[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 152 KB, 567x567, 1513912941218.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14800869 No.14800869 [Reply] [Original]

>Youve sworn these documents are authentic?
>CSW: Are what? Sorry.
>Authentic?
>CSW: They're what were in my possession.
>Dr. Wright, you said they were authentic. Are they authentic?
>CSW: Uh, they are authentically documents in my possession.
>So are they real documents, Dr Wright?
>CSW: They're real documents, but a document means many things.[snip]

>All right. Dr Wright, are these documents forgeries?
>CSW: Um, I don't know.
>Dr Wright, you're testifying directly before this Court. You submitted these documents, you swore to their authenticity, and now you're saying you don't know if they're authentic, if they're not forgeries?
>CSW: Um, all I can say is they are documents that were -- that look similar to ones that I've seen in the past that I haven't had access to that are in company files that have been in my basement for years.

He is literally, unironically, unequivocally, a complete and utter fraud.

>> No.14800972

Holy shit is that an actual transcript?

I feel bad for BSV, it literally is satoshis vision but this guy being involved ruins the whole thing

>> No.14801068

>>14800972
Yes, it is.

>> No.14801113

Ver has a brown belt in BJJ and would break Craig’s arm.

>> No.14801143

>>14800869
>He is literally, unironically, unequivocally, a complete and utter fraud.
prove it in court then

>> No.14801159

dude craig what the fuck is your problem

just run normal fucking pnd scams like any other scumbag you goddamned lunatic, what the fuck is wrong with you

what a fucking nincompoop

>> No.14801166

>>14800972
It's not tho, it's cregcoin which is about as far from Satoshi's vision as possible. Satoshi's vision includes the fact that he stayed truly anonymous and disappeared. Decentralisation is about more than just who's mining.

>> No.14801197

>>14801166
i honestly feel bad for you sv bagholders....watching tards get wiped out by a conman sucks ...

>> No.14801200

>>14800972
i hope Craig gets his autism in line

>> No.14801223

>>14801143
You say this like it isn't happening already.

>> No.14801228

>>14800869
Please be real

>> No.14801310

>>14801143
That's what that transcript is proving you fucking dunce

>> No.14801355

>>14801197
Still more than 2x from its low back in march
Seethe more

>> No.14801366
File: 84 KB, 910x812, csv.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14801366

CSW go to prison for sure.

>> No.14801370

>>14800869
Imagine how annoying it must be to be in court and watch this guy evade every question like this.

>> No.14801416

>>14801228
It's real, anon.

>> No.14801436
File: 222 KB, 1080x1559, Screenshot_2019-07-15-14-09-09~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14801436

>>14801228
Forgot my image

>> No.14802009

>>14801370
Just check this out. Fucking frustrating.

>Dr. Wright, did you edit the from field of this PDF in 2014?
What I'd like to say is --
>I'd like you to answer the question, Dr. Wright.
What you're trying to do is lead me into something that is clearly false.
>COURT: Dr. Wright --
You are creating --
>COURT: Dr. Wright, excuse me. The question was simple: Did you change the from field or not. That's a yes or no question.
This is not the document.
>COURT: I think his question was: Did you change the from field on exhibit 2; yes or no. It's a simple question.
This is not the e-mail, so, no.
>Did you ever edit the from field of the PDF?
This is a PDF of an e-mail, not the e-mail. No.
>Did you ever have someone else edit the from field of the PDF?
This is a PDF of the e-mail that someone has put in falsely as the e-mail and is trying to mislead the Court. This is proveably misleading by you.
>Dr. Wright, let me make it clear. Did you ever edit the from field of exhibit 2?
You are proveably misleading the Court.
>Dr. Wright, answer the question. Did you edit the from field of exhibit 2?
There is no -- this is a printout of a e-mail made at a later time than the e-mail that you are falsely leading the Court to believe is real evidence that you are misleading them on.
>Yes or no, Dr. Wright. Did you edit the from field of exhibit 2?
There is no from field to edit. This is a printed later document that he is now misleading the Court on.
>Will you answer the question?
I have.
>Is the answer "yes"?
You are committing perjury by falsely putting in a document. That is not real evidence. You have created something. [throws paper]
>COURT: Dr. Wright, you throw another document in my courtroom --
I'm sorry, Your Honor.
>COURT: -- you will be in handcuffs so fast your head will spin. Do you understand me?
Yes, Your Honor. I apologize.

>> No.14802403

>>14802009
This can't be real. Holy shit, BSV is FUCKED!

>> No.14802697

>>14800869
If you can upload this document to the BSV blockchain I'll send you $12 on hand cash.

>> No.14802794

>>14802403
Its real, it's a long read and Craig is a dweeb
>>14802697
How to upload? Id do it even just for the lulz

>> No.14802845

I feel nothing for sanjay vision bag holders it was so fucking obviously a con. And everyone told them that.

>> No.14802880

>>14802009
>this is a printout of a e-mail made at a later time than the e-mail that you are falsely leading the Court to believe is real evidence that you are misleading them on.
If that's the case couldn't he just say no, I did not edit that document and leave it at that? For a "genius" he really doesn't seem to understand how guilty he's making himself look.

>> No.14802981

>>14802880
he avoided the question. he doesnt care how guilty it makes him look, what he cares about is committing perjury.

>> No.14802997

>>14802880
No, he is doing it exactly right.

He did change the from field but a legit reason, let's call it reason X.
The forged pdf has also the from field changed but other info is also false.

If he would admit that he changed the from field on that forged document, court would believe he changed all the info on that document.
So while he changed the from field for reason X on the real document, admitting he changed it on the forged document would bring him in trouble.

I dont even understand what I just wrote but as an Asperger I understand Craig without understanding him.

>> No.14803002

>>14802880
He's avoiding direct incriminating statements. He could simply plead the 5th and not answer anything at all, but on all accounts hes making himself look guilty as charged.

>> No.14803003

>>14801310
>anon tells me to prove it in court
>we uhh asckkkshuallly literally proving it right now but uhhh it gone take awhile
prove it in court anon. dont tell me how you are in the process or you are going to do it someday. why not do it now, why not do it today?

>> No.14803041

>>14802880
This. It's very clear that converting an email into a PDF document does not change the fact that the underlying email exists and doesn't change whether or not he edited it. He's dodging by saying "well, THIS document is not that email. how could I have edited this? No, I did not edit this pdf."
fucking con

>> No.14803095

>>14801143
kek thats what hes doing right now

>> No.14803116

>>14801197
whos dumber? true believers in blockstream or bsv pajeets? it's hard to say

>> No.14803125

>>14802997
>If he would admit that he changed the from field on that forged document, court would believe he changed all the info on that document.
Not true. Admitting to one modification would not allow them to imply more circumstantially. They would need to *directly* ask him whether he made any other changes to the document, unless the one field in question is all that matters, in which case he is just being evasive.
>>14803003
He was outed in court as a con on June 28th, which is where I got these quotes. You cant just keep saying "prove it in court". It has been proven.
>why not today?
you know very well that anons on a somalian dreadlock-weaving forum have no way to expedite the legal procedures. They are continuing proceedings end of July.
>no, do it now if you're so sure!
you might as well just sell instead of coping so hard

>> No.14803139

I'm so disappointed there's no cameras in the courtroom so we didn't get to see his high school drama performance about how "I don't even care about the coins, I just want to save my soul bloo bloo bloo"

>> No.14803183

>>14803139
That was my favorite part.
>we discussed when and if we get control -- and it's still an "if" -- every one of them will go to funding educational charities for the poorest 1 billion people on earth.
so much for operation dragonslayer lmao

>> No.14803299 [DELETED] 

>>14803139
>I'm so disappointed there's no cameras in the courtroom so we didn't get to see his high school drama performance about how "I don't even care about the coins, I just want to save my soul bloo bloo bloo"
your response is pure idiocracy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bvov1QEg7-A

>> No.14803331

>>14802794
https://www.bitpaste.app/
You'll need a money button account though.

>> No.14803602

>>14800869
top
fucking
kek

>> No.14803618

>>14803003
Clearly don't know how courts work fkn brainlet

>> No.14803622

>>14801166
DGB is unironically the closest coin to Satoshi's vision.

>> No.14803766

>>14803622
>DGB
huh i never looked into this before but a quick look at their website, this sounds pretty based

>> No.14804150

>>14802794
upload it anywhere, even mega