[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 191 KB, 1242x2208, 65B4377D-5D47-4737-8D2F-3CBBB04A2E4B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15656550 No.15656550 [Reply] [Original]

https://www.r3.com/videos/swift-gpi-link-and-corda-settler-in-action/

>> No.15656643

Dont even bother
This board is dead

>> No.15656659

gpi is not chainlink. Just because you idiots are delusional and keep trying to fir a square into a triangle does not make it true. You guys need to go outside

>> No.15656697

>>15656659
Poo in loo Ranjesh

>> No.15656731

>>15656659
Mumbai Miscreant.

>> No.15656736

>>15656697
this jeet is right though, Chainlink has no relationship with Swift. They did a PoC using public APIs 3 years ago and won some competition. Nothing else since.

>> No.15656762

>>15656736
Occams razor says you're probably right

>> No.15656825

>>15656550
That narrator sounds eerily like me

>> No.15656836

>>15656550
>SOMETHING HAS THE NAME 'LINK' IN IT WE'RE ALL GOING TO MAKE IT
unironically kys

>> No.15656853

>>15656736
>They did a PoC using public APIs 3 years ago and won some competition. Nothing else since.

stale fud rajesh.

>A representative of Swift confirmed to CoinDesk that it is a SmartContract customer.
https://www.coindesk.com/swift-completes-blockchain-smart-contracts-trial

also watch from the timestamp onwards in this.
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/482730049?t=00h17m31s

>> No.15656880
File: 48 KB, 400x500, drns.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15656880

>>15656550
I don't give a fuck and I am not reading this shit. Wake me up when the fucking crypto markets aren't retarded anymore and properly value LINK

>fucking TRON is still ahead of LINK
>as well as other shitcoins

>> No.15656914

>>15656550
That’s not referring to Chainlink you donkey

>> No.15656923

>>15656550
I watched it and it really doesn't seem like it's talking about chainlink. Barely even seems like it needs to be blockchain lmao.

>> No.15656939
File: 48 KB, 458x390, D090C915-C230-4032-B589-94EC25D1F25E.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15656939

>>15656550
Reminder:
https://twitter.com/kiacrypto/status/1173688314454511616

>> No.15656976

>>15656939
In case anyone has doubts on the legitimacy of someone calling themselves the joker on CT:
https://www.r3.com/press-media/r3-launches-universal-corda-settler-application/

>> No.15656996

>>15656976
Cripple reks Link.
Worst timeline

>> No.15657021

>>15656976
This. Im holding out home that link announces they are going to sibos ahead of time, if not im swinging at the start as there will be an almight dump when the gpi link talk goes on about xrp and not link.

>> No.15657065

>>15657021
It is clear xrp and r3 are connected, no one should doubt that. However.. r3 has made many mentions of smart contracts, so it’s either they got their own thing going, or LINK is involved:
https://link.medium.com/eVl9pkoR8Z

So maybe, unironically xrp and link will coincide in the same eco system. But key point here is that link isn’t confirming just yet

>> No.15657115

>>15657065
Does xrp support smart contracts? I know nothing about the redditcoin.

>> No.15657190
File: 3.20 MB, 2560x1452, 1568895695250.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15657190

>>15656853
this literally cannot be refuted

>> No.15657221

>>15657065
You people are so fucking dumb
Imagine actually believing xrp ia doing anything with swift when they dont say they work with them or are partnered, unlike chainlink who built gpi link for them

Die you stupid subhuman niggers

>> No.15657249

>>15657115
I had to look it up, no it doesn't

It's a centralized coin that is being tested by a consortium of banks, it doesn't have a blockchain

From what I can gather, it's main focus is for "fast payments across borders", like you can pay for things in USD with Euros using ripple and the fee would be like $0.000001 and it would be nearly instant

>> No.15657264

>>15657249
So it's just digital currency?

>> No.15657274

>>15656550
Based

>> No.15657278

>>15656731
Underrated

>> No.15657290

did we know LINK was going to SIBOS in 2017?

>> No.15657291

>>15657264
pretty much

>> No.15657306

>>15656853
>>15657190
That presentation was by the ceo of a literally who company called skillz. You really think the first integration with swift will be mentioned by that guy? He was just showing one of the USE CASES that could be a possibility with CL. That presenter has nothing to do with swift

Idk if some of you are literal brainlets or just blindly accept anything that gets shilled here about chainlink

>> No.15657316

>>15656550
Good work friendo!

>> No.15657331

>>15657306
how are corda and gpi link accessing off-chain data then?

>> No.15657345

>>15657290
yes

>> No.15657357

>>15657306
brainlet

>>15657331
based

>> No.15657387

>>15657331
chainlink is basically the tcp/ip of the new internet

Nothing gets on or off any chain unless it goes through a chainlink oracle

>> No.15657390
File: 740 KB, 2852x1378, 1558674261010.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15657390

>> No.15657447

>>15657306
you should check the other link maybe? fucking tard its been confirmed multiple fucking times this past week that chainlink is working with swift

>> No.15657883

>>15657447
Ok show me one proof swift is using chainlink. Everything is just speculation. Swift hasn’t mentioned chainlink once since 2017 when they did the poc

>> No.15657906
File: 41 KB, 1078x982, pajeetOdorRemover.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15657906

>>15657883

>> No.15657946

>>15657249
Award for the stupidest comment of the thread goes to this anon

>> No.15658039

>>15657249
>I had to look it up, no it doesn't
>It's a centralized coin that is being tested by a consortium of banks, it doesn't have a blockchain
>From what I can gather, it's main focus is for "fast payments across borders", like you can pay for things in USD with Euros using ripple and the fee would be like $0.000001 and it would be nearly instant

ripple doesn't support ISO 20022 or smart contracts. literally outdated tech.

>> No.15658063

I used to be confident in chainlink because of the high iq community but seeing all the retards believing gpi was related was the biggest red flag for me

>> No.15658140

>>15658063
This is link dumb fuck. IntelectEU is link. Sergey and team get the data. Corda is basically just a ui. We made it boys. If you can’t put this together you have no hope.

>> No.15658183

STOP MISLEADING PEOPLE, THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH CHAINLINK

>> No.15658211

>>15658140
No

>> No.15658267

>>15657906
That’s what I thought. You got nothing anon

>> No.15658296

>>15658267
You smell.

>> No.15658306

>>15657946
it's a reddit coin, is what I meant

>> No.15658311

>>15658063
the good community era ended almost a year ago

like was full of retards before mainnet

>> No.15658318

>>15658296
Ok rajeet

>> No.15658323

>>15658211
fuck off phonefagging ranjeesh

>> No.15658456
File: 630 KB, 1183x1075, chainlinkscam.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15658456

>>15656550
700,000
>Nothing wrong with me
1,400,000
>Nothing wrong with me
2,100,000
>Nothing wrong with me
2,800,000
>Nothing wrong with me
3,500,000
>Something's got to give
4,200,000
>Something's got to give
4,900,000
>Something's got to give
NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

LET THE CHAIN LINK HIT THE FLOOR

LET THE CHAIN LINK HIT THE FLOOR

OH SWEET GOD THERE IS NO FLOOR

OH SWEET GOD THERE IS NO FLOOR

CHAINLINK $0 EOY

CHAINLINK $0 EOY

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH

>Dumped on why for (why for)
Can't take much moreeee

700,000
>Nothing wrong with me
1,400,000
>Nothing wrong with me
2,100,000
>Nothing wrong with me
2,800,000
>Nothing wrong with me
3,500,000
>Something's got to give
4,200,000
>Something's got to give
4,900,000
>Something's got to give
NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

LET THE CHAIN LINK HIT THE FLOOR

LET THE CHAIN LINK HIT THE FLOOR

OH SWEET GOD THERE IS NO FLOOR

OH SWEET GOD THERE IS NO FLOOR

CHAINLINK $0 EOY

CHAINLINK $0 EOY

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH

>Pump me again (again)
Holding bags near the endddddddd

700,000
>Nothing wrong with me
1,400,000
>Nothing wrong with me
2,100,000
>Nothing wrong with me
2,800,000
>Nothing wrong with me
3,500,000
>Something's got to give
4,200,000
>Something's got to give
4,900,000
>Something's got to give
NOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

>> No.15658503
File: 813 KB, 320x240, 88E0955A-0AC6-4041-BA7B-00E324AC9BF8.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15658503

>>15658306
Still stand by my comment, you and everyone else in this thread is slipping hard and spewing fiction.

>>15657115
>>15657221
Read the link I posted here:
>>15657065
R3 clearly is working on smart contracts. Xrp is currently the only crypto currency that will be used with Corda we of now (>>15656976).

These are facts I bring to the table. By all means, sleep on xrp

>> No.15658593

>>15656550
HOW I JUST WANT TO KNOW HOW
THIS FUCKING NEET CIRCLE JERK FOUND THE NEW FUCKING BACKBONE OF WORLD FINANCE
FUCKING HOW
IF THIS IS ALL REAL THAT MEANS I WILL HAVE MADE MORE MONEY LISTENING TO A FAGGOT BOARD OF FURRY REJECTS THAN I EVER COULD IN MY ENTIRE LIFE WORKING A PRESTIGIOUS HIGH PAYING JOB

I CANT FUCKING BELIEVE THIS
I JUST FUCKING CANT

>> No.15658665

If you go to the Chainlink website, it clearly states they are working with Swift, why do you anons keep ignoring this?

>> No.15658684

>>15658665
because its been there for almost three years and there has been no proof/working product/or evidence that they are.

>> No.15658700

>>15658684
SWIFT isn't one to let anyone just use their logo for no reason.

>> No.15658710

>>15658593
i have been a neet since 2017


i have 35k link lol

>> No.15658774

>>15658665
Libra was also on one of the slides, you think zuckerberg is sucking sergeys dick? Show me one piece of publicity published by swift that shows that chainlink will be the backbone of their new systems or any of the other unsubstantiated claims made in this thread. Im sick of you fuckers saying "swift would sue Sergey for use of their logo if it wasn't true". They have previously worked with swift. That doesn't validate any of the wild theories flying around. Logos don't mean shit. Look at any other shitcoin website and if you judged solely by logos and quotes you'd be fooled into thinking they were absolute gold too.

>> No.15658813

>>15658211
This is the gpi Link I’m going to talk about by the way, which is the settlement layer for smart contracts. Just to qualify you do have to be on gpi and live, but what we did is we announced with r3 a partnership for this PoC, and they’ve been great partners. And we’ve been looking at I think two of their platforms for Trade Finance called Voltron and Marco Polo. Working about how to provide a settlement layer around Smart Contracts on a distributed ledger platform.

We are looking at other platforms too. We know Hyperledger and Consensus have a lot of Ethereum based products. Digital Asset is also out there. We realized in the verticals it’s beyond Trade Finance into maybe commodity Trade Finance, Insurance, and the Securities and Derivatives world.

But the basic idea is basically I’d like to tell a story about mangos. I can imagine a world where I am a buyer of mangos. I enter into a smart contract with a seller and there’s certain conditions with that contract. Right? The crate of mangos has to weigh a certain amount. Maybe it’s on a boat from the Caribbean and I don’t want those mangos going above 95 degrees during the entire voyage. I want it to arrive at a certain time, I want the pallet to be certain dimensions when it arrives. And guess what with the IoTs and Sensors you can guarantee all these things right? So it would be great if all these things were guaranteed via these “oracles” or third party sensors. When the mangos hit the port knowing that all these conditions were met, it would be cool if you could pay for the mangos and the mangos could be delivered in an automated way according to the conditions of the smart contract.

Yes. Faggot.

>> No.15658833

>>15656659
GPI does not have smart contracts or access to API's to fill in the contracts. corda can use smart contracts but cannot pull API information. sooo how are we going to get real world payments into this i wonder

>> No.15658850

>>15658593
We had actual autists in 2017 making spreadsheets of hundreds of ICOs and rating them according to a whole bunch of criteria, then posting their spreadsheets on biz.
You don't see that kind of effort and sharing as much any more, but then again there isn't an ICO craze any more.

>> No.15658873

>>15657390
This right here is the simple truth

>> No.15658878

>>15658774
Read what is on the official SmartContract as well as the Chainlink website about their explicit connection to Swift...this is not comparable to some mention on a powerpoint slide.

>> No.15658918

I just want to see what oracle they are going to be using for this huge fucking system. Did they create their own highly reliable oracle, use some other shitty oracle or did they use Chainlink. If they are going to use APIs that have multiple sources like weather APIs then having own oracles seems like a bad idea from a game theory perspective.

>> No.15658931

>>15658850
I remember and bought during the etherdelta days and even then biz amazed me
If literally all of it is true that means that unironically the greatest performing vc/investment group on earth is the mutants that inhabit this place
Better than the firms made entirely of ivy league grads
Better than legacy institutions with millions of collective years of investing experience

4chan motherfucking biz will have beaten them
Its cant be real

>> No.15658980

>>15658931
The day singularity happens is the day we wake up from this long ass dream. Only remembering small parts as if this was just another dream.

>> No.15658995

>>15658931
We got pretty lucky as well. Not for making the right choices back then, we were way ahead of the pack in seeing the value of Ari and taking seriously not just the scale of the problem, but the seriousness of the approach. First peer reviewed whitepaper and stuff. Also Ari's IC3 talk from 2016 where he lays out "The 5 problems facing smart contracts" and essentially lays out the case for Chainlink still only has about 1000 views on YouTube, which shows how little research the vast majority of people, even link holders, do.

But there's no denying the fact that even with all of that good backing to go from, we are still super lucky that they have been able to execute to this degree, get in with all the right people, do crazy takeover shit like Town Crier.
Even just the level of IC3 integration where we basically have probably the world's premier smart contract research organisation working on Chainlink's behalf to solve problems... It has turned out incredibly well, and in retrospect it seems like a sure thing, but we should all be tremendously grateful for our good luck in it working out this well.

>> No.15659277

>>15658813

where is this from?

>> No.15659335

>>15658995

also don't forget assblaster's posts that helped set the knowledge framework to research from! no doubt about it though - all in all, /biz/ and LINK is a true black swan event.

>> No.15659536

>>15658995
this; anything could have gone wrong in the making but it didnt. it only got better and better up until now. lets see where we are headed now. as an ico investor i already realized my profit and i am set for life in my shithole 3rd world country when link hit 3-4 usd band. now i am gonna hold the rest for another 2 years.

funny i found biz thanks to chainlink in 2017; it is just the opposite for many anons here. i am hooked since. thanks for all the laughs you bring to my life frens.

100eoy

>> No.15660158

>>15659277
How new are you anon

>> No.15660194

>>15658995
reminder that link is $1.84

what the fuck are you smoking

>> No.15660217

>>15659335
Interesting, never thought of this as a black swan.

>> No.15660227

>>15658833
Why can't they just use normal APIs?

>> No.15660237

>>15660194
>reminder Bitcoin is 2.22
>It was 30 dollars
>WTF