Deal with it

[Anonymous No.15749715]

Craig Wright = FRAUD

[Anonymous No.15749717]

Based

[Anonymous No.15749718]

[Anonymous No.15749736]

Yep... I mean it's very strange why BSV proponents don't denounce him, it's like pulling weeds in your backyard

[Anonymous No.15749750]

>>15749736
BSV transcends personalities

[Anonymous No.15749766]

>>15749750
>hurr durr muh craig wroight is satoshi le based god le 179 IQ genius
>a-a-actually its all about the tech dont mind this lunatic, heh just ignore his antics we buidl great tech and shit

[Anonymous No.15749772]

>>15749750
It could be so but it's not, the community revolves around Craig and strives to find excuses for various stupid shit he said

[Anonymous No.15749778]

>>15749766
256MB block
uncapped scaling
whitepaper implementation
2nd layer programming
its just better than every alt on every metric

[Anonymous No.15749781]

>>15749715
Give it a rest, leave Satoshi alone.

[Anonymous No.15749796]

>>15749778
>implying anyone gives a shit about technology
>implying big companies will ever adopt a project run by a complete lunatic and serial scam artist

[Anonymous No.15749809]

>>15749796
it is going to replace tcp/ip
you would be a fool to sit idly by

[Anonymous No.15749821]

>>15749809
>the entire internet will run on blockchain
>even though it has zero benefit to the end user and will actually cost him money
imagine being this delusional

[Anonymous No.15749868]

>>15749809
The idea behind BSV is not complex at all and is just about running big blocks on big hardware and attaching all kinds of data to transactions (like pictures and blog posts) with user-created protocols. It's very simple to replicate and no patents and no copyrights can stop that. But regardless of whether this world view is right or wrong, it has nothing to do with CSW (he is not even a code contributor) and his dumb forgeries and plagiarism are a different matter altogether

[Anonymous No.15749874]

>>15749821
you have free internet?
no isp cost?
no ads?
free servers to host your material?
no cost of hardware?

what alternate universe do you live in?

[Anonymous No.15749877]

>>15749868
>oh yeah lets take all these FREE services and put them on the blockchain and have people pay for them
>its gonna be a smashing success, after all people love paying for shit they could get for free
what could go wrong with this genius business model?

[Anonymous No.15749897]

you are retarded.
when people dont want to pay, they will see ads, just like now with tcp/ip

[Anonymous No.15749900]

>>15749715
>>15749717
>>15749736
>>15749766
>>15749772

[Anonymous No.15749918]

>>15749897
>he thinks a shitcoin fork of a shitcoin fork will replace the base layer protocol of the entire internet
>he actually believes that
>calls other people retarded
oh sweetie...

[Anonymous No.15749920]

>>15749715
interesting use of the word fraud greg, must have been emblazoned in your mind from this

[Anonymous No.15749928]

>>15749918
it is the original bitcoin being implemented for the first time without restrictions

[Anonymous No.15749937]

>>15749918
>blockstream literally hires the same paid shills as CTR
too easy to spot

[Anonymous No.15749954]

>>15749928
>muh original bitcoin
>took several features from BCH
weird how all your narratives fall apart at a closer look anon

[Anonymous No.15749972]

>>15749954
BCH forked away from BSV using hired hashpower and by introducing new checkpoint code, you are so not very educated

BSV is removing all of the garbage code added by blockstream and bitmain

[Anonymous No.15749977]

>>15749736
because BSV has utility and scaling that is necessary for big banks to come in and use the tech. 8k transactions a second, that's on the level of VISA.

I get it, Craig and Calvin are totally unlikable and their gay mannerisms don't help either but look at all the buzz there is surrounding BSV

[Anonymous No.15749982]

>>15749972
>hurr durr you uneducated
anon BSV has the EDA from BCH for instance and a bunch of other shit too. it cant be muh original bitcoin and at the same time share features with the shitcoin fork BCH. you guys should really get your talking points together.

[Anonymous No.15749987]

>>15749972
>you so not very educated
this reads chinkish. unironic sell sign.

[Anonymous No.15749995]

>>15749987
im white, just been drinkin

[Anonymous No.15750000]

>>15749718
FIXED
>(+ hat tip to prev. anon ship shooper)

[Anonymous No.15750001]

>>15749982
genesis update, wait and see

[Anonymous No.15750003]

>>15749995
>conveniently ignores that I just dismantled his "muh original bitcoin" talking point
>degenerate drunk
yup thats the typical BSV shill for you

[Anonymous No.15750007]

>>15750000
nice quads

[Anonymous No.15750014]

>>15750001
>y-y-you just wait
sure sure. just like Craig is gonna reveal the fatal sewgit flaw any minute now hm? just like promised to build a bitcoin bank in 2016? or like he promised to rape Roger Ver and Ira Kleiman in court yes? I mean he totally delivered on all of those promises, hes a very trustworthy individual.

[Anonymous No.15750021]

>>15750003
read the original whitepaper then compare it to all coins

BSV is the only coin that operates under those rules

[Anonymous No.15750026]

>>15749918
>(8)
>oh sweetie...

[Anonymous No.15750062]

>>15749977
I don't believe banks will ever use a public chain for settlements, but that's not the point. I get it that some people like the idea of toying with on-chain data and coming up with various ways to encode it. It's a very simple idea, it doesn't require any deep tech and it can be easily replicated on other chains if it was in demand. Anyway, it has nothing to do with CSW. His fabrications are unrelated to BSV regardless of how good or bad it is on its own.

[Anonymous No.15750094]

>>15750062
i just want a coin that doesnt turn to a fee market when enough people choose to use it, and that is why i said fuck BTC, then i was all in BCH, then BCH didn't fix that problem either and forked into their own bullshit head in the sand ideas, thus, BSV is where im staying for now

[Anonymous No.15750095]

>>15750021
BSV brought the idea that the blockchain must be used to store everything, and various user-generated protocols, tools and web services must be used. If any major coin (BTC, ETH) decides to follow it, nChain's patents are useless. It's incredibly simple.

Again, NONE of this is related to CSW being a fraud.

[Anonymous No.15750110]

>>15750026

Here you go, bro

https://imgur.com/pUOZ3DR

[Anonymous No.15750121]

>>15750095
BSV removed a blocksize restriction, that is all i care about

if people choose to use it to upload data, or whatever, make an internet, it doesnt matter to me, at that point the price will be though the fuckin roof anyway, i just want a coin that functions and doesnt keep my funds locked up for days on end because my fee wasnt high enough

[Anonymous No.15750208]

>>15750095
>nChain's patents are useless
you probably don't know that BSV is turing complete kek

[Anonymous No.15750260]

>>15750208
Do you think this buzzword has any practical relevance to the matter? The patents are useless, too. The idea of BSV is as follows: "let's uncap the block size, allow to attach unlimited data an let users and script kiddies like unwriter come up with ways to encode it". Obviously it can't be patented, and if it is REALLY a gem, it is trivial to replicate it on any major chain.

[Anonymous No.15750291]

>>15750260
its only works on a major chain that has enough tx to feed the miners. nothing is free, and it is a race to large blocks, and BSV has the capacity, just needs the traffic, then its game over. the others can only handle sub visa levels of tx/s

[Anonymous No.15750398]

>>15750291
It's not hard to make a simple BSV-like patch for any cryptocurrency.

However, it still has nothing to do with CSW. Criticism of CSW and his fraudulent stuff has nothing to do with scaling ideas.

[Anonymous No.15750423]

>>15750398
BSV wan't a patch, it was just a removal of not needed patches, and if another coin had a simple fix, i dont think we would have seen crypto kitties kill the entire ETH market, its just not easy to do without going back to square one

[Anonymous No.15750470]

>>15750423
Nah, it's simple. You just have to use more expensive hardware and a few interconnected miners. Every coin could go in this direction.

[Anonymous No.15751470]

>>15750208
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn5072-microsoft-gains-double-clicking-patent/

[Anonymous No.15751515]

Blockstream shills. Satoshi was big blocker. BTC has 2gb block limits in 2009.
// FAT32 filesize max 4GB, fseek and ftell max 2GB, so we must stay under 2GB

A higher limit can be phased in once we have actual use closer to the limit and make sure it's working OK.

Eventually when we have client-only implementations, the block chain size won't matter much. Until then, while all users still have to download the entire block chain to start, it's nice if we can keep it down to a reasonable size.

With very high transaction volume, network nodes would consolidate and there would be more pooled mining and GPU farms, and users would run client-only. With dev work on optimising and parallelising, it can keep scaling up.

Whatever the current capacity of the software is, it automatically grows at the rate of Moore's Law, about 60% per year.
SN 2010

[Anonymous No.15751517]

>>15751470
>double-clicking ? on 'links' you say ?
https://www.wired.com/2000/06/british-telecom-we-own-linking/

[Anonymous No.15751723]

>>15749977
>look at all the buzz there is surrounding BSV
really don't see any buzz nobody knows wtf is it and those who do know overehelmingly think its a bullshit scam

[Anonymous No.15751745]

>>15750014
https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
>Bitcoin: a peer to peer electronic cash system
>We define an electronic coin as a chain of digital signatures.

[Anonymous No.15751861]

>>15751745
funny you mention signatures

[Anonymous No.15751910]

>>15751861
I mention it because of segwit.

regarding signing being proof of satoshi, if a 9 year old publicly signed a message with the genesis block tomorrow you would believe they were satoshi

[Anonymous No.15752018]

>>15751910
>you would believe
..and if a near 50 year fat alcoholic compulsive liar with a proven history of forging, lying. and plagiarism who is PAID $15m to PRETEND he's Satoshi COULDN'T sign, this despite YEARS of promises to do so - should you STILL believe he is Satoshi ?

[Anonymous No.15752045]

>>15749736
Because BSV is riding entirely on his claim of being Satoshi. He's the only reason it exists. He has to be Satoshi for their shitcoin to ever be worth anything. Without that, it's just another unwanted fork. Any performance advantages it claims to have over Bitcoin are also held or surpassed by countless other cryptocurrencies. In the first place, fundamentals still don't matter in crypto.

[Anonymous No.15752049]

>>15752018
>ad hominen, name calling, contradiction

There is no evidence he can't sign.

at this point the only thing that would cause me doubt that craig is satoshi is if someone else signed with the first 9 keys
Craig wright was 50% of a partnership started in 2009 that mined 1million bitcoin including the satoshi coins
https://github.com/StackmyBCHup/SatoshiTimeLine
https://youtu.be/ATapuAYgEeI
https://ohmysatoshi.com/
https://ohmysatoshi.com/blacknet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdJexAYjrDw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSikhu1X49M&t=5s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNZyRMG2CjA&t

how would someone prove to you they are satoshi nakamoto?

[Anonymous No.15752054]

>>15749715
bsv is not

[Anonymous No.15752075]

>>15752018
The fact of the matter is he's going through the legal process of making crypto mainstream and readily available to the unwashed masses. He loves big government, he wants people to pay taxes on crypto, he supports KYC etc etc. Big government will back BSV, you can bank on this.

[Anonymous No.15752105]

>>15752049
absence of proof that he has PROMISED to provide = he's a fraud. And a fucking liar.
The only signed wallets ever seen in connection with this sham was the one he claimed as his to the Florida court. For a year. The ACTUAL OWNER then signed the 'CSW is a fraud' message. THEN, the fat fraud claims this wallet address 'must have been forged by greg maxwell, or persons unknown'. A year or so earlier. And the great computer security expert 'didn't notice'
WAKE THE FUCK UP
>>15752075
>Big government will back BSV
yeah, the judiciary etc just LOVE this cunt. Him and 'FBI Top 10' Calvin. NO legit co. would touch this fucking toxic garbage with a bargepole and a hazmat suit. As is fucking evident from thier (non-existent) customer base. Last weeks weather, anyone ?

[Anonymous No.15752133]

>>15752049
>how would someone prove to you they are satoshi nakamoto?
signing any of his wallets. or how about any wallet that is older than 2010.
publically demonstrating that he can write code or even re-write some of the original code, that he's not just an "ideas guy"
provide emails that were not proven fake before 2011
sign in with his account in bitcointalk
prove he leased the domain prior to the release of it to the bitcoin community
move coins from the wallet

i would except any one of these

[Anonymous No.15752134]

>>15752105
andresen and matonis maintain he signed for them amongst others. As we have already said publicly signing a message with satoshi keys does not prove you are satoshi >>15751910

that roger ver address was on a forged document from you greg

This is a simple argument just say how would someone prove to you they are satoshi nakamoto?

[Anonymous No.15752207]

>>15752133
>signing any of his wallets.
signed for andresen and matonis and others
if a 9 year old signed with the genesis block today would you believe they were satoshi?

>publically demonstrating that he can write code or even re-write some of the original code
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHVWVP1WXmA&t=2s

>sign in with his account in bitcointalk
not bitcointalk but similar https://ethereumworldnews.com/satoshi-nakamoto-is-woke-posts-for-first-time-in-4-years/

>prove he leased the domain prior to the release of it to the bitcoin community
https://twitter.com/cryptorebel_SV/status/1117267279937449984

additionally
Craig wright was 50% of a partnership started in 2009 that mined 1million bitcoin including the satoshi coins
https://github.com/StackmyBCHup/SatoshiTimeLine
https://youtu.be/ATapuAYgEeI [Embed]
https://ohmysatoshi.com/
https://ohmysatoshi.com/blacknet
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdJexAYjrDw [Embed]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSikhu1X49M&t=5s [Embed]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNZyRMG2CjA&t [Embed]

[Anonymous No.15752234]

>>15752207
>signing privately proves it's him but signing publicly wouldn't prove anything

[Anonymous No.15752246]

>>15752134
>how would someone prove to you they are satoshi
as >>15752133 above, be a reasonable start.
also, HOW -NOT TO- PROVE YOU ARE SATOSHI:
#1 continually claim you'll publicly sign for years, then don't
#2 claim historic wallets as yours, then, get caught LYING, AGAIN
#3 halfass bollocks forgeries like the 'bitcoin.org' hosting receipt .jpg
#4 FORGE fucking MULTIPLE documents, and get caught
#5 Invent Alice down the Rabbithole horseshit excuses for not signing like the 'Tulip Trust', a tale so bizarre and full of holes even Judges had to describe this as 'utterly incredible' And they weren't being complimentary
AND, most of all:
#6 try not already being a proven disreputable conman WHO IS FUCKING PAID (by nTrust/nChain)TO PRETEND HE IS SATOSHI.
The real Satoshi does not, nor ever would, need anyone to PAY HIM to pretend to be who he is. And especially not charmers like Calvin

[Anonymous No.15752278]

>>15752207
https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/188871/aussie_achieves_world_first_audit_certification/
https://medium.com/@jonmatonis/how-i-met-satoshi-96e85727dc5a
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nXdkczX5mR0
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=2682943
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdvQTwjVmrE&t

>>15752234
I didn't say that. Andresen and matonis maintaining craig signed for them is evidence he can sign.

[Anonymous No.15752294]

>>15752246
still waiting for you to define the process for someone to prove to you they are satoshi?

[Anonymous No.15752357]

>>15752278
https://soundcloud.com/alabpodcast/episode-3-faketoshi-the-perfect-client

https://medium.com/@samwill102244/anatomy-of-a-fraud-a-deep-dive-into-one-of-craig-wrights-plagiarized-papers-96bc8624fc12

https://www.google.com/search?q=Why+is+this+fraud+allowed+to+speak+at+this+conference%3F

dude. If I had a SINGLE ONE of any of the above links referring to MY PERSON ?
I'd go and live up a fucking tree somewhere quiet for shame. except, this fat fraudulent cunt literally has -none-
>>15752294
you've been fucking answered, this multiple times. Hes a fraud, a paid sham, a conman and not a very good one either. I know it, you know it, the courts know it, most anyone with half-a-fucking braincell knows it. Give it up already

[Anonymous No.15752367]

>>15752357
how would someone prove to you they are satoshi nakamoto?

[Anonymous No.15752373]

>>15752367
you've been fucking answered, this multiple times.
we are done. good bye

[Anonymous No.15752377]

>>15752373
please show me where

[Anonymous No.15752384]

>>15752377
howto: >>15752133
how NOT to: >>15752246
Hes failed both, CONTINUALLY
>literacy among bsv shills is not what it was

[Anonymous No.15752405]

>>15752384
>>15752207

[Anonymous No.15752406]

>>15752384
>tldr, as said:
don't be a paid conman who's paid to pretend they are Satoshi, but can offer NO CREDIBLE PROOF,

[Anonymous No.15752434]

>>15752405
-publicy sign-, not that three card monte horseshit to an audience of one in some hotel for that idiot Andresen. THERE IS -LITERALLY NO CREDIBLE EXCUSE- FOR NOT PUBLICLY SIGNING
>except, he can't

[Anonymous No.15752457]

>>15752405
>Now if he had tweeted that before and not after the post at P2P Foundation, then it might have had more import, but instead it just seems to be Wright trolling
do you even read your own tenous links btw ?

[Anonymous No.15752468]

>>15752434
there is more evidence craig wright has possession of the satoshi keys than anyone else on earth matonis and andresen believe it
the court rule craig wright was 50% of a 2009 partnership that mined 1million btc including the satoshi coins
publicly signing doesn't prove you are satoshi>>15751910

[Anonymous No.15752508]

>>15752468
andresen is, as noted, an idiot. Publicly sign or STFU
Just checked your third 'proof' link btw - thats the very one where the fraud wright forged a 'bitcoin.org; hosting receipt .jpg. Except, he used product codes that didn't exist at the time. Tangled webs, eh ?
>this time, good fucking night

[Anonymous No.15752540]

>>15752508
see you tomorrow greg. Keep up the good work

[Anonymous No.15752606]

>>15752207
>he signed for these guys
>keys have been locked in the "tulip trust" with a guy who died in 2013
>he didnt come out to the public until 2014
interesting

[Anonymous No.15752633]

>>15752606
exactly. are the keys craig claimed in court he didn't have access to the same he signed for matonis and andresen?

[Anonymous No.15752757]

Craig appears to be a fraud, but why is Calvin investing millions (or less I don't know) into this scam? Calvin isn't a stupid person, he became a billionaire by founding the most successful online casino in the early days of the web. What does he gain from all this?

[Anonymous No.15752809]

[Anonymous No.15752846]

>>15752757
>why does the largest holder of miner of BSV want people to believe his investment is the real bitcoin which is worth 100x what his investment currently is
i honestly the faintest

[Anonymous No.15753282]

>>15752846
I understand, but if he partnered with Craig and invested millions, why did he allow Craig to act like a fool from the start? Craig could have hinted at being Satoshi without all the forgeries and being a dick to everyone, marketed the improvements over btc, and price could have increased based on speculation. I don't get it.

[Anonymous No.15754012]

>>15749928
No,Satoshi said it shouldn't be used for hosting data that isn't financial. So twietch and all that other bullshit is not the idea that Satoshi had.

[Anonymous No.15754018]

>>15749972
The checkpoint code was already there. They just implemented it.

[Anonymous No.15754051]

>>15754012
Satoshi literally posted an article headline in the genesis block and >>15751515

[Anonymous No.15754060]

>>15752207
matonis also took craig to "prove" himself in front of GQ and craig got btfo. matonis is a scumbag

[Anonymous No.15754092]

>>15754051
And he later stated that bitcoin should not be used for hosting shit. He specifically said any chain that does that is not bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.15754175]

>>15754092
Where did he say that.
why would he include op pushdata4

[Anonymous No.15754253]

bsv is pathetic.

the whole point of that shitcoin was that craig is satoshi (which this faggot is not).

they may as well just cede any operations and close doors ASAP.

building a filecoin on a fork of a fork where 80% of the supply is given for free away and the tech clearly not suited for it. this is so maximum retarded.

you could do something like bsv gazillion times better if you were not to build upon ten year old tech but do it from scratch with 2019 tech. now they are forced to turn a dinosaur into a plane because of this lying retard craig wright. i hope someone ambushes him on the streets of london and beats the shit out of him for being such a gigantic faggot. he shouldn't die but suffer.

[Anonymous No.15754280]

>>15754253
https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/04/17/the-roadmap-to-genesis-part-1/
https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/07/13/quasar-upgrade-24th-july-recommendations-roadmap-to-genesis-part-2/
https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/07/26/utxo-height-based-activation-roadmap-to-genesis-part-3/
https://bitcoinsv.io/2019/07/27/the-return-of-op_return-roadmap-to-genesis-part-4/

for anyone that wants to know what the point of bsv is

[Anonymous No.15754430]

>>15749796
this anon is correct, in big business Creg and his criminal benefactor Calvin Ayre will never get their scam mass adopted by any REAL corporation bc the fact is that they are desperate scammers only capable of defrauding RETAIL INVESTORS. lol

[Anonymous No.15754874]

>>15752049
>There is no evidence he can't sign.
except his failed attempts at forgeries and reusing signatures you mean

[Anonymous No.15754881]

go to sleep greg

[Anonymous No.15755880]

If dubs bsv $1000 eoy