/biz/ - Business & Finance

[Anonymous No.14639362]

Faketoshi

[Anonymous No.14639370]

>>14639362
Yes

[Anonymous No.14639656]

>>14639362
difference is szabo never said he was satoshi even tho linguistic analysis pegged him with 99% certainty.

[Anonymous No.14639762]

>difference is szabo never said he was satoshi even tho linguistic analysis pegged him with 99% certainty.

[Anonymous No.14640127]

>>14639656

Nick Szabo has never written a single line of code. "Linguistic analysis" is pseudoscience. You got played by a grifter.

https://derekmagill.com/2018/09/26/szabo-is-not-satoshi/

[Anonymous No.14640168]

>>14640127
>invented bitgold
>invented smartcontracts
cope

[Anonymous No.14640172]

>>14640127
ian grigg is your answer to that.
nick sabo had the well estabilished theoretical background desire and expertise to design bitcoin but ian grigg had the programming skills.

i'm not saying i belive this i'm saying it's a 100 times more plausible than craig having to do anything with bitcoin that did not involve tax fraud.

[Anonymous No.14640225]

>>14640168

Bitgold is literal vaporware, and if you'd actually read any of his papers about smart contracts you'd see that they have nothing in common with what we know today.

>>14640172

Funny how Ian Grigg has come out many times and said CSW was Satoshi then

[Anonymous No.14640313]

>>14640225
not surprising (same for gavin) as the real satoshi preferred to remain unnamed.

[Anonymous No.14640483]

>>14640127

Wrong, Nick Szabo is fluent in C++.

[Anonymous No.14640512]

Nick Szabo never claimed to be Satoshi.

[Anonymous No.14640526]

>>14639362
real or not he is unequivocably based

[Anonymous No.14640822]

>>14640526
he is but i don't like his academic approach to smart contracts. too high headed for me not practical for a good while. he is preaching something that will be seen as revolutionary in "
the next century. people will point back and say "this guy knew" but that doesn't help us right now.