An olive branch to all the nulinkers

[Anonymous No.15407795]

I'm not a selfish piece of shit like most here so I'll give you some help
There are basically two groups posting about link now:
Fucking idiots who tried to swing and are now way out of the money from google/coinbase
They fud to try to get back in because they're faggots
OG link holders who have big stacks and fud because theyre bored
There used to be a third group who dug for clues etc. but really at this point we'll know if link is everything we thought it was by the end of 2019, so now its just a waiting game

A few examples:
any normal person would look at these 700k transfers and think they're either being sold to fund development or being transferred to blue chip partners
If you had half a fucking brain you'd look at the price and see it's still up massively from the historic speculative value, so either 700k chunks of buy pressure aren't dropping the price (which is incredibly bullish) or there are partners big enough to command $2mm stakes from the get-go for their participation (which is incredibly bullish).
Similar shit can be seen in "muh TA" threads etc.

Remember, this place is a grinder and 99% of what you read here is a lie or at least an inside joke that you don't get if you haven't been here at least a year.

Also remember this: this fucking circlejerk found the absolute best investment in the most scammy emerging market the world has ever seen. In other words, autist incel neets have outperformed literally all other value investor groups because of the brutal culture here. Stick around and it's worth it.

[Anonymous No.15407821]

>>15407795
DR:NS

[Anonymous No.15407826]

>>15407795
ill give you an olive branch and let you know coinbase pump has deleted itself and people who got left behind at 1.80 already bought back in at a slight lose

[Anonymous No.15407836]

So what do you say anon? Buy link and wait?

[Anonymous No.15407869]

$1.49 eoy

[Anonymous No.15407871]

>>15407836
Pretty much what we been saying for two years

[Anonymous No.15407880]

>>15407821
Here's another one for anyone who actually wants to read:
Everyone who has been around knows that the team basically works and releases things when they're done. They work transparently. This makes the project attract larpers and swingfags because they know the normal scammy crypto cycle ("wait for our huge announcement at this conference") and can fake that for link.

Literally all you need to know about the project is now right here:
https://market.link/search/nodes?sortBy=created_at&sortOrder=desc&page=1

If you go there you will know all the certified nodes in the network. That's where you'll hear about banks running nodes first if link is everything we think it is.
Larpers are literally people with lives so pathetic that they have nothing other to live for than interaction on an anonymous image board.
They will do anything to get this and actually don't care much about price, they're just desperate losers
The oldfags will demand insane levels of proof to believe a larp for this reason. You should do the same.

[Anonymous No.15407881]

>>15407795
I have a question as a newfag, why is there an oracle problem in the first place? Can't the data be recieved from inside of a smart contract checking multiple nodes?

[Anonymous No.15407897]

>>15407871
Imagine posting that chart and thinking it’s bullish. I remember once I used to think the “bubble” meme chart couldn’t be true because then it’d be too obvious, who would ever fall for these cycles if they’re so predictable. Now I have first hand witnessed how anyone can essentially become cognitive dissonant to their investment and hold through a crash lmao

[Anonymous No.15407914]

>>15407795
Who cares.
Let's discuss about nodes.
So let's suppose CL price is 9k by the 2021. So a node has to have substantial amount of CL at stake as a leverage for a contract.
How can a new node in 2021 can compete with nodes which have substantially more tokens locked in and where created in 2020 when the price was 5$.
There is no way new node can gather up so much tokens to become relevant in the market with it's low leverage, when an old node can offer contract coverage 1000x bigger than a new one.
The question would be how much for api call, guys?
When would that 9k link pay itself off?

[Anonymous No.15407918]

>>15407826
Way to justify your failures swingtranny
>>15407836
Here's some big brain big dick shit for you:
The most powerful people in the world think smart contracts are the most important economic innovation for the forseeable future
Smart contracts need a code execution layer and an oracle layer to make them valuable
The code execution layer is replicable and will be hotly contested
It will capture a small amount of the value added by smart contracts
The oracle layer is a de facto monopoly and will capture the vast majority of the value add for the most important economic innovation of your lifetime

Chainlink has already won the oracle war

What the fuck do you think you should be doing

[Anonymous No.15407928]

>>15407897
the entire DRNS meme the linkers have come up with shows how delusional they have become, there's no point in trying to debate with "investors" that loudly and proudly declare they are ignoring anything said about their investment.

[Anonymous No.15407940]

I doubt we'll see any SWIFT announcement, ever

Chainlink is and will be the only oracle solution,
but SWIFT will likely upset and we'll dump hard.

[Anonymous No.15407956]

>>15407881
The answer from a game theory perspective is very complex but that answer is no
A simpler explanation is one of safety and utility:
When you're a startup you could spend your time coding outlook, but you don't you buy it from microsoft. You do this because everyone uses it, its secure and it eliminates one path of "we fucked up and failed" from your startup.

In ten years if you don't use chainlink as your api bridge (because its the absolute standard) there's a good chance you'll be sued by your investors. Seriously.

[Anonymous No.15407965]

>>15407897
This is a perfect example of the kind of mindless fud you will see around here
This makes sense if you're stupid and don't think
Because most of crypto hypes itself nonstop
But it can only be believed by the kind of idiot who knows literally nothing about the project

[Anonymous No.15407988]

>>15407880
>Chainlink
>transparency

All their damage control statements neither confirm nor deny what they’re doing with the Binance transfers.

[Anonymous No.15407991]

>>15407914
Have you even thought about this question for five minutes? Are you actually this stupid?

Any new competitior has to beat the established players on some front. The most successful new nodes will be bringing previously unavailable data sources or API actions (transfer the deed of a house, confirm the death of a person, modify an in-process order on an automated factory etc etc etc)

Same as it ever was

[Anonymous No.15407997]

>>15407965
Explain to me, succinctly, the value proposition of purchasing LINK for an institution.

[Anonymous No.15407998]

Fuck off sirgay, we're not buying your exit scam.

[Anonymous No.15408007]

>>15407795
Pee pee poo poo

[Anonymous No.15408014]

>>15407991
Good guy op restoring /biz one thread at a time. This is actually interesting to read.

[Anonymous No.15408015]

>>15407928
Look at Tesla and Apple delusional fanfare investors.
Those people drive stock price into infinity, meanwhile company is doing really bad, but they are still delusional. You can't short on them no matter how many maths and geometry you apply, there is no way you will change their mind about their favorite brand and their stocks.
I see this is being applied to Cl and it's happening and being applied.

[Anonymous No.15408018]

>>15407928
Because they're sick of the constant retard fud from human wastes like you
you're the problem
>>15407940
Because why? again, brainless FUD with literally every PR statement still mentioning their work with swift
>>15407988
Read above you moron, literally either way its bullish
If the price was crashing to sub 50c where it was for years and we actually were getting dumped on it would be bearish

[Anonymous No.15408036]

>>15407795
>by the end of 2019
this is why no one likes you goal post moving faggots. It'll be by the end of 2020 next year. Then 2021.

[Anonymous No.15408039]

Did read now shopping

[Anonymous No.15408044]

>>15407998
You are the problem with this board
The world would be better off without you
>>15407997
Institution looking to sell smart contract insurance/derivatives etc: for use in paying link nodes that constitute their product
Institution looking to sell their data or API access: to enter the market with a significantly staked node that alleviates new partners from fearing counterparty risk, thereby securing them a novel revenue stream

[Anonymous No.15408051]

>>15407991
Who told you you can't provide same data, all point of many nodes is to provide same data and to compare it against each other to catch lies.
Am I wrong on this?

[Anonymous No.15408058]

>>15407881
The process of checking multiple nodes is a bidding war. Chainlink is the marketplace that facilitates those bids.

So you're correct in the method of solving the oracle problem. It's a "problem" because it has no absolute solution. There (still, even after chainlink,) exists no way to KNOW you're getting correct data. However, using game-theory, we can account for the tragidy-of-the-commons by harshly punishing defecting nodes, such that we get correct answers with statistical certainty even without absolute certainty. Link is the platform that allows for that outcome.

[Anonymous No.15408060]

>>15407918
>Chainlink has already won the oracle war

but you wouldnt be able to tell us how now would you anon

[Anonymous No.15408066]

>>15408018
there hasn't been any PR statement
only thing said is that Smartcontract is working with SWIFT as per their website,
building their own Smart Oracle

likely SWIFT will run their own node and sell API data. Right?

So, they might announce something.. but
Chainlink aren't on the list of SIBOS speakers.
and the Chainlink product itself isn't ready to serve this purpose.

So, you think a SWIFT announcement.. 6 months ahead of time? 1 year maybe? How long will staking, TEEs, take(necessary for SWIFT).

[Anonymous No.15408076]

>>15408007
great
>>15408014
Thanks
>>15408015
Then literally use the smart contract networks available to you to make a derivative that allows you to short link
You will have no shortage of people taking your bet
But you wont because you're stupid and a coward
>>15408036
When has PSD2 changed dates?
How can you be a goalpost moving faggot when your asset is up 1500% in a bear market?
>>15408039
Still amazing that you can get link for two bucks

[Anonymous No.15408083]

>>15407795

But fundamentally LINK has no commercial use case because ETH can't scale, and therefore there will be no commercial e-commerce customers.

I challenge the OP to fucking answer this.

[Anonymous No.15408086]

>>15408083
Blockchain agnostic; threshold signatures

[Anonymous No.15408089]

>>15407869
cringe
yikes
ugh
um, okay, wow
discord tranny
leftypol
reddit
fagfag
doublenigger

[Anonymous No.15408093]

>>15407795
Price prediction. Stupid question and prob out of topic i know. But i need some opium from someone who knows more than i do. Also 50k enough to make it in 2020? I mean 5M$ atleast.

[Anonymous No.15408096]

>>15408083
port CL onto blockchain that is able to do what you want.

[Anonymous No.15408097]

>>15407795
>Also remember this: this fucking circlejerk found the absolute best investment in the most scammy emerging market the world has ever seen. In other words, autist incel neets have outperformed literally all other value investor groups because of the brutal culture here. Stick around and it's worth it.
stop spoonfeeding them

[Anonymous No.15408105]

>>15408051
Did you even read or understand your own question?
If you want to break into a market you generally can't just copy the market leader and sell for the same price
You have to be better
I told you how to be better
>>15408058
This is why stupid people still don't get it: when you do something new you don't have to beat perfection, you have to beat the current system by a margin. The project as it stands beats the current system and has at least two more years of network improvements that will make it absolutely crush the competition long term.

[Anonymous No.15408119]

>>15407795
I own 1500 LINK, will I make it and when?

[Anonymous No.15408122]

>>15407795
>99% of what you read here is a lie
posts lies and tells everyone hes is lying just for lols. truely based. nulinkers are chum

[Anonymous No.15408127]

>>15408060
First people didn't know or care about the oracle problem, and chainlink was focused on solving it
Then they realized that it was important and a bunch of crypto retards started projects that were worse than chainlink
Then they realized their projects were miles behind and doomed to fail, so they ran for partnerships with chainlink

Literally the only people who have any chance of beating chainlink are trying desperately to surrender to chainlink

Can you name a more total victory?

[Anonymous No.15408129]

W O R T H L E S S
S H I T C O I N

[Anonymous No.15408134]

>>15408119

[Anonymous No.15408141]

>>15408066
So your entire fear is that things might not time out exactly as you personally would like it for the best investment you will ever see in your lifetime?
Life must be really hard for you

[Anonymous No.15408159]

>>15408105
So at the end market player becomes one node with one API?
How's that a smart contract, when you have to trust one node?

[Anonymous No.15408166]

Bump
Good thread for once

[Anonymous No.15408167]

>>15408141
You're working in overdrive here haha.

All I said was that we'll dump hard if there is no SWIFT announcement. Fucker

[Anonymous No.15408195]

>>15407795

How about we fucking hate you fsggots and your scam and a useless non-pointer token has less thsn zero purpose.

SCAMMED

[Anonymous No.15408197]

>>15408086
>Blockchain agnostic

That's not actually an answer, you fucking brain-dead, drooling spastic.

ETH is the only blockchain that has a hope in hell of ever being used by e-commerce, and it currently has no ability to scale, so there will be no e-commerce use.

Other shitcoins are not even worth discussing because they are a fucking side show.

Now go read the white paper, and get back to me with an actual answer, cunt-face.

[Anonymous No.15408202]

>>15408129

/Biz/ I want to tell you a secret, everytime someone replys with a anime picture, its a fucking DISCORD TRANNY FUD .

[Anonymous No.15408203]

>>15407997

Zero

[Anonymous No.15408217]

>>15408096

But NOBODY pays for anything related to Blockchain.

There is no company or commercial firm paying money to use Ethereum/any other smart contract platform.

There isn't anything like that even lined up for the foreseeable future.

LINK will fail because blockchain in general is a commercial failure.

It's basically just a vehicle to launch scams.

[Anonymous No.15408218]

>>15407880
Wouldn't banks be the ones making calls to node operators and not the opposite? Yes i'm new

[Anonymous No.15408224]

>>15408127

Sirgay ripped off the idea.

It's a non problem. No one needs decentralized google searches.

[Anonymous No.15408241]

>>15408083
You know this was asked back during the ruby to go port, right?
Do you remember the answer?
Here's a hint: there's a good chance that the reason moneyskelly doesnt like moneybelly is that transferring your cryptokitty is going to get a lot more expensive after chainlink is fully up

[Anonymous No.15408242]

>>15407918
>The code execution layer
You mean a platform like Ethereum?

[Anonymous No.15408248]

>>15408086
Blockchain agnostic doesn't mean any blockchain can transfer the value asset (link)
For the forseeable future all link transfers will happen on ETH

[Anonymous No.15408263]

>>15407795
There is a 4th group....like me....who FUD to keep away black people. I dont care if white high schoolers or college kids who are late to the party catch on and buy in at 2$ and get a stack of 1,000 LINK. I FUD to keep away as many non whites as possible.

Now...there are some amongst us that are black and hispanic...and they are in fact higher status than blacks and hispanics who I am trying to currently keep out from investing, since they had the presensce of mind to invest when we were investing.

But make no mistake....at the huge yacht party we have on some big yacht...there will be a designated area of the ship for these non whites to party at. And they wont be able to drink from the same vodka faucet as us. And they will be allowed to have hookers to but they will be thr 5-6 out of 10 hookers you see on craigslist...and also high value gay escorts as well since blacks are more pre-disposed to being faggots than whites which is why they have a higher % of AIDS

[Anonymous No.15408275]

>>15408089
ok
>>15408093
asking for a price prediction on link is like asking if a retarded kid will cry or shit next
Crypto investors are the literal dumbest investor group on the face of the earth, except at the very extremes
How long tron and bitconnect buyers can fail to see the value of link is impossible to predict
>>15408096
Again, it allows for execution layer agnosticism but link payments and job calls have to go through eth

[Anonymous No.15408285]

The best post in a long, long time. I'm constantly asking myself what kind of people would post this dumb fud and actually believe it.

[Anonymous No.15408293]

>>15408203

This.

As long as there is no demand for blockchain-based services, LINK has literally zero value is nothing more than a novelty, a theoretical exercise in creating a centralized oracle.

[Anonymous No.15408305]

>>15408263
Lmfaoooo based.

What about Assyrians.

Pls no bully

[Anonymous No.15408342]

>>15408263
Fuckin based, keep up the good work

[Anonymous No.15408351]

>>15408285
I have a theory that it's actually a bunch of BTC maximalists. Too stubborn to see that there is value beyond bitcoin, but not quite stupid enough to be able to ignore the price appreciation over the past year. Their response: fear.

[Anonymous No.15408354]

>>15408167
Stay on script, pajeet. You're not getting paid to think.

[Anonymous No.15408381]

>>15407795
Sergey read, he's selling

[Anonymous No.15408387]

>>15408097
Unless you were the motherfucker pooling eth for the ico someone spoonfed you
Get over it
>>15408119
Depends on your discipline
If you have a lot, you'll make it
Ironically if you have a lot of discipline you'll probably make it regardless of link
>>15408122
Fuck off swingtranny
>>15408129
You too
>>15408134
K
>>15408159
You have to trust one data source in circumstances where that data source is monopolized
That is not the vast majority of use cases
Chainlink enables useful smart contracts
It doesn't bend the laws of reality
>>15408166
Thanks
>>15408167
It may, it may not
The swinglink retards tried desperately to pnd web3 and basically nothing happened
If the team said we're going swift in 2019 and they didn't it would definitely crash
If incel larpers say it who cares
>>15408195
Another person who shouldn't exist
>>15408197
Also wrong
All of the first implementations will be link oracle and permissioned projects eg corda and sawtooth for excution
ironically those layers may get so popular that they become pseudo public chains by default
>>15408202
Not true
>>15408203
Dilate tranny
>>15408217
This statement is immediately verifiable as false
Die in a fire
>>15408218
No problem being new, just don't be a bitch
Chainlink gets you paid for doing two things: providing data triggers for smart contracts and providing the outputs through API access. banking APIs are the most important players here, so every time the bank transfers, freezes or does some other banking shit in response to a smart contract the bank effectively gets paid.
>>15408224
Die retard
>>15408242
Or corda or hyperledger or quorum or polkadot or tezos or etc etc etc etc etc
>>15408263
The greatest irony of this is that even if you actually were trying to be a good racist you're fucking failing at it- if you think there is a big footprint of anyone other than whites some indians and some asians in early stage tech investing you have no idea what you're talking about

[Anonymous No.15408392]

>>15408354
Nice input faggot

[Anonymous No.15408458]

All link threads are boring now

[Anonymous No.15408472]

>>15408202
It's just a meme bro. I bet the Nico poster holds link

[Anonymous No.15408485]

>>15408285
At this point its mostly way out of the money swing fags who sold like leet traders at 80c
They have nothing else in life than to try and get back in
>>15408293
Again, business has been investing big in this for years now
They dont invest without expecting a return
>>15408305
Back to pol until you're smarter
>>15408342
You too
>>15408351
Its possible, but true early btc maximalists have made it and don't care
They may or may not be right but they arent seething every day about how they fucked up
>>15408354
He seemed at least somewhat genuine, but who knows
>>15408381
You clearly didnt read
Because you cant?

[Anonymous No.15408507]

>>15407795
Link will moon regardless of these faggot fudders OP. Just take a deep breath and relax.

[Anonymous No.15408515]

>>15408089
That was being generous. I promise you, it's not worth .59, it isnt worth anything. The link token itself isnt worth anything unless the token has value. Staking a token with no use or on a project that never follows through or implemented has no value. There is no reason that for the next 5 years link will be worth anything. It possibly could in maybe 10, but its purpose isnt necessary and many others can fill the same use case regardless. I'm serious, sit down and think about it for 5 min turd nugget. What need is there for the link token other than to fund the team in developing the actual tech? You are just paying sirgay to eat big macs and pretend he is actually making strides in the cryptosphere. There are actual projects that have government funding and dont need the token for funding/dumping 700k. FTM has enough funding for 2.5 years, without having to dump. It has largely got funding from the government, and companies in SK. They spent millions on research before they had even started developing the ideas. Now they have real developments and a great marketing team, and are working on actually implementing the use cases that ftm can provide. Wait until the end of next month when link is under $2 and ftm is .10. Then watch by mid way next year when ftm is $1 and link is under $1. Link is done, it's not worth a fuck, and many people have come to realize this. Coinbase was the best you guys were ever gonna get and those who didnt sell, lost. Those who bought since $4 are going to drown in their bags. Sorry to tell you, but you're retarded faggot and your dad should have came in a sock

[Anonymous No.15408517]

dem comfy holders

[Anonymous No.15408524]

>>15408485
>Again, business has been investing big in this for years now

Business does not invest in that which makes no money.

You have no evidence for your claim anyway.

[Anonymous No.15408534]

>>15407795
based OP

FYI a large portion of the retard tier FUD spammed on /biz/ since post-mainnet is unironically coordinated. There is at least one dedicated discord group run by a swinging """whale""" paying neets in LINK (kek) to brigade /biz/ with this mind numbing FUD to try and shake out bizlets and accumulate cheaper.

Of course much of the nu-fud comes from legit salty nolinkers, burnt nulinkers and older linkies trolling but a large volume of it is paid pajeetery. The willingness to torpedo /biz/ into the gutter out of pure (((greed))) is fucking pathetic.
>but we need to keep reddit away
We already had 2 years of ingroup filters and language that would drive away redditors anyway, nuking /biz/ wasn't necessary

But it's all in vain because we're never fucking selling. When will they learn?

[Anonymous No.15408543]

comfy hold

[Anonymous No.15408564]

>>15407881
Technically yes, you could just point it to the free public api and be done. Cl does some background nerd shit like encryption and consensus...but let's focus big picture.

Cl is huge and going to be adopted because it monetizes data. Those free apis are gone when neet nodes will pay a subscription or per call percent. Plus the need for 5 10 100 independent raw data sources, even the offbrand providers will make huge profits.

So then you're trying to redesign the wheel, can only ever pay over price vs Cl nodes, with less security and more hassles compared to the 5 min streamlined process marketplaces will make it.

It's dumb and or pointless not to bend the knee to the "standard"...which seems to be link until further notice/3+ year headstart

[Anonymous No.15408578]

>>15408392
I liked it
>>15408458
Start a good one or hold your peace princess
>>15408472
sort of 4chans heritage
>>15408507
I don't care about their effect on link
I care about their effect on /biz/
It would be fucking great if the best investing resource for the next 20 years was knowing how to properly use and navigate biz
Biz legit has a chance of being the biggest billionaire maker of the next decade
I want to live in that world
>>15408515
Again, if you kill yourself the world will be a better place for literally everyone except you
>>15408517
Top meme you got there
>>15408524
https://newvantage.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Big-Data-Executive-Survey-2018-Findings-1.pdf
Now fuck off and die you worthless piece of shit

[Anonymous No.15408609]

>>15408387
THESE LINKS DONT SWING! NEVER ONCE. IM NEVER FUCKING SELLING.

[Anonymous No.15408649]

>>15408534
How pathetic must people be to actually dedicate time to that shit?
I hope they swing from ropes
>>15408543
True
>>15408564
This is somewhat similar to the game theory explanation
>>15408609
This doesn't even make sense

[Anonymous No.15408661]

>>15408578
>https://newvantage.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Big-Data-Executive-Survey-2018-Findings-1.pdf
>Now fuck off and die you worthless piece of shit

Shows no investment or business applications of Blockchain.

In fact, in emphasizes how much businesses fear AI for its disruptive impact and how little Blockchain is perceived as disruptive, and therefore not commercially viable.

Thanks for confirming what I've been saying all along. Businesses are ignoring Blockchain technology, it's a 12-year old, antiquated eMule 2.0 with no actual commercial applications.

No major e-commerce vendor accepts shitcoins. No one is paying for data on the Blockchain.

OP has been exposed as a clueless, and terrified bagholder, with no more insights than the average crypto Twitter faggot Zoomer.

There is no confidence in this gamble, the only people with confidence are those holding 600 million pre-mined tokens, and being able to make greasy dumps above $2.00.

[Anonymous No.15408664]

Let me start by saying :DDDDD

It is so obvious why these "marines" ( which unironically couldnt pass the marines coopetest) are so afraid to even a think that Chainlink was a waste of time & money.
Reading arguments like "There are group of people who pays pajeets to brigade, clearly states that the mindset of these argumenters are
deeply in videogame-mode. Most likely they have spent most of their lives playing Sims, Transport Tycoon or something like.
And in realms of videogames they felt some level of succession; "yehaa, i built a city".
But in real life... Debts, mortages, car, commute to work, boring work... They made money ofc due the education,
but nothing more. And then these "cryptocurrecies" came along and suddenly Game/Real life got mixed.
They have been thinking that now they can succeed in real-life (eventough its just a virtual numbers and charts they keep watching)
But when "fudders" threats this illusions of gaining something... you know... nobody wants to admit it even when you can see the facts, dumps and stocks crumbling.

[Anonymous No.15408703]

>>15408661
Why I'm even responding to a fucking retard like you I have no idea
At least I'll type less
https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/se/Documents/risk/DI_2019-global-blockchain-survey.pdf
>>15408664
Are you actually for real retarded?

[Anonymous No.15408718]

>>15407795
>we'll know if link is everything we thought it was by the end of 2019
no

[Anonymous No.15408734]

>>15408661
Literally says these businesses are investing in blockchain

[Anonymous No.15408759]

>>15407881
Jesus you are a nufag like no one else

[Anonymous No.15408768]

>>15408734

Lmao, crypto is a joke to the business world.

[Anonymous No.15408798]

>>15408718
Great talk
>>15408734
This faggot swingtranny has been owned in every hole he has and can't refute anything posted yet
>>15408759
We all were once
>>15408768
Again, go back to every one of your points where you got blown the fuck out like your moms asshole on a busy tuesday night

[Anonymous No.15408806]

Great thread OP. Thanks

[Anonymous No.15408817]

>>15407897
>I don't know the difference between a market cycle chart and a single asset chart

[Anonymous No.15408826]

This thread got some high quality hopium. Give me a realistic price prediction, OP, I need more hopium

[Anonymous No.15408827]

>>15408076
I appreciate your posts dude. /biz/ has been shit since June 13th.

[Anonymous No.15408832]

>>15408768
Yes, businesses tend to invest in what they consider jokes.

[Anonymous No.15408848]

>>15408768
AI is also very much related to blockchain and co. Look into AGI, for example.

[Anonymous No.15408850]

What's your stack frens?

I am a late 10K'er here - went all in between Google and Coinbase.

[Anonymous No.15408867]

>>15407795
>being sold to fund development or being transferred to blue chip partners

lmao no

[Anonymous No.15408872]

>>15407940
It's unlikely swift would proactively announce that they are using chainlink because real companies don't do shit like that but if you go to chain.link their logo is plastered right on the homepage

[Anonymous No.15408895]

>>15408872
I'm 100% certain that SmartContract has worked or are working with SWIFT on their own oracle

however, what does that actually mean?
Is it it their internal gpi link thing that does nothing for Chainlink (the token/network)?

Will they run a node on the public network?

What do you think?

[Anonymous No.15408906]

>>15408661
Well I am actually for blockchain just not LINK, there is no need for oracles to onboard API data streams into blockchain dapps because blockchain dapps have such narrow functionality. Smart contracts will never be a thing, but cryptocurrencies will eventually replace fiat because fiat is an antiquated method of exchanging value that has been largely unchanged in millennia.
Blockchain is not a tech disruptor it's a finance disruptor.

[Anonymous No.15408919]

What you need to understand is that Link is literally Christ 2.0, our lord and savior brought to earth once more. The first time as a human. This time, as the greatest investment mankind has ever known. The meek shall inherit the earth

[Anonymous No.15408932]

>>15408850
LT. General split into multiple wallets.

OP is right.
My bags been packed but the fud has become a part of me.
I love confusing nulinkers into thinking Is it a fucking scam or what?

[Anonymous No.15408934]

>>15407795
>>15408564
I should also reiterate that CL is focusing on valuable, sensitive business SCs. The 2 tranny fudding "devs" are right, no one is paying money to have secured data on a grindr dapp. Spend the weekend setting up a personal single oracle on a trash spoofable api.

This is for the medium sized trucking company doing 5mm a day gross that requires hundreds of paper shufflers on payroll. Ask a company with 6 figs per day of redundant employees how much trustless automated contract execution is worth

[Anonymous No.15408942]

>>15407795
Great thread OP.
The only fud that gets to me is rarely even discussed on /biz/
I know it wouldn't make sense for most institutions to copy the CL-code and create their own network. But my fear is that it would make sense for swift. Who's telling us that sergey isn't just using CL as a prototype to - once it's finished - just start with swiftlink, where he holds 1/3, 1/3 is held by swift and 1/3 goes will be sold the cooperations instead of ICOed away?

[Anonymous No.15408980]

>>15408197
Dude I work in retail and we are literally implementing blockchain in diverse use cases as we speak
ETH is the only public blockchain that's worth it right now, and we won't even use it because of the Eth foundation block fees.
Hyperledger is where the business is going, lookup FT
IBM got it all right and it's only a matter of time before everyone knows they use Chainlik oracles, just like everyone else.

Chainlink is not that much linked to ETH in the background fren, BC AGNOSTIC is not a meme

[Anonymous No.15408986]

>>15408806
No problem
Glad to be here
Fuck all the losers fudding
>>15408817
This
>>15408826
You didn't read what i said. The prices you see are largely irrelevant now because they're what retard crypto moonbois are willing to pay. Predicting that is a fools game.
If I had access to OTC transaction data I'd share but I don't
>>15408827
Agree. I'm going to make more of an effort to be around even if its just to tell idiots to fuck off and die
The world needs biz
>>15408832
This guy gets it
>>15408848
Yep
>>15408850
Good for you
>>15408867
Provide evidence or silence yourself by suicide
>>15408872
And swift knows the logo is there
>>15408895
Swift currently has a legal obligation to allow outside groups to access banking APIs
Swift has a project which monetizes API access
Is swift are retardeds?
>>15408906
This fucking moron is a good piece of evidence for the anon above who thinks the 90iq fud is muh BTC maximalists
>>15408919
Relax, it's just a really good investment
Literally hundreds of people became rich af from google, from facebook, from intel, from microsoft
Its bigger and more important than those companies, but in the end it will just make you rich
You'll be surprised how little being rich really changes your life

[Anonymous No.15409016]

>>15408768
Just another screenshot from the other report OP linked to. These are companies with minimum $100MM in annual revenue. Many with over $10B.

These are exciting times

[Anonymous No.15409030]

>>15409016
Literally who

[Anonymous No.15409035]

>>15408661
What the fuck does e-commerce businesses accepting shitcoins as payment have to do with chainlink? You lack the most basic understanding of what a smart contract is and the value it can provide.

[Anonymous No.15409057]

>>15407914
The amount of tokens a node has will not matter. Any new node can open up with a small amount of tokens and it will function as long as the number of tokens is enough to stake as collateral for the type of data it is supplying. The way new nodes will become relevant is by providing quality data, and potentially new data not offered by other nodes. Once they are doing this they will gain reputation. Tokens count is not indicative of a higher quality node, we have reputation for that. Also, it doesn't matter if a node has 1 mil link, if it doesn't have the data the requester needs then they won't request data from that node, they will go to the new node that is only staking 100 link but can provide the data they need. That will result in the little guy building reputation.

We have no idea what Costa and returns will be like, the market will decide. This is literally a brand new emerging markets, there is no history to base speculation off of.

[Anonymous No.15409058]

>>15409057
Literally who?

[Anonymous No.15409074]

>>15408986
I'm not a btc maximalist you faggot, I am for cryptoCURRENCIES, plural. There will be many currencies with various degrees of functionality and a high amount of volatility for several years until a currency comes out on top. Could be BTC due to the lindy effect, could be something else. But trust me I did more research on LINK than you can imagine, I made some of the infographics you faggots post, I was in the ICO. I sold most of mine at 40 cents and then my final 'suicide stack' of 50k at 4 bucks so I'm pretty happy. I got my 21 BTC and change. Might buy LINK when sergey stops dumping to ride an echo bubble up but let me tell you conclusively this shit has no long term future because it doesn't solve any real problem. The oracle problem in computer science is more fundamental than creating a decentralised network of nodes, it has to do with the fundamental nature of information. It cannot be solved only mitigated and ultimately corporate bureaucracy will reign supreme because no one will ever allow unmitigated access to world financial markets to a bunch of automated smart contracts where it is conceptually possible for an entire economy to tank due to some glitch.

[Anonymous No.15409085]

>>15409074
Literally who..

[Anonymous No.15409097]

I'll stop posting and you guys can read it for yourself

[Anonymous No.15409100]

>>15409074
>echo bubble
been learning some nu words on twatter fren?

[Anonymous No.15409111]

>>15407795
Fuck you faggot, been waiting over a year, fuck you I'm fucking over it.

[Anonymous No.15409124]

>>15408263
Is /pol/ actually doing something useful for once?

[Anonymous No.15409132]

>>15408932
Take your thumb out of your ass and make biz better
you didnt find link first either
>>15408934
Winner
Whats the margin on a company with billions of revenue
What are back end costs
Whats the margin if you can cut back end costs by 80%
>>15408942
Right now chainlink is owned at least 25% by swift
They could do that just like any company could burn itself to the ground and rebuild to screw their shareholders
But there are some fairly good reasons you rarely if ever see that done
>>15408980
I know its a meme but I think that ethereum eventually becomes primarily the network that exists to transfer link
Kind of like how some high end stuff still runs on early programming languages etc.
>>15409016
Its almost like klaus motherfucking schwab wasnt full of shit
>>15409030
Literally everyone
>>15409035
He's not trying to get it he just wants to try to derail the thread

[Anonymous No.15409151]

>>15409057
This
>>15409058
>>15409085
die
>>15409074
So you're just too dumb to get it, ok
>>15409097
Blockchain in a box isnt really a meme
>>15409100
Seriously
>>15409111
Some of us have been in a lot longer
Grow up you whiny little fuck
>>15409124
They have moments of efficacy amidst the neverending tardsperg

[Anonymous No.15409162]

>>15409097

An important capability of a technology no one uses or will ever use.

Absolutely delusional.

[Anonymous No.15409166]

>>15409151
Fuck you some of us can't afford to wait. I'm not getting any fucking younger fuck you faggot!

[Anonymous No.15409168]

>>15409151
Is there any more pathetic defence than 'ur 2 dumb 2 understand', google dunning-kruger my friend.

[Anonymous No.15409183]

>>15409162
its ok man
we will all go broke and you will feel good yes

little do u know we dont care about our links. its all a possibility and we arent betting our lives on it

[Anonymous No.15409196]

>>15409162
Again, you've been blown out at every turn
Your only options are to apologize or leave
>>15409166
Literally nobody is getting any younger
But you do need to grow up
Otherwise the money will destroy you
Im not joking
>>15409168
If you think the killer application of distributed networks is simple value transfer rather than trust assurance then you deserve to be poor
Watch the next 24 months and come back here to gloat if you're right
I will when I am

[Anonymous No.15409239]

>>15409196
What do you think I possibly want to do? I just want my own fuckin space, my own fuckin car, all used i don't give a shit, and I want to have money to spare. Im not asking for the fucking world. Im already fucked up, i need some form pf escape i can't normally get as a poorfag. I hate fucking work.

[Anonymous No.15409243]

>>15409196
>trust assurance
Except it doesn't assure trust you moron you still have to trust the API source. It's just an unnecessary middleman.

[Anonymous No.15409277]

>>15409239
This is exactly what someone who will be destroyed by money says
Anything you are doing saying or feeling now will just be more with money
Fix your shit now so you're a decently happy wagie, then when the pain of work goes away you wont be forced to confront what a shitty human being you really are
>>15409243
It assures the contract will execute as written
True deterministic contracts have not yet existed
Try to understand

[Anonymous No.15409293]

>>15409243
I'm not saying every time I need to do this I need to just write code that is completely inconsistent and unusable.

I'm just trying to point out that you can't write reliable code under these conditions without adding some sort of bias to the entire process.

So, you're saying that something similar could have been done to my code?

No. Everything that was actually written down in detail was written in a way that was completely consistent with the API. The actual changes are only a change to my understanding of how the API interacts with the underlying hardware.

So I guess you can't rely on their API anymore?

To a certain extent. There's no way to guarantee it 100% of the time.

I see no real benefit to getting this fixed so you're going to release this

[Anonymous No.15409297]

N-n-nice thread op, what do you think about my meme

[Anonymous No.15409326]

>>15409239
Tough shit. Try growing up in the 1920s and not having any of this technology, owning a farm, and raising cattle. Everyone wants a way out today. We have to make the most of what is in front of us. Gives you something to do so enjoy it for what it is. I work in the heat everyday and it isn't easy. That doesn't mean it's impossible. Stop relying on others to buy their bags so you can sell yours.

[Anonymous No.15409329]

>>15409277
You're a faggot. This is how I know that you have lived life on easy mode.
>fix your shit now so you're a decent happy wagie
I bet you have never did physical labor in your entire life.

[Anonymous No.15409343]

>>15409326
Id have loved to, id have been able to shoot guns on a farm, go camping, do woods men shit. That would have been cool if my family actually owned a farm back then. But no were a bunch of poor retards who can only fuck and make other poor retards.

[Anonymous No.15409371]

>>15409243
You mean the same data sources everyone has already been trusting for a century? Oh geez that’ll kill link.

[Anonymous No.15409380]

>>15409329
As someone who has done A LOT of physical labour for a civil construction company (in trenches, shovelling drain rock for days, nearly getting crushed by excavator buckets) i agree with OP's sentiment that your unhappiness is on you and you alone.

[Anonymous No.15409382]

>>15409343
Im just an unhappy motherfucker. I just wish I didn't grow up such a poor filth.
You all are right unironically, it just sucks I just want to move on with my life, not working for some other fag... not having to live with my parents. I've traveled on the road before a few times hoboing around, I'll more than likely go back to doing that because everything else sucks.

[Anonymous No.15409401]

>>15409380
Yea, i have not worked the last couple months, but I haven't been living either, I thought this shit was going to be 20$ by now :/

[Anonymous No.15409439]

>>15408515
>There are actual projects that have government funding
Bullish for link

[Anonymous No.15409441]

>>15407821
Didnt React. Now Suffering.

LOL SCHLOP SCHLOP

[Anonymous No.15409445]

>>15409401
Start working again anon. A sense of purpose/community is essential to happiness. The days that i worked on a construction crew with a bunch of degenerates were some of my happiest.

[Anonymous No.15409467]

feels good to still be early tbqhwya (to be quite honest with you all)

[Anonymous No.15409486]

>>15409445
Dude, whatever little coping mechanism that helps your brain make you feel at home with a bunch of meatheads, I don't have it anymore. Work does not feel fulfilling anymore, i did moving for over 2 years, 99% of clients are jerkoffs, the boss was a jerkoff. My co worker I'm pretty sure was low key downs. I NEED LINK to take off soon. Otherwise I'll probanly an hero. Im fucking done, a bunch of child molesters/murderers can live good lives, I deserve a good one too.

[Anonymous No.15409501]

>>15408263
finally a fucking post that makes sense, thanks anon

[Anonymous No.15409516]

>>15407997
zero

[Anonymous No.15409519]

>>15407795
didn't read, not buying

[Anonymous No.15409527]

well I get back in when link starts going toward 5$ again. if it really moons to 100, 200 or 1000 it's still a massive gain. but right now it's a falling knife and I still comfy on ETH for the time being with nothing to lose.

[Anonymous No.15409533]

>>15409293
Is this English?
>>15409297
Think its time for you to transition
>>15409326
And they had higher levels of self-reported happiness as well
hmmmm......what changed.......
>>15409329
Built a couple businesses, remodeled houses, got a professional degree etc etc etc
I've done more productive work in one year of my life than you have in the entirety of yours
>>15409343
lol
>>15409371
Read the sybil chasm thread, this was discussed in depth
>>15409380
Ironically many of my rich friends spend their time intentionally gardening and doing ranch work
>>15409382
You understand this is fixable, right?
>>15409401
Why would you ever rely on a speculative investment?
>>15409439
lol
>>15409441
Some people
>>15409445
Same for me at a taqueria
>>15409467
now do the 365

[Anonymous No.15409537]

>>15409445
i was just thinking today how relaxing and easy being part of a road construction crew must be. isn't it a great job for somebody broken? and you get to see the outside. unlike dudes who drive around forklifts in depressing warehouses. or have to deliver parcels... i mean you get to see the outside. at least during summer. i am sure winter sucks. and summer sucks, too. if it gets too hot. but the premise is great. because you are outside. and it's easy... you cut open the road. remove dirt from ground to expose some pipe. replace the pipe. or add a new pipe. refill the hole. and put new concrete on it. how relaxing is that? and it's also better than being a fucking farmer who has to till 50000 repetitive fields. because the individual task takes longer. and there's more "complexity" (even if rudimentary) to it.

i also love how this kind of pyramid always tries to slip propaganda "needs" into it that are entirely subjective. i saw the same with some "heteronormative" shit, which tries to add things like polygamy even if it makes no sense. why can't people not be honest and try to push their agendas for once.

[Anonymous No.15409548]

>>15409527
You're making the wrong choice.

[Anonymous No.15409558]

>>15407795
DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB DRNB

[Anonymous No.15409581]

>>15409533
You mean your employees built your business while you just barked orders around? Super. Fucking
Impressive. Seriously go fuck yourself. Stupid old boomer. Like i said, life was handed to you on a silver platter when you were growing up, and you know it. Now fuck off, no one cares about the millionth larp of this month.

[Anonymous No.15409597]

>>15409486
"Bow down before the one you serve, you're gonna get what you deserve".

[Anonymous No.15409603]

>>15409533
>remodeled houses
You mean you told the contractor which colors to use and which shit ply boards to jew out on?

[Anonymous No.15409606]

>>15409486
Would rather keep this thread on CL, but get out of moving. Any retard can do it and nobody wants to do it.
>Go to a technical school and learn a skill (hopefully something that you enjoy and you're naturally good at)
>Get a job performing that skill.
>Take pride in being good at your work.
>Be happy.
>Realize you own CL and be more happy.

[Anonymous No.15409612]

>>15408263

Based. Hispanic here. triple digit IQ.
I understand my people are not worthy of drinking from the same vodka. I hate my brown kind as well.

If u see me, and my perfect fucking english, my 6,2' chad Aryan genes, you would never guess where im from.

pero no importa, porque nunca sabras quien onions.

t. 100k Linkos

[Anonymous No.15409621]

>>15409533
Whats your "professional degree" in?
It all means jack shit. You're just tootin your own horn.

[Anonymous No.15409622]

>>15408387

Estas equivocado broder.

[Anonymous No.15409629]

>>15408934
>>15409132
https://www.ttnews.com/top100/companies/
I've already ran the numbers before in other threads, but I forgot how solid the hoppium is. Obviously not real financial documents for everyone, but years when trucking companies make/take profits, its between 5-10% gross. Theres some LTL and intermodal companies that require tons more paperwork and workers to make profits that throws it off...but using the top20 carrier I contract for: I estimate office backend closer to 60-70%, 10% real estate, rest company drivers and repair staff. They actually turn a profit on equipment/it's negligible after reselling and their bulk discount prices.

Extremely conservative napkin math puts it at 3x profits, probably closer to 5x. Which is in the 650mm-1.5b range. Not factoring in the reduction in office space and support staff (HR cunts).

It also digitizes their systems completely, allowing for things like algorithmic planning to be fully implemented, something that I think is somewhat in use....but far from perfect (it's usually hillbillies that fuck up dividing hours into miles and set appointments faster than the trucks can physically go). Easily a couple hundred mil saved annually from better route/load distribution and planning.

There's tons of other side benefits to SC, like fuel surcharge factoring, accurate distancing/pay per mile, more competitive rates on both shipper and hauling sides, on and on....but it really comes down to walking up to the owners with the sales pitch of the century: "how would you guys like to make 500-1.5 billion dollars yearly, with no extra effort and no drawbacks. Have your IT dept do 5 minutes of setup/customization and you're set"

>How much is that worth? x top 50 companies, x 10-1000 industries.

[Anonymous No.15409663]

>>15407914
step back and look how things are done in other markets. how the hell do i start a business when theres businesses that have been aroudn for 20 years? oh well look at that i can take out a loan and if my business model is better then their and more successful i can make it! same thing with link, as soon as its huge network there will be servies that provide for it, similiar to how your seeing pools and staking features pop up now. there will be says to loan out link for your node if you that much for the contracts you want to provide, think big not small

[Anonymous No.15409676]

>>15409537
I loved construction because the goal as well as your responsibility was so clear. I'm still in construction but at a much higher position and make much more money. However, now i'm relying on many people under me to perform their tasks correctly. The money's nice but you lose a lot of peace of mind with the responsibility you gain.

[Anonymous No.15409679]

THANK YOU OP
Finally someone with a IQ over 100
god bless you and all chainlink holders
1000$ EOY is fud
Stay strong
see you on the yacht

[Anonymous No.15409692]

>>15409132
>Right now chainlink is owned at least 25% by swift
gunna need a sauce for that one captain

[Anonymous No.15409731]

>>15409486
If you think like this you wont be happy rich either
>>15409501
>>15409516
>>15409519
tards
>>15409527
Or one day there happens to be an HSBC node on the explorer unannounced and you're forever poor
>>15409537
Youre starting to see through the psyop
>>15409548
yep
>>15409558
k
>>15409581
I was the only employee for years for all of them
How do you think businesses are built you moron?
>>15409597
Truth
>>15409603
I would say that I flipped houses then
I remodeled them
People pay for quality
>>15409606
dingdingding
>>15409612
fine by me
>>15409621
md/phd (mstp)
>>15409622
ok
>>15409629
Here's the even better part:
Short term existing value capture will dominate
Long term novel value sources will be larger by orders of magnitude
Just like they always are

[Anonymous No.15409733]

>>15407795

People tend to forget what weaponized autism means nowadays

[Anonymous No.15409775]

>>15409731
>Here's the even better part:
>Short term existing value capture will dominate
>Long term novel value sources will be larger by orders of magnitude
>Just like they always are
So link tokens will just go up in value over time?

[Anonymous No.15409780]

what year will we see mass adoption by companies by your estimation? PSD2 i cant see being the catalyst

[Anonymous No.15409781]

>>15409731
>>>>>>>>>
>>15409692
dont ignore this, sauce pls. i also disgree with how you said link is transparent, go and ask rory anything youll get the good old "cant comment on it"

[Anonymous No.15409801]

>>15409663
Fair
>>15409676
This is universally true
The most powerful people on earth are responsible for everything and personally capable of none of it
>>15409679
No problem
>>15409692
Who do you think owns the 350mm?
Who do you think bought the nearly impossible to get into presale?
>>15409733
Maybe I did

OK off with the family for some food and drink- thanks to all for a good thread except the swing/fudfags who deserve their fate
Fuck tripfags, doubt larps and keep biz great
Love you one and all

[Anonymous No.15409813]

>>15408263
I got a BBC anon, I’m taking all the 9-10/10 prostitutes on the mega-yacht, they’ll fuck me for free whilst you pay and there’s nothing you can do about it. You gonna fight another marine? I’ll splatter big-mac sauce all over your fucking white versace silk shirt for even having that thought.
T. Black Male with 9.7K Link

[Anonymous No.15409824]

>>15409801
>Right now chainlink is owned at least 25% by swift
need sauce for this, this isnt redit you actually need to back up what you say otherwise its just air mister

[Anonymous No.15409859]

>>15408664

your brain on 4chan

[Anonymous No.15409862]

incredible thread, op. seriously.

[Anonymous No.15409920]

>>15409824
>this isn't reddit

[Anonymous No.15409926]

>>15407795
this smells rancid

[Anonymous No.15409928]

Thanks OP for providing a rational view of the 700k dumps. I had thought about it from 2 angles basically, that they are expanding, which is good, or they are actually sending LINKs to partners, which is also good. But I didn't think about that if they were dumping, that the price is holding on so well.

[Anonymous No.15409938]

>>15409775
No. He means the shit we can't even fathom/has been invented yet is going to dwarf the billions of dollars saved per year per company. Things like the Jewish scammitry of insuring all these newly digitized assets/contracts. You can start offering weather delay insurance to the shipping companies for 5 bucks per. The early soiboi use-case of flight delay insurance.

Ultimately kikery like SC powered decentralized alarm clock memes that we can't even imagine yet. Something will go big.

[Anonymous No.15409948]

>>15409813
Quit being a nigger and get to 10k

[Anonymous No.15409973]

>>15409938
This all means the valuation of the link token will rise correct?

[Anonymous No.15409988]

crazy how OP disappears when asks to show proof...what do ya know..
>Right now chainlink is owned at least 25% by swift
still waiting for sauce

[Anonymous No.15410015]

>>15409988
I don't think he has proof. Just speculation. Still an interesting thread though.

[Anonymous No.15410028]

>>15409581
Reading all your posts I have determined your IQ to be about 96.

[Anonymous No.15410044]

>>15410028
Now do me!

[Anonymous No.15410056]

>>15409948
Already spending my wagebucks on it

[Anonymous No.15410158]

>>15409486
You have a lot more problems than money dude, you wanna act like you've had a hard life when every single one of us, that is if we live in America, western Europe or the like, exist as the top 1% most wealthy people in the history of the world. While no that doesnt mean you have no right to complain about how the boomers screwed us and how much better off we could be, what it does mean is that people have been happy and have prospered in far far worse conditions, think the Black Plague wiping out half of Europe. Yes we all have problems. And no, we cannot have those problems solved by a magical wave of the hand. Relying on a brand new technology's price to make you happy means youre literally destined to be a depressed mess for the rest of your life.

>>15409581
>You mean your employees built your business while you just barked orders around?
Capital investment and risk. Communist fag.

[Anonymous No.15410177]

>>15409973
Yes, obviously. In my barely top 20 trucking company example, they can afford to spend a bit over 2k a week per truck on SC (3 loads per week roughly), and still profit 800-1 billion extra. Something like 600 bucks per SC wouldn't even make management blink. That's only using company supplied api/diagnostics (GPS etc effectively free) and barebones reciever confirmation; an e-sig trigger.

Obviously it won't be that much to start, and SC will evolve to include other data and triggers and more trusted redundancy which will probably up the price...but yeah.

250 per truck per day is a bargain, which will either lower the overall cost of moving goods, or pump SC technology to 200+ per truck per day.

[Anonymous No.15410245]

>>15409243
This weak fud again, holy shit. Yes its almost like if you wanna know if North Korea is stockpiling nukes out in the open, you have to trust satellite imagery to relay an accurate image of what's going on. Or if you wanna know the weather in New York you have to actually use weather radar in New York or go there yourself.

Chainlink is not a 5th dimensional know everything everywhere all the time jesus eye, believe it or not we still have to rely on existing technology to relay results to us, or, in the case of chainlink, to the oracles.

[Anonymous No.15410307]

>>15409612
>If u see me, and my perfect fucking english, my 6,2' chad Aryan genes, you would never guess where im from.
>*you
>*saw, not see
>no 'and' after "me, " needed, and the word 'and' is needed aftert the second comma
>english and chad must be capitalized
>6,2' written correctly is 6'2"
>'then' needed after final comma
>*I'm, not 'im'

[Anonymous No.15410324]

>>15409527
>well I get back in when link starts going toward 5$ again.
This thinking is why you will always be poor

[Anonymous No.15410337]

>>15407795
>Team owns 65%
>Team aggressively dumping
>Linkers: This is bullish!

[Anonymous No.15410347]

>>15410044
Sorry dude, it's much easier to estimate the IQ of dumb wagecucks than it is for someone with at least 120 IQ.

[Anonymous No.15410447]

>>15408076
>When has PSD2 changed dates?
There has been a year long transitional phase granted by the EU cucks

[Anonymous No.15410464]

>>15440880
>Larpers are literally people with lives so pathetic that they have nothing other to live for than interaction on an anonymous image board.

>>15408986
>You'll be surprised how little being rich really changes your life

This man speaks the TRUTH!

[Anonymous No.15410570]

>>15410015
thats all this thread is..more speculation, anyone following link for the past 2 years could have said anything he did.

[Anonymous No.15410576]

>>15407991
LETTING THE DAYS GO BYYYYYYYYYY

[Anonymous No.15410578]

>>15410464
>Team owns 65%
>Team aggressively dumping
>Linkers: This is bullish!

[Anonymous No.15410716]

>>15410028
IQ is a kike lie.

[Anonymous No.15410759]

>>15407795
>which is incredibly bullish
the link team can do anything and this is the linkie's natural response. if you truly feel this is bullish, just hold and prove us all wrong in a few years.
personally, i hope you guys all make it. i'd love to see how the mentally-handicapped with incredible delusions handle money.

[Anonymous No.15410833]

>>15410759
He gives reasoning why it's bullish, and he's not wrong.

[Anonymous No.15410843]

>>15408305
Assyrian are fine. I met my first Assyrian recently playing poker. Some Jew was mouthing off about stupid Ben Shapiro shit. I said I can't stand Ben Shapiro he's a Zionist. The Assyrian was like absolutely. The jew trying to pretend he wasn't a Jew said what's a Zionist? The Assyrian hates Jews so I unironically like assyrians more than trump supporters

[Anonymous No.15410854]

>>15410843
They are not. They are shitskins and as soon as they leave their shithole they are not different from any other jew or mudslim

[Anonymous No.15410860]

>>15408275
>tron and bitconnect buyers
Bullshit, tron and bitconnect buyers lost all their money and will never ever buy any crypto even if it had partnership with the whole world, because they dont have fucking money and are scared it will end up being another -99% buzzword shit just like it was in late 2017
Thats why link will never be valued highly

[Anonymous No.15410879]

>>15409612
Thats fine. I'm my own white supremacist breed. Even the actual white supremacists are just as if not more retarded than hispanics. There are always exceptions. I'm fucking polish granted born in America and never been to Poland....and I'm from an American city with a decent amount of poles. Whenever I see poles speaking polish I want to round them up and ship them off to the Hawaiian island of Molokai just like they did with the people who had leprosy decades ago... except the new colony will be for morons.

[Anonymous No.15410883]

>>15409801

Thanks for being here anon. Love this thread.

Question.

Do you know or have a good idea who is acquiring the 700k LINK?

[Anonymous No.15410893]

>>15410307
lol at the nigger tier nitpicking
A grammer Nazi, I sea.
you are all subhumans compared to the jews

[Anonymous No.15410920]

>>15410893
>you are all subhumans compared to the jews

Keep showing off that extra chromosome.

[Anonymous No.15410934]

>>15409813
Pic of cock with time stamp or gtfo

[Anonymous No.15410943]

>>15410833
he's not wrong, he's not right. we don't know. what's frustrating is people that can't understand the fact that analysis is stupid. only the link team knows what they're doing and they're not being transparent at all. depending on who you ask, this is either really bearish, or really bullish.
in my opinion, it's bearish. but that's just my opinion. just like OP has his opinion, and you clearly have yours.

[Anonymous No.15410975]

>>15410943
The link team is being opaque as fuck, but the market isn't really being fazed by the movements of these tokens. That's the part I find bullish, mostly.

[Anonymous No.15410980]

>>15409731
Don't take it personally, I'm tired of the larps. Also I'm trying to provide fory family, so yes I'm fucking depending on a super untraditional speculative asset, but I've had visions of the future anon, im mad because you are wrong, I'm upset because I know how right you and all the other larps are... LINK will be tens of thousands of dollars a piece one day.

[Anonymous No.15410991]

>>15410879
You seem to have some serious issues.

[Anonymous No.15410995]

>>15410980
Im not mad because you are wrong*

[Anonymous No.15411041]

Sergey said derivatives live Q4, September is going to be a crazy month.

[Anonymous No.15411074]

>>15411041
Did not

[Anonymous No.15411110]

>>15411074
Yes he did faggot, it was a while back, o didn't even save the link, i watched it. Had to have been 4-6 months ago, maybe a little less.

[Anonymous No.15411124]

>>15410854
I guess. The assyrian i met believed in christ

[Anonymous No.15411132]

Nigger tits.

[Anonymous No.15411142]

>>15411124
>believed in christ
so? If they move to the west they are cowards and traitors, period. Your personal impressions don't matter.

[Anonymous No.15411144]

>>15411110
If he did it would be the only thing anyone would be talking about on biz. I hope you're right but i'm pretty sure you aren't.

[Anonymous No.15411167]

>>15410991
I identify mostly with white people/white nationalists...but then you see or meet those kind of people and you connect on that front but at the same time they are mostly idiots and cringe and stupid too. I don't want to be part of any group really. Every group is just a gang...whether its whites, blacks, cops, or people who work for the same company and go out together. I had a shit ton of fun growing up, and 20's were wild and early 30's were fun too. Im in my mid 30's now and just want to fucking have link moon and move to fucking Oklahoma or something away from everything and everyone.

Do you remember the movie Gangs of New York? One group was better than the other but each group was full of idiots.

[Anonymous No.15411196]

>>15411144
I am right.
https://youtu.be/1UlRIbpYTwk

[Anonymous No.15411235]

>>15411041
It wasn't sergey, it was the dude that recorded the fireside chat who said this after speaking to a team member

[Anonymous No.15411263]

>>15411235
Maybe in the timeline you are in.

[Anonymous No.15411298]

EVERYONE SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!
BUY MY BAGS!!! RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!! BUY MY BAGS FOR 1000$ A PIECE, YOU PIECES OF SHIT!!!!

[Anonymous No.15411333]

>>15408703
Actually decent information. They interviewed boomers and perceptions are positive including blockchains can scale smart contracts are important and so on. Thanks for this. Seriously.

[Anonymous No.15411368]

>>15411074
And fuck you sergey!!! Stop dumping 700k!!!

[Anonymous No.15411371]

>>15408167
kek, hard to tell from your word vomit. Learn to communicate or stay poor.

[Anonymous No.15411380]

>>15411371
Israel HATES when its talked about. Trump is destroying bipartisan support and the status quo surrounding Israel. He's hugging it to deatth.

I hate the 4d chess meme, but Trump knows PR better than anyone. Jews, and Israel in particular, hate having the spotlight shined on them. It makes people start to ask questions like "why do we give billions to an apartheid state, again”?
Trump endorsing Israel is the fucking equivilant of David Duke endorsing someone. IT DOESN'T HELP IT ONLY HURTS THEM.

Look at all the people talking mad shit about Israel and how accepted it is now compared to before Trump took office. Trump saying GOOD things about Israel is the worst thing he can say about them because a ton of people are braindead NPCs who think they must take the opposite position of anything Trump says. Shills can send me retard wojaks and go "HURR 4D CHESS" all they want but look at the RESULTS of what Trump is saying rather than what he is actually saying. Israel is far more scrutinized now than they were before Trump took office.

[Anonymous No.15411407]

>>15411380

[Anonymous No.15411422]

>>15408524
>businesses are not investing in opportunities to save big money, all they think about is how to make less on wagies that are bullied into thinking how honored they are to serve the corporate jew
KYS

[Anonymous No.15411432]

TELE is developing Trend-Setter to focus on Micro-Transactions in various sectors such as retail, marketing, social content and gaming

[Anonymous No.15411537]

>>15407795
Listen up newfags, I'm a tcp ip developer at a fortune 50 big data company with 25 years experience in database infosec, I've looked into chainlink and all I can tell you if that the cryptographic measures implemented in regards to the decentralized security paradigm in the API and IoT structure of chainlink's github code is fundamentally flawed after the Pivotal tracker server crashed due to the core attacks on the network enabled by its corrupt data inputs and outputs, what this really means is that by attempting to solve the oracle sybil resistance issue it instead allows customers to bypass the encrypted hardware and even hack into the smart contract Intel SGX mainframe, unless they manage to increase the signatures and scalable nodes, which isn't likely considering the Google backend isn't compatible with the legacy JSON systems and Solidity language from the EVM in the Truffle stacks, that's why the ic3 and SWIFT engineering teams developed the ISO 20220 standards but it's centralized and susceptible to the 51% front running program so yeah basically Sergey didn't foresee that the enterprise customers and cloud blockchain dapps would never allow their protocols to rely on these permissioned host mechanisms thus rendering the LINK ERC 677 token obsolete and no serious developer would consider DLT technology in these conditions, sorry linkies I'm just telling it how it is.

[Anonymous No.15411557]

>>15411537
>listen up fags I'm a huge fucking autist
>proceeds to ramble incoherently for literal miles of text while buttfucking the entire concept of punctuation

[Anonymous No.15411561]

>>15411407
this man is based and redpilled af

[Anonymous No.15411595]

Oh fuck it I guess I'm buying even more linkies

[Anonymous No.15411603]

>>15411407
>>15411561

imagine cracking a cold one with the boys

trump, hitler, mel gibson and bob fischer

what would a party with all of them drunk feels like

[Anonymous No.15411610]

Bump this thread. Fuck discord trannies and jannies too. Thanks for bringing biz back op at least a bit.

[Anonymous No.15411625]

>>15411603
At least two of those were confirmed teetotalers.

[Anonymous No.15411637]

>>15411625
i bet they would drink if the party was to commemorate the eradication of jews

[Anonymous No.15411647]

>This thread

Holy fuck, so glad I sold at $4.00

[Anonymous No.15411657]

>>15407795
I took a break from crypto a while ago to party and focus on school, kind of tired of partying now. I have made zero trades in that time frame. Kind of want to get back into it, what the fuck do I do? I want to learn to trade but all my information on crypto was literally off of this website. What do you use for news and advice? Any suggestions on my portfolio.

[Anonymous No.15411684]

>>15411657

>VeChink
>OMGook

Lmao, you're missing REQt for the JUST trifecta.

[Anonymous No.15411762]

>>15411684
Lmao vchain looked dope when I was active, and OMG was interesting.

[Anonymous No.15411774]

>>15411657
>all my information on crypto was literally off of this website.
No it wasn't, faggot. You got shilled link for TWO FUCKING YEARS and you don't have a single one.

[Anonymous No.15411838]

>>15407795
OG linker here finally a good post fuck discord trannies and fudders.

[Anonymous No.15411842]

>>15411774
I’m not gonna lie, the shill made me not want to buy it at twenty cents. I was in class and looked at Blockfolio throughly for the first time in a long time and saw link was at like two dollars. Wanted to jump off the roof when I realized all those autistic weebs are now very rich.

[Anonymous No.15411852]

>>15407795
>If you had half a fucking brain you'd look at the price and see it's still up massively from the historic speculative value, so either 700k chunks of buy pressure aren't dropping the price (which is incredibly bullish) or there are partners big enough to command $2mm stakes from the get-go for their participation (which is incredibly bullish).

Just curious how this is different than Charlie Lee dumping his bags at ATH?
Litecoin fanboys were saying it's bullish because he has no conflict of interest now.
If the leader of the project is dumping, why the hell should we be buying?

[Anonymous No.15411854]

>>15409813
based. we're taking over the lower deck running gangbang sessions on all the whores.

[Anonymous No.15411856]

>>15411842
if you cant see the paid shilling vs real autistic shilling difference you are not gonna make it ever.

[Anonymous No.15411875]

>>15411854
Is that your gf?

i'd fuck

[Queens English No.15411898]

>>15411537 Translated into english...

Gather around, Gentleman.

Your author is a tcp ip developer at a fortune 50 big data company who has 25 years experience in database infosec.

I've looked into chainlink, and there is a problem with the cryptographic measures implemented with the decentralized security paradigm in the API and IoT structure of chainlink's github code.

This paradigm as implemented is fundamentally flawed because the Pivotal tracker server crashed due to the core attacks on it's network enabled by its corrupt data inputs and outputs.

There is a wider issue enlivened by attempting to solve the oracle sybil resistance issue.

This issue allows customers to bypass the encrypted hardware and even hack into the smart contract Intel SGX mainframe.

While this can be stopped if they manage to increase the signatures and scalable nodes, this isn't likely.

This is due to the Google backend lacking compatibility with the legacy JSON systems and Solidity language from the EVM in the Truffle stacks.

The problem is that the ic3 and SWIFT engineering teams developed the ISO 20220 standards to deal with these problems.

Unfortunately, link is centralized and susceptible to the 51% front running program.

It appears that Sergey didn't foresee that the enterprise customers and cloud blockchain dapps would never allow their protocols to rely on these permissioned host mechanisms.

This renders the LINK ERC 677 token obsolete and no serious developer would consider DLT technology in these conditions.

My apologieslinkies I'm just telling the audience how it is.

[Anonymous No.15411899]

>>15411762
there is always a shitcoin flavor of the month being shilled on biz. in 2018 it was WAN, ICX, AION "interoperability" meme and more recently it was VIDT, LIT, etc (low volume idex pnds). the only coin that has survived on biz for more than a few months, besides BTC and ETH, is LINK.

[Anonymous No.15411920]

>>15411875
That's a dude.

[Anonymous No.15411943]

>>15411898
Thank you for spacing this the correct way. I find the spacing conventions on 4channel quite hard to cognate. This is much more like other, more civilized sites I frequent.

[Anonymous No.15411956]

>>15411537

STinklets literally lack the technical knowledge to ever recover from this.

[Anonymous No.15412046]

>>15411856
Is fantom paid or real shilling?

[Anonymous No.15412155]

>>15411898
Didn't read, not having sex.

[Anonymous No.15412209]

>>15411899
indeed. BTC, ETH and LINK sir

[Anonymous No.15412223]

>>15407795
Nice blogpost faggot

[Anonymous No.15412229]

>>15411537
is this pasta or what? explain this please smart linklords... im scared.

[Anonymous No.15412242]

>>15412229
>we have to refuckulate the carbonator, bubbles

[Anonymous No.15412258]

>>15411943
Please be bait

[Anonymous No.15412279]

>>15407795
>autist incel neets have outperformed literally all other value investor groups
What else is new

[Anonymous No.15412303]

>>15407918
>smart contracts are the most important economic innovation for the forseeable future
It’s the platform we need to continue developing and to overcome this stagnation we’re all living through
Funny money doesn’t work for a very good reason
>it’s based in fraud

[Anonymous No.15412320]

>>15407928
>the entire DRNS meme
Mfw

[Anonymous No.15412328]

>>15411603
when I make it, its gonna happen.

[Anonymous No.15412333]

>>15408076
>Still amazing that you can get link for two bucks
For a limited time

[Anonymous No.15412356]

>>15408248
Can you speak to polkadot?
They were at the web3 conference as well
I have a good feeling about them
>also edgeware lockdrop participant
>will signal the rest by end of month

[Anonymous No.15412358]

>>15408217
Go back to plebbit

[Anonymous No.15412371]

>>15408275
>Crypto investors are the literal dumbest investor group on the face of the earth, except at the very extremes
Yep

[Anonymous No.15412400]

>>15412333
42?

[Anonymous No.15412403]

>>15411657
Sell everything and go all in Link this instant. You’re welcome

[Anonymous No.15412421]

>>15408224
>No one needs decentralized google searches.
that's not true
have you seen how (((google))) sends swat teams for (((wellness))) checks on their whisteblowing employees (that sacrificed $260,000 salary a year)?

https://youtu.be/g1VeElBAeas
https://youtu.be/ricI5t66cj8

[Anonymous No.15412429]

>>15412421
God bless the usa.

[Anonymous No.15412581]

>>15412400
Mebe

[Anonymous No.15412599]

>>15412429
It’s a disgrace
They really hate Trump and they would rather see America burn than to have him win the election again.
Video related from 2016:
https://youtu.be/Za4tsfdpeMw

[Anonymous No.15412611]

>>15409612
basadisimo and rojopildorado

[Anonymous No.15412615]

>>15412581
How's it going? I got banned for a month lmao. Just been watching from a distance. Lmfao what a shit show, glowies in over drive. I saw the thread where 4chan got shut down, there was also a lot of interesting threads that got purged from /pol/as well.

[Anonymous No.15412616]

>>15412599
Love the pajeet (they make for cheap slaves and most will do anything for status and money) in the clip with google dunce cap on his head
That place is a fucking cult masquerading as a company

[Anonymous No.15412629]

>>15412615
>I saw the thread where 4chan got shut down
It was a good one eh?
>pic related was their faces

[Anonymous No.15412640]

>>15412615
> I got banned for a month lmao
What else is new
>pic related are the (((people))) that hate what I have to say
I call them (((Facebook drones))) aka cult members

[Anonymous No.15412653]

>>15412356
Mfw I’m part of the chad insurrection
>why yes I was on my way to buy more of that chainlink, how did you know?

[Anonymous No.15412691]

>>15412599
https://youtu.be/UR5nEMq6PcY
Fuck em all!!

[Anonymous No.15412721]

>>15412691
Nice video
You know what they say:
>Dying is easy, comedy is hard
Video related
Pic related
>a small talent for war
https://youtu.be/fbT1fCHOjfI

[Anonymous No.15412769]

>>15412721
Hehehe watched that, was pretty hilarious. I wonder what those clowns were covering up that day. Now its quiet as fuck.. too quiet.

[Anonymous No.15412789]

>>15410980

[Anonymous No.15412800]

>>15412789

[Anonymous No.15412816]

>>15412769
>Now its quiet as fuck

[Anonymous No.15412823]

This from forgotten sandwiches?

[Anonymous No.15412834]

>>15412823
indeed
did you check out Newton's book?
>pic related
I'm adding it to my list
apparently by studying the constellations he figured out that they lied about history for at least 500 years
have to check it out to confirm

[Anonymous No.15412851]

>>15412834
In what context could they lie when it comes to astronomy and the history of it? What could they achieve?

[Anonymous No.15412870]

>>15412834
Could it have to do with how scientists said we are located 10,000 light years in one direction and then say no actually were in a different spot?

[Anonymous No.15412944]

>>15412851
>What could they achieve?
everything
>>15412851
>In what context could they lie when it comes to astronomy and the history
he was able to chart the motion of the constellations not just forward in time, but backward
checking historical records and indexing it against his projections led to mismatch
I'll have to read it in depth and study the topic more to better understand
still working on finishing a few other books in the process
>finished pic related a while back, really good

[Anonymous No.15413033]

>>15408661
ENTP boomer fag

[Anonymous No.15413037]

>>15412944
Where should a brainlet start when it comes to all of this?

[Anonymous No.15413080]

>>15413037
it takes a lifetime and then some
turns out I started doing this from childhood without knowing it
if you look at your past you'll realize a lot of things aren't coincidences
also this book isn't too long and makes for a good read:
http://strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/maxwell-matter-motion-1925.pdf

[Anonymous No.15413090]

>>15412816
also good theme song:
https://youtu.be/8UbD9zd3lUs

[Anonymous No.15413290]

>>15411235
I remember this.

[Anonymous No.15413464]

>>15411142
> Britain sides with muzzies after WW1 & WW2 - putting balance in their favor
> America puts Saddam in power and gets rustled as they lose control over him
> America sides with Saudi's for that oil money. Get wrecked in 9/11 by Saudi citizens and attack Iraq instead kek
> America gets absolutely subverted and cucked by Israel on the daily…
> “GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY NOW”
No thanks, I’ll stay.

[Anonymous No.15413561]

>>15408387
this is a great post. cya at the yacht party

[Anonymous No.15413570]

>>15408919
This

[Anonymous No.15413576]

>>15413080
Tell me more about Libra's strategic partnerships with Web3 and Pokadot you mentioned earlier on the Chinese site for webs at libra-china.org

[Anonymous No.15413582]

>>15407795
DIDN'T READ, NOT BUYING

[3x3x3 No.15413684]

>>15413080
Hope you’ve been well man! I really liked the netsky mix.

Looked into rsr as well. The self fud they did was a little strange but I like everything else.

[Anonymous No.15413740]

>>15408515
Idiot Alert on isle 5

[Anonymous No.15413831]

>>15408895
I think Chainlink is Swift, has been since day 1 of the ICO.

[Anonymous No.15413907]

>>15411537
>>15411898

added to my extensive menu of link pasta ty

[Anonymous No.15414061]

>>15413907
Listen i need dat link pasta white boi

[Anonymous No.15414321]

memebois who dont undertand technology, please read this:

Listen up newfags, I'm a tcp ip developer at a fortune 50 big data company with 25 years experience in database infosec, I've looked into chainlink and all I can tell you if that the cryptographic measures implemented in regards to the decentralized security paradigm in the API and IoT structure of chainlink's github code is fundamentally flawed after the Pivotal tracker server crashed due to the core attacks on the network enabled by its corrupt data inputs and outputs, what this really means is that by attempting to solve the oracle sybil resistance issue it instead allows customers to bypass the encrypted hardware and even hack into the smart contract Intel SGX mainframe, unless they manage to increase the signatures and scalable nodes, which isn't likely considering the Google backend isn't compatible with the legacy JSON systems and Solidity language from the EVM in the Truffle stacks, that's why the ic3 and SWIFT engineering teams developed the ISO 20220 standards but it's centralized and susceptible to the 51% front running program so yeah basically Sergey didn't foresee that the enterprise customers and cloud blockchain dapps would never allow their protocols to rely on these permissioned host mechanisms thus rendering the LINK ERC 677 token obsolete and no serious developer would consider DLT technology in these conditions, sorry linkies I'm just telling it how it is.

[Anonymous No.15414379]

people that have pointed out why Link is of no value are not swing trading link, nobody want's to swing trade a house of cards.

[Anonymous No.15414771]

>>15407795
Thank you OP for this blessed thread

[Anonymous No.15414796]

>>15412333
soon you can buy link for $1 and then for 50cents

[Anonymous No.15414825]

>>15414796
Yes always best to wait with the links. I would not mind buying the links for under a dollar. I think the links have been overvalued for awhile now. You would have to be gullible af to buy the links right now.

[Anonymous No.15415073]

>>15410893
You literally said you had perfect fucking English. In the same sentence you made countless errors.

[Anonymous No.15415106]

I no longer feel sorry for the people who haven't got any LINK, or those that sold this early. I hope you kill yourselves from regret

[Anonymous No.15415117]

>>15414825
>>15414796
Chainlink literally couldn’t be more oversold right now

[Anonymous No.15415118]

>>15413576
This is some scammy shit bro

[Anonymous No.15415145]

>>15415117
what do you mean sir

[Anonymous No.15415168]

>>15415117
The Links are oversold??? Hello?

[Anonymous No.15415655]

Here's a new idiot question: will the reputation system of chainlink be decentralized or is it maintained by sergey's company?

[Anonymous No.15415879]

>>15415655
Sergey will sit at a desk and manually check each individual transaction then apply relevant reputation based on his own personal opinion. Idiot.