/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.15012921]

Cash will flip core by the end of 2020

ask any bch related questions you'd like to have answered.

[Anonymous No.15012929]

funding doesn't look too good

[Anonymous No.15012936]

>>15012921
BCH not BSV
Top Kek faggot you chose the wrong team

[Anonymous No.15012949]

>>15012921
BSV bro here, but I'll bite. Why is BCH going to flip BTC?

Thanks,

[Anonymous No.15012976]

>>15012921
tell me everything that is being used as FUD against BCH?
why is it superiour to litecoin

[Anonymous No.15013002]

>>15012949
I'm assuming sth about ICOs on BCH, including one by bitcoin.com, security tokens and Jihan's new billion dollar project - Matrixport.

[Anonymous No.15013017]

>>15013002
>more eth Ponzi schemes

Bold strategy Cotton, let's see if it pays off.

[Anonymous No.15013201]

>>15012976
Litecoin doesn’t have the roadmap and technical development that bitcoin cash has. Ltc might get mimble eventually, but it’s mostly being marketed with adoption and not so much with advancements in speed, security and privacy.

[Anonymous No.15013246]

Hey roger can you please delist my government and become prime minister pipe bomb?

[Anonymous No.15013272]

>>15012976
LTC:
>copy+paste BTC, do no development whatsoever, only change consensus algo
>Greg Maxwell writes a GPU miner for LTC, shares with nobody, gets half the circulating supply for himself
>Scammer creator gets his bro to list it on coinbase, dumps at ath
>Biggest technological advancement is that they'll start copy+pasting code from GRIN as well as BTC, lmfao
BCH:
>The entire early bitcoin community left the infiltrated BTC for BCH
>This includes billionaires such as Roger and Jihan, as well as dozens of others who prefer their privacy. But they're all investing in the ecosystem
>The best scientists Bitcoin ever had stuck to BCH, actual scaling is happening
>Even tokens are now on BCH and the first few ones were moon missions (biz missed them)
>More merchants in East Asia accept BCH than BTC now, the trend will only become more and more pronounced
>Even got Schnorr signatures before BTC, lmfao
>Solid devs, no infinite inflation bugs like BTC retards
>Every shitcoiner is afraid of it, so they have to call its biggest holders scammers, but the biggest holders are actually the greatest selfless philanthropists of our time

[Anonymous No.15013289]

>>15012921
>cash will flip core
will flip the wallet?
maybe you mean the node software?

[Anonymous No.15013456]

>>15013272
bch was a good bet fundamentals wise but recent price action clearly indicates the market couldn't care less about that. in the end all minority forks of bitcoin are inherently worthless.

[Anonymous No.15013564]

>>15013456
> but recent price action clearly indicates the market couldn't care less about that
I only had 10.5, I started buying at sub 0.03, already have 105 now.
I'm confident that it has bottomed out and even put a lot of my LINK profits there.

[Anonymous No.15013569]

>>15013456
Imagine thinking bot manipulation is an accurate assessments of value.

[Anonymous No.15013580]

>>15013564
it's not what i see i sold all my bch for btc at 0.5
i'm gonna have to see that bottoming out for myself before i even entertain buying back. i have the feeling in the next bull all alts gonna get the shaft even the few decent ones.

[Anonymous No.15013591]

>>15013569
obviously not my dude i just said all minority forks are fundamentally worthless yet bots trade them for something.

[Anonymous No.15013621]

>>15012921
NO ONE WANTS TO USE BITCOIN AS A CURRENCY, IF PEOPLE CARED ABOUT THAT THEY WOULD MINE 0XBTC OR SOME SHIT

CORE IS STILL THE BEST FOR MINERS AND THE BEST STORE OF VALUE

[Anonymous No.15013660]

>>15012921
>>15012936
>>15013272

>you had 10 years

[Anonymous No.15013731]

>>15013660
?

[Anonymous No.15013789]

>>15012921
Is it true that Roger is not allowed back to the US?

[Anonymous No.15013798]

>>15012921
>>15013272
LOL. BCashers actually believe this shit. Here's the real story:

>two Yurapeons invent an improvement to the mining algo code that eliminates a redundant calculation
>they file a patent application for mining hardware/firmware using it
>Terra buys their application during the big 2013 bubble
>2014, MtGox implodes
>destroys dozens of companies that were investing in Bitcoin infrastructure and hardware
>including destroying Terra
>2014
>Jihan Wu notices the patent application when it publishes
>begins secretly using the improvement in the mining rigs that he wears out before dumping them to suckers
>disables the code before sending it out to his sucker customers
>suddenly
>SegWit is planned
>SegWit will prevent him from continuing to secretly use his Covert ASICBoost mining accelerator
>he panics
>begins creating a giant FUD campaign to stop SegWit from being adopted
>manages to hold the entire dev community hostage for two years
>2017
>someone is disassembling and analyzing Antminer firmware
>discovers the disabled Covert ASICBoost code
>suddenly it all makes sense
>everyone realizes at last why Jihan Wu is blocking SegWit
>UASF is proposed to overcome miners' opposition
>Jihan pays off a bunch of suckers to stay with him and keeps proposing weird shit like 2X to stall
>when UASF is finally forced on him, he splits to form BCash
>tries to do "the flippening" to overturn Bitcoin
>fails miserably
>2019
>BCash is largely irrelevant
>all the suckers he lured over are noticing that no development is happening, blocks are empty, and price is collapsing
and yet assholes like OP are still trying to sucker more suckers.

Fuck you, OP.

[Anonymous No.15013823]

>>15013789
Nor canada and australia.

[Anonymous No.15013825]

>>15013246
>prime minister pipe bomb

[Anonymous No.15013947]

>>15013825
Is that a camp bill murray?

The "firecrackers" he was selling were equivalent to a quarter stick of dynamite. He was sending up to 20 of them in a package. Shit could have gone horribly wrong.

[Anonymous No.15014017]

>>15013947
No, that's John De Lancie - more usually seen as Q in star trek

[Anonymous No.15014564]

>>15013798
Segshit is actually bad though.

[Anonymous No.15014806]

>>15013798
does this retard think btc pow changed with segwit?

[Anonymous No.15014824]

>>15014806
That and the amazing (allegedly) improvements with lightning are all you hear about from the core crowd. I just see a laggy blockchain with high fees and name recognition at this point.

[Anonymous No.15014874]

Fake and gay coin.

It’s basically diet bitcoin

[Anonymous No.15014927]

>>15014806
>Defined as a chain of digital signatures
>segregated witnesses
>no longer BitCoin

[Anonymous No.15014982]

What do you think about that, Dale?!

[Anonymous No.15015017]

>>15014806
>>15014824
Morons like you two don't understand the math behind mining. Everything was detailed in the patent application. If you guys had read it, and read about the discovery of the covert version, you'd understand (1) how it worked, (2) why SegWit would stop Jihan from hiding it any longer, (3) how this meant that Jihan lost his advantage that allowed him to screw everyone else, and (4) why Jihan smeared so much bullshit around about "SegWit bad! 2X good!"

But you're idiots, so you chose to believe Jihan's FUD. I hope you enjoy losing everything you put into Jihan's scam.

[Anonymous No.15015077]

>>15012921
Tiny block retards (BTC) vs Medium block chads vs Big block retards (BSV)

BTC's blocks are too small to scale the network without retarded fees. BSV's blocks are too large to scale the network without reorging the chain and centralizing hashpower.

BCH is quite literally the goldilocks coin. It's just perfect. Only problem is not having the ticker and not having the mindshare.

[Anonymous No.15015093]

>>15015017
Jihan and Roger are rekt but corecucks will get an even more glorious JUSTing

[Anonymous No.15015108]

>>15015017
I only care about functionality and what works best today. If it lose it all, so be it. That’s still preferable to wasting time going back and forth with fedora tippers on the other end of the pond.

[Anonymous No.15015110]

>>15012921
the concept of BCH is utterly retarded
either you focus on maximizing hashrate (core) by keeping the blocks very small or you maximize potential adoption by making them gigantic (BSV) and opening the door for other potentially gigantic usecases (IoT, metanet and so forth).
semi-large blocks are not any form of optimization/maximization, they are just the same thing with a guaranteed lower hashrate (= lower security of the network) and at the same time don't allow for massive scaling.

what i'm saying is that making an arbitrary compromise will not be the way to take over everything. either there are usecases that will require insanely large blocks (BSV wins) or not (core wins), but the absolute optimum will not be an arbitrary number inbetween.

at least litecoin is honest by calling itself "just another, shittier bitcoin" by its name LITE alone.

[Anonymous No.15015410]

>>15015110
Wrong, BCH is Bitcoin and it adjusts to whatever blocksize is needed to accomplish the mission stated in the whitepaper: peer to peer electronic cash.

BTC does not do electronic cash anymore, so it is not Bitcoin.
BSV does aims to be some centralised mess of hosting the entire internet, so it is not Bitcoin

BCH is peer to peer electronic cash and therefore it is Bitcoin.

[Anonymous No.15015451]

>>15015410
BitCoin = chain of digital signatures not shitshow of checkpoints and schnorr signatures. Change the chain of digital signatures and you are no longer BitCoin.

[Anonymous No.15015702]

>>15013621
>THEY WOULD MINE 0XBTC OR SOME SHIT

0xBTC is being mined like nutso already.

[Anonymous No.15015865]

>>15015110
What's really retarded about BCash is that they don't seem to be able to comprehend that Bitcoin has doubled the number of transactions per block by adopting SegWit. So there was literally no need to double the block size. Just needed to upgrade the code to make transactions more size-efficient.

So now BCash has empty blocks and nobody uses it, and they're whining that the big blocks are necessary because reasons.

Schnorr will make the transactions even more space-efficient. And some day, when all these efficiency gains have been implemented and it actually becomes necessary to increase block size to handle transaction volume, Bitcoin can finally bother implementing that, too.

>>15015410
>BCH is Bitcoin
Well, amazingly enough, the rest of the world disagrees, which is why everyone calls it "BCash" and not "Bitcoin".

[Anonymous No.15015941]

>>15015865
Argue all you want. The fees and slow. Confirmation times are bullshit.

[Anonymous No.15016025]

>>15015702
0xBitcoin is in fact a very good "version" of Bitcoin built for Ethereum. You can hate it all you want, but it does exactly what Bitcoin did in 2009, but on top of Ethereum as a immutable smart contract. All the specifications match the original Bitcoin code,but it is built in Solidity.

Now if Ethereum can massively scale and set out to accomplish what it has planned, then THAT my fren is the best decentralized peer to peer cash.

[Anonymous No.15016061]

>>15012921
You spelled bsv wrong.

[Anonymous No.15016094]

>>15015077
>BSV's blocks are too large to scale the network without reorging the chain and centralizing hashpower.
Just go back to Core.

[Anonymous No.15016902]

>>15016025
>0xBitcoin is in fact a very good "version" of Bitcoin built for Ethereum. You can hate it all you want, but it does exactly what Bitcoin did in 2009, but on top of Ethereum as a immutable smart contract. All the specifications match the original Bitcoin code,but it is built in Solidity.

Red pill me on 0xBitcoin you jew. It is a scam is it not?

[Anonymous No.15017164]

>>15015941
Fees are 1 sat/byte right now. (Actually, they're zero sats per byte, but since those transactions don't always get relayed by all nodes, you're risking not getting confirmed if you try to do zero fees.) See this:

https://www.blockchain.com/en/charts/mempool-size

When the mempool size is under 1,000,000 it means that every transaction can fit into the next block. (Actually it's about 1,500,000 because of SegWit and size efficiency.)

Confirmation time is the same as it's always been, 10 minutes per block. Same as BCash, right? Or did you guys implement your own version of LN to do instant (2-30 seconds) transactions?

Oh, that's right, you can't, because you can't do SegWit, because Jihan would lose his ability to scam you all with his ASICboost firmware, and besides, that would be an admission that he was lying the whole time.

LOL. Sucks to be a big-blocker.

>>15016902
The question you gotta ask yourself is, do you feel lucky? Well do ya, punk?

[Anonymous No.15017180]

>>15016902
Its not but remember how long it took bitcoin to go from <$1 to $5+, price might be kept down for a very long time while people accumulate and FUD at the same time

[Anonymous No.15017199]

>>15012976
Litecoin doesnt have the coin distribution and amount of lost coins that BCH got from its long chain history of being formerly together with BTC.
If BTC fails, miners are going to choose to mine BCH.

[Anonymous No.15017214]

>muh coffee

-Centralized shitcoin
-Insecure
-Worthless

[Anonymous No.15017225]

>>15017214
Works pretty well if you ask me. Ever try transacting with it?

[Anonymous No.15017261]

>>15015410
This btc and bch are fine bsv is a scam

[Anonymous No.15017309]

>>15017225
>pee pee poo poo muh coffee nigga


Not even responding to what I wrote (retard)

[Anonymous No.15017347]

>>15017309
Try articulating your thoughts with complete sentences.

[Anonymous No.15017400]

>>15017347
-Don't tell me what to do (retard)
-Bigger block sizes -> centralization
-You're literally as bad as Ripple cucks
-Lightning network works and will scale (cry harder faggot)
-I don't need to convince you of anything
-Your girlfriend is pregnant w/ my son
-Go on buying your useless cuck tokens
-I don't want you driving up the price of (real) Bitcoin anyway

[Anonymous No.15017469]

>>15017400
Have fun with your store of value. I don’t give a flying rats ass about what core can do. Only that the brand helps the value of bitcoin cash. Good day to you, sir.

[Anonymous No.15017500]

>>15017469
Bye faggot, hope you don't have to dress up like a girl and whore yourself out when it tanks

[Anonymous No.15017510]

>>15013798
Best post I seen in a long time on this shit

[Anonymous No.15017533]

>>15017500
I said good day!

[Anonymous No.15017541]

>>15017510
An upper lip like that is a classic SJW, refugee accepting, coal burner characteristic.

[Anonymous No.15017645]

>>15017541
So what? Just blow loads in her till you get bored or she gets pregnant and some other cuck will raise the kid for you. Win win.

[Anonymous No.15018353]

>>15015410
This Asuka wins the thread.

[Anonymous No.15018370]

>>15013798
Bcashers utterly BTFO

[Anonymous No.15018389]

>>15012921
Every copy from BTC is a failed cringe project.
Grow up streetshitters.

[Anonymous No.15018402]

>>15018353
Is this Ver?

[Anonymous No.15018429]

>>15017400
> bigger blocks = centralization

you guys really are brainwashed

[Anonymous No.15018455]

>>15018429
big blocks -> more memory to run a node -> more expensive to run a node -> fewer nodes

It's not so fucking complicated for people of normal intelligence

[Anonymous No.15018458]

>>15012921
The truth is sirs, BCH will flip the USD by the end of the century. Check these

[Anonymous No.15018464]

>>15018402
Is this blockstream paid troll?

[Anonymous No.15018483]

>>15018464
**a blockstream paid troll

[Anonymous No.15018494]

>>15012921

EOS could be come number 1 coin

EOS Will Scale Bitcoin

https://medium.com/@persianzuck/eos-will-scale-bitcoin-22268914bde8

[Anonymous No.15018496]

>>15018389
Yeah too bad for you r/btc contains the majority of the original bitcoin community pre-2015. Idiot. BSV and core are the paid trolls, not us.

[Anonymous No.15018504]

>>15018494
Literally kys idiot.

[Anonymous No.15018509]

>>15018455
In that case why not 1mb blocks? Anything under 1gb is fine right now you idiot.

[Anonymous No.15018521]

>>15018389
>>15018455
Who am I kidding you're both probably paid trolls anyway.

[Anonymous No.15018529]

>>15018509
I mean 1kb.

[Anonymous No.15018560]

Bitcoin is Bitcoin. (BTC)

Everything else is kaka made by petulant children.

[Anonymous No.15018572]

>>15018560
Funny how the BTC ticker symbol was stolen from the original bitcoin community then.

[Anonymous No.15018585]

>>15018455
it's worse than that , miners don't even run nodes only the pool they work(there must be 12 pools maximum).

As a result runing node is mostly done for free since needing 300gb on space for runing a btc node is literally nothing.
In the case of BCH it would be 1.5tb per year , not bad at all.
In the case of BSV it would be 700tb per year top Kek.

You would end with literally 12 nodes and since they allow to upload shit in their blockchain those 12 nodes will probably be sued for having ilegal shit.

>>15018509
Because 1kb is absurd , 1mb is also absurdly low but hard forks have their risk.

BCH is in the golden spot 1.5tb per year in the case of full nodes is nothing for today standard.

[Anonymous No.15018600]

>>15018572

This is what two mums does to a child?

oh my

[Anonymous No.15018599]

>>15018585
>Because 1kb is absurd , 1mb is also absurdly low but hard forks have their risk

That was my point. And we already hard forked, we're fine.

[Anonymous No.15018608]

Everything else than Bitcoin (BTC)
Is just sad empty block filled with incel jizz.

[Anonymous No.15018616]

>>15018600
Paid troll, they ad hominem when dealing with the truth. They can't do anything, as confrontation leads to the reader's education on the matter.

[Anonymous No.15018648]

>>15018599
Yes but the bch community should be less autistic about core.

Bitcoin CORE , will always have more hashrate due to having smaller blocks thus less fees.
It will become the reserve currency of the crypto world regardless of what anyone thinks.

BCH has the same inflation , and history thus it's the candidate to take the second place.
But this talk about the real bitcoin and constant shilling between btc and bch is absurd.

The only way bch will thrive is by keep doing what they been doing regarding adoption such as their own localbitcoins alternative.
Keep having merchants like bitpay using bch and pushind adoption in general.

This constant shilling against core is retarded , core arguments are as good as the bch arguments and bch has been gaining strenght every time btc bottlenecks(and btc hashrate every time it bottlenecks).
And the old asics will go to bch mining.

So it's a win win to everyone but the shilling scares newfags and gives an angle of shilling to bsv scammers.

[Anonymous No.15018653]

>>15018648
>due to having smaller blocks thus less fees.

*MORE fess.

[Anonymous No.15018668]

>>15018648
>Bitcoin CORE , will always have more hashrate due to having smaller blocks thus less fees.

Wrong, hash rate follows price.

As for the rest of your reply, check out r/btc more, we've gotten past our anger these days.

I'm out now, keep up the good thoughts.

[Anonymous No.15018701]

>>15018668
I check both subreddits and used both coins.
Being in Argentina and having lived under capital controls i believe in bitcoin like few do and i believe that bch will be the coin with the biggest gains.

Regarding hashrate following the price that's true now but not in 2030 , as bitcoin inflation goes to 0.04 levels post 2028 halving the fact that hashrate may collapse for bch is a real posibility.

This is why monero is inflationary and why corecucks see small blocks as a necesesary stuff.
However that's very conservative because bitcoin CAN get full 32mb blocks as is the case of bch.
More risky but it can do it by then.

I literally have all my savings in btc but i am using bch more and more.
Only reason i have not used it more is because the lack of liquidity in the local market makes the conversion to usd for purchases costlier than btc even if fees are lower for bch.

Local.bitcoins seem to be changing slowly this thankfully and the fact that the true localbitcoins cucked on cash purchases when local.bitcoins was released is bullish for bch.

But make no mistake , core and bch will have to live together.

[Anonymous No.15018788]

>>15012921
BCH for life. Hook me up with some plz qrurmp0lagl4zw0hkyzww8muy83ux7dn2s2elwa53u

[Anonymous No.15018796]

[Anonymous No.15019610]

>>15014927
i'm talking about the pow nigger, if there is an exploit in sha256 or sha256d segwit didn't change anything about that. that is why i'm calling stupid. and you not understanding that simple fact but feeling the need to post that cringey thing makes you an idiot.

[Anonymous No.15019637]

>>15018701
>subreddits
What's that?

[Anonymous No.15019649]

>>15015108
>I only care about functionality and what works best today.
at this stage where we are at roughly 0.1% adoption rate worldwide i only care about valuation. and all alts are fundamentally fucked in that regard. this especially includes bch and sv who share pow hash with bitcoin it just for some reason did not penetrate the thick skulls of morons that the only reason these coins exist is miners playing nice which we can't rely on.

[Anonymous No.15019658]

>>15013201
BCH has nothing but incompetent devs and cult followers.

[Anonymous No.15019675]

>>15018458
Bitch i got that bitcoin cash.

[Anonymous No.15019694]

Yesterday I went to one of my favorite Indian spots and after the meal i asked to speak with the owner. I sat down with him and showed him the bitcoin.com wallet and showed him how it’s used. He said he was afraid of adding something like that on his phone, and also didn’t trust bitcoin because “it crashed”. I even offered him $20 in BCH and he just laughed at me.

I am not sure how I can better sell the idea of bitcoin cash to someone like this but I think I will go back next week and maybe try and show him a video explaining it better on my iPad.

The next place I’m going to try is my boxing gym!

[Anonymous No.15019705]

>>15019694
>desperately trying to get more pajeets into crypto
dude what are you doing

[Anonymous No.15019708]

>>15019705
Doing the needful sir

[Anonymous No.15019727]

>>15019658
i don't see that they are developing more boldly than core devs who are focusing entirely on offchain scaling. bch is a good testnet for btc alternative scaling. sv is just garbage.

[Anonymous No.15019730]

BCH has more rights to call itself Bitcoin than BTC but we're here to make gains, not argue politics.
The reason I'm headed towards 210 BCH is that BCH is simply oversold and at current rates Jihan himself can buy all BCH up, causing a flippening.
Don't underestimate billionaire backers, BCH is leading the way in that regard.
Its technical development is also progressing well, but idgaf about that, the only think tech and announcements are good for is the fact that they conceal fake pumps and make them look real.
Next fork is in November, and by that time Jihan would have officially announced Matrixport. There's no flippening in sight but BCH right now is a great way to double (or even triple) your BTC/LINK stack.

[Anonymous No.15019736]

>>15019730
>BCH has more rights to call itself Bitcoin than BTC
that's bullshit no minority fork has the right ot the kings mantle.

[Anonymous No.15019744]

>>15019730
P.S. I expect at least 0.08 BTC at the height of the fork pump, and if Vitalik follows through with scaling ETH on BCH it could go to 0.2 - but that's unlikely and I'd sell at 0.08 personally

[Anonymous No.15019760]

>>15019744
i got out at 0.05 frankly this bull is gonna be different. this is not the time to buy alts imo. they gonna get absolutely devastated. and at the end of the day bch is an alt it is valued like an alt. so i'm just gonna pick some up under 0.01

[Anonymous No.15019771]

>>15019736
>that's bullshit no minority fork has the right ot the kings mantle.
Every coin is defined by its whitepaper.
If LINK decides they're not doing oracles tomorrow, and start selling poop in a glass tomorrow you'd call it a scam. Not sure why BTC gets a free pass.

Most realistically, Bitcoin is just an idea that simply doesn't exist anymore.
There's BTC which is a shitcoin that doesn't work as described and is useless as cash, which is bitcoin's main purpose.
Then there's BCH which is a loser of a political war, reliant on the good will of miners due to being a minority fork and is all-in on being solid cash, even when it takes a major change to achieve that.
And then there's BSV which is a shitshow mined by computers all situated in teh same building, yet still suffering from reorg attacks because it can't scale for shit.

[Anonymous No.15019777]

>>15019705
Its called adoption and I'm doing my part. A few weeks ago I even got my local deli (persian owner) to accept bitcoin cash. I've been going there for about a year now every week and I was just talking to the owner about my week. I mentioned that I've been buying bitcoin regularly and he asked this time about how he can also do the same. I showed him the bitcoin.com wallet and also more importantly about how to cash out. He is also already down with venmo and paypal so this seemed like an easy step for him.

[Anonymous No.15019784]

>>15019777
Checked.

[Anonymous No.15019788]

>>15019760
> i got out at 0.05 frankly this bull is gonna be different. this is not the time to buy alts imo. they gonna get absolutely devastated.
I'm by no means selling my BTC stack but unless this pump is entirely fake tethers and the conspiracy is right, I think some alts will get solid rallies, BCH and ETH leading the way.
> and at the end of the day bch is an alt it is valued like an alt.
True. I'm an early bitcoiner who sees BCH as the continuation of what I used in 2013, but I'm not gonna argue that it's already considered an alt that that's all that matters.
> so i'm just gonna pick some up under 0.01
If that happens I'm going all in

[Anonymous No.15019808]

>>15019771
>Bitcoin is just an idea that simply doesn't exist anymore.
oh it definitely exists. also most importantly compare holding metals and btc since 2016!
10% vs 2380% gains. you fags are all so hasty to bury the king but if you zoom out you see the big picture and the big picture is btc shits all over meme metals stocks and bonds in general every other investment class.

btc is trustless permissionless publicly auditable and secure also of fixed finite supply. and it is the only thing on the planet with all of these properties. you tak tech and shit but it only takes 5 minutes to fork a shitcoin and "improve" on it. everybody tries to replicate what bitcoin did but it's resiliently unique.

[Anonymous No.15019836]

>>15019808
We can agree to disagree. I think that Bitcoin cannot survive over the long run without the ability to build a parallel economy of many transactions.
I also KNOW that the small block idea came out of nowhere and has been sponsored by state actors. Even Hal Finney's ideas are largely different from what we have today.
But I'm still holding a decent chunk of BTC because how a shitcoin is perceived is more important than its fundamentals.
If I had 10MM+ net worth I'd buy gold instead but we gotta risk :)

[Anonymous No.15019861]

Bhc is pumping

[Anonymous No.15019923]

>>15018616
paid troll?
BSV,BCH inbreds are the paid trolls.

troll

[Anonymous No.15019940]

>>15018796
So true.
ver and craig is Kings of the lemmings.

[Anonymous No.15019945]

>>15019940
Doesnt matter its pumping

[Anonymous No.15019962]

>>15017469
bitcoin cash is cucked as a duck

[Anonymous No.15019973]

>>15017645
niggerish

[Anonymous No.15019979]

>>15019675
bitch u got a red haired orphan. bad decision.

[Anonymous No.15019990]

>>15019836
>I think that Bitcoin cannot survive over the long run without the ability to build a parallel economy of many transactions.
that's possible.
>I also KNOW that the small block idea came out of nowhere and has been sponsored by state actors.
fuck knows but state actors are all for centralization and oversight and control so it makes little sense.
>If I had 10MM+ net worth I'd buy gold instead but we gotta risk :)
that's the funny thing even if i had billions at this point i wouldn't buy gold. because it's fundamentally shit.

[Anonymous No.15020176]

Bunch of porn addicted cookie cutters in this thread. Pic related is the answer and you all know it.

[Anonymous No.15020340]

>>15018353
its not asuka, its just some ramdomless anon without brain

[Anonymous No.15020442]

>>15020176
A fat scamming slob is what I see.

[Anonymous No.15020526]

>>15013798
>>15015017
>>15015865
>>15017164
Absolutely based

[Anonymous No.15020572]

>>15012921
Do you realise that CTOR fucked up the informational integrity of the protocol and disallowed various neat features such as parent node relationships and smart contracts and that BSV is BitCoin?

[Anonymous No.15020689]

>>15012921
I think BCH is cool but the mainstream media ignores it and it has such a long way to go to catch up to BTC's recognition. In the meantime, other alts have a chance to catch up too. This is why I'm no longer a Bitcoin maximalist. BCH, albeit 'the real bitcoin' by some valid perspectives, doesn't seem to have a big edge over other altcoins without the brand recognition that Bitcoin used to have. I'm also holding a penny stock coin called XMY which is in many ways almost as good as BCH but with a way more appealing upside. Obviously there's a heightened risk too, but I'd rather dev on top of XMY, and if its market goes pear-shaped I could easily migrate to BCH.

[Anonymous No.15020755]

>>15015865
>which is why everyone calls it "BCash" and not "Bitcoin"
Nice headcanon. Only butthurt redditors and normies do that. Why would I hate something I got for free?

[Anonymous No.15020960]

>>15013272
They got schnorr before btc because they literally copy paste an early implementation proposal from btc, which was deemed to not be a good enough implementation for btc. So congrats to your "devs" on copy pasting a rough draft I guess

[Anonymous No.15021636]

>>15012921
Substantiate your claims. Why would BCH flip BTC? Honest question.

[Anonymous No.15021653]

>>15019777
Checked

[Anonymous No.15021910]

>>15019637
If you're into crypto and you don't go on subreddits such as r/btc you're a fucking idiot.

[Anonymous No.15021971]

>>15020340
>This Asuka

You're a non-English speaking troll though I bet.

[Anonymous No.15022010]

i think bch may outperform but now is not the right time..

-> chainlink needs to work
-> libra needs to release
-> way way way more crypto users
-> tired of paying high ass fees
-> tired of the Great Depression 2021

then perhaps, if lucky, bch can go really high. like take over btc, and basically be the next ethereum. lol. all in one coin.. on satoshi's simple/complex technology, i love that its proof of work. none of this proof of stake algorand / hedera / xrp poo

[Anonymous No.15022018]

>>15018701
I don't think core will survive by 2030 given how much the fees are and how instant payments are impossible. It's a useless coin. People will continually be coming around to BCH, and it'll probably become the dominant bitcoin and be renamed to 'bitcoin' on the exchanges, and then that's it.

[Anonymous No.15022046]

>>15022018
This isn't mentioning the fact LN is vaporware. More people are coming around to this. LN simply doesn't work, at all. It was a farce and an excuse to get people complacent.

[Anonymous No.15022187]

>>15022046

LN + 1MB limit.

now all the software has caught up; you have Cash app, Venmo, in Singapore you have Paynow, Paylah, GrabPay, in China Alipay, Wechatpay etc.

It was a brilliant move by the puppet masters behind Core.

Pay off 100 something million to some random neckbeard nerds, and keep your monopoly industries (credit card processing, banks etc.)

Fuck they charge shit tons for doing real poor work.

My local bank apps are programmed so badly, stall etc. Embarrassing. If banks didn't have a monopoly on money printing and had to earn your right to business, they would be broke faster than a toupee in a hurricane.

BCH is the only coin that ticks for me: PoW, decent community, larger transaction per second capacity..

Even on-boarded a local merchant. I think something nifty with Simple Ledger + DataSigVerify might create the next big Killer App, maybe in conjunction with Chainlink, and then BCH could go to 10k.

By then BTC gets eclipsed for being lazy fatasses, and well as u know the rest is history

[Anonymous No.15022231]

>>15022187
Yep they set us back at least 5 years in adoption. Also think about how many places would be accepting bitcoin payments right now, STEAM, with the 2017 newcomers using bitcoin to pay for things as much as the original bitcoin community did (does).

[Anonymous No.15022293]

>>15022046
>LN simply doesn't work
but it does you are fucking stupid the network will take a shape that works eventually right now it's at the least ideal shape possible.

[Anonymous No.15022325]

>>15022187
>BCH is the only coin that ticks for me: PoW, decent community, larger transaction per second capacity..
dude minority pow chains are beyond retarded. they are not secure which makes it a joke and has to rely on central authority for checkpoints which makes it an even bigger joke. and then imbeciles like you go around praising them for being shit.

[Anonymous No.15022369]

>>15022018
It's worth noting that core can't hard fork a blocksize increase. Because of segwit and LN, a hard fork would cause some users to lose coins, and not only that but the code would be all fucked up. This is called technical debt. This was intentional.

[Anonymous No.15022387]

>>15022325
>has to rely on central authority for checkpoints

That's not how checkpoints work, you've been taking the BSV shills for gospel. DYOR.

[Anonymous No.15022421]

>>15022293
LN has to be a hub and spoke network to actually function.

[Anonymous No.15022435]

>>15022293
Hi paid troll.

[Anonymous No.15022436]

>>15022387
well is it a checkpoint or not? cause checkpoints work like what i said. satoshi put particular block hashes in the code. if you do automated checkpoints that are not centrally issued then you increased the chance of a permanent chainsplit to millionfold.

[Anonymous No.15022525]

>>15022436
From a single fucking search of 'BCH checkpoints':

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/9xtvaj/checkpoints/

I didn't even read, check more search results if it doesn't satisfy. I'm not going to write this shit up for you. DYOR.

[Anonymous No.15022885]

>>15022525
>I didn't even read
who would have guessed
https://blog.bitmex.com/bitcoin-cash-abcs-rolling-10-block-checkpoints/
this seems to be abetter summary
so bch doesn't have checkpoints as we call them. they just introduced new settings to the client like maxreorgdepth.
this is fucking bad on so many levels but also highlights why what i said about minority pow chains being retarded is so true.

[Anonymous No.15022954]

>>15022885
>who would have guessed
You're stupid.
>this seems to be abetter summary
No.

[Anonymous No.15022985]

>>15022954
what you linked is a shitty circlejerk with no actual information in it you really don't read anything do you? you just opinionate straight from your ass.

[Anonymous No.15022999]

>>15022985
Lmao. These kind of shitheads are so funny.

[Anonymous No.15023070]

>>15022985
I got caught opinionating from my ass one time, shit was so cash.

[Anonymous No.15023144]

>>15022985
Where'd you go? Did you go cry to your mommy that someone told you to DYOR?

[Anonymous No.15023671]

Guise! Can’t we just team up, pool our resources and make sure that Craig and zuckerberg fail?

[Anonymous No.15023743]

>>15023144
came home from work no worries

[Anonymous No.15023758]

>>15023671
That's what r/btc are doing, check it out.

[Anonymous No.15023942]

>>15023671
i don't think there is a timeline where craig succeeds. for libra it's a different animal. it's very hard to stop it as zuck is 3 steps ahead of regulators from the get go. best thing about it is just explain to everyone how libra is not even a real crypto let alone something that could substitute bitcoin. it's a "new" asset called corporate digital currency.

[Anonymous No.15024973]

>>15021910

[Anonymous No.15025034]

>>15012921
incel dreams so cute.
following these coins (bch,bsv) means you look up to scammers.

cute