1k is truly FUD

[Anonymous No.15194871]

Basically there are 16x more Link tokens then BTC..

BTC is pretty limited to just store of value, where Links possibilities are much more useful

BTC has already reached 20k, If Link were to reach that marketcap it would be worth over 1k, and that was last bullrun, this bullrun it will be headed to 100k+... I'll say 160k to make the math simple, but when Link reaches that marketcap it will be worth over $10,000... Also another thing is has going for it that BTC doesn't is staking, which will fuel a lot of growth.

The marketcap for Link could unironically reach Trillions of dollars, which if crypto has any relevant future it most definitely will.

DIDN'T WIPE NOT FLUSHING.

[Anonymous No.15194890]

I CRAPPED MY PANTS TODAY

[Anonymous No.15194914]

>>15194871
Absolute delusion. I own 3k stinkies but to think it'll ever reach $1,000 is pure delusion.

[Anonymous No.15194934]

>>15194914
With only 3k you'd be better off hoping for $1k

[Anonymous No.15194936]

Right so this actually happened I'm not joking. I had a dream back when link was around $3.50 or so that the new bottom for LINK was going to be $1.73, and that the top in the future will be somewhere around $370. I don't remember the number exactly down to the dollar amount but that's what I dreamt

Do with this information what you will, I'm not shitting you my dream was incredibly clear as well, like I was actually there.

[Anonymous No.15195016]

>>15194914

it's not delusional, it's FUD. you do not understand what you bought. Do you even know what ISO 20022 is ?

[Anonymous No.15195051]

>>15194871
Most of the Alt coins are more useful than BTC... Everyone know's this but the fcking media shill the shit coin btc cause its easy and they morons...

[Anonymous No.15195058]

>>15195016

Fun fact that somehow has escaped everyone but me, a random wagie. The Fed Reserves new instant transfer protocol for payments indicates it will operate on/and with ISO 20022.

Was watching some retardo XRP streamer, he read that and had no idea what it was, convinced XRP would be the transfer protocol, not understanding the verbiage of their announcement that the ISO 20022 layer will not just be a transfer layer, but a settlement system capable of automatically verifying transactions near instantly, pulling data and reaching consensus.

TL;DR Fed confirmed FedNow, and this the Fed Reserve in general, and thus the entire world financial system, will run on LINK last week and nobody spoke a word about it.

[Anonymous No.15195064]

>>15194934
Why? 3k will net me 1MM when it reaches $275.00

[Anonymous No.15195075]

>>15195064
>believes it'll hit $275
>meanwhile a mere 3x from that is "pure delusion"

[Anonymous No.15195080]

>>15195064

>selling all your LINK, ever

Not gonna make it

[Anonymous No.15195098]

>>15194936
are you the dmt fag? like 2 people who did psychedelics said the top of the first bullrun would be $379

[Anonymous No.15195117]

>>15195058
Thanks fren

[Anonymous No.15195118]

>>15194871
Are you retarded? There’s 1 billion link. 1k per LINK is 1 trillion market cap. End of discussion. Not interested in any kind of semantics about how sergeys tokens are for node incentivisations. They still count towards mcap.

[Anonymous No.15195136]

>>15195058
Wtf

[Anonymous No.15195194]

>>15195058
I know what you are talking about anon. There have been other payment system/data announcements come out even before the Fed, which I believe are tangential to this whole thing, but I basically took the [redacted]pill and I know we are going to make it so I didn’t want to mention it on here. Also, it just feels like I am schizo because I have studied all this material so religiously that now when it’s happening I practically see it everywhere I look.

[Anonymous No.15195216]

>>15194871
marketcap is a useless metric
all that matters for utility tokens is if someone NEEDS them and if holders are willing to sell them
total supply is irrelevant if people arent' fucking selling

[Anonymous No.15195219]

How long is everyone gonna hold? Can't help but to think LINK is simply a band-aid solution. Does anyone think it'll still be relevant in say 2030?

[Anonymous No.15195270]

>>15195219
they will be talking about chainlink billionaires in 2030

[Anonymous No.15195353]

>>15195270
You really think the current LINK whales aren't gonna sell before 2030?

[Anonymous No.15195385]

>>15195353
most ICO buyers like myself are only selling 50-66% at most. the rest is for passive staking gains. i'm personally holding them for the next decade at least, assuming link succeeds.

[Anonymous No.15195772]

>>15195058

Gotta link ? That is one based breadcrumb, had suspicions about governments

[Anonymous No.15195792]

>>15194871
I farted haha lol

[Anonymous No.15195821]

Binance is happy to announce that we will be listing the Chainlink (LINK) token. The token is not needed. We will hire an army of pajeets to promote and fud the LINK token, to cause mass panic and F.O.M.O. among low IQ readers, and pump our bags. Each time the LINK token raises in price by $.30 (until the final dump to 5 Sats, which only we at Binance will know about), we at Binance will sell. After agreeing with Sergey Nazarov that several times per week, he will dump 700,000 LINK tokens into my personal wallet, we at Binance are excited about this new and elaborate exit scam. The most elaborate exit scam in the history of Cryptocurrency!

[Anonymous No.15195879]

>>15195219

Old fud

>>15195118

The marketcap for Link could unironically reach Trillions

[Anonymous No.15195911]

>>15195118
The mcap for crypto is simply the price x circulating number of tokens...it's not an accurate indicator.

[Anonymous No.15195949]

>>15195772
It's on the Google you braindead mutant.

[Anonymous No.15195953]

>>15195194
SAME!!!!!!

[Anonymous No.15195984]

>>15195058
holy shit. when will this be implemented?

[Anonymous No.15196004]

>>15195879
It ain't fud. You really think LINK will be around in another decade?

[Anonymous No.15196011]

>>15195058
What makes you think chainlink has anything to do with this? Is this one of those far reaching breadcrumbs?

[Anonymous No.15196017]

Just gimme 1k link and 10 RSR and I will deradicalize

[Anonymous No.15196018]

>>15195772

Google FedNow announcement happened a few days ago some roasties did a web announcement and danced around any actual name drops, Cripples thought it was about their shitcoin, one of their drones found ISO 20022 mentioned on the FedNow .gov website PDF, and their general announcement page.

I’m waging on my phone so I can’t help with specific links but it wouldn’t be hard to find.

[Anonymous No.15196043]

>>15195984

FedNow Timetable states operational by 2023/2024, but that is probably a very conservative estimate what with PSD2 happening Q4 this year.

Every major economy on the globe will share a mutual transfer and settlement layer within 5 years, and that medium is Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15196063]

>>15195118
Are you mental? 350M of those tokens are dedicated to node operations. Leaving 650M. Another 300M will be used for company/team development. The last 350M is the current circulation. Therefore the only # of Tokens your retarded ass needs to worry about is 350M. The more link that is taken out of circulation, the more the price will increase due to scarcity. This is unironically the last month to get in below $10 after that it’ll go parabolic as we go into the more SWIFT related stuff and ‘20. EOY 2020 is the singularity granted we all live long enough to see it.

[Anonymous No.15196064]

>>15194871
>dopamine running low
>curtains closed
>vitamin d depleted
>feeling the depression coming on
>"w-we're going to be rich a-arent we??"
>breathe a sigh of relief
>other anons are reassuring you you're going to make it
>ten minutes pass
>the feeling has worn off
>time to make another thread
>"link price prediction thread"
>yeah that's nice... look at all those numbers
>put all the posted numbers and multiply them with your stack
>haha wow, thats a lot of money
>imagine what all you could do with that money
>maybe i'll finally have sex...
>sun peeks through the curtains
>you hear your parents waking up
>hehe, fucking wagies
>the depression comes back
>the dopamine rushes dont last as long as they used to
>time to make another thread
>"is 300 link enough to make it?"

[Anonymous No.15196071]

>>15196011

Do you even have any idea what ISO 20022 means?

I’ll give you the long and short if it since you have a 2 digit IQ, it’s NDA code speak for SWIFT/Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15196090]

>>15196043
oh my. thank you brother

[Anonymous No.15196095]

>>15196071
Chainlink is simply ISO 20022 compliant...just because ISO 20022 is mentioned doesn't mean they are referring to Chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15196122]

>>15195058
>>15196071

im bullish as fuck on LINK. bought at ICO. bought more on etherdelta. bought more sub $1.
but you guys are absolute cock suckers for relating every single thing that follows ISO 20022 standards to LINK
ISO 20022 is simply a set of standards that was developed to give achievable goals to financial institutions, so that they had some sort of framework to base their systems on,
Yes, LINK follows ISO 20022 standards, but so does literally every other fucking thing on earth that wants to comply with these standards.

tldr
yes LINK follows ISO 20022 standards, but that is a result of chainlink being tailored to these standards, not the standards being tailored to chainlink.
chainlink = ISO 20022
but ISO 20022 != chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15196126]

>>15196095
dont say that you will piss off a lot of dumb linkies!

[Anonymous No.15196137]

>>15196095

Chainlink is the product and solution of/to ISO 20022.

[Anonymous No.15196151]

>>15196137
...no, read what this anon posted >>15196122

[Anonymous No.15196167]

>>15196095
>>15196122
>>15196126

You really need to stop buying shot coins and DYOR. I’m a rando wagie, again, and I know for a fact LINK is more than 20022 “compliant.”

Better hit the archives. All it takes is reading.

[Anonymous No.15196172]

>>15194871
you had one month (1) >>15191550

[Anonymous No.15196203]

>>15196004

if there's a better solution it hasn't come yet, and it will be too late by the time it does, since link will have all the money in the world (literally) it will be able to evolve whatever the next future system is

[Anonymous No.15196218]

>>15196167
you are incorrect. Nothing uses chainlink, but chainlink uses public apis to make it seem like breadcrumbs and fake partnerships to fool low IQ neets like yourself. You've been scammed, you're just too low IQ to know yet.

[Anonymous No.15196220]

>>15196203
unironically Chainlink is like Microsoft in that way. it will be the standard and then get updates when needed to stay ahead of the curve

[Anonymous No.15196238]

>>15195194

Yep once you start listening/reading you can see it everywhere. The FedNow presentation was basically a presentation on [Redacted] in everything but name.

Glad I’m not the only one, probably the last time I’ll ever drop a crumb, I’d like to accumulate a few more before singularity myself.

[Anonymous No.15196249]

>>15194871
Yikes, you linktards are so fucking delusional

[Anonymous No.15196254]

>>15196172
you had two years (2)

[Anonymous No.15196261]

>>15196167

Based wagie anon

[Anonymous No.15196264]

>>15196122
yea this
>>15196167
it's a common standard. Fed can build their own inhouse compliant solution. Or if they outsource it and put it to tender, they will pick the most competitive proposal. I work in government contracting and sometimes it just works and is merit based.
If it's a corrupt process it'll probably go to a management consulting firm based in Washington with connections to the Fed.
LINK has 100s of competitors, just because they offer a white label service it doesn't mean anyone will adopt it.

[Anonymous No.15196274]

>>15196167
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_20022
>A 2015 report by the United States's Federal Reserve System classified Europe having "mature adopters" of ISO 20022; India, South Africa, Japan, Singapore, and Switzerland as having "growing adopters"; and Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and New Zealand as having "interested adopters". The report concluded that the Federal Reserve should push for ISO 20022 adoption within the United States financial system.[1]

hmmm so countries have been using link since 2015?
fucking retard

>>15196095
>>15196122
these two posters are right, stop calling other people low iq and keep waging

[Anonymous No.15196279]

>>15196218

Okay please provide proof these partnerships are fake then

[Anonymous No.15196284]

>>15196218

>Admitted I’m a eshield
>NEET

I have all the IQ, skills, Charisma and drive necessary to be successful in the traditional normie sense, I’m just so tired of the bullshit a decade in I want off the ride now. I can’t imagine doing this another 30 years.

I looked for a ticket out, an alternative way once I realized the traditional path to “success” was a yoke that ended in a bad place. I just read and listened, it’s been there for literally anyone to read.

You literally had two years. I got in so late and still had time to get mine. No excuses, last chance is very, very nearly gone.

[Anonymous No.15196292]

>>15196264

What part of OPEN SOURCE STANDARD do you not understand ?

[Anonymous No.15196297]

>>15194890
YOU COULD HAVE IT ALL
MY JEANS FILLED WITH SHITE

[Anonymous No.15196302]

Why exactly did ETH pump so hard a few years ago? How could it possibly be more useful and mainstream than LINK?

[Anonymous No.15196319]

>>15196302
ETH pumped because of the ICO craze that required investors to purchase ETH to participate in. More ETH purchased = going interstellar like eth did. Will Chainlink have a similar mechanism where LINK tokens will need to be purchased in order to participate in something akin to the 2017 ICO craze?

[Anonymous No.15196356]

>>15196319
If it sees mass adoption, big companies are going to kill for a few hundred linkies

[Anonymous No.15196360]

>>15196274
https://www.iso20022.org/faq.page
>the first edition of ISO 20022, published in December 2004
>The second edition of the standard, published in May 2013

who knew the singularity would allow link to travel in time

[Anonymous No.15196387]

>>15194871
Cute but how will chainlink help this corrupt system we live in. How will it stop Epstein type.

[Anonymous No.15196414]

>>15196360

Do any of you fidget spinner holders even know the origins of LINK? Who/what entity was the driving force of its creation?

Last help you’re getting from me, which is more than anyone should need to see the writing on the wall tbqh.

[Anonymous No.15196432]

>>15196414
>Last help you’re getting from me
good that you stop posting now that you've been blown the fuck out, that's all i wanted

[Anonymous No.15196450]

>>15196432

[Anonymous No.15196453]

>>15196064

[Anonymous No.15196459]

>>15194936
I know this is almost a meme at this point but I similarly have seen $374 in highly realistic dreams

[Anonymous No.15196505]

>>15195058
Wait what? Is this actually true, can anyone confirm?

t. Sep 2017 stinker

[Anonymous No.15196514]

>>15195058
This is why the Jews are buying it up so much that it’s going to 1k ....it solves the oracle problem too, everybody knows it and pretty soon Coinbase normies will be buying it up cuz we’re smart early adopters
>yfw you realize I’m sarcastic

[Anonymous No.15196529]

>>15196319
FUGG NO

[Anonymous No.15196534]

>>15196203
Just like MySpace and AOL, right?

[Anonymous No.15196539]

>>15196450
>The standard covers financial information transferred between financial institutions that includes payment transactions, securities trading and settlement information, credit and debit card transactions and other financial information.

all right let's say that chainlink is just an updated iso20022 (you never claimed this, but i'll take what you're saying in good faith), tell me brainlet, what would be the benefit of putting all this onto slow as fuck blockchains? do you have any idea how many transactions this is in just a day?
you can't answer, because it isn't based on reality, you've been reading too much /biz/ and misunderstood shit

>>15196505
not true

[Anonymous No.15196607]

>>15196043
PSD2 is scheduled for Q4, it won't. Every major European bank is working to push it back. It will be delayed.

[Anonymous No.15196632]

>>15196539

Chainlink is chain agnostic. It’s very nature will allow it to launch on whatever chain is fastest as its operational layer.

Not to even begin talking about threshold signatures, which will allow bundling of large numbers of transactions at a much lower TPS.

Am I smart enough to know the details on how all this works? Absolutely not, and never claimed I was, I am however smart enough to read what people smarter than me write and digest their meaning and intention.

LINK will be as fast (actually faster/more efficient via TSIGS) as whatever chain de jour is the defacto transfer layer acceptable by major institutions for reliability.

Check.
The.
Archives.

[Anonymous No.15196635]

>>15196137
Lmao just because you make a product to solve a problem don't assume markets are rational enough to not only accept it as the best solution, but actually buy it.
> Markets can remain irrational longer than (((you))) can remain liquid.

[Anonymous No.15196650]

>>15196632
i asked what the benefit would be, not theoretically how they would do it, you really need to learn how to read, then you wouldn't end up misunderstanding things so much :)

[Anonymous No.15196652]

>>15196635

I pity you, FUDing must have gotten so much harder post Google and Oracle.

[Anonymous No.15196663]

>>15196632
> it can work on the fastest still slow as fucking shit blockchain

[Anonymous No.15196678]

>>15196650

You asked what the benefit would be if putting it on a slow chain, and implied there would be bottlenecks due to TPS volume.

Which isn’t the facts at all and I provided you the accurate information. I read your question, it was just based on faulty beliefs so it wasn’t worth answering, and instead answered a better question.

The benefits are fairly blatant of the factually correct scenario I described.

Maybe you should try and advancing beyond stage 1 flowchart logic.

[Anonymous No.15196680]

>>15196539
Mate threshold signatures solve that problem though

[Anonymous No.15196687]

>>15196678
>The benefits are fairly blatant of the factually correct scenario I described.
no answer yet again stop posting anytime wagie

[Anonymous No.15196694]

>>15196652
you had one month (1) >>15191550

also google is a proven fake partnership and most people have realized already

[Anonymous No.15196696]

>>15196652
I really can't wait until sibos when an actual name launches their own method of connecting off chain data, without link or any other meme coin. Swift is going to show /biz that unless the big name in the equation is calling it a partnership, it's not a partnership
> We 'work' with Swift
Like every bank in the world does.

[Anonymous No.15196702]

>>15195016
He had 2 years, stop spoonfeeding him.

[Anonymous No.15196720]

>>15196694
>also google is a proven fake partnership

[Anonymous No.15196801]

>>15196720
Cite anything from Google calling it a partnership. Not your delusional breadcrumbs, not Chainlink saying we 'work with' Google, cite Google announcing a partnership.

[Anonymous No.15196850]

>>15196801
HAHAHAHA

[Anonymous No.15196880]

>>15195058
We agreed not to let biz know this. Delete now.

[Anonymous No.15196886]

>>15196850
Thanks for proving my point. I have a small stack of link, so I'll be happy if it moons, which if it does will be entirely because Oracle startups showing POC early to mid next year, but all this nonsense about Google or swift etc. is just that, nonsense.

[Anonymous No.15197065]

>>15196880

I’m not part of your tranny group just a very, very observant wagie IQ too high for his station in life. I’ll be free soon enough, though.

Don’t worry, none of them listened anyhow. I figured out you can’t set normies free, guess that applies here as well even amongst “peers.”

[Anonymous No.15197112]

>>15197065
look, iso20022 has been around since 2004, it's not chainlink. i don't know why you're still believing this after being so blown the fuck out itt

[Anonymous No.15197149]

>>15196534
no, just like the HTTP be protocol that was developed in the 80s that you're still using right now.

[Anonymous No.15197160]

>>15197112

Strawmanning the creation date of the ISO 20022 standard won’t change the fact that LINK is the fruition of attempting to become 20022 compliant.

The tree predated the fruit, no one is arguing otherwise.

I get it either you’re a braindead cripple or a LINK whale still accumulating (I suspect the latter) but enoughs enough, these games are ending very soon.

[Anonymous No.15197164]

>>15196220
I wouldn't compare LINK to any company. it's only comparable to the internet.

[Anonymous No.15197198]

>>15194936
Fuck we're so going to $370

[Anonymous No.15197216]

link is not a crypto currency, it's a useless oracle token. nobody considers it money. link holders should dump while they still can. I mean, the founder is dumping every other day. What more needs to be said?

[Anonymous No.15197223]

>>15196801
we don't give a shit to prove it to you.

[Anonymous No.15197232]

>>15197198
Were all gonna make it! Except for nolinkers. They get the rope.

[Anonymous No.15197241]

>>15197160
>these games are ending very soon.
Sergey has enough tokens to dump 1million link per day for 2 years strait. The only thing that's ending soon is LINK being above $1.

[Anonymous No.15197253]

>>15196801

[Anonymous No.15197262]

>>15196319
Yeah it's called sweet passive income

[Anonymous No.15197288]

>>15197253
> This enrages the linkie unable to prove any of their ridiculous claims.

[Anonymous No.15197303]

>>15197160
to simplify things for you so you maybe can see that you've misunderstood this:
iso20022 is a language/syntax/format
link is a network of oracles that can understand this format
but link is not the format itself

i'm still baffled how anyone could confuse the two, but i guess there's a brainlet for everything

[Anonymous No.15197305]

Just laughing at FUD now, posted this on a few other threads https://censys.io/certificates/ce82abae480cd35085d52a2f6744e62e67684090e266c558784d5b25fe20310f

Swift got a cert for apigeecloud.swift.com and it appeared in the certificate transparency logs. Massive breadcrumb.

Only created on the 15th of July and it's valid!

Apigee = google company
Swift now confirmed to be using apigee.
Swift setting up the subdomain for apigee just after the google/chainlink partnership was announced.

Things looking good for SIBOS!

Some more links;

1. https://crt.sh/?id=1671486604 (most anon's understand what this is)

2. https://cloud.google.com/apigee/

3. https://www.swift.com/news-events/news/standards_the-key-to-making-apis-the-new-normal-in-banking

4. https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1139217022477361152

[Anonymous No.15197345]

>>15197241

There won’t be enough LINK to go around inside of 5 years.

There’s a reason hypervaluation is baked in as a security feature natively.

[Anonymous No.15197371]

>>15197303

I haven’t confused anything. I understand perfectly what ISO 20022 is and what LINK is.

Go dilate, and afterward look into where and why LINK was started.

[Anonymous No.15197384]

>>15197305
> just after the google/chainlink partnership was announced.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
> works with

[Anonymous No.15197398]

>>15195058
ISO20022 is not built on LINK, you incredible halfwit.

[Anonymous No.15197406]

>>15197371
you seem to have the delusion that every transaction in the world will be put on blockchains, i find this very strange

[Anonymous No.15197439]

>>15195098
Wait, that was a thing? I must have missed that thread, no I haven't done any drugs aside from the caffeine and alcohol jew.

[None !DG0i14iE82 No.15197451]

>>15194871
Take all your coins off of bitmex by Sunday anons exit scam incoming,

[Anonymous No.15197456]

>>15197305
>Apigee = google company
that breadcrumb is ancient bro, its so old it was even on one of the first chainlink collages.

[Anonymous No.15197479]

>>15197406
>he doesn't know about the "Golden Copy" and how the goal is to get rid of paper based shit
https://www.globalcustodian.com/dtcc-to-create-golden-copy-for-cds-with-blockchain/

[Anonymous No.15197498]

>>15197479

He’s a fudding tranny bro prob up to his dilated asshole in LINK.

[Anonymous No.15197505]

>>15197456
>that breadcrumb is ancient bro, its so old it was even on one of the first chainlink collages.

Agreed but the cert that swift got for the subdomain "apigeecloud.swift.com" isn't.

[Anonymous No.15197511]

>>15197305
here some more apigee crumbs
https://diginomica.com/apigee-sees-enterprise-api-management-go-native-at-google-cloud

https://blogs.perficient.com/2018/04/12/apigee-and-pivotal-partnership-accelerates-value-for-apis/

[Anonymous No.15197533]

>>15197505
I'm sorry you got me wrong, I meant that apigee itself is connected to all this, that is the ancient breadcrumb. we knew for some time that there is a connection and it proved to be right now with the whole google thing playing out.
the subdomain is of course new.

[Anonymous No.15197561]

>>15195118
This FUD in particular always makes me laugh. "Nuhh, one trillion...high number! Crugg no like."

[Anonymous No.15197563]

Discord trannie pagans fuck off

[Anonymous No.15197587]

>>15196387
VR will lead to the next stage of human consciousness. STRAP IN.

[Anonymous No.15197596]

>>15196018
https://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/fednow_about.htm
>"The FedNow Service will also support the inclusion of additional descriptive information related to a payment, such as remittance or invoice information. Payment message format will be based on the ISO 20022 standard.

Not sure how this can be real, either way I'm comfortable essentially living innawoods with my suicide stack on a tezos, hold me bros god willing I will spend my 30's building a home, starting a family and living FREE

FREEEEEEEE

[Anonymous No.15197617]

>>15197498
you also seem to believe that you NEED chainlink to send or receive data in iso20022 format, that is very strange to me

[Anonymous No.15197626]

>>15196122
This. Kind of. The Fed is doing what Facebook is - they're making their OWN network, and it won't be built on an existing cryptocurrency, because they're not idiots. And, it's not the only system like this being developed, Clearing House is also working on a system, and is much further ahead in development than FEDNOW - and Clearing House is not Link, either.
If you think any of these real money systems will be built on top of existing crypto systems, you're an idiot who's huffed himself retarded on poo fumes and scams. These systems will be closed plantations, and your coins are NOT invited.

And, a reminder that the bull goose Linktards will ignore is that this is a SERVICE, that's optional. It's like Western Union, at a banking level. It has yet to prove itself at any level, and there is no indication of how widespread it will be, or how it will fare against Clearing House's service.
And, if you've huffed yourself retarded on Crypto, you should hate this, because it A. won't use any existing cryptocoins, and B. it will remove ANY need for anyone to use crypto, for US customers.
Linktards also conveniently disregard that if this service FEDNOW seeks to offer, it won't go very far using a cryptocoin basis that creates an onerous reporting requirement filing taxes, and doing simple things like paying a bill through it would be a tax liability. IF - and it's a huge honking bull goose IF - US tax laws concerning crypto change...maybe this will take off. But don't hold your breath. Based on Link? Nope. Not for US customers, and that's their market.

I won't even bring up how they're limiting transactions to $25k, because even they're not so dumb or greedy to just throw this onto the market and see what happens.

At least it will be worth the amusement watching the retards and poos build their hopes and dreams on not understanding what's going on. Like usual.

[Anonymous No.15197633]

>>15194871
21mil x 16 = 1 billion

[Anonymous No.15197641]

>>15197596

You’re welcome for that comfy feel fren.

This is my payback for all the hyper autismos that did all the digging to let me buy in at .53 cents. Like I said, late, but still very comfy.

[Anonymous No.15197644]

>>15197533

All good, agreed with you on that, the connection is indeed ancient.

Wonder will swift use the BigQuery/Chainlink integration as the mechanism for using chainlink. That would benefit all 3 parties and mean that swift wasn't staking their credibility on a startup (chainlink) and borrowed from the prestige of Google.

[Anonymous No.15197661]

>>15197617
What's strange is the smell emanating from your fundamentally gaping faggot ass

[Anonymous No.15197672]

I swear to god the stupidity of 4chan is hard to believe at times. A store of value is a trillion dollar market. Gold market cap is worth 7.7 trillion by itself and that doesn't even include CFD's.

Link will never go to the moon because Sergey dumpnarov is just fucking dumping tokens on investors that fucking piece of shit nigger.

[Anonymous No.15197687]

>>15197596

Also in there if you dig it talks about point to point settlement of the transaction(s). Institution A directly settles with institution B with no middleman or added steps, which knowing ISO 20022 is the transfer layer implies extra-transactionsl data IE pricepoints/valuation can be pulled for included invoices/etc. There is no middle step to settle value changes, implying data is pulled in as part of the settlement process.

There’s only one entity in the fintech sector that I can think of capable of such a feat at the moment on a live network, disregarding all the blatant connections between SWIFT/20022/LINK.

[Anonymous No.15197703]

DR;BM

[Anonymous No.15197712]

Basically pic related

[Anonymous No.15197713]

>>15197687
SIBOS 2019 is going to either be day of the rope of an uncontrollable boner for us

[Anonymous No.15197759]

>>15197713

It definitely looks that way, to me the FedNow announcement is extremely bullish long term. If CryptoBanning fear mongers we’re right the (((Fed))) wouldn’t be putting effort into getting their cut of the digital trustless derivatives pie.

Very bullish for Fintech long term, but yeah SIBOS is going to be a crescendo one way or another for fucking sure green. Strap in, stay strong, never sell.

[Anonymous No.15197762]

>>15196720
no they just integrated bigquary with link you fucking inbred . nigger faggot

[Anonymous No.15197767]

>>15197762
HAHAHA

[Anonymous No.15197781]

>>15197713
It's going to be the crushing blow for Chainlink that plummets it below $1

[Anonymous No.15197785]

>>15197303

"we make open source software, and we make it so well that it is likely to become a standard" - SN

[Anonymous No.15197789]

reminder you still have time to make it
Aug 19-21 Web3 Summit
Sept 12th Binance US Ban
Sept 14 PSD2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6WAX-H8CC0
Sept 15-19 Oracle Code One
Sept 23-26 SIBOS/SWIFT
Octo 19-20 Diffusion (https://twitter.com/OVioHQ/status/1156190222260064257

Chainlink
https://imgur.com/a/bklfSCi

[Anonymous No.15197839]

>>15197785
the standard for getting data onto blockchains, yes
the standard for every transaction on the planet, no
and i don't get how people in this thread can actually misunderstand iso20022 to the point of actually believing this, it's very strange to me

[Anonymous No.15197848]

>>15196696
And every bank in the world is going to work with Chainlink, because swift will be using it.

[Anonymous No.15197852]

>>15197839
Get the fuck out Shareblue

[Anonymous No.15197853]

>>15194871
>theres 16x more link than BTC
>1billion link
>21million BTC
>47x more LINK than BTC
>17million BTC exhist, estimated 1million - 2 million lost forever
>66x more LINK than BTC if 1billion vs 15million is the correct amount of LINK and BTC that is currently available to be bought and sold
just because 650mil is in the dev wallets doesnt mean you shouldnt take them into account, the did start selling link on the day it hit its ATH

[Anonymous No.15197861]

>>15197839
middleware. Middleware. Say it one more time... miiiiiiiidddddddddllllllllllleeeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeee

[Anonymous No.15197865]

>>15197712
Based
See you on the other side anon

[Anonymous No.15197888]

>>15197672
Store of value is the tip of the iceburg, anon.

[Anonymous No.15197895]

>>15197789
reminder that no chainlink announcement has ever made it pump. The only thing that did was the fake partnerships with Google and Oracle, as well as the original fake partnership with Swift, none of which were planned in advance, so these dates are completely irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.15197900]

>>15197861
yes middleware for getting data onto blockchains
iso20022 has been working fine for years without blockchains, and will continue to work fine without blockchains in the future
the fact that link works with iso20022 DOES NOT mean that everything in the iso20022 format is gonna go through the chainlink network, how people can misunderstand this is very strange to me

[Anonymous No.15197905]

Attention all brainlets

Buy DGD

DigixDAO is a Decentralized Autonomous Organization that is controlled by token holders.

They did an ICO in 2016 raising $5,500,000 in funds (466,648 ether).

Currently the DAO has the custody of 394,900 ether from the funds (remember, token holders control this).

https://etherscan.io/address/0x75bA02c5bAF9cc3E9fE01C51Df3cB1437E8690D4

https://etherscan.io/address/0x24626FD95aD815bAB2136d6f91cA10562161CDa3

The access to the funds is through a governance model in which token holders make proposals and vote on them to be implemented.

Currently there is a proposal for implementing a new function/contract that will be burning DGD tokens and spitting out the ethereum that is held by the DAO.

The amount of ETH that someone burning a DGD token will get is 0.197, the current price for DGD is 0.085 ETH. That means is a 2x from here to reach the new floor.

Now the token price can never ever be below 0.197 because now the full supply of DGD is backed by the ethereum in the contract.

Tether is backed and pegged to dollars. DGD is going to be backed by ETH but no pegged so it will only increase in value.

https://community.digix.global/#/proposals/0x295ae203328a91bd9063f4384b270461437910ccdd26ba3ded2cac2890b16ac5

[Anonymous No.15197913]

also reminder that Sergey has enough tokens to sell 100k every single day (1 link per second) for 20 years, or 1million per day (10 link per second) every single day for 2 years strait. Mooning is literally an impossibility.

[Anonymous No.15197921]

>>15197852
Mofuckin JTRIG all up in this bitch.

[Anonymous No.15197922]

>>15197900
reminder to dilate your hole on account of being too dumb to buy with the rest of us in 2017

[Anonymous No.15197936]

>>15197922
and you will hold all the way down to 0.2 as Sergey keeps selling 1 link per second for literally the next 20 years

[Anonymous No.15197948]

>>15197922
no one has explained to me how i'm wrong, while i've been very clear in the ways you all have been wrong and misunderstood iso20022.
very strange how you all can be so certain without being able to explain why you are so certain. it's almost like you're all brainlets and can't articulate a thought or reason

[Anonymous No.15197966]

>>15197948
linkers don't understand programming, if they did they wouldn't be linkers.

[Anonymous No.15198024]

>>15197948
it was explained here >>15197479

[Anonymous No.15198029]

>>15198024
that link proves the opposite retard.

[Anonymous No.15198042]

>>15197839
It's the same magical thinking they employed to still be clinging to the "Link making me a billionaire" meme. It's pure cope.

[Anonymous No.15198052]

>>15198029
no

[Anonymous No.15198069]

>>15198052
yes, you're just too low IQ and uneducated to understand. learn some programming before investing in software project you can't possibly comprehend.

[Anonymous No.15198077]

>>15194871
>DIDN'T WIPE NOT FLUSHING.
Reminds me of SIBOS. Anyone got the toilet photo?

[Anonymous No.15198094]

>>15195353
If they are all getting 6-7 figure passive income what incentive would there be to sell the whole stack? That was rhetorical question to which the answer will tell you the reasoning you seek.

[Anonymous No.15198097]

>>15198069

[Anonymous No.15198124]

>>15198097
you don't need to sell, sergey can sell 1 link per second for the next 20 years, or 1 million link per day for the next 2 years. EVERY SINGLE DAY. What you do is irrelevant.

[Anonymous No.15198143]

>>15198124
I just buy more

[Anonymous No.15198153]

>>15198143
and he just sells more

[Anonymous No.15198175]

>>15198153
and I just buy more

[Anonymous No.15198186]

>>15198175
>team owns 65%
>team aggressively dumping
>linker: this is bullish

[Anonymous No.15198193]

>>15194890
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FywSzjRq0e4

[Anonymous No.15198200]

>>15198124
Who do you think he's selling to? "Institutional" money? :D

He's selling to the HODLers, and he's gonna walk away wealthy, and the Linktards will be here muttering and whining how "STILL NOT SELLING".

[Anonymous No.15198228]

>>15195058
>FedNow

IT'S FUCKING HAPPENING

[Anonymous No.15198273]

>>15198228
HOLY FUCK WE ARE GOING TO FUCKING MOON READ THIS SHIT

[Anonymous No.15198274]

>>15198228

Indeed.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/SECRS/2019/February/20190207/OP-1625/OP-1625_121318_133139_430730115884_1.pdf

[Anonymous No.15198275]

>>15198228
Cryptosite: "This is bullish for crypto"

Every time, lol.

[Anonymous No.15198303]

>>15194936
>$370 top
>tfw fudded even in your dreams
>$1000 EOY

[Anonymous No.15198311]

>>15198274
Read my post above, It's some pajeet from GOOGLE saying that he's excited for FedNow. This is BULLISH for chainlink.

[Anonymous No.15198316]

>>15198228
>by 2024

[Anonymous No.15198332]

>>15194871
Not going to read through the thread, but you're a little off OP
When fully released, there will be 50x more LINK than BTC. 1k LINK will be similar to the 21 BTC club, and the 10k will be similar to current 210 BTC status.

[Anonymous No.15198335]

>>15198273
>real-time payments
>Federal Reserve
>Trump Faster Payments taskforce

It’s XRP you stupid cuck. How the hell could you think this has anything to do with your babby league ERC token from a bunch of zoomers?

[Anonymous No.15198347]

>>15198274
Actually read this shit, It's fucking insane.
Fudders BTFO right now

[Anonymous No.15198359]

>>15198335
You forgot the settlement service part buddy

[Anonymous No.15198377]

>>15197888
Delusional Linkies think they’re gonna take over the entire global market cap with a fucking ERC677 token HAHA

[Anonymous No.15198408]

>>15197913
>>15197936
You make yourselves so obvious

[Anonymous No.15198440]

>>15198347

Yeah I was pretty blown away when I heard, did I, a lowly wagie anon, find a decent breadcrumb? Would me neat to have contributed something, I assumed some in the know would be wise besides me.

And yeah XRP brainlets have no answer for the settlements part of what FedNow allows.

[Anonymous No.15198441]

If (((they))) whoever (((they))) are at the top of the world see link being this big they would immediately start buying up raising demand to 100$ - 1k$ each very rapidly to buy everyone out and then price out the rest. Then it would jump to 10k and above. the idea is if this is really what we believe it is then we will be dealt with earlier rather than later by big organizations and given a quick payout rather than a slow. they will make demand known just to price every other buyer out

paying 50k people out and making them fantastical levels of millionaires is not a big deal if this is the next revolution and data really is important

[Anonymous No.15198468]

>>15198347
Nothing to do with blockchain. Don’t be deluded.

[Anonymous No.15198514]

>>15198347
nice find but you're completely off in your highlighted points

you need to look at the part that says reduce barriers to innovation, trusted third parties. also, the liquidity bit at the beginning is kinda bullish on ripple fuck me man

[Anonymous No.15198526]

>>15198347
DUDE HOLY SHIT!!!
RIPPLE AND LINK BOTH USED TOGETHER to solve different problems

[Anonymous No.15198532]

>>15196254
>Bruh, Just Go to the archives

[Anonymous No.15198549]

>>15197288
She's cute how did the two of you meet?

[Anonymous No.15198554]

>>15198526
This is peak delusion

[Anonymous No.15198560]

>>15198468
K.

[Anonymous No.15198638]

>>15195075
This

[Anonymous No.15198664]

>>15197672
network could be at trillions doesnt matter retard can you put a value to the internet it jesus christ chainlink is a fuckin open source network.It is not a commodity not an equity not a fuckin company stock not a shiny boomer rocks but piece of network.SmartContract is the company name , Chainlink is the network.No one owns the network.SC is the developer of this open source network they cant just shut it down once its running.

[Anonymous No.15198718]

>>15198664
There's only one contract being used now to call the price of eth for no purpose. Sergey has his team of interns go to the local shops cafes and malls here in san fran selling discounted api calls they didnt sell before.
They shout out "price of eth at 0500GMT 05/08/19 going for 25% discount. Ive got the price of eth here cheap". Some boomer always comes up but always walks away in disgust when he realizes they are selling old data.

[Anonymous No.15198751]

the fucking delusion in here.

buy DGD and flip it into link after the easy 2x.>>15197905

[Anonymous No.15199101]

>>15197687
>capable of such a feat at the moment on a live network
Chainlink in it's current state doesn't even have staking or penalty contracts, even if what everything you say is true, I don't see how link will be ready to handle any of these tasks anytime soon. At the moment it is only capable of checking the eth price.

[Anonymous No.15199163]

>>15198069
>https://www.globalcustodian.com/dtcc-to-create-golden-copy-for-cds-with-blockchain/

I was an accountant and this shit will use link. Nothing like it exists as of yet. And there might be untold applications that are unclear as of yet; that might emerge on top.

[Anonymous No.15199325]

great thread desu
never selling

[Anonymous No.15199529]

https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/files/other20190805a1.pdf

Where do they say they will use Chainlink ?

[Anonymous No.15199602]

most likely end result? your own bullet in your own noggin and i sleep like a baby and wake up like a baby, waking up crying, hoping there's someone else that needs a lesson taught.

[Anonymous No.15199629]

NWO

[Anonymous No.15199721]

>>15195058
Based.

[Anonymous No.15199749]

this thread is fake

[Anonymous No.15199778]

>>15194871
GO THE FUCK BACK REBBIT
NO CENTRALIZED SHITCOIN XRP SHIT ERC SHIT NONE

BACK TO REBBIT
BACK TO REBBIT
LINKIES ARE REBBITORS
ALL LINKIES ARE NEW
REPORT REBBIT CENTRALIZED SHITCOINS

[Anonymous No.15199816]

>>15194936
I’m not making anymore of this than I need to but I had a dream that the link price went to $370.73. I don’t remember much else about the dream but I distinctly remember that price. Kind of weird thinking about it after seeing this.

[Anonymous No.15199854]

>>15199602
Sometimes the biggest reason investors lose out is not because of fud, but because of boredom. Don't let your lack of patience lull you into selling. Remember why you believed in externally aware smart contracts. They are the future. Godspeed LINK marines

[Anonymous No.15199946]

Blessed thread. We're all going to make it

[Anonymous No.15199960]

>>15199816

Two people here have done DMT and reported the price at 378, and 380 I believe.

[Anonymous No.15200017]

>>15199816
I had a similar dream. I fall asleep to watching the hourly chart and I had this very odd dream last night where I was watching the price skyrocket. 10, 55, 200, 840... It was so real I didn't know whether I was dreaming or awake until I woke up to realize I wasn't staring at my screen. I've had these types of dreams before but not with crypto. When I experience the events in real life I get an amazing rush of deja vu.

[Anonymous No.15200063]

>>15200017
legit same dream but it was a candle what wicked to 5k then found support in the high 3 figs lol

[Anonymous No.15200310]

>>15199946

I’m really happy to have contributed to a solid LINK thread for my frens, I’ve felt I’ve owed you autistic bastards for letting me in on the secret.

Glad I could help in some way, keep a few frens comfy while we wait for liftoff.

[Anonymous No.15200322]

>>15200017
i had a dream i was riding a skateboard with sergey... it was based but he had to let me off eventually

[Anonymous No.15200349]

>>15200322
That's beautiful

[Anonymous No.15200387]

>>15198718
these will be the best memes in a few months

[Anonymous No.15200530]

People here are delusional. They ascribe some sort of hypercompetence to the team that doesn't exist. They're a tiny team for someone who is meant to revolutionise finance. Even something like moving to another chain would take an enormous amount of time and effort. Don't you people remember how long it took to rewrite the codebase? Or that it took two years to reach mainnet? Two years for a mainnet lacking essential features, let alone extra crap like TEEs or zkps.

[Anonymous No.15200540]

>>15200530
this lol. people are in for fucking heartbreak.

[Anonymous No.15200597]

>>15200310
Life's funny, because of these retarded memes I am going to be richer than my entire family combined. There's no doubting it anymore, it's just reality.

[Anonymous No.15200605]

>>15194871
>16x more LINK than BTC
There is 50x more LINK than BTC

[Anonymous No.15200638]

>>15200540
It's really sad that so many people have fallen for unrealistic predictions. They see link everywhere. They think link will partner with the FED.

This guy knows what's up.
>>15197626

No current chain is ready for something like that. And chainlink is certainly not ready to deal with that kind of demand. The whole crypto space is just not at that level. But some retards had dreams from reading too many 42 posts, so they must be millionaires come september.

[Anonymous No.15200693]

>>15200530
>>15200638
jews detected

[Anonymous No.15200782]

>>15200638
If you attempt to discuss anything that drifts away from the "1000 eoy" narrative its disregarded it as fud. Pretty fucking dumb and pathetic. No one here thinks realistically anymore.

[Anonymous No.15200819]

>>15200782
Nulinkers have taken over. There was much more actual, realistic discussion. Now its just, "is 300 link enough?" and DR;NS. 1000 eoy used to be only half serious. It's sad.

[Anonymous No.15200957]

>>15200782
>No one here thinks realistically anymore
and you are also participating here

[Anonymous No.15200998]

>>15194936
>>15195098
>>15199816
>>15199960
Maybe you had seen that 370 number thrown around about link before given the dmt predictions. Still very weird to dream about that.

[Anonymous No.15201254]

>>15194871
Don't mind me. Just saving all the dank OC Chainlink memes in this thread.

[Anonymous No.15201263]

>>15200605

50x more total, 16x more currently circulating

[Anonymous No.15201271]

>>15194871
$6 LINK eoy.

[Anonymous No.15201281]

>>15195058
lmao peak linkie delusion

[Anonymous No.15201288]

>>15198526
We've been saying this shit for a long fucking time bros.

[Anonymous No.15201418]

>>15196880
Do not make the mistake of assuming discord trannies are more in the know than biz

pic-related, t. wolf faction

[Anonymous No.15201439]

>>15197626
>bro they're creating another centralized solution it will be good trust me my dad works for clearing house

[Anonymous No.15201460]

You all rode $1000 EOY all 2018, August 2019 we are getting $6 hopium posts. My how humble pie tastes

[Anonymous No.15201473]

>>15198124
so he cuts the price to 1/3, who gives a shit

[Anonymous No.15201479]

>>15197626
Why did they ignore this post?

[Anonymous No.15201502]

>>15201479
because its shitty cope

[Anonymous No.15201509]

>>15201502
He has a point though.

[Anonymous No.15201540]

>>15195194
anon you are not a schizo. There are a few anons here who know these same things and feel these feelings you have. Just hold and work on self improvement now. I can't know how often you browse here, but a healthy dose of biz should be limited to 45 mins to an hour a day. Take care.

[Anonymous No.15201647]

>>15201540
This is correct. Very few truly see. Congrats anon.

[Anonymous No.15202782]

>>15195058
>TL;DR Fed confirmed FedNow, and this the Fed Reserve in general, and thus the entire world financial system, will run on LINK
this conclusion doesn't follow at all from what you're saying

That's great that the FedNow instant transfer protocol will onerate on/with ISO 20022, but it doesn't mean it will be running ON chainlink. All it means is that chainlinked smart contracts will be able to use this protocol (if there is demand)

[Anonymous No.15202874]

A market cap of 1.5 trillion and 40-46% BTC dominance is bullish for Link.