[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 55 KB, 1992x532, .png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15781234 No.15781234[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

i dont get it

>> No.15781282
File: 6 KB, 95x128, 1569836232157435.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15781282

>>15781234
/sci/

sage this

how appropriate, that bday hat looks like a dunce cap

>> No.15781322

-2x-3y = 35 becomes 10x+15y=-175 (*-5)
5x-8y=52 becomes 10x-16y=104 (*2)

-16y+15y=104+-175
-y=-71
y=71

with this you can calculate x
even though this doesn't belong here i was bored so here you go

>> No.15781341
File: 477 KB, 438x527, 46568658.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15781341

>>15781322
shhhh. stop. can't you see you're doing his homework?

>> No.15781364

>>15781341
i know i am, and there was a mistake in my calculations anyway, so op can have a good old time either searching for the mistake or calculate it himself

>> No.15781365

>>15781322
the right answer is apparently (-4,-9)

>> No.15781380

>>15781234
plug it into a calculator you dumb fuck
or equate the equations and separate x and y

>> No.15781436

Reported for underage.

>> No.15781451

You can use a whole bunch of Methods to solve systems of equations with two variables. It’s really not that hard, fucking google it.

Consider KYS.

>> No.15781619
File: 36 KB, 655x527, 46146146.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15781619

>>15781322
kek, it's wrong

>> No.15781653

>>15781234
8*(-2x - 3y = 35) --> -16x -24y = 280
3*(5x - 8y = 52) --> 15x - 24y = 156
15x - 24y + 124 = 280
15x - 24y + 124 = -16x - 24y
15x + 124 = -16x
31x + 124 = 0
31x = -124
x = -4

>> No.15781689

>>15781619
Answer:
x = -4
y = -9

-8y = 52 - 5x
y = (52 - 5x) / -8
y = 52/-8 - 5x/-8
y = -6,5 + 0,625x

-2x - 3 * (-6,5 + 0,625x) = 35
-2x + 19,5 - 1,875x = 35
-3,875x + 19,5 = 35
-3,875x = 35 - 19,5
-3,875x = 15,5
x = 15.5 / -3,875
x = -4

-2 * (-4) -3y = 35
8 - 3y = 35
-3y = 35 -8
y = 27/-3
y = -9

>> No.15781705

Lol I took honors linalg in uni and I forget all this shit. If I need to reduce a matrix I just call a method. The better you become at math the worse you become at doing it by hand.

>> No.15781755

let b = a
a^2 = b*a
a^2 - b^2 = b*a - b^2
(a+b)*(a-b) = b(a-b)
( (a+b)*(a-b) / (a-b) ) = ( b(a-b) / (a-b) )
a+b = b
b+b = b
2b = b


also math is bullshit
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8xwm54/number-theorist-fears-all-published-math-is-wrong-actually

>> No.15781801

>>15781755
you can't divide by 0, silly

>> No.15781827

Imagine taking the time to solve such a simple problem for some retarded anon

>>15781705

>honors in linalg in uni
>can't solve a fucking 2x2 instantly when looking at it

you probably went to mcburgers kentucky uni or some shit

>> No.15781850
File: 8 KB, 250x202, 446941641.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15781850

>>15781755
>vice

>> No.15781928

>>15781850
>muh vice
>being incapable of looking at information from people you may not agree with
I'll DM Anglin and he can put it on the Stormer, maybe then you'll read it

"Buzzard’s point is that modern mathematics has become overdependent on the word of the elders because results have become so complex. A new proof might cite 20 other papers, and just one of those 20 might involve 1,000 pages of dense reasoning. If a respected senior mathematician cites the 1,000 page paper, or otherwise builds off it, then many other mathematicians might just assume that the 1,000-page paper (and the new proof) is true and won't go through the trouble of checking it. But mathematics is supposed to be universally provable, not contingent on a handful of experts."

>> No.15782182 [DELETED] 

>>15781928
Doesn't mean math is bullshit.
Your claim>>15781755
>also math is bullshit