon.

Expect nothing but trannie-tier cope from the bagholders.

[Anonymous No.15820718]

>>15817145
And once again, I'll say the same thing I said in the other thread that you posted this drivel.

>850k Volume
>Shifting to RLC

Do you worry about Ranjeet snatching your phone from your hands while simultaneously street shitting and phoneposting?

Shit posting means something entirely different for indians it seems.