[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 213 KB, 894x897, 1548702870801.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14854877 No.14854877 [Reply] [Original]

Is the FaceApp selling personal info and sensitive facial mapping data or "losing" it in a hack a buy signal for dApp coins? Would dApps prevent this type of "selling sensitive information"?

If so, this is a huge buy signal for iExec considering it would easily allow for the decentralization of any centralized app. Imagine using dApps instead of apps because every shitty fucking app nowadays just steals your personal information and sells it to hackerniggers so they can make deepfakes of you having sex with animals and blackmail you for money with the contacts they stole from the info you gave them.

>> No.14854963
File: 2 KB, 68x66, 676767.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14854963

>>14854877
Is no one on biz interested in this?
For context: That FaceApp that generates an "older looking you" is gathering and storing everyone's facial mapping information and info people gave access to(name, phone number, contacts, etc). They are a Russian developed app and it will most likely end up as them selling that information to the highest bidder. This will generate incredible amounts of potential deepfake ransom attacks on unsuspecting people.

>> No.14855058

>Would dApps prevent this type of "selling sensitive information"?
Enigma, chainlink would.

>If so, this is a huge buy signal for iExec considering it would easily allow for the decentralization of any centralized app.
No.

>> No.14855105

>>14855058
Enigma and chainlink can do dApps? I haven't seen anything like that, but iExec is known for powering dApps...

>> No.14855120

>>14855105
IExec is known for being a french shitcoin that No one is interested in

>> No.14855141

>>14854877
no one is interested in iexec

>> No.14855142

>>14855120
Who cares what you think about iExec, I have never seen enigma or link talked about when talked about dApps so why do you faggots think they would be a better choice than an actual dappcoin?

>> No.14855145

we are still whale prophecy right? FUCKING KEK

>> No.14855168

>>14855141
maybe none of you retarded faggots are, but enterprises will be when they can save massively on costs.
>>14855145
I think the whale said he will stop suppressing it, seems to have stopped. There's just no volume now because of BTC death and "muh delisting" scare. If you knew anything about RLC you'd know it's gonna get listed back for burgers within 6 months. Great time to buy.

>> No.14855172

free & giving away info vs $ and keeping your info

most people use free

>> No.14855190

>>14855172
even if "free" opens them up to stolen identities and deepfake ransom attacks? Idk but I like to think eventually people will get tired of them selling our data.

>> No.14855204

>>14855168
wait, should i withdraw my rlc from binance?

>> No.14855230

>>14855204
I'd never hold my coins on an exchange. If you're worried about them being delisted forever for burgers just sell now.(protip: it will be on american exchanges soon and you'll regret it)

>> No.14856021

>>14854877
There's been no news since V3. This team sucks at marketing. They're letting it die, fuck off my bags are heavy

>> No.14856081

Where the fuck is the team? They've been silent for days, nothing new, no expectations to get better. Meanwhile the volume and price is at the ATL, their marketplace have no orders, 1 task every 5 hours.

>> No.14856177

>>14856081
the tasks literally don't matter because all of them are generated by the team to appease bagholders.

>> No.14856275

>>14856177
Exactly why it's even worse, the team can't even create a fake demand themselves.

>> No.14856593

>>14856275
Apparently spending 10$ per day to keep workers happy is to much to ask if you have over 40 million in eth and an undisclosed amount of btc and RLC

>> No.14856675

>>14856593
>undisclosed amount of RLC
come on, that's just patently false... the fud on this coin is really getting out of hand.

>> No.14856753

>>14856593
yeah brother, that's too much. Better spend it on a mozzarella and a bottle of wine.

>> No.14856816

>>14856081
>they've been silent for days, nothing new
JUST TODAY they announced they joined the international internet consortium alongside names like Boeing, Bosch, Cisco, Dell, Hitachi, Texas Instruments, Samsung, etc etc etc
>inb4 it's literally nothing
>inb4 french frog coin, trannies, FUD lies

>> No.14856842

>>14856675
Ok fine, undisclosed amount of btc and fiat and huge, but known amount of RLC. Doesn't make it any less shit though

>> No.14856855

>>14856816
that was already known here and they posted it a few minutes later.

>> No.14856889

>>14856816
Hahaha they were always part of this consortium. Only the consortium merged with another one. Literally anyone can join the industrial internet consortium if he pays 5k per year.
> muh boeing
> muh cisco
Oh another attempt to create fake partnership hypes. Fuck of RLC faggots, stop shitting up this board and just let this coin die in peace.

>> No.14856899

>>14856855
I was responding to
>theyve been silent for days, nothing new
which is baseless fud
>>14856842
>huge amount of RLC
They have like a million in an 80m supply, compared to 35% of a billion supply for link.
fuck you guys are infuriating.

>> No.14856922

>>14856889
That is correct, I don't get why can't they just be transparent. This pajeet tier marketing and hype is terrible.

>> No.14856934

>>14856899
check the time it was posted and the time of their Tweet retard.

>> No.14856952

>>14856889
I never said they were partnered, I said they're in the consortium. pretty sure you dropped a chromosome somewhere retard.
>literally anyone can join the IIC
right, that's why the list is jammed full with industry leaders like microsoft and general electric

>> No.14856990

>>14856899
try like 65% lol

>> No.14857004

>>14854877
unironically Iexec will thrive when people start stealing working apps and porting them to be decentralized.

>> No.14857014

>>14856934
>industrial internet consortium Q2 report dropped 2 days ago naming iexec as a member
>tweet drops today
wow you sure got me anon.

>> No.14857020

>>14856952
> pay 5k for membership
https://www.iiconsortium.org/become-member.htm

And iexec is spamming twitter with how they managed to get in HAHAHA fucking faggot

>> No.14857031

>>14856990
the rest of it is to go towards node operators so **allegedly** they don't have a whole 60%. but they for sure have 350000000 to dump.

>> No.14857050

>>14857031
disgusting IMO. RLC seems much better. A lot of LINK is all hype and based on the cult spawned from biz.

>> No.14857053

>>14857014
What part of they were already inside of a consortium that got merged into this new one you can't understand?

>> No.14857065
File: 75 KB, 240x180, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14857065

>>14854877

Yeah, what a revolutionary idea; instead of trusting a company with your information you can distribute it across the world so everyone has a copy. Midwit logic at its finest

>> No.14857090

>>14857020
your posts are all fucking shit, clearly they didn't pay 5k just to have their name listed, if it was valuable and that easy then every blockchain project would have done it by now. read the second half of my post.

>> No.14857132

>>14857090
Iotex, a dead shitcoin is part of it, of course its that easy. Maybe the projects just dont see value in it, and iExec does it once again so they can throw around big names, like always.

>> No.14857134

>>14857053
what part of
>your post is literally inconsequential
do you not understand? also, name the consortium that got merged.

>> No.14857164

>>14857134
Openfog, it even says thats the consortium from which they are inviting the members in the doc iExec sharef. God you are an insuffurable cunt

>> No.14857172

>>14857132
I can't keep up with your dedicated fud, transjeet. I don't have as many hours to actually answer questions as you have to mindlessly spam lies and fud and press submit. guess you win. eat shit. anyone reading this thread, please try and see the bigger picture.

>> No.14857193

>>14857164
I was just lazy anon, thanks. okay, what's the problem with openfog consortium getting invited into IIC?

>> No.14857197

>>14857134
>JANUARY 31, 2019 – The Industrial Internet Consortium® (IIC™) and the OpenFog Consortium® (OpenFog) today announced that they have finalized the details to combine the two largest and most influential international consortia in Industrial IoT, fog and edge computing. Effective immediately, the organizations will work together under the IIC umbrella to drive the momentum of the industrial internet, including the development and promotion of industry guidance and best practices for fog and edge computing.

>> No.14857205

>>14857065
How would it be distributed if it's done off-chain through sgx?

>> No.14857207

>>14857172
Lmao anytime people call out your lies, paid shilling and hyping, and you can't refute them you call them transjeet. Mental illness my brother, get it checked iut

>> No.14857214

>>14857193
The problem is that they're hyping this as if it's news

>> No.14857228
File: 103 KB, 700x775, 1563195775245.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14857228

>>14857020
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Internet_Consortium

>Founded by AT&T, Cisco, General Electric, IBM, and Intel in March 2014, the IIC catalyzes and coordinates the priorities and enabling technologies of the Industrial Internet.

https://www.iiconsortium.org/members.htm
>acting like they let anyone in

you're reaching bro
go back to your link containment threads

>> No.14857237

>>14857053
>7 posts by this id.
be sure to buy back by eom.

>> No.14857252

>>14857228
>Membership in the Industrial Internet Consortium is open to any company
>acting like they let anyone in
lmao, you absolute fucking retard.

>> No.14857262

>>14857237
I'm already all in you faggot, I just can't stand pajeet marketing and poverty hyping old news.

>> No.14857279

>>14857252
you lacking reading comprehension
please refrain from embarrassing yourself further little pajeet

>> No.14857282

>>14857207
you aren't calling out shit, I called out transjeet because you type like that mother fucker and he's the most active, most dedicated anti RLC fud neet on the planet.
>Call out your lies, paid shilling and hyping and you can't refute them
you haven't called out shit and I've refuted everything. iotex isn't even a dead project, you just said it was and assumed it was true, like every other thing you've said in this thread.
>>14857197
oh, fucking bearish! this coin is L I T E R A L L Y dead!

>> No.14857327

>>14857262
stop fudding i am not a faggot

>> No.14857332

>>14857282
I'm not saying its bearish, I'm saying it's not news worthy because it's from January 31st. This speaks volumes about the autists behind the project marketing and those are the ones we should be pressuring 24/7, not transjeet.

>> No.14857363

>>14857327
sorry bro, you're not a faggot.

>> No.14857426

>>14857332
okay, you have a point. I'm struggling to tell the difference between this recent addition to the IIC in the most recent IIC Q2 report and the merger with openfog consortium.

>> No.14857570

Iexec baggies are pathetic. Buy more then cry more.

>> No.14857646

>>14857570
iexec hodlers do their research and are open to discussion, and that's why they're so die hard on the project
hence why after anon made a good point about the openfog merger in january I was willing to change my mind

discussions on fundamentals are more critical than
>french
>trannies
>baguetted
>bend the knee
>1000 eoy
etc etc. and yes, I will buy more, good idea.

>> No.14857708

>>14857020
Jesus fucking christ

>> No.14858021

>>14857646
True.
As soon as Binance US is announced I can see it doing a 3x, they need to fire the whole marketing team tho.

>> No.14858580

>>14858021
Well, a x3 after 2 years of dumping woudln't make me happy desu

>> No.14858951

>>14854877
7 BTC daily volume
Dump your bags, RLC might get delisted any day now, which is an instant -20% and then a slow bleed down to 0.

>> No.14859328

>>14858951
WILL DO SARGE
COMMENCING 100K DUMP, SEE YOU UNDER ICO PRICE

>> No.14859396

>>14858580
I bought in after 3 years of dumping, I'd be very happy

>> No.14859544

why is biz so obsessed with this project?

>> No.14859588

>>14859544
DYOR
biz hates this project ever since V3 threatened to tread on link but it has a vocal die hard hodler base that DTOR and knows the potential

>> No.14859590

>>14859544
The same couple of people are making these threads desperately trying to create some buyers and pump their bags.
The general biz consensus on RLC is that its the typical french project, just like Req and Ark: Looks ok at first glance, but doesn't acomplish anything ever.
>Muh V4 is on the way, Muh roadmap is on track
Yeah sure, Req also managed to create a new logo, but I wouldn't count that as progress, just like RLC isn't really making any progress.

>> No.14859693

>>14859590
Yep, they are releasing V4 6 months in advance, that's no progress at all

>> No.14859706

c-c-cope