[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 63 KB, 960x498, EDiv8t2XoAAepzl.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15475203 No.15475203 [Reply] [Original]

Are you ready for it? It starts tonight
https://twitter.com/IPAPool/status/1168584840524029952

>> No.15475256

Normies will think this is a sponsorship from Bitcoin. Craig Wright is a mong.

>> No.15475320
File: 100 KB, 810x539, 0_swr_ayp_250419kit5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15475320

>>15475256
>Normies will think this is a sponsorship from Bitcoin
It is, so what's the problem?

>> No.15475384

>>15475320
The problem is that they're paying for advertising that is more helpful to their main competitor than to themselves. It's akin to Coca-Cola making an advert with a massive Pepsi logo with small print saying "buy coke instead".

>> No.15475810

>>15475384
True, but soon BTC will be forced to change the name to something other than Bitcoin. Remember, Craig has the legal right to the name and a small bird recently told me he is about to enforce his copyright. Another thing to note is no one has challenged his copyright. Really makes your thinker think, doesn't it?

>> No.15476809

which one of these fellas is 'BSV will win'
https://twitter.com/IPAPool/status/1160986901941227520

>> No.15476856

>>15475810
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License

>> No.15476869

>>15475810
Kys

>> No.15477313

>>15476856
LOL. I'm talking about the Bitcoin NAME and you counter with a SOFTWARE license? You actually believe MIT Licence is the same as copyright? That is so stupid it's hilarious.

>> No.15478032

>>15477313
I'm not countering anything retard
you are not going to patent the name of a MIT license open source project after years of operation and expect it do gain traction and legal rights over any fucking name LMFAO
you can't just start browsing github, look at a project and patent it's name to force the owners to give it up to you
delusional faglord

>> No.15478468

>>15478032
>patent the name
You have no idea what you're talking about do you? A patent is not the same as a copyright at all. As for the MIT license you should read the Wikipedia article you linked to, because it is not what you seem to think. Why do you act this uninformed?