uhhhhh guys?

[Anonymous No.15728807]

[Anonymous No.15728828]

>>15728807
Lmao "in november we'll try get some people to consider chainlink"

All so tiresome.

[Anonymous No.15728832]

>>15728807
Priced in already:/

[Anonymous No.15728834]

>>15728807
Whats your point here retard, also check the catalog before you post you fucking nigger

[Anonymous No.15728839]

>ISDA
>derivatives
This is the motherlode, lads.

[Anonymous No.15728847]

please, no... just stop. we've all given up hope and have moved on from chainlink... we all sold... we've capitulated. we don't want to hear about it anymore, remove this post...

[Anonymous No.15728869]

>>15728807

flush this stinky turd LINK coin down the drain!

[Anonymous No.15728879]

>>15728828
>>15728832
>>15728834
Here comes the damage control, right on cue.

>>15728839
>Sergey explicitly mentioning derivatives
>Mixicles paper explicitly mentioning derivatives
And now this. Fucking ISDA, which is THE standard in derivatives contracts.

[Anonymous No.15728881]

>>15728839
>dopamine low, moms spaghetti

[Anonymous No.15728891]

>>15728807
holy based look at the response to the sergey picture. pic related.

[Anonymous No.15728892]

more like what isda easiest way to kill myself

[Anonymous No.15728905]

>>15728891
we already know openlaw works with serg... priced in...

[Anonymous No.15728906]

>>15728892
... for not buying enough fucking linkies

[Anonymous No.15728917]

>>15728892
Kek

[Anonymous No.15728938]

>>15728905
ok mein nigger

[Anonymous No.15728939]

This is huge

[Anonymous No.15728966]

>>15728891
they are watching us

[Anonymous No.15728990]

>>15728905
COOOOOOOOOOPE

[Anonymous No.15728995]

>>15728847
His interview in China was awesome, I am seriously bullish, fuck Sibos. If any of you were dumb enough to sell you are going to eventually want to kys.

[Anonymous No.15729013]

>>15728995
What if I'm selling small amounts to be able to neet?

[Anonymous No.15729029]

>>15728879
Not damage control. Openlaw sounds like a big institution but it's a few hipsters and this isn't some announcement date, it's a forum where amongst many others selling themselves, openlaw will be as well.

[Anonymous No.15729042]

>>15728939
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNlzQsLl8mE&list=PLWZJpzZuXfQm0Y5m5qsGPg1R7aF8Vu8AS&index=3&t=0s

this is hugerest, count those fundamentallies

[Anonymous No.15729050]

>>15729013
Nope, you're still going to kiss your sister.

[Anonymous No.15729055]

>>15729029
Just google the openlaw team its an eye opener
Bunch of college kids and law students, women and poc

[Anonymous No.15729056]

>>15729029
OpenLaw is presenting at a fucking ISDA event.
See >>15728990
for some context.

Derivatives are the biggest market in the world, and ISDA is its biggest player.
Deal with it.

[Anonymous No.15729069]

>>15729050
But working makes me want to kill myself :( i still have 35k!!!

[Anonymous No.15729084]

>>15729056
Yeah, so mid november you'll have a tiny digital law contract team as part of a multi speaker slot mentioning chainlink. That's years away from actual derivative of chainlink.

Of course people advertising it is good but to me it just uncomfortably screams how far off we are.

[Anonymous No.15729093]

>>15729084
>waaaah why am I so EARLY???

[Anonymous No.15729119]

>>15729093
Yeah we've been earlier for over 2 years. Gets a bit tiresome. Especially when the supposed strength of chainlink over big industry alternatives is the network effect of being first mover. Lately it seems more and more they haven't established at all which leaves the whole thing open to just being copied.

[Anonymous No.15729122]

>>15728807

>hold through ath dude trust me
>it's happening in august just hodl
>it's happening in september just hodl
YOU ARE HERE
>it's happening in october just hodl
>it's happening in november just hodl
>it's happening in december just just hodl
>it's happening in 2021 just hodl

[Anonymous No.15729134]

>>15728891
>about to revolutionize the legal framework for the quadrillion dollars financial institution which will disrupt the business of NY banking Jews forever
>using incel nazi memes on Twitter
Based and red pilled indeed

[Anonymous No.15729145]

>>15729119
>Yeah we've been earlier for over 2 years.
And look how far we've come. Fucking Google Cloud endorsed Chainlink ffs.

This is a very concrete step towards DERIVATIVES and you're crying about it.
Fucking sell, right now.
And post proof.

>>15729122
C O P E
O
P
E

[Anonymous No.15729183]

>>15729145
The concrete step was mixicles, this is just learning that they don't really have anyone on board looking at using it and they're waiting until november to do so.

Do you get excited by chain link fences when you see them? Not every mention is just bullish, reflect on news you get.

[Anonymous No.15729220]

>>15729145
>Fucking Google Cloud endorsed Chainlink ffs.

and what good has that done? what usage has it brought to the network? where are the thousands of developers?

[Anonymous No.15729231]

>>15728891
>it's real
we are all going to make it

[Anonymous No.15729242]

>>15728879
Neva hoid of 'em

[Anonymous No.15729286]

>>15729183
>this is just learning that they don't really have anyone on board looking at using it
Holy shit you're an idiot lmao.

ISDA is looking at smart contracts from Chainlink users, and you're crying about it.
Fucking SELL SELL SELL for the love of God.

>>15729220
Don't worry about it lol.

[Anonymous No.15729329]

>>15729286
No. An openlaw representative is talking with several other speakers at the ISDA forum. It's totally misleading to say isda is now looking into using chainlink. Im bullish on link but this idle hopium bores me.

[Anonymous No.15729338]

>>15729329
>It's totally misleading to say isda is now looking into using chainlink.
I said ISDA is looking at smart contracts.

Stop crying.

[Anonymous No.15729372]

>>15729329
>>15729338
... smart contracts powered by Chainlink, of course.
See pic in OP.

[Anonymous No.15729375]

>>15729220
three months ago. I bet you're constantly disappointed with every crypto project out there

[Anonymous No.15729389]

>>15729338
You said ISDA is looking at smart contracts from chainlink. It's a great exaggeration of the degree of importance. It's not a meeting of the ISDA and chainlink, nor a talk just on openlaw. These are all talks you'd really hope would have been happening already.

[Anonymous No.15729425]

>>15729389
yeah, i hold LINK and this is bad news. they aren't integrated into "the system" at all, just begging to be let in the door like every other shitcoin team in the world.

[Anonymous No.15729450]

>>15729389
>>15729425

Imagine trying THIS hard to downplay ISDA talking about smart derivatives with Chainlink partners.
Maybe just buy back in, way less trouble.

[Anonymous No.15729457]

>Wait for October.
>Wait for November
>Wait for December
2020
>Wait for January
>Wait for February
>Wait for March
>Wait for April
>Wait for May
>Wait for June
>Wait for July
>Wait for August
>Wait for September
>Wait for October
>Wait for November
>Wait for December
2021
>Wait for January
>Wait for February
>Wait for March
>Wait for April
>Wait for May
>Wait for June
>Wait for July
>Wait for August
>Wait for September
>Wait for October
>Wait for November
>Wait for December
2022
>Wait for January
>Wait for February
>Wait for March
>Wait for April
>Wait for May
>Wait for June
>Wait for July
>Wait for August
>Wait for September
>Wait for October
>Wait for November
>Wait for December
2023
>Wait for January
>Wait for February
>Wait for March
>Wait for April
>Wait for May
>Wait for June
>Wait for July
>Wait for August
>Wait for September
>Wait for October
>Wait for November
>Wait for December
2023
>Wait for January
>Wait for February
>Wait for March
>Wait for April
>Wait for May
>Wait for June
>Wait for July
>Wait for August
>Wait for September
>Wait for October
>Wait for November
>Wait for December
2024
>Wait for January
>Wait for February
>Wait for March
>Wait for April
>Wait for May
>Wait for June
>Wait for July
>Wait for August
>Wait for September
>Wait for October
>Wait for November
>Wait for December
2025
>Wait for January
>Wait for February
>Wait for March
>Wait for April
>Wait for May
>Wait for June
>Wait for July
>Wait for August
>Wait for September
>Wait for October
>Wait for November
>Wait for December
2026

[Anonymous No.15729474]

>>15729457
>list ends in 2026
Yep, looks like we made it in this timeline brehs...

[Anonymous No.15729479]

>>15729457
This anon gets it!

[Anonymous No.15729492]

>>15729450
Im all in you fucking moron. It's not bullish every time some person utters the syllables 'lee' and 'nk'.

[Anonymous No.15729495]

Google will acquire OpenLaw this year.

[Anonymous No.15729516]

>>15729492
i am also already balls deep in LINK and have never sold

[Anonymous No.15729518]

>>15729457
Isn't it great to constantly having things to look forward to?
Like pic related.

[Anonymous No.15729530]

>>15729492
>OpenLaw speaking at an ISDA event (and actively namedropping Chainlink in the announcement)
>someone uttering the syllables 'lee' and 'nk'

Pick one, and start coping nolinker.

[Anonymous No.15729560]

>>15729530
Yes but the mention of link wasn't bullish. As already discussed.

[Anonymous No.15729587]

>>15729560
>Chainlink partner at ISDA event
>not bullish

You're trying way too hard, this is getting embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.15729590]

YOU SAID SEPTEMBER WAS THE MONTH IT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN WHY DID YOU LIE TO ME BIZ I THOUGHT WE WERE FRIENDS

[Anonymous No.15729614]

>>15729518
>L-literally w-whomst

[Anonymous No.15729717]

>>15729375
>three months ago. I bet you're constantly disappointed with every crypto project out there

ethereum had thousands of devs working on it from the jump. how the fuck is LINK supposed to get to 1000 EOY if no niggers are using it?

[Anonymous No.15729726]

>>15729587

>chainlink isn't at ISDA event
>some people that they kinda know are

OMG WOW 10004039393 EOY WOWOW

[Anonymous No.15729744]

>>15729717
People honestly think it's going to just go from $1 to $1000 in a month. The price corresponds to attention and industry use, we're at pre-coinbase because no-one is using it and until we're at $10 the network will be unused enough that the people needed to take us to $100 won't be interested and so on.

We need to start worrying about what's happening with it now, not hopium about $1000.

[Anonymous No.15729752]

>>15728807
NOTHING TO SEE HERE

[Anonymous No.15729758]

>>15729055
Every organization has women and points of contact, anon.

[Anonymous No.15729763]

>>15729744
Well we are pretty much at a crossroads, people think that corporations will want to wait, that's fine, the longer they do the worse it will be for them.

[Anonymous No.15729765]

>>15728891
Well this is reassuring

[Anonymous No.15729774]

>>15729752
>it says smart contracts wow that must mean it's all about chainlink because sergey says smart contracts sometimes in his speeches and he owns smartcontract dot com

[Anonymous No.15729788]

>>15728807
>just wait until September
>just wait until November
the memes write themselves kek
>continues to dump violently
neck yourselves linktards.

[Anonymous No.15729794]

>>15729774
Even if this is fud you’re retarded.

[Anonymous No.15729803]

>>15729763
But i don't see avant garde smaller companies getting the edge by signing up. It's looking like a lot of cryptos that promise to revolutionize an industry but it turns out they're making a problem where there isn't one and legacy systems are pretty decent.

Now we do have the oracle start ups which will hopefully break that trend but it's not been great how they cancelled the presentation about it and then the first announced was a project with fucking Thomas and Johnny on it and all it did was help other companies use chainlink.

It's just been a dire few weeks really. It's about time we had some material development.

[Anonymous No.15729816]

>>15729803
Im talking about wallstreet and the banks, you notice how the fed has been scrambling to patch up all of their problems recently?

[Anonymous No.15729819]

>>15728990
>what the derivatives industry can learn
>how smart derivatives contracts might be constructed
we are so fucking early holy shit

[Anonymous No.15729842]

itt impatient dumbies who don't realize they've been bumping the thread for people who know what they're looking at

[Anonymous No.15729844]

>>15729794
sure thing curry breath.

[Anonymous No.15729850]

>>15729816
Yeah i think chainlink will be very useful for them. But they aren't going to consider a totally real world untested network with billions of dollars like this. Link really has to go to them with a portfolio showing trustworthy, seamless data transfers over a good period of time, worth a lot of money. That's why i say we need to see some positive moves soon.

Otherwise soon these smart contract talks will happen but with a bank made proposal, not chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15729868]

First the typos now this.
It's ridiculous sergey doesn't know he's 1.464 billion bellow the capital requirements for an isda

[Anonymous No.15729890]

>>15729819
The autists who bought btc in 2010-2011 were early. And eth at $3. Come to think of it, you’re early too. Just early enough to lose 98% of your investment blindly hoping a fat Russian convinces someone to eventually run a single job on his “”””god protocol””””

[Anonymous No.15729891]

>>15729850
If banks do make an oracle it’ll be centralized and piece of shit because of that.

[Anonymous No.15729901]

>>15729850
>with a bank made proposal
Dude chainlink is that.

[Anonymous No.15729903]

>>15729850
Large companies will not use centralized oracles to trigger their contracts running on decentralized infrastructure, because why would they want a highly secure and reliable mechanism, to be triggered by a highly unreliable mechanism.

[Anonymous No.15729923]

>>15729726
>Let's invite the protocol to the conference
>Let's invite the people using the protocol to enable derivatives
Pick one retard.

[Anonymous No.15729959]

>>15729774
First thing that pops up when googling smart contracts is smartcontract.com

[Anonymous No.15729973]

>>15729055
*bunch of lawyers
ftfy

[Anonymous No.15729995]

>>15729803
Here you go, friend

https://imgur.com/uOmGMQG

[Anonymous No.15730018]

>Cancelled my ACH of 1000 USD to Kraken since Sibos was a bust
>Went back to ACHing 250$ a week to CB Pro instead
Oh well, I have 5700 LINK anyway. The price probably won't be jumping any time too. ACHing to CBPro will be fine even if it takes 9 fucking days to get there.

[Anonymous No.15730036]

>>15729220
>expects thousands of developers to dump their projects and run over as quickly as he can spin the propeller on his hat
Jesus Christ. You really are damage control.

[Anonymous No.15730068]

>>15729717
ETH took years before the EEA you turd.

[Anonymous No.15730232]

>>15728891
what the fuck. It's real.

Now I'm worried

[Anonymous No.15730285]

>>15729774
>>15729752
>Aaron Wright, CEO of OpenLaw, ConsenSys
>Peter Hunn, Founder, Accord Project

[Anonymous No.15730286]

>>15728891
Okay non of your larps nor shilling got me but this did.
I am oficially a 2k linket.

[Anonymous No.15730564]

>>15729518
Sauce on pic?

[Anonymous No.15730590]

>>15728807
OpenLaw ceo is a sex offender

[Anonymous No.15730622]

>>15728891

[Anonymous No.15730680]

>>15730286
kek glad that's what did it, brainlet.

[Anonymous No.15730737]

>>15729868

Almost like in the near future 1 LINK will equal 1,000 USD or something...

[Anonymous No.15730787]

>Not buying chainlink in 2019

Your new names IDIOT

[Anonymous No.15730877]

>>15728990
Holy shit Chris Clack will be there. I was jn his class for 2 modules during computer science msc. Dude is definitely 150 iq+ no larp. Fucking middle class looking old richfag. Very different to your typical university lecturer

[Anonymous No.15730913]

>>15728892
Underrated

[Anonymous No.15730959]

>>15728892
Kekd

[Anonymous No.15731007]

>>15730877
SEC gonna be on your ass for insider info son

[Anonymous No.15731360]

>>15729492
>nk
>syllable

[Anonymous No.15732133]

>>15729868
Lmfao nice reference. I'll watch the movie again soon.

[Anonymous No.15732199]

>>15728891
They know about us....

Who else knows about us...

Frens..... I don't feel safe anymore.

[Anonymous No.15732323]

>>15732199
checked. danger is the price of freedom. you want to run with the big dogs, don't you?

[Anonymous No.15733056]

>>15728807

[Anonymous No.15733062]

[Anonymous No.15733071]

[Anonymous No.15733095]

>>15731007
Professor Doctor Click Clack is well known on campus.

[Anonymous No.15733773]

bump

[Anonymous No.15733775]

>>15729122
>>it's happening in 2021 just hodl
Its happening by April 2021 - the ASX interview stated that this is when they are onboarding their DLT clients. Their product needs to be finished by that point. Between now and then other products and services will become available.

Prior to this statement all we had were larps and guesses. This is one of the first firm dates we have received from industry that isn't a guess based on breadcrumbs. And it is awesome.

[Anonymous No.15733809]

>>15729122
WHT THE FUCK DIDNT I BUY CHAINLINK 2 YEARS AGO

[Anonymous No.15733851]

>>15733809
buy the dip feggit

[Anonymous No.15734506]

>>15733056
>>15733062
>>15733071

[Anonymous No.15734513]

[Anonymous No.15734522]

[Anonymous No.15734722]

>>15728891
why doesn’t sergei quit being a faggot and just make a thread?

[Anonymous No.15734896]

[Anonymous No.15734963]

>>15733062
>moitoring
>>15734506
>CHAINLINK is UNSTOPPABLE!

[Anonymous No.15735269]

>>15734522
Where's this from?

[Anonymous No.15735287]

>>15735269
Some blog post from a few weeks back

[Anonymous No.15735301]

>>15735287
A chainlink blogpost?

[Anonymous No.15735652]

>>15730036
shut the fuck up. there's next to zero interest in developing using chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15735658]

>>15735301
No someone else. It was a decent read but I can't find it. Maybe someone else can help

[Anonymous No.15735660]

>>15735652
>here's next to zero interest in developing using chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15735665]

>>15729803
>But i don't see avant garde smaller companies getting the edge by signing up. It's looking like a lot of cryptos that promise to revolutionize an industry but it turns out they're making a problem where there isn't one and legacy systems are pretty decent.
>Now we do have the oracle start ups which will hopefully break that trend but it's not been great how they cancelled the presentation about it and then the first announced was a project with fucking Thomas and Johnny on it and all it did was help other companies use chainlink.
>It's just been a dire few weeks really. It's about time we had some material development.

agree with all of this 100%.

[Anonymous No.15735678]

>>15729329
Developing a set of standards was certainly a recurring theme at Sibos. I think a little hopium is warranted in this case.

[Anonymous No.15735686]

>>15728807
No linkers about to bust their balls when derivatives pump us to 1k

[Anonymous No.15735688]

>>15735665
>>15729803
Chainlink is still in its initial mainnet phase, exactly as described in the mainnet blogpost.
You whining about it not having mainstream adoption yet is just retarded af.

Oh, and the first Oracle startup only has Thomas and Jonny as consultants.
Which makes perfect sense, since it's geared around Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15735690]

>>15728807
>WE MAKE IT TONIGHT ANONS!
>OMG GOOGLE! SINGULARITY INCOMING!
>IN AUGUST ANONS!
>IN SEPTEMBER ANONS!
>ANY DAY NOW ANONS!
>JUST WAIT ANOTHER 18 MONTHS ANONS I PROMISE!!

Inb4
>You're just impatient if you sell now after only 3 years

[Anonymous No.15735700]

>>15735690
>walk from your room to the kitchen
>enter the hallway
>"why am I in the hallway, I was going to the kitchen???"

Take your meds.

[Anonymous No.15735703]

>>15735700
What a god awful analogy

[Anonymous No.15735706]

>>15735688
>You whining about it not having mainstream adoption yet is just retarded af.

link has busted everyones balls for near on 3 years now, fuck you.

>>15735690
based

[Anonymous No.15735715]

>>15735706
Can't wait a measly 10 years for good return on investment? Just spoilt.

Take your scraps and be happy.

[Anonymous No.15735721]

>>15735703
kek. So much negative sentiment lately. We have been dumping for a few months now, and straight through Sibos. So I'll spill a little hopium.

>And then once you have that software you want to apply it to something. And that’s where the tokens come in. Thats where the digital assets come in. So the first version of the token is to just have a little bit of information about the outside world. It’s kind of like a hyperlink to the outside world. The 1% of the information is the token, and the rest, all the legal paper, all the human processes are outside. But then over time, what happens, is that more and more of that information goes into the digital asset. Today we’re just referring to paper, tomorrow we’re having dividends and stock splits happening within the digital asset itself. At then over time, all the software that used to apply externally to the asset, to the security, to the bond, to the real estate, things like rebalancing or financial planning, or risk assessment, or the collateral piece. All the engines that were “external”, those are all software that are moving into the blockchain network themselves. …And the good thing is when we’re in that world it all is on the same standards and rails.

[Anonymous No.15735727]

>>15735715
I'd rather take 10-20x gains every few months over a possible 100-200x in 5 years

[Anonymous No.15735741]

>>15735727
I agree and more importantly you won't see the x1000 gain without plenty of x2 growth long before then. With link price corresponds to network use so the stagnation lately is terrible. It doesn't just indicate speculator disinterest but reveals the lack of actual use. Only when the network is handling millions of dollars will banks and derivative groups look into it.

[Anonymous No.15735751]

>>15735721
Not sure how that's hopium, just drivel.

[Anonymous No.15735756]

>>15735700
>>15735703
this
>taking 3 years to get from the hall to the kitchen

[Anonymous No.15735766]

>>15735721
>blahblahblah

Meanwhile the price drops another 5 percent
You're not fooling anyone

[Anonymous No.15735773]

>>15735751
If that is not ringing bells for you, there's nothing more I can do. I will spoon feed you, but I will not wipe you ass.

[Anonymous No.15735786]

>>15735773
It is exactly the usual drivel about the amazing things chainlink will definitely do one day! No coin before has ever had world changing scope!

Ignore the zero (0/none/not one) jobs performed on the network since launch and the sole current data source being crypto price.

[Anonymous No.15735804]

>>15735727
Good luck making that consistently

[Anonymous No.15735808]

>>15735786
It wasn't too long ago that I questioned if the project would be abandoned before main net was finished. Now I hear whispers of ChainLink's functionality from upper level executives constantly. No one said this journey would be easy.

[Anonymous No.15735851]

inb4 Link starts pumping and Bogs crash Bitcoin even harder to supress it

[Anonymous No.15735888]

>>15735786
it’s turned into the same perpetual state of progress shit as every other coin.
>progress is coming soon, just you wait!
>mainstream adoption is juuuust around the corner!
>yep, coming in november!
>fast forward to november
>what do you mean it was supposed to kick off so soon? it was always going to happen 18 months from now. this is a long term hold, i am personally in it for the tech. delete your blockfolio and come back in a year.

[Anonymous No.15735900]

>>15735703
>>15735706
>>15735756
In the two years since the ICO, Chainlink went from one among many ICOs to:
- the number 1 gainer in all of crypto
- getting promoted by the likes of Google Cloud and Oracle
- releasing an initial mainnet on the threshold of expansion (which will be triggered at 21 nodes)
- vastly expanding its fundamentals with TownCrier, threshold sigs, mixicles, ...
- being explicitly adopted/integrated/recognized/... by half of all known cryptos
etc.

And now they're taking their first concrete steps towards derivatives as well, and you keep trying to paint this as bad news.
Absolutely hilarious.

[Anonymous No.15735906]

>>15735888
Who the fuck are you even quoting lmao.
Fucking schizos with their voices.

[Anonymous No.15735916]

>>15735888
God the transition to 'its a long term hold be patient' hits home, it's the path of so many dead coins.

[Anonymous No.15735918]

>>15735900
>concrete news
Any proof anon, a link, an article not written by some pajeet or twitter shill?

Perhaps more importantly, the price has gone down more than 50% in the past month. This scam is over, nobody has time for it's shit anymore.

[Anonymous No.15735923]

>>15735918
>Any proof anon, a link, an article not written by some pajeet or twitter shill?
About what?

[Anonymous No.15735927]

>>15735900
> threshold of expansion
What binance? Lmao more crypto price feeds no-one wants to use! Or do you mean the community feedback drive they do after 21 nodes? I hope you don't mean that.

Jesus this is bearish if this is the straw clutching.

[Anonymous No.15735937]

>>15735927
>What binance?
The threshold for expanding mainnet has nothing to do with Binance lmao.
What the fuck are you doing anon.

[Anonymous No.15735946]

>>15735916
>it's the path of so many dead coins.
This: >>15735900
is not the path of dead coins, schizo.

[Anonymous No.15735948]

>>15735937
So you have nothing. It would be more constructive for you to just not come to link's defence desu.

[Anonymous No.15735951]

>>15735948
>So you have nothing
About what?

[Anonymous No.15736126]

>>15735918
>Any proof anon, a link, an article not written by some pajeet or twitter shill?
Were you asking for proof of the "concrete steps towards derivatives"?
See the OP and >>15728990
you doofus.

[Anonymous No.15736137]

>>15735906
look around you nigger. it’s all the coping linkies that didn’t sell at 4 dollars.

[Anonymous No.15736145]

>>15736137
So "anons flapping their gums" equals "a coin's state of progress" to you?
That's insane.

[Anonymous No.15736251]

>>15736145
how fucking stupid can you get? let me make this clearer for you, smoothbrain. all the bagholder cope is a result of the current state of progress.

[Anonymous No.15736268]

>>15735900
>Number one gainer
All due to market manipulation. Any and all pumps will be killed by either whales or Sergey himself.
>Google cloud and oracle
Plenty of shit projects have been shilled by the Google cloud blog. Oracle is a bunch of who's and they can't even get 50 of them.
>verge of expansion
Yeah in 6 more months we'll have the promised 21 nodes.
>expanding its fundamentals
None of which have been implemented yet. They're already taking so long to implement staking. How many years will tees take? How long did the rewrite from Ruby take?
>half of all known cryptos.
Shitcoin small caps like moab. And half is a gross exaggeration.

This guy is right.
>>15735888
Link is heading down the same path as req. No real users. No adoption. Just empty promises.

[Anonymous No.15736269]

>>15736251
So are you saying this ISDA event is something Chainlink bagholders made up?

[Anonymous No.15736276]

>>15736251
> smoothbrian

[Anonymous No.15736289]

>>15736268
>All due to market manipulation.
lmao, cope

>Plenty of shit projects have been shilled by the Google cloud blog
No.

>Yeah in 6 more months we'll have the promised 21 nodes.
The current rate implies we're reaching 21 much more quickly than that.

>None of which have been implemented yet.
Which takes away nothing from the merits of these elements, which only enhance the already tremendous promise of Chainlink.

>Shitcoin small caps like moab.
lmao, and ZeppelinOS, Accord, OpenLaw, Web3, Kaleido, BNC, Hedera, etc. etc.

>Link is heading down the same path as req.
See >>15735900

You're an idiot.

[Anonymous No.15736584]

Thanks for looking out for my financial interests guys. As a result of this thread I've sold all of my chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15736632]

>>15736584
Isn't it great that there are so many anonymous faggots out there who are so concerned about our financial wellbeing that they spend this much time and effort convincing us?

[Anonymous No.15736650]

>>15736584
proof pl0x

[Anonymous No.15736857]

>>15735269
https://blog.framework.ventures/revisiting-chainlink-future-of-oracles/

[Anonymous No.15737099]

>>15736857
This is a nice read for sure.

[Anonymous No.15737440]

>>15735900
Stop trying to convince these brainlets of anything. You escaped Plato’s cave and it’s pointless attempting to spoon feed these troglodytes.
The majority of people want money NOW. This instant. They hate waiting and their impatience blinds them.

[Anonymous No.15737461]

>>15737440
Or, you know, money not falling to new lows everyday would be nice.

[Anonymous No.15737479]

>>15728891
What the fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck¡!!!!!!!!?????
Fuck this I'm spending 80% of my next paycheck on chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15737500]

>>15728891
All of you are saying you're buying must be joking. This is not good. Reminds me of that fat favela monkey talking about link Marines.

[Anonymous No.15737505]

>>15737461
Maybe not depressing the market sentiment would help, no?

[Anonymous No.15737523]

>>15737440

[Anonymous No.15737524]

>>15728892
Hearty kek

[Anonymous No.15737535]

>>15737500
>This is not good.
whoa...
no way???

[Anonymous No.15737551]

>>15735900
yep this

anyone unironically fudding link at this point (a small number anyway) has no argument against this. they can never answer when you ask them which crypto did they buy instead of link. stay comfy marines.

[Anonymous No.15737585]

>>15737505
>Maybe not depressing the market sentiment would help, no?

you have now reached 'bargaining'. next stop is 'depression' when the truth finally sets in.

[Anonymous No.15737597]

>>15737585
>complain about price action
>spew nonsense to depress market sentiment
Just pointing out the bs, my lad.

[Anonymous No.15737658]

>>15737597
>criticism is fud to keep the price low
fucking pathetic, you are no better than amblets or vechain bagholding redditors.

[Anonymous No.15737673]

>>15737505
/biz/ doesn't have that much capital and the more damaging effect are those who FUD it on fundamentals on reddit amd elsewhere with a seething need to normies to not get in.

[Anonymous No.15737713]

>>15737658
The criticism itt is fud, yes.

[Anonymous No.15737751]

>>15737673
But it don't help, do it?

[Anonymous No.15737773]

>>15737751
There seems to be about 10 legit anons present on /biz/ at any given point, i don't think it matters. Plus it's genuine disappointment. I've held since start of 18 but im genuinely thinking of just selling some out, I'll wait a week to see if staking is in fact coming but otherwise it legitimately looks to me like we're just way too early and it's going to dwindle for another year.

[Anonymous No.15737778]

>>15728891
Shit like this should make you very very wary, you fucking newfags.

[Anonymous No.15737782]

>>15737778
Well yeah people think openlaw is a big company but it's basically a start up.

[Anonymous No.15737792]

>>15737782
OpenLaw is literally Consensys.

>>15737773
>disappointment
With this? >>15735900

Fucking sell already shithead.

[Anonymous No.15737805]

>>15737792
Half of that is wrong or misleading, so yeah. Disappointed.

[Anonymous No.15737819]

>>15737782
They are obviously catering to the autists on /biz/ and the Twitter shillbots.

[Anonymous No.15737827]

>>15728807
I hope you guys fucking realize that they're not going to go after the OTC derivatives market any time soon right? The shit they're referring to are defi meme projects like Synthetics, Maker, Uma, or Market Protocol that have 0 liquidy and no one to trade against. There's not going to be a huge market for hyper risky financial instruments on a slow ass blockchain.

Before you cream yourself over how great it is why don't you try using some Defi products and ask yourself if anyone with any real money at play would even think about touching these shits? We still have a long, long way to go

[Anonymous No.15737839]

>>15729518
Sergey looks gangster as fuck

[Anonymous No.15737856]

>>15737778
>Shit like this should make you very very wary, you fucking newfags.

this.

it reminds me of pic related kek

[Anonymous No.15737872]

Will I make it with 2.7k link? I recently got fired and can't stack more

[Anonymous No.15737907]

>>15729084
This is like complaining bitcoin or ether is only 1.60

[Anonymous No.15738003]

>>15737805
>Half of that is wrong or misleading
It's all factual.

[Anonymous No.15738225]

If there are any newfags confused about buy or not buy Link. Look at how many posts this thread has gotten versus other threads. That should tell you something

[Anonymous No.15738233]

>>15737827
The most accurate thing posted in this thread. We'll be lucky to see actual usage from meme crypto derivatives by the end of this year. Real derivatives won't be seen, best case, until 2022.

[Anonymous No.15738290]

>>15738233
>>15737827
ISDA is the fucking mac daddy of mainstream derivatives, that's what makes this so bullish.
cope

[Anonymous No.15738453]

>ISDA

They are at least aware of oracles and how they will play out with regard to derivatives, check on page 23 of their document

https://www.isda.org/a/MhgME/Legal-Guidelines-for-Smart-Derivatives-Contracts-Introduction.pdf

I know it doesn't talk about chainlink, but really, who's the king of oracles

[Anonymous No.15738461]

>>15730018
Just do a wire transfer in the morning if you're gonna be doing >1k amounts

[Anonymous No.15738499]

>>15730018
Sorry, you don't have 9 days.
t.101k

[Anonymous No.15738650]

>>15735727
>I'd rather take 10-20x gains every few months
the absolute fucking state of this board

[Anonymous No.15738665]

Just got 10000000k

[Anonymous No.15738671]

>>15738665
PLS BE IN LONDON

[Anonymous No.15738707]

So is it the same anons for over two years getting excited about each event, or is there a turnover point where new anons come on for the masochistic roller coaster?

[Anonymous No.15738725]

>>15738707
cope

[Anonymous No.15738770]

>>15738725
just bought more today. but it's tiring to analyze every fucking event when all the news that pumped LINK came in a clear and concise tweet lmao.

[Anonymous No.15738801]

>>15738453
In house apis from well trusted corporations. Much faster, cheaper and currently trustworthy.

[Anonymous No.15738815]

>>15738233
This, like BAT which probably has the lead on any coin for actual use but all the ads are crypto & vpn adverts lol.

[Anonymous No.15738823]

>>15738707
I don't care about any events. I am only interested in the product and its development. Only the PnD groups talk about the events.

[Anonymous No.15738840]

>>15738770
This is an ISDA event about derivatives.
If you don't think that's significant then I don't know what to tell you.

[Anonymous No.15738854]

>>15728807
>linkies on suicide watch

[Anonymous No.15738859]

>>15738801
>he thinks oracles are a type of API

[Anonymous No.15738897]

>>15729122
Sergey is a fucking asshole for saying
>“we will make it, like next month”
All while he dumped 700ks. I am unironically worried because of the dumps and how far it actually is from adoption. Part of me wants to contact the SEC but that would just doubly screw me if they did fuck sergey.

[Anonymous No.15739017]

>>15735741
Desu
The lack of functionality and use cases after all of the talks and the hype that CL itself pushed is concerned. I could give a fuck if Serg said it will take time, but the events like Gonser and his hyped speeches “make it next month” before dumping are very suspicious.

Remember he said derivatives eoy? Worst case no derivatives at all, less worse but still a death knell would be crypto derivatives, and making it would be actual mainstream derivatives.

I have a feeling at best we’re going to get degenerate crypto derivatives.

[Anonymous No.15739050]

>>15739017
You thought that autists taking 'make it next month' out of context was the truth? Please sell

[Anonymous No.15739156]

>>15739017
>The lack of functionality and use cases after all of the talks and the hype that CL itself pushed is concerned.
Sergey's mainnet blogpost was published on May 30th, and after all this time you STILL haven't read it.

[Anonymous No.15739425]

>>15729868
Not if link is $1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.15740430]

>>15729752
kek hope you fags can wait until 2025

[Anonymous No.15740448]

>>15738897
>the SEC doesnt know about an asset that just became available in the trade capital of the world
sure give em a ring