He just can't stop SCAMMING

[Anonymous No.15506258]

Charles Miller is at it again trying to bring legitimacy to BSV by doing a traditional one on one interview with their lead developer Steve Shadders. Just look and their faces and tell me you don't see something sinister. The way they try to scam people into thinking BSV is not a scam is so cynical it makes me sick. I wonder how much Crejg and Kelvin pay them

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=KJXr_Dz7x4A

[Anonymous No.15506274]

Have you forgotten to take your antipsychotic meds again?

[Anonymous No.15506278]

>>15506258
>I wonder how much Crejg and Kelvin pay them
it must be a lot, any shitty programmer can make 100k easy without even trying so they must be paying Shadders very well since he seems like a decent coder. Also Charles Miller could make a shit load of money working for BBC or whatever so why is he now following BSV around, Kelvin they must pay him millions

[Anonymous No.15506281]

>>15506274
Back to the ad hominem attack are we? Typical of pajeet scammers with no real arguments

[Anonymous No.15506291]

>>15506278
>Also Charles Miller could make a shit load of money working for BBC
Yes, this is what I don't get. He did work for BBC before and was one of their top reporters of all time so he must have made a shit load of money working there. That would mean he is paid a disgusting amount from faketoshi to join in on his scheme

[Anonymous No.15506312]

>>15506274
thanks for this, just sold all my bsv for btc

[Anonymous No.15506385]

haha, Steve just admitted faketoshi is not satoshi. It slipped out of him lol. "they are two different persons". I wonder how they're going to spin this

[Anonymous No.15506508]

>>15506385
>It slipped out of him lol. "they are two different persons".
Timestamp? I'm not gonna sit through 40 mins of bullshit scam talk

[Anonymous No.15506519]

>>15506508

[Anonymous No.15506529]

>>15506385
can confirm he says theyre two different persons and craig admitted to him in private that he cant prove shit lmao. bsvfags BTFO

[Anonymous No.15506655]

>>15506258
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXUOSCGfuJA

I really like what Craig is saying, even if he's not Satoshi.

[Anonymous No.15506685]

>>15506258
It;s funnier than that anon - they actually believe in it so theyre doing it for free

[Anonymous No.15506686]

>>15506385
>>15506508
>>15506529
>>15506655
Desperate core cucks grasping at straws as usual.
Pathetic

[Anonymous No.15506709]

>>15506686
typical bsvfag, denying facts and reality. did you even listen to the shadders interview? he clearly says satoshi and craig are two different people and craig refused to show him proof in private. what you need a timestamp or something?

[Anonymous No.15506758]

>>15506508
>Timestamp?
He says it at 14:00.
You can see immediately after he gets uncomfortable when he realize what he said, and then Charles quickly moves on to other questions

[Anonymous No.15506766]

>>15506709
Retard
Why would coingeek upload an interview of their lead developer calling out Craig as not Satoshi?
Retard level cope but what can u expect from a core cuck.

[Anonymous No.15506768]

>>15506529
Fuck, is the price going to dump?
I'm surprised how well it's held about $100 desu.

[Anonymous No.15506825]

>>15506258
>paid nChain whore 'interviews' other paid nChain whore
WHY would anyone need to employ a disgraced ex-BBC'er to 'interview' random cunts within their own organisation ? Oh, because its a scam desperately trying to convey 'respectability'. Too fucking late for that, convicts. nothing to see here folks..
>>15506385
..unless they selling fatboy down the river, finally. A falling out amongst thieves, surely not

[Anonymous No.15507006]

>>15506766
>Why would coingeek upload an interview of their lead developer calling out Craig as not Satoshi?
People make mistakes and when it comes to fagtoshi et al the mistakes are piling up. They won't be able to keep the scam going much longer.
Check out the interview at 14:00. You can see how uncomfortable Shadders becomes when he realize he said something he shouldn't

>>15506825
This guy gets it

[Anonymous No.15507071]

>>15506758
>>15507006
>14:00
>"Its unfair to Craig Wright and its unfair to Satoshi Nakamoto. Theyre two different persons."
there you have it straight from the horses mouth. bsvfags absolutely BTFO I guess nchains propaganda backfired their pajeets were probably too busy shitting up some streets to prevent this from being uploaded. too bad they blew all their budget on sell out "jounralists" like Charles Miller who would sell his own mother for a quick buck apparently. absolutely disgraceful this entire project.

[Anonymous No.15507152]

He says "they're two different personAs", not persons, retards.
Persona: persona, /pəˈsəʊnə,pəːˈsəʊnə/
the aspect of someone's character that is presented to or perceived by others.
"her public persona"
I'm beginning to think BSV is the one being fudded by "Pajeets", learn to speak English mongoloids.

[Anonymous No.15507177]

>>15507152
uh huh so why does he admit just a minute later craig never showed him any proof?
COPE
O
P
E

[Anonymous No.15507207]

>>15507152
>He says "they're two different personAs", not persons, retards
Listen to what he says just before that:
>>"Its unfair to Craig Wright and its unfair to Satoshi Nakamoto. Theyre two different persons."
It is clear that he speaks about fagtoshi and satoshi as two different persoNS. Trying to split hairs and dragging in a dictionary is just a stupid and dishonest way to derail the thread

[Anonymous No.15507223]

>>15507207
>Trying to split hairs and dragging in a dictionary is just a stupid and dishonest way to derail the thread
absolutely disgusting how low these bsvfags will go to defend their lord and saviour scamtoshi

[Anonymous No.15507428]

He clearly says personas:
A persona is a role or character adopted by a singular author or an actor. Singular. That means one, Pajeets. So he's talking about Craig as the Satoshi character, idiots.
This is almost as pathetic as Corefags claiming "gotcha" when CSW clearly joked about "I remember reading about the whitepaper... Probably when I wrote it." Core cucks only have language games and bent definitions, it's the socialist's only arsenal.

[Anonymous No.15507533]

>>15507428
>He clearly says personas
Dude...Just listen to what he says before. It is all about context and it is obvious he means persons not personas. He literally says "Its unfair to Craig Wright and its unfair to Satoshi Nakamoto".
Does that sound like the same person to you? And even if he did say personas, why would the same person have different personas? Are you saying Craig is a schizo? That would explain alot. Pleas stop it with these derailing tactics

[Anonymous No.15507548]

>>15507533
checked. and he admits a minute later craig never showed him any proof look at his body language. its clear he got scammed by craig as well, steve shadders is an intelligent man but even smart people get conned and craig is a master conman.

[Anonymous No.15507940]

>>15507548
Shadders told CSW he didn't want to see him sign with the Satoshi keys after CSW literally offered to show him in private. Shadders said this in a different interview, idiot.

Also did someone really just ask why anyone would employ a different persona when the Bitcoin whitepaper was literally signed under a pseudonym? How fucking dense are people. Literally sub 75 iq.

[Anonymous No.15508049]

>>15507940
>Shadders told CSW he didn't want to see him sign with the Satoshi keys after CSW literally offered to show him in private
This is the exact same thing Roger Ver said. It is clear that Craig has an abusive and toxic sociopathic personality (or should I say persona? lol) where he is able to manipulate and spell people into doing and saying what he wants to. Roger luckily managed to break the conditioning and exploitation by Craig, but it breaks my heart to see and intelligent man and great programmer like Shadders be trapped in the web of an abusive person like Crej

[Anonymous No.15508058]

>>15506258
Kys cuckstream shill

[Anonymous No.15508390]

>>15508049
>intelligent man and great programmer like Shadders be trapped in the web of an abusive person like Crej
This interview is so fucking awkward it hurts. Roger is rich af and doesn't need some sociopath to make him more money. Shadders is 100% being paid off for this kind of nonsense, don't feel sorry for him he is doing this to himself.

>>15508058
Literally nobody on the planet should hold Satoshi's keys other than Satoshi himself which is why it would be pretty good fucking evidence. But please, if it isn't sufficient evidence then who else could possibly hold them? Also why would he do retarded private "demonstrations" that have been debunked? And why forge documents? A signed message would shut everyone in the world up and bring a lot of needed legitimacy to the BSV joke chain.

You are doing the work of Satan. Change your ways. Go prostitute if you need money. Beg on the streets. Just don't shill this garbage. Biz is already bad enough without you.

[Anonymous No.15509036]

Haha this is epic. What's the easiest way to download the video? I want to save it before they realize the mistake and re-upload a scrubbed version.
Someone should inform Peter McCoremack about this. This is actually good evidence for him in the upcoming court case against craig. I guess they could call shadders in as a witness where he has to say the same thing under oath, and it would be hard for him to get away with lying when we already have it on tape

[Anonymous No.15509112]

>>15506385
He said two different PERSONAS you retard. Look up what that word means. Holy shit how do we stop this invasion of pajeets in crypto??

[Anonymous No.15509152]

>>15509036
How stupid are you? Shadders literally says there is 0 doubt in his mind that Craig is Satoshi, and that his deep and complex knowledge of Bitcoin is literally years ahead of anyone else is more than enough proof for him. Seeing proof for him would be like an insult to the impressive work that Craig has been doing.

The entire interview is basically Shadders praising Craig as Satoshi, WATCH IT YOU FUCKING PAKIS and stop shitting up the board

[Anonymous No.15509772]

>>15509112
"Its unfair to Craig Wright and its unfair to Satoshi Nakamoto. Theyre two different personas."
- so, Shadders be saying, creg is full schizo ?
Above is either an admission that cregs a fraudulent fat lying bastard (oh, the surprise), a Freudian slip or indicative of deeper mental problems, as noted. Pick one

[Anonymous No.15510398]

>>15506758
different Personas... learn english you fuck.

[Anonymous No.15510407]

>>15509772
>Above is either an admission that cregs a fraudulent fat lying bastard (oh, the surprise), a Freudian slip or indicative of deeper mental problems, as noted. Pick one
This. No matter how you twist and turn the words in that interview the result is the above. Stop enabling this sad person

[Anonymous No.15510428]

meanwhile, I´ll just leave this here. Check it and think again if it really matters if Craig is Satoshi or not.

[Anonymous No.15510521]

>>15506274
Faggot

[Anonymous No.15510824]

>>15509772
>so, Shadders be saying, creg is full schizo ?

I think you're projecting Greg.

[Anonymous No.15510922]

>>15510824
ohno, I'm saying, you can't claim to be someone else for the purposes of financial gain, provide absolutely zero proof, get caught forging documents, lying and absolutely btfo in the process. Then, have your employees claim, 'oh it's unfair to ask ANY questions, that is a different person(a)..'
AND NOT HAVE PEOPLE ASK, WHAT. THE. FUCK. IS THIS FOR FRESH SCAM HORSESHIT ? SO, IS HE THEN SATOSHI ? EH ? AND WHEN WILL HE PROVIDE PROOF, FINALLY ? (stop laughing at the back) OR, IS fat creg ONLY SATOSHI ON Tuesdays and Bank Holidays ?
ANSWER THE FUCKING PEOPLE ALREADY. GODDAMMIT. OR ADMIT, FINALLY, bsv/nChain ARE JUST LYING CONMEN TRYING TO STEAL FOLKS CASH BY LYING TO THEM, REPEATEDLY. PROOF, OR FUCK OFF

[Anonymous No.15511652]

>>15510922
good FUD
https://youtu.be/pNZyRMG2CjA?t=2

[Anonymous No.15511659]

bumping this so more people get the warning

[Anonymous No.15511865]

>>15511659
>11 posts by this ID
Or see how retarded you really are, Greg

[Anonymous No.15512499]

>>15506385
>>15506758
>>15507071
>>15510398
>>15509112
that's not the important part
the important part here is calling the media and then not signing a simple message like his name
anyone that has used electrum or a command line wallet knows how fucking pathetic and easy it is
a toddler could sign a message on a bitcoin address it's that easy

pic related, it's the interface for electrum, you can take the old private keys, sweep them and then sign any fucking message

[Anonymous No.15513077]

>>15510922
Take your meds schizo

[Anonymous No.15513091]

>>15512499
It's not in his interest to sign, tough luck. The are other ways to know that he created Bitcoin but most people are too retarded to understand it.

Their loss.

[Anonymous No.15513328]

>>15513077
>schizo
appologies, someone(s) else appears to have been posting under my userID. Previous employees with a grudge must have broke in to 'my systemz' and planted those messages, years ago. Either that, or thats my 'ANGRY ALLCAPS' persona taking over, again. But its not fair, your asking me about HIM, is it now ? Would you like to GO TO COURT CUNT, eh ? ACTUALLY I'M OP. (specially if he's got a large wallet)
>bursts into tears. goes to jail.

[Anonymous No.15513436]

>>15513077
would you like to be 'interviewed' by a guy who used to work for the BBC btw ? Go on, it'll be fun. We hired him in some desperate, pathetic attempt to appear credible, because actual journalists keep laughing at us or asking some boring shit about Fatboy Fraud. Like 'wheres the proof ? eh ?' Fucking journalists. This ones cool tho, we pay him to write whatever shit we want. 2.30 Tuesday good for ya ?

[Anonymous No.15513559]

>>15513091
>The are other ways to know that he created Bitcoin
please to go ahead and share inviolable proofs with all us retards Sir. Enlighten us. PROVE them Courts, and Judges, and Journalists, and Twitter Users, and bloggers, and doubters, and etc. etc., ALL these DOUBTERS worldwide who call creg a Fat Lying Fraudulent Cunt, go on, and PROVE them all wrong !
>crickets

[Anonymous No.15514457]

>>15508049
>but it breaks my heart to see and intelligent man and great programmer like Shadders be trapped
cry not for these soup takers, for they know only too well the lie they live. Shadders should have brought a longer spoon to Calvins pig party. Too fucking late now - wave that rep 'bye bye'
BUT where have all the bsv shills gone ? They disappeared, all of a sudden. Funny that. Isn't it

[Anonymous No.15514494]

>>15506258
you blockstream shills are relentless, bilderberg has a lot of you on the payroll. go ahead, imply that i'm a pajeet faggot

[Anonymous No.15514527]

>>15513559
>Dr. Wright and David Kleiman entered into a 50/50 partnership to develop Bitcoin intellectual property and to mine bitcoin

>DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers this 27th day of August, 2019, at West Palm Beach in the Southern District of Florida.

>signed -BRUCE REINHART
>UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
btfo blockstream faggot

[Anonymous No.15514561]

>>15514527
'for the purposes of' = I know creg is a lying cunt, but, using this phrase is the easiest way to fuck him over. Did I mention creg is a lying cunt ? Heres me mentioning (lots) creg is a lying cunt. Any further questions ? No ? Good.

[Anonymous No.15514565]

It didnt matter who satoshi is, it doesnt matter who satoshi is, it will not matter who satoshi is, BSV follows the whitepaper and the writtings of satoshi. BTC doesnt. Bydefinition the longest chain with the most hash is bitcoin. That crown belongs to BTC. Nevertheless BTC is doomed and a dead man walking. BSV has the potential and the armaments to dethrone and rule supreme. No othe Blockchains are necessary and in time no other Blockchains will survive excpt BSV. IfBSV fails, and a lot of people are wishing it to fail, humanity fails with it. Learn and use BSV, or say hello to your old masters fiat and central banking.

[Anonymous No.15514588]

>>15513559
We know you are paid to attack Craig and BitCoin SV on the internet, but please try harder man, you couldn't look more desperate.

[Anonymous No.15514589]

>>15514561
>financial times
my source was the court documents faggot, not some gossip magazine

[Anonymous No.15514598]

>>15514565
>If BSV fails, and a lot of people are wishing it to fail, humanity fails with it
damn. pack it up boys, the failure of the fat australian's fraud has doomed us all
>>15514589
>not this shit again.jpg
I suspect you might find, them words were the gospel of Based Judge Bruce Himself, actually. Why are you cunts invariably too fucking thick to recognize, what is -obviously- part of a legal Judgement ? So, THE JUDGE is calling your boy a lying, fraudulent cunt. Would you care to comment on that FACT then ? No ? Thought not

[Anonymous No.15514608]

>>15514561
The Judge asserted that Craig created Bitcoin, it's DONE. Switch to a new talking point Greg. Here how about this one:

"Ackschually Craig might be Satoshi, but it's not that important anyway!"

It's over dude.

[Anonymous No.15514617]

>>15514608
The Judge asserted no such fucking thing, you lying fucking weasel. He in FACT asserted entirely the opposite, namely, he had neither intention nor need to be sticking his oar into that shitpile. This is also the same Judge that is calling creg (unmistakably) a lying fraudulent forging perjuring fuck btw. Just in case you missed that part. He did go on about it at some length tho

[Anonymous No.15514625]

>>15514608
and btw, your Pic Related really is someone who should be on their meds. Or off the vino. Fucking nonsensical babble

[Anonymous No.15514677]

>>15514617
>The court deems the following FACTS to be established for purposes of this action: (1) Dr. Wright and David Kleiman entered into a 50/50 partnership TO DEVELOP Bitcoin intellectual property and to mine bitcoin

>SIGNED BRUCE REINHART

>The court deems the following FACTS to be established for purposes of this action: (1) Dr. Wright and David Kleiman entered into a 50/50 partnership TO DEVELOP Bitcoin intellectual property and to mine bitcoin

>SIGNED BRUCE REINHART

>The court deems the following FACTS to be established for purposes of this action: (1) Dr. Wright and David Kleiman entered into a 50/50 partnership TO DEVELOP Bitcoin intellectual property and to mine bitcoin

>SIGNED BRUCE REINHART

Now KYS Greg.

[Anonymous No.15514697]

>>15514617
wait, you mean the same judge that was Epsteins lawyer?

[Anonymous No.15514710]

>>15514677
again, one last time:
'for the purposes of this action' =
'while the defendant is (obv.) a compulsive lying sack of shit who we can't trust to tell us his name without lying, we have to use SOMETHING to base the Judgement on. Thus, said lying sack of shit will be 'assumed' to have x-billion BTC so I can award half of them to someone who might actually be a rightful owner, namely, the plaintiff. AND JUST IN CASE YOU MISSED THE POINT: here is 10-odd fucking pages of me, The Judge, calling this wanker a lying fraudulent perjuring cunt. etc'
>>15514697
And who was the Judges in Australia that BTFO'd the fat loser in EVERY instance there ? The Judge in Bong who told the fat cunt to pack up his useless shit and go home in the Ver case ? SEE A PATTERN HERE ? EVERY fucking Judge the fat dick HAS EVER BEEN NEAR hated him EVERY FUCKING ONE. Jesus. How much of an annoying dick would you need to be ?

[Anonymous No.15514720]

>>15514625
>projecting

[Anonymous No.15514723]

>>15514720
Dude. read it. slowly. its fucking nonsense

[Anonymous No.15514731]

>>15514723
>dumbfuck
read
>>15514527

[Anonymous No.15514735]

>>15514710
How much are you getting paid to lie about this? Is it per comment or do you get paid for your effort?

[Anonymous No.15514756]

>>15514735
What part is 'lies', exactly ? go on, I'll wait.
I don't actually recall my being before a court and being called a fucking liar/forger/etc over about 10 pages by a Judge recently. Now, if its liars you seek, maybe, the Good Judge here knows one when he sees one ? They have to listen to lying cunts like creg every day. Can you imagine. Be like working for bsv

[Anonymous No.15514785]

>>15514756
Whether he forged documents or not is besides the point; he can still be Satoshi and also forge documents, one does not exclude the other.

What you are obfuscating is the fact that the judge has ruled as a fact that Craig created Bitcoin together with Dave Kleiman. It's right there in the court documents.

Must be hard to have your job right now when you literally have to demand people to ignore their own eyes and listen to your lies instead.

[Anonymous No.15514796]

>>15514785
>Maybe creg's a liar, DOESN'T MATTER
>Maybe creg's a forger, DOESN'T MATTER
>Maybe creg has no proof, DOESN'T MATTER
m-maybe.. he's not Satoshi either ?
AGAIN, I'm not the one fucking lying here.
and you know it

[Anonymous No.15514809]

>>15514785
no, >>15514756
has to reinforce it to himself that craig is a liar and a fraud. He can´t be my Saint Satoshi. It doesn´t matter that the judge inplicitly has to admit that Craig was in part at least the creator of bitcoin, it cant be, because that would mean that he is right, and that bitcoin does scale and that blockstream stuck it up anons bum without anon noticing it.

[Anonymous No.15514813]

>>15514494
Heh if u can’t beat em join em bucko

[Anonymous No.15514857]

>>15514809
The judge IMPLICITLY ruled out having anything to do with that shitfest, as noted 50 fucking times already. FIRST POINT made:
>First, the Court is not required to decide, and does not decide, whether Defendant Dr. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto, the inventor of the Bitcoin cybercurrency.2 The Court also is not required to decide, and does not decide, how much bitcoin, if any, Dr. Wright controls
NONE OF THAT in any, way, shape or form 'admits' fatboy was 'the creator of Bitcoin' nor anything remotely of the sort, you disingenuous lying fucking shill. I like how you take one sentence tho (one which actually states the opposite of what you claim) and turn it inside out to try (and fail) to prove a point WHILE IGNORING THE NEXT 20 PAGES POINTING OUT, IM-FUCKING-PLICITLY, WHAT A LYING DISREPUTABLE CONMAN creg is. Talk about fucking cherry-picking. Youre right to pull up your colleague prev. there tho - him admitting, creg actually forges documents ? Dangerously off-reservation that. Start admitting ANY truth to yourselves over this con, how soon the rest of the house of bullshit collapses. Get the sackcloth back over their heads, quick.

[Anonymous No.15514863]

>>15510428
compare that to BTC and LN, a shit show that cant get even the most basic function of value transfer in order be it onchain 5tx/s or offchain: https://medium.com/crypto-punks/lightning-network-ux-centralization-b517037b92ec and on top of that "4 weeks"until we disclose the vulnerability that may lead to loss of funds as was tweeted by core lead developer.
https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1167452784888819714

[Anonymous No.15514984]

>>15514857
You are a funny little paid Jew, I'll give you that.

[Anonymous No.15515035]

>>15514857
>#notmysatoshi
>#cregmanbad
shit's starting to feel like pre-election in here

[Anonymous No.15515307]

>>15514857
dude, the judge can try to weasel himself out with legalese or whatever, I dont care. Mere logic between you and me now: Judge orders 480k to be handed over.... because two guys had a partnership and mined 480k*2. Nobody in that oh so beloved court of yours denies the mining of the amount, so that is one rule of the logic game. the 480k*2 exist. If they dont exist there is no basis to play this logic game. Since the judge and all parties involved accept the rule that the coins exist the game goes on. Since the judge ruled 50-50 , it means that CSW is at lest 50% Satoshi. If it were true what the judge would write, that CSW is a lying conman then the verdict would be 100% to Ira/Dave and CSWgets nothing plus jailtime, for being the lying prick that he is , but now doing it under oath.... I mean if the judge really despises CSW he had everything laying out in front of him to send him out in an orange jumpsuit.

now, csw aint in no jumpsuit, the game was played, so the only logical state is: csw is by law now =>50% Satoshi, Dave is dead, CSW is alive.... I dont know man, 50% satoshi is more than your sorry ass wil ever get credit for. Fraud.... Fraud my ass, Blockstream are the frauds, misleading so many into a known dead end. I really hope they pay you well.

[Anonymous No.15515394]

>>15515307
>the judge can try to weasel himself out with legalese or whatever
wut
>it means that CSW is at lest 50% Satoshi
stop this now. puleese. This bizarre bullshit has zero basis in reality, relativity nor any other fucking thing. FOR ABSOLUTELY THE LAST TIME, the Judge CATEGORICALLY STATED, he was not ruling, nor inclined to, on that issue, precisely for this reason. You shill cunts ignore the other 20 pages btfo'ing crag entirely and use the 50-50 ruling as some kind of moral victory sign. Fatboy got FUCKING REKT, SAVAGED, TORN A NEW ASSHOLE in court, end of. The 50-50 was, AS STATED, a convenience to hang some ruling on, guven te utter absence of truthful testimony elsewhere. All concerned (except maybe Ira) are only too aware, creg will never pay shit anyway
>csw aint in no jumpsuit
a temporary state of affairs that will be resolved, shortly. He's already been declared guilty as shit, they just ain't got around to hanging him yet. Also, the amount of BTC is never specified. Doing so will cause fatboy further legal difficulties
>really hope they pay you well
only liars get paid

[Anonymous No.15515443]

>>15506291

this is probs just some freelance shit he’s doing to fill in time between jobs.