[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 2 KB, 250x201, reqt.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15000266 No.15000266 [Reply] [Original]

*sharp inhale*

>> No.15000304

The old logo was better. Rebrand did nothing.

>> No.15000415

>>15000266
Is anyone actually still holding this? If so, why?

>> No.15000453

>>15000266
Crazy to think that you have to pay over $2000 for 1k LINK and only 10$ for a 1k REQ stack when both went for the same price at one point in history

>> No.15000506

>>15000453
held 50/50 req/link in 2017 when both were around 20c. went full dweeb into req. now the only thing that concerns me is where i an hero. i'm thinking the woods i guess.

>> No.15000581

>>15000304
OH NO NO NO THEIR NEW LOGO LOOKS EVEN MORE LIKE A SHITCOIN HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>> No.15000624

>>15000506
never go full reqtard

>> No.15000631

>>15000266
1-800-got-reqt
Call to request ur money back anons

>> No.15000642

>>15000624
it's too fucking late now isn't it. my final wish is for my fellow anons to write my suicide letter--which will be titled "suicide letter"

>> No.15000672

This will never be Link. Link is such a powerful crypto with devoted developments. Only tokens wish they could be Link, and Link Holders know big things incoming. Link=Lambo

>> No.15000862

kill yourself so this can moon already

>> No.15000954

>>15000266
worst team ever. robbin is the ultimate imbecile who should’ve been fired a long time ago. they will never succeed at anything in life, other than having scammed ico investors.

>> No.15000964
File: 128 KB, 831x639, 1488662495471.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15000964

>>15000415
>Is anyone actually still holding this? If so, why?

At this point, most REQ bag holders who had like $10,000 US invested are left with nothing but Binance dust, so they may as well sit on it.

>> No.15001115

>>15000304
They got sued by a crazed Aussie dentist for having a similar logo
The rebrand was to avoid his persistent litigation

>> No.15001655

>>15000964
this is me.
I lost 120k $ in gains.
will never recover from this.

>> No.15001755
File: 165 KB, 600x596, sadpepe.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15001755

>>15000964
Same

>> No.15001815

>>15000266
I kept telling you retards req have no product and yet you wouldnt listen. Bitcoin can already do invoices by the way.

>> No.15001842

'the paypal killer"

Y-Combinator, so agressive

>> No.15001866

>>15001655
holy shit how dumb are you to get that 120k

>> No.15002060

Could have sold my 70k req last October for 11k link, held down like a retard till i capitulated for 836 link. Better late than never.... Thought I was getting a steal at 17 cents a req

>> No.15002073
File: 1.06 MB, 330x186, 1508513352183.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15002073

>>15001655
>>15001755

Lmao, absolutely REQt, glad I sold around 22 cents. Still lost out on 250K in gains from ATH.

Anyone who touched REQ and didn't sell in 2017 got REQT

>> No.15002082
File: 33 KB, 512x355, 1504534968661.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15002082

>>15002060

That's still like $836,000 if you can wait another 3 years.

Pretty good cushion for life.

>> No.15002096

Pretty impressive roadmap desu. I don't know if these guys can actually deliver, but I wish them the best. I'll buy up a small stack just in case.

>> No.15002736

>>15002082
Yeah I'm pretending I'm buying eth at $2-3. I remember being told about eth late 2015 or early 2016 and remember it at $10. I think I'll do alright. It took like what, 2-3 years to hit $1400? Hopefully we see something similar. Been throwing 500 a week on link and I'm at 1425 link now

>> No.15003059

>>15000266
>this absolute SHITCOIN was >$1 at one point
amazing

>> No.15003120

The worst part is that this seems like a legitimate project with developers who are still actively working on creating a protocol for smart invoices/requests on multiple smart contract platforms. One of the developers recently said that they do want to bring more utility to the token and are thinking about adding a type of staking similar to BNB's locking mechanism. I seriously do not know how this is not at least a top 100 coin/token especially when you consider the fact that Coinbase has stated interest in adding the token despite it's low volume.

>> No.15003200

>>15003120
> developers who are still actively working
no fucking way. Maybe a couple of days a week tops, no way they are doing this full time.